Paper ID #39532Board 42: WIP: Reflections on teaching an engineering course throughmurder mysteriesKrishna Kumar, University of Texas at Austin Krishna Kumar is an Assistant Professor in Civil, Architecture, and Environmental Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. Krishna completed his Ph.D. from the University of Cambridge in 2015 on multi-scale multiphase modeling of granular flows and was supervised by Professor Kenichi Soga. Krishna’s research interest spans high-performance computing, numerical modeling, and explainable AI of natural hazards. He has developed massively parallel micro-/macro-scale numerical
and Professional Field Trips Development Leadership team of campus org Objective: Create a Case competitions stackable-units digital Complete LinkedIn and badge program Handshake profiles Research Read and reflect on transportation careers & certifications
increase the hands-on time with the workshop activities and tools. 7. Creating new Seminars on “Introduction to Active Learning” and “Creating a Civil Classroom” (i.e., to integrate DEI in the ETW curriculum) to make both of these inferred topics more transparent during the workshop. 8. Creating new Reflection-based activities in order to encourage participants to envision how their learnings could be adapted and applied in their classroom in the near-term future.CFD established an implementation plan whereby CFD committee members would proceed withthe creation of new “Base Slides” for the forthcoming Summer 2023 ETW. In anticipation ofthese workshop changes, CFD organized in December 2022 a “Town Hall Meeting
Paper ID #44299Board 32: Designing a Graduate Course in Sustainable Transportation andHuman Rights with a Student-Centered ApproachLeana Santos, University of Connecticut Leana Santos, is a fourth-year Ph.D. Candidate in structural engineering at the University of Connecticut. She is a Harriott and GAANN Fellow. Alongside her current program courses, Leana is pursuing the Graduate Certificate in College Instruction offered by UConn’s Neag School of Education. Her current research is centered on the impact of pyrrhotite oxidation on concrete deterioration, reflecting her dedication to understanding and mitigating
theirdemonstrated success in effecting academic change; we are particularly interested in learningfrom their experiences with and suggestions for creating DEIJ-focused changes. This papersynthesizes what we learned in a series of semi-structured interviews in which we asked about 1)their perspectives on community of practice as a theory of change and whether it is appropriatefor this work, and 2) their reflections on and examples of effective DEIJ efforts as well asbarriers to operationalizing change theories in practice.The following section introduces the CIT-E CoP in the context of the literature on communitiesof practice as a theory of change. Then, we describe our methods and results; this is followed bya discussion of what we have learned so far
mindfulness(see [6] for a detailed review). The first author's (instructor's) experience through end-of-semester student reflections in her other classes and classroom observations strongly supportsstudents' receptiveness to practice mindfulness in the classroom. It is worth noting that theinstructor has been utilizing mindfulness activities in sophomore to senior-level civil engineeringand fundamental mechanics courses for the past four years.Mindfulness practices, innovation, and creativity: Cognition is all forms of knowing andawareness, such as perceiving, conceiving, remembering, reasoning, judging, imagining, andproblem-solving [7]. A research study [18] in psychology revealed that brief mindfulnessinterventions in novices could improve mood
concept maps for “equitable infrastructure” at the end of the semester. The concept mapsrevealed differences in student ideas that reflect the different approaches taken in the courses.Analysis of these concept maps yields insight into student learning on equitable infrastructureand can provide guidance for others wishing to incorporate equity into first-year and/or civilengineering coursework.IntroductionCivil engineering education has long recognized the need for the curriculum to blend a broadarray of technical and professional skills to meet the needs of the profession (see, for example,the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge [1]). The ways in which infrastructure has bothpositively and negatively affected equity in our social systems have
implemented in the respective firstyear classes this semester, Spring 2023. The team is piloting several assessments this semester. Toassess the perceived impact on learning and perceived difficulty we will be asking the students tocomplete a simple survey (See Appendix D.) To assess a delta in comprehension of diversity,equity, inclusion, and social justice, we will be giving the same pre- and post-assessment askingstudents to define each of the above. (See Appendix E.) After the hands-on activity students willalso reflect on how they think the activity is related to diversity, equity and inclusion. The teamseeks to investigate if there is any correlation between a student’s learning style and theircomprehension of DEI and justice. Hence, each
motivate and retainthose students in a program of study. Ensuring that students remain motivated by theireducational program greatly increases the likelihood that they will successfully complete themajor.The study presented within this paper used a course-generated student essay that reflects on whystudents at a particular academic institution selected the civil engineering major. The essayassignment has been used over multiple course administrations during a five-year period. Essayswere reviewed for reference to a series of nine specific motivations for selecting the academicStudents at the United States Military Academy (West Point) select their academic major duringthe spring of their first year. They start coursework in their major during the
For the assignment this week, take some time to reflect on your experiences in college so far. You may choose to read some of the resources provided (or not). Discuss elements among the following that are of interest to you – you do not need to discuss all of these elements. • What has been your mental health / wellness status this semester? Describe times you have felt happy, excited, confident, successful, stressed, anxious, disappointed, and/or tired. Discuss sources of these feelings: physical health / illness, homework, exams, family issues, financial issues, etc. • Describe a situation where you reached out for help and received support – from friends, family, on-campus resources. • Describe positive actions you are taking to
]. Results from the case-study questions during the firsttwo years proved inconclusive and student comments reflected their confusion in trying torespond to the case studies, so this part of the survey was dropped in subsequent years. Resultsof the case study responses from 2020 and 2021 are not included in this discussion. This studypresents the results of the Likert scale questions, which were consistent across all four years ofthe study period. Values reported below are the averages for all responses, based on the 5-pointscale defined for each question.Results and DiscussionThe social justice focused instruction showed an effect on the first-year environmentalengineering students’ understanding of social justice, their perspectives on equity
duties or roles, where teaching faculty alternate in delivering classes or dividethe course credit load based on specific weeks or assignments [4]. This method does notmaximize the potential of coteaching, which should enable instructors to interact with each otherin class be used to leveraging the collective knowledge and expertise of multiple teachers withinthe same classroom to enhance student learning outcomes [1], [5]. This collaborative teachingmodel fosters a dynamic learning environment, addresses the varied learning needs of students,promotes active engagement, and provides differentiated instruction. Furthermore, co-teachingencourages shared responsibility, reflection, and professional growth among teachers, ultimatelyenhancing the
topics of ethics and sustainability, as well as being a stand-alonetopic in 2020-2022. Each of these three topics had an associated individual homeworkassignment supported by readings and/or online videos. The specific prompts and readings/videos changed over time. The DEI teaching practices aligned with self-determination theory(e.g., autonomy). Evidence of the effectiveness of the DEI integration approaches is provided viacontent analysis of a homework assignment and the final reflective essay. In addition, there wasno evidence of student resistance to DEI topics in the course. The results provide specificexamples that can support civil engineering programs in fulfilling the new proposed ABET civilengineering program criterion related to
such as this. Instead, students were encouraged to reflect ontheir own strengths and challenges and make choices based on their understanding of theirabilities. Following every exam and the group project, the students were asked to respond toreflection questions, encouraging them to take ownership of their learning. For example, after themidterm II exam, the students were asked to answer the following questions among others: a)What was/were the most important factor/s behind your performance in Midterm-II exam? b)“How well do you expect to perform in Midterm-III exam? What is/are your plan(s) to achievethat?”The term group project was part of the Project-Based Learning implementation in the course andhad specific milestones for deliverables
will be able to understand how equity can be considered in community resilience-basedinfrastructure decision-making. 4) Students will be able to assess the potential impact of differentdecisions on various stakeholders in the community, including marginalized groups. 5) Studentswill be able to collaborate effectively with their peers to make informed and equitable decisionsbased on multiple criteria and perspectives. 6) Students will be able to reflect on their learningexperience and apply the knowledge and skills gained from the game to real-world situations.The concepts stemming from these objectives drive the entire game design and motivate choicefor game structure, components, actions, special roles, and scoring system. Additionally
; Clarke, S. (2009). Doing interdisciplinarity: motivation and collaboration in research for sustainable agriculture in the UK. Area, 41(4), 374–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1475-4762.2008.00859.XHorn, A., van der Meij, M. G., Willems, W. L., Kupper, F., & Zweekhorst, M. B. M. (2022). Developing interdisciplinary consciousness for sustainability: using playful frame reflection to challenge disciplinary bias. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 18(1), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2022.2095780Jepsen, A. L., & Eskerod, P. (2009). Stakeholder analysis in projects: Challenges in using current guidelines in the real world. International Journal of Project Management, 27(4), 335–343. https
three courses. Approximately 91% (75out of 83) of the invited students in CE 3110, 33% (21 out of 64) in CE 3220, and 37% (29 out of80) in CE 3510 responded to the surveys.Students responded to a series of questions to reflect on their learning experience such as if theprojects enabled them to use their strengths/talents, enhanced the skill of applying theirknowledge to real life examples, and if they used their creativity. It was investigated if thetimeline, the instructions, and the feedback system were appropriate for the projects. Finally, aquestion on the accessibility and approachability of the instructors and teaching assistants wasasked. The results of the surveys are described below.Figure 1 shows that a majority of the respondents (69
their curriculum development project also revealed their increasedawareness of their own understanding of the material and the challenges for curriculum design.Based on the feedback provided by the first cohort of students to receive this project, the nextoffering of the project will have students present a rough draft of their curriculum in class atmidterm to receive feedback from their peers. Each student will then also participate in amidterm interview with the instructor to discuss how to incorporate that feedback in their finaldeliverable. The authors hope these changes will help students make further progress on theircurriculum design, but also provide the students additional opportunities to reflect on and learnfrom the curriculum
theories.Constructivism Learning Theory:Constructivism - a theory based on observation and scientific study about how people learn. Thetheory states that through experience and reflection on various experiences, individuals areguided to construct their understanding and knowledge of the world [11]. Experiment-centeredpedagogy integrates problem-based activities and constructivist education by allowing studentsto actively engage in the learning process by drawing on their prior experiences andunderstanding to generate new information or understanding.According to constructivism, learning takes place under the following four assumptions: 1. Learning involves active cognitive processing. 2. Learning is adaptive. 3. Learning is subjective, not objective
in the number of units and modes of instruction for individual courses. • There are many university level committees making decisions (common courses committee, university conversion committee, undeclared majors committee, calendar committee) that effect the program. Get faculty to serve on those committees. • There was no formal methodology used. The program did prepare a reflection report looking at five other programs before starting.Our a priori expectation was that this is a parallel process and a once-in-a-generation opportunityto take a fresh holistic look at the curriculum. It was surprising that both programs interviewedtold us not to do that. There was not time in the conversion schedule to do that
questioning if she should bean engineer, which seemed to be a common feeling within her social circle. Today, as a recentgraduate, she explains that she sees engineering as a career and something that she is passionateabout, but not as an integral part of her because this status could change over time.Lastly, when reflecting on her identities within the context of civil engineering, Camille sharesthe following thoughts: “I think about when I was a kid, and I didn't see people who looked like me or who were like me. I wonder if I had met someone who was like me, would that have helped me? That makes me want to be that for someone else, I want to motivate people. You can't change anything if you don't start with yourself. I
illustrated. Learners are alsoactively participating in the activity. Finally, the instructor asks the same sets of questions toassess how well students comprehend the experiment. ECP Module Instructional Design Template Module Information Synoptic/Purpose of Instructional Instructor Module Process Reflection a. Developers/Instructors a. Essential Questions a. Materials needed/Expected Reflection Institution for use. b. Module Objectives b. Mobile Title/Topic b. Procedures c. Placement within
game, including1) Network Strength (measured by number of improvements), 2) Inequity of Improvements(measured by the maximum difference in improvements for different neighborhoods), 3)Inequity of Restoration (measured by the maximum difference in the number of non-operationalcomponents for neighborhoods), 4) System Functionality (measured by the total number ofoperational components), and 5) Community Resilience (measured by the area under recoverycurve). Teams consider all five of these objectives as they make infrastructure decisions whichare considered in final game scoring. At the end of the game each team community’sperformance is compared among the other teams based on the scoring system reflecting the fiveobjectives. The exact scoring
(54.9%) opted to respond to the Compassion toOthers sub-scale. 38 shared their demographic information. Of these, 58% self-identified asmales, 37% as females, 2% as non-binary, and 3% preferred not to say. The participants wereundergraduate students (n=21) and graduate students (n=17), mainly from the U.S. (n=25).Engagement with others' distressThe responses suggest that the participants self-identify as individuals who are sensitive todistress and motivated to help those experiencing distress. This includes accepting andresponding empathetically to others' distress and being motivated to continue the relationshipwith them (Figure 5).Figure 5. Results pertaining to the Compassion to Others subscale - Engagement I reflect on and
but also sustainable [6], [7]. However, sustainability is frequentlyreferred to as environmental sustainability, overlooking its other two essential pillars: social andeconomic. Thus, infrastructure systems frequently lack social justice which leads to anunbalanced influence on different populations through different mechanisms, such as eviction,exposure to environmental danger, and access to necessary services. Even while engineers andpolicymakers base their decisions on technical and engineering factors, social and racialdisparities are exacerbated by stakeholders' choices, which reflect current economic and politicalframeworks [8]. Therefore, the project team members must be sufficiently competent to addressthese challenges and construct
presented, or when their idea might be perceived as contradicting another person’s idea.To help students overcome these concerns, the first skill we taught the students was to treatevery idea as having potential to contribute to a positive outcome.All team members are empowered to act this way, not just the “Team Leader” or “ProjectManager”. We discussed how to foster psychological safety by asking for input: • Ask for input from everyone. • Encourage multiple ideas from people. • Encourage out-of-the-box ideas.We also discussed how to foster psychological safety in how a person responds to teammembers’ contributions: • Affirm the value of contributions as they are made. • Reflect back the potential value of an idea.To practice this
and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of theUnited States Military Academy, Department of the Army, DoD, or U.S. Government.References[1] S. Nicholson, “Creating Engaging Escape Games for the Classroom,” Child. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 44–49, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2018.14203.[2] E. Ozcelik, N. E. Cagiltay, and N. S. Ozcelik, “The effect of uncertainty on learning in game-like environments,” Comput. Educ., vol. 67, pp. 12–20, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.009.[3] R. Garris, R. Ahlers, and J. E. Driskell, “Games , motivation , and learning : A research and practice model,” Simul. Gaming, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 441–467, 2002, doi: 10.1177
also betransferrable to other institutions. The reported assessment of the final project option showedgreat potential to increase creativity in the Statics course, which could have a further impact onthe engineering education curriculum.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underIUSE/PFE: RED Grant No. 1920761 (PI: Prof. Maria Chrysochoou). Any opinions, findings,conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors would like to thankProf. Mousumi Roy and Caressa Wakeman for their valuable assistance in rating projects.References[1] J. C. Blickenstaff, “Women and science
. Studentswere also asked to write a brief reflection on this project in their report conclusion and how thisexercise helps them be better engineers in the future.This project allowed students to grow in three aspects: applying theoretical knowledge to real-life designs, connecting with their community/client, and finding innovative solutions to ongoingproblems. It opened the door for students to research the effects of civil engineeringinfrastructure on communities and challenged them to be inquisitive about the diverse impacts ofevery future structure they design. Students were also taught to remedy problems created byprevious generations of engineers using an innovative and inclusive approach. Students wereassessed for their growth in EDI by
guest speakers from academia andindustry, individual homework assignments where students reflected on what they learned fromthe speakers, and a group project to design a sustainable human habitat on the planet Mars. InFall 2023, a new instructional team (1 lead professor, 2 undergraduate and 1 graduate courseassistants, and 1 education specialist) was mentored by an instructional team in the Chemical andBiological Engineering Department to redesign the course. The course redesign features twogroup socio-technical design challenges and weekly individual homework for students toresearch disciplinary sub-specialties and career opportunities. During the first month ofinstruction, students are oriented to campus, the major, resources within the