elements: purpose, compensation,and a definite period of prior service in the institution.” We shall discuss each of these elementsin turn.Purpose: Bennett and Krueger3 claim “sabbatical leaves for faculty are important (to theindividual) because they serve to promote their professional development by providingopportunities for reflection, artistic creation, research, innovation in teaching, and professionalexploration.” Sabbatical leaves with industry for engineering faculty, from the point of view ofthe institution, is a form of personnel exchange. ASEE4 has taken a position that “time spent byengineering faculty and graduate students in industry can enhance transfer of new technologiesto industry, as well as provide practical experience and an
. Weconclude that the FLDoE framework may be used as a foundation, but not the sole source, forimportant AM knowledge areas, leaving opportunity for the development of an AM body ofknowledge that reflects employer expectations and geographic variations.1.0 IntroductionManufacturing has evolved from the time that Henry Ford operated the first assembly line in1913. The ability to make products in volume, allowed the US to dominate the world inmanufacturing output, and increase its gross domestic product. In 1951, units of operation inproduct assembly began to be infused with technological innovations, evolving into what is nowknown as advanced manufacturing. Advanced technologies, systems, and processes have notonly transformed the assembly line, but
larger environment of which [a system] is a part” and theimportance of the “role it plays in the larger whole.”14 We use a semi-structured format withfollow-up probes to help the interviewee reflect on their insights, strategies, and basis fordecisions, judgments, or courses of action.15 Probes were used to ask participants to expand onthe meaning of certain ideas such as “broad background.” The interview lasted one hour and theprotocol had three sections: a section on background and influential experiences; a section on thecritical decision method; and a section on questions about experiences with developing andidentifying other big picture thinkers. Following the individual interviews, a second one-hourfocus group discussion was used to follow
. Globalengineers should possess cultural sensitivity and knowledge, as well as the interpersonal skills, toadapt within a variety of cultural contexts and with people that differ from their own experiences.A positive attribute of this intercultural literacy is that designs and solutions are no longer boundwithin the technical domain, but should be reflective of the engineer’s cultural understanding andinterpersonal competence. Working closely with the Dubai Contracting Company (DCC) and incollaboration with the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at Syracuse University,the authors have successfully designed and implemented an innovative program to providestudents with distinctive skill sets to enhance their capacity as global civil engineers in
professionalcompetency development reflects this. They are found to be goal oriented and demonstrate somelevel of interpersonal skills. The Next-Gen Skilled Trades people comprise multiple generationsand thus represent a more eclectic and diverse set of individuals. They demonstrate stronginterpersonal skills and show appreciation for others.Next-Gen LeadersTable 3 provides a deeper look into the professional competencies associated with each segmentof the talent pipeline. Table 3 compares the average competency by segment to the mean of allpeople who have taken the same suite of TTI TriMetrix® DNA assessments (hundreds ofthousands of people across all professions). The intention is to get a benchmark comparison ofeach segment against an aggregate mean of all
, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design; Page 24.286.1 writing across the curriculum in Statics courses; as well as a CAREER award to explore the use of e- portfolios to promote professional identity and reflective practice. Her teaching emphasizes the roles of engineers as communicators and educators, the foundations and evolution of the engineering education discipline, assessment methods, and evaluating communication in engineering. c American
training will be most beneficial to individuals that have the educational maturity for the reflection, analysis, and synthesis necessary to process clinical experiences, and then to apply that learning in practice. For identical reasons, we believe engineering internships and cooperative educational experiences are most meaningful for students at the post-baccalaureate level, and that a practice-based post-baccalaureate education is the optimal pre-requisite for entry into the profession. Incorporation of Clinical Experiences into Program Learning Outcomes The accreditation standards set by the Liaison Committee for Medical Education (LCME) explicitly state that “the curriculum of a medical education
president and general manager to ask whether he thought he should move to manufacturing management. The vice president told him the main issue would be dealing with a wide variety of people and their problems. This was somewhat disconcerting to Nate. He did think some of his skills would match the job, even though he was good at keeping a lot of balls in the air. It was a risk moving outside his comfort zone, yet others felt he had the ability to succeed. He took the plant manager job. This step led to personal growth beyond his wildest expectations.A Model Reflecting Culture ChangeWhat is needed in industry and academia to identify, articulate and educate for the capabilitiesand mindset needed to lead? How
survey data, which reflects the use of computational tools and computationalthinking in the context of the engineering workplace.2) Jeannette Wing’s discussion of Computational Thinking (CT)6 can be summarized in terms ofeight exemplar categories: • Building on power and limits of computing processes. • Solving problems, designing systems, and understanding human behavior. • Reformulating a difficult problem into one we can solve. • Thinking recursively. • Using abstraction and decomposition. • Thinking in terms of prevention, protection and recovery from worst-case scenarios. • Using heuristic reasoning to discover a solution. • Complementing and combining math and engineering thinking. We aligned our interview
(graduates) and thereforehave significant interest in the quality of graduates. This of course, assumes thatdissatisfaction by employers of the quality of graduates is fed back to the Joint School (shortfeedback loop) or to the new applicants to the course via student satisfaction surveys,graduate employment statistics, or national /international surveys. These surveys may suggestthe course does not reflect the needs of modern employers.However, there is a third “Buyer Power” force which is little mentioned. The educationsystem itself is a consumer of graduates; either as postgraduates to participate in Masters orPhD level courses, or as new recruits as future researchers and teachers. Furthermore, theunique access available to the education sector
share activities that would add valueto your recruitment process.8. Please add any other reflections and suggestions for improved career development andemployer engagement events for our students.
interpersonal 3. Engineering skills: design and system integration 4. Business skills and acumen: cost accounting, scheduling, and planningUsing these categories offered a simplifying strategy for presenting all of the literature reviewedin this study, from both themes. Results are shown in table 2.Although articles in this theme do not attempt to elaborate upon how these necessarycompetencies should be taught or applied within the engineering curricula, they did all reflect anattitude that the reform of engineering curricula is a work in process that should continue,sometimes offering a proposed categorized list of competencies which they felt could bridge thetransition between academia and industry10.Theme 2: Approaches to Address
combination with technical skills, such as the need to usepersonal qualities (e.g., tolerance to stress or attention to detail) to deal with “all the movingparts,” suggests that some employability skills many not be optional to perform technical skills,but essential.5.2. Implications.There are several implications for two-year postsecondary institutions offering AM programsthat can be deduced from the preliminary findings. The employers included in this study believedthat employability skills, core skills in particular, should be part of course activities; however,this curriculum integration is difficult to do unless state standards reflect the importance of theseskills. Although employers continue to express the essential nature of core skills, such
training andimprovement projects utilizing industrial engineering concepts, computer science concepts,supply chain and inventory management concepts, quality concepts, Lean and Six Sigmaconcepts, electronics, and technical writing. Figure 3 shows a summary of the types of projects Page 24.20.5completed during the seven year period for which the data was collected. The top ten types ofprojects reflected in this data directly relate to a professional certification i.e., Lean Six Sigmacertifications, Certified Manufacturing Technician (CMT), Computer Aided Design (CAD)certifications, Certified Supply Chain Professional (CSCP), Certification in
objectives of College of Engineering asfollows [4]: 1. Provide excellent academic programs that best reflect the current needs and requirements of the profession. 2. Recruit, nurture and retain outstanding students 3. Recruit, nurture and retain outstanding faculty. 4. Empower the College’s research 5. Establish a strong outreach and external business collaborations with industry, government and other entities in the society. 6. Establish and maintain effective and efficient support services, facilities, and infrastructureCollege of Engineering Partnership with IndustryThe College plays an important role in consultation and research activities as applied to localindustries. In fact, the College considers industry as a
that Meagan already had people in her network toreach out to, and she reflects on the saying, “The network you need tomorrow, you should benurturing today.” If a student doesn’t have a strong network, it is recommended that they notonly begin nurturing the connections they have, but explore where those connections extend.Don’t be afraid to ask for an introduction. The online professional social network LinkedIn is auseful tool for managing your network and exploring potential connections.Industry is not Academia. While this may seem like an obvious observation, Meagan found thetransition from academic researcher mindset, back to an engineer in industry mindset to bechallenging. Negotiating priorities of “rigor” was a constant struggle for her
emerging leadership-oriented topic of interest to engineering students. April Industry Engagement Field Trip, a 2-3 hour site visit with a local organization representing one of the 6 engineering disciplines in the school; this event will be held with the support of DIAC member organizations. May End of year wrap-up, reflection, and celebration meeting, and a preview of summer Page 24.275.3 electronic mentoring and cohort assignments and facilitation activities.Over the summer, CLEAR Scholars remain in contact and receive electronic mentoring via emailand the campus’s online
the terminal degrees conferred in the nation.Upon spending seven or more years here as students, many non-citizens acclimate to theAmerican life-style, sought employment, usually taking teaching jobs along with some of theirU.S. cohorts in engineering colleges, applied for U.S. citizenship, and assimilated into the facultyranks. As time has passed, aerospace engineering faculties with rank have become dominated bynon-practitioners as the majority at many of our institutions. As could be expected, the reference-frame that these faculty use in deciding curricula content, hiring, and promotion requirements forother faculty is often a natural reflection of their own personal experiences, which has largelybeen focused on engineering academics
collaboration and communicationand disrupted project schedules. While the pandemic created many barriers to the capstonedesign experience, it also provided a substantial real-world constraint for students to assess andaddress. In this respect, the pandemic was an unanticipated learning opportunity for students tolearn how to improvise, innovate, and adapt over the course of their design experience.A limited number of studies have examined how the capstone design experience changed duringthe pandemic. Jamieson reflected on the challenges during the pandemic and strategies used topreserve the quality of the students’ learning experience in a chemical engineering capstone, asenior design course and a transdisciplinary freshman course. One of the key
coursewas 98%.The TTI survey was administered again in the junior year in the context of the ProfessionalPractice of Engineering course, which is a required lecture-based course that students take aftercompletion of a minimum of one co-op semester. The survey was required and was used in asignificant assignment in which students reflect on their strengths and weaknesses and on how toleverage the former and mitigate the latter. The survey participation for junior students whocompleted the course was 100%.The TTI survey was also administered to ninety-three (93) graduate students in a professionalmasters program in product development, which draws early career engineering professionals.This group is considered to be successful in their careers as
- academia collaborations in software engineering: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 2016. 79: p. 106-127.[8]. Weagle, D., D.B. Ortendahl, and A. Ahern P.E., Universities and Industries: A Proactive Partnership Shaping the Future of Work, in 126th ASEE National Conference. 2019: Tampa, FL.[9] Harrisberger, L., Experiential Learning in Engineering Education. 1976.[10] Banks, S., et al., Focus on EMPLOYABILITY SKILLS for STEM Workers - Points To Experiential Learning, S.I.T. Force, Editor. 2015, STEMconnector: Washington, D.C.[11] Moon, J.A., A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: Theory and practice. 2004: Psychology Press.[12]. Hauhart, R.C. and J.E
a priority forimplementing the B&R which need PCEE to give assistance.Universities have richexperience and activity forms at PCEE, which can help enterprises to carry out PCEE andultimately promote B&R construction. Therefore, the successful university-industrycollaboration participating in the PCEE of B&R should be reflected in four factors:professional knowledge training, cultural exchange & transmission, International studenteducation and joint research. Only to achieve the above four points can it be said to besuccessful.But all things are difficult before they are easy. At first, enterprises did not realizethat universities could help. Few enterprises took the initiative to seek cooperation withuniversities, and
values: •Industry experiences • “Social learning”— • Adopting the must expand the individuals “learn- (ing) profession’s values and university education the ropes” from those norms into one’s belief • Opportunities for around them through system students to reflect on careful listening and • Identifying with the successes and failures observation [1]. profession during
the program.The roadmap planning meeting produced an Excel spreadsheet in a Gant chart format with over75 work items on it. The spreadsheet also included color coding reflecting responsibility for the Page 23.116.3task (company or College), as well as major milestones. The significant organizational workstreams included: definition of curriculum (and new focus area); gap closure (remediation ofstudents that were not ready for the second two years of an engineering curriculum);development of a financial model to support new development work; company resources to fieldthe program (both recruitment and employee absence from work); student
. Page 25.778.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012Infusing the Curriculum with Cutting-Edge Technologies through Partnerships with IndustryAbstractTo ensure that curricula and course content reflect both academic and industrystandards the School of Engineering and Computing Sciences (SoECS) at NYITbelieves that course content must include elements of contextual teaching andlearning (CTL) which emphasizes the relationship of course content to real-lifesituations1,2. It is expected that CTL which incorporates 1. hands-on activities 2. work-based learning experiences and 3. project-based learningwill engage today’s students more thoroughly than the traditionallecture
@hscpoly.comAbstractAt this point in my career, I have spent half of my career in academia, and the latter half inindustry. Having bridged this divide between the two worlds, I believe that my perspectives canbe beneficial to both sides of the matter, bringing attention to ways in which collaborativepartnerships between industry and academia can be enhanced. In this paper I address severalclassifications of topics related to the general theme of my transition from academia to thecorporate world. I share an insider’s perspective that I have within my current workplaceregarding the academic world. Conversely, I reflect on the opposite perspectives that I recallfrom my academic days, and the extent to which those beliefs have been disproven or fortifiedsince I
Characterizing the Environment for Sustainability (SLICES): Im-proving Understanding of Real World Systems via Direct Observation/Reflection. The opinionsexpressed are those of the authors and do not imply endorsement by NSF. The authors gratefullyacknowledge the contributions of the 54 undergraduate interns who collected industry data andprovided important feedback about involving undergraduates in research to improve the SLICESprogram.Bibliography1 Rothman, H. (1992). "You need not be big to benchmark." Nation's Business, December, 80(12), 64-65.2 Fisher, D., Miertschin, S., and Pollock, D.R. (1995). “Benchmarking in construction industry.” J. Management inEngineering, 11(1), 50-57.3 Mitra, C., Pearce, A.R., and Fiori, C.M. (2011). “Developing
and for those of one’s group, team, or department. 1.2.1.2 Demonstrate global, social, intellectual, and technological responsibility.1.2.2 Behaving ethically 1.2.2.1 Encourage others to behave ethically. 1.2.2.2 Understand that behaving ethically goes beyond what the law requires. 1.2.2.3 Respect the need for confidentiality, when appropriate.Employment and Training AdministrationUnited States Department of Laborwww.doleta.govEngineering Competency Model – May 2015 61.2.3 Acting fairly 1.2.3.1 Treat others with honesty, fairness, and respect. 1.2.3.2 Make decisions that are objective and reflect the just
, Writing and Learning Disabilities Vol. 6, pp. 223-247.9. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. & Smith, K.A. (1991), “Active Learning Cooperation in the College Classroom,”Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.10. Fairhurst, A.M., & Fairhurst, L.L. (1995), “Effective Teaching, Effective Learning,” Palo Alto, CA: Davies-black Publishing11. Dale, E. (1969), “Audiovisual Methods in Teaching,” (3rd ed.), New York: Dryden Press.12. Wankat, P.H. (1999), “Reflective Analysis of Student Learning in a Sophomore Engineering Course,” Journal ofEngineering Education, Vol.88, (no.2), 195 -203.13. Finelli, C., Klinger, A., & Budny, D.D. (2001), “Strategies for Improving the Classroom Environment,” Journalof Engineering Education, Vol 90, (no.4), pp. 491