Conference Session

College Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session III: Collaboration

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Diane L Peters PE, Kettering University; Anne M Lucietto, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

College Industry Partnerships

survey examinesthese collaborative relationships only in the United States, while it is important to include foreignliterature in the historical development of these relationships.BackgroundIndustry-academia collaboration is not a new concept as we find the earliest discussion occurringat the end of the 1960’s,3 in Russia. These collaborations sponsored by the governments ofcountries4,5 interested in promoting this kind of activity, eventually became individualrelationships between companies and universities throughout the rest of the world. Currentliterature indicates that such relationships became more of the norm in the late 1990’s and in thelast decade commonplace in various forms. Recently, consideration of minorities, women, andother

Conference Session

College-Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session I: Students

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Glenda D Young, Virginia Tech; David B Knight, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education; Lee Michael Warburton, AKKA Technologies; Christopher David Ciechon

Tagged Divisions

College Industry Partnerships

major in college. Findings identifieddifferences in male and female students career fit confidence offering another reason whywomen were more likely to leave engineering after graduation [25]. Cech et al.’s findingssuggest it is important to consider the impact of professional socialization when examininginteractions engineering students have with industry. The authors illustrate how the frameworkcan be used to explain gender representation differences in engineering.Our intent for this paper is to use professional socialization as a lens to examine the value that anAIDP brings to a students’ engineering identity formation, not to provide a full review on thistopic. We focus on three outcomes of professional socialization to guide our

Conference Session

INDUSTRY DAY: Industry-Focused Collaboration Techniques

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Victor Taratukhin, Stanford University; Yury V. Kupriyanov, National Research University Higher School of Economics; Jörg Becker

Tagged Topics

Corporate Member Council

Tagged Divisions

College Industry Partnerships

is in it’sexclusively industry orientation. The framework is also targeted only on educational aspectsof cooperation. Among the potential future improvements the case of research cooperation canbe reviewed, as well as the possibility of initiating cooperation from the university side can beadded.REFERENCESAnderson, M. S. 2001. “The complex relations between the academy and industry: Views from the literature,” Journal of Higher Education (72:2), pp. 226–246.Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., and Salter, A. 2010. “Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university– industry collaboration,” Research Policy (39:7), pp. 858–868.Cerych, L., and Frost-Smith, B. 1985. “Collaboration between higher education and industry: an overview

Conference Session

College Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session III: Collaboration

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Waddah Akili, Iowa State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

College Industry Partnerships

their hands dirty  Trained to work as individuals. No experience working in teams  Do not have the desire and/or the skills to do their own search or learn on their ownTable 2. An Industry Perception of Weaknesses in New Graduates of Gulf Region’s Eng.CollegesTo try to understand today’s state of engineering education in the Region, it is important to cometo grip with the challenge that the Region’s pre-university educational systems are facing today.Pre-University Education in the Gulf Region: The most significant change in the pre-universitysystems occurred in the decades of the 70’s and 80’s, as a direct result of the substantial wealthderived from oil revenues, which have found its way to the Region. Public schools, in

Conference Session

College Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session III: Collaboration

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Duncan J Bremner, University of Glasgow; Kathleen Meehan, University of Glasgow; Yangyang Liu, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China; Xingang Liu, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

College Industry Partnerships

R. J. Puerzer, “The Smaller Engineering School and its Industrial Advisory Board; An Effective Partnership?,” in ASEE /IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boston, MA, 2002.[3] R. Greenlaw, “Setting Up and Maintaining A Strong Industrial Advisory,” Journal of Scientific and Practical Computing, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 23-34, 2009.[4] S. R. Genheimer, “The Effectiveness of Industry Advisory Boards in Engineering Education,” University of Oklahoma Graduate College (PhD Thesis), Oklahoma, 2007.[5] D. J. Bremner, “Analysing the IoT Ecosystem: the Barriers to Commercial Traction,” in Embedded World 2016, Nurenberg, 2016.[6] M. E. Porter, “The Five Competitive Forces that Shape Strategy,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 86

Conference Session

INDUSTRY DAY: Industry-Focused Collaboration Techniques

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yuetong Lin, Indiana State University; A. Mehran Shahhosseini, Indiana State University; M. Affan Badar, Indiana State University; W. Tad Foster, Indiana State University; Jason C. Dean, Indiana State University

Tagged Topics

Corporate Member Council

Tagged Divisions

College Industry Partnerships

, Atlanta, GA, United states, 2005. [3] Cornelius J. Dennehy, Steve Labbe, and Kenneth L. Lebsock. The value of identifying and recovering lost GN&c lessons learned: Aeronautical, spacecraft, and launch vehicle examples. In AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 2010. [4] J.D. Novak. Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Maps(tm) As Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations. Taylor & Francis, 1998. [5] J. S. Bruner. The Process of Education. A Harvard paperback. Harvard University Press, 1960. [6] J. S. Bruner. The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31:21–32, 1961. [7] Kirsten R. Butcher and Tamara Sumner. Self-directed learning and the sensemaking paradox. Human–Computer Interaction

Conference Session

College-Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session I: Students

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Niranjan Hemant Desai, Purdue University North Central; George Stefanek, Purdue University, North Central

Tagged Divisions

College Industry Partnerships

needs. Thesenames were given to the professor who then contacted them, described the pilot project, andchose a topic(s) for the capstone course.A company in the entertainment industry that agreed to participate had technical staff that werelocated at a distant location. Despite this distance, they were willing to work with students viavideo teleconference, multimedia and the internet. They also committed their time to supportingthe capstone and mini-capstone projects to 1 hour per week. The other participant in theeducation industry was in the local vicinity and therefore could make a presentation on site andcollaborate with the students in person.Busy industry technologists were offered the following incentives to make presentations tostudents

Conference Session

College-Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session II: Curriculum

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Schmueser, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

College Industry Partnerships

solid model initially provided by the OEM (which wasmade purposefully deficient to illustrate the effect of poor modeling) and incorrectly predicted thefailed component(s). The next instructional phase was in experimental setup, nondestructivemeasurement techniques, data acquisition systems, and analysis of experimental data. This led tostudents running destructive experiments on real OEM assemblies in the lab, and discovering thattheir predictions did not match reality. We took advantage of the teaching opportunity to illustratethe effect of problem setup in meshing the solid models; students corrected and optimized theirmodel and were able to correctly predict the failed component. This exactly mirrors what happensin the OEM’s own labs.The

Conference Session

College-Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session II: Curriculum

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Farrokh Mistree, University of Oklahoma; Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma; Maysam Pournik, University of Oklahoma; Bryan William Bodie

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

College Industry Partnerships

. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.[6] Business Roundtable, 2005, Tapping America’s Potential: The Education for Innovation Initiative. Business Roundtable: Washington, D.C.[7] Blue, C.E., Blevins, L.G., Carriere, P., Gabriele, G., Leader), S.K.G., Rao, V. and Ulsoy, G., 2005, The Engineering Workforce: Current State, Issues, and Recommendations. Final Report to the Assistant Director of Engineering. National Science Foundation: Arlington, VA.[8] Lang, J.D., Cruse, S., McVey, F.D. and McMasters, J., 1998, “Industry Expectations of New Engineers: A Survey to Assist Curriculum Designers.” Journal of Engineering Education. 88(1): p. 43-51.[9] Chubin, D.E., May, G.S. and Babco, E.L., 2005, “Diversifying the Engineering

Conference Session

College-Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session I: Students

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pradeep Kashinath Waychal, NMIMS University; Luiz Fernando Capretz P.E., Western University

Tagged Divisions

College Industry Partnerships

Field Job Total 33 26 12 8 3 3 2Percentage 47% 37% 17 % 11% 4% 4% 3%Table 3: Frequencies of Cons of students 2nd Miss No No Time Frustr Less Hard class Tediou develo Difficu Interes Patien Pressu ating Thinki work citizen s pment lt Others t ce re ng 25 19 15 8 7 6 5 5 4 4 3 36% 27