projects. The Civil andEnvironmental Engineering (CEE) Department’s curriculum at The Citadel places a premium onpreparing graduates to serve as principle leaders through their service to society. In support ofthis vision, CEE Department faculty focus on implementing high-impact learning pedagogicaltechniques to prepare graduates for successful careers in the engineering profession. One high-impact method of instruction of specific interest focuses on service learning and communityengagement, resulting in creation of an enhanced student-learning environment.BackgroundService learning is an educational approach that balances formal instruction and the opportunityto serve in the community in order to provide a pragmatic and progressive learning
has also initiated an exchange program for faculty and students to visit the University of Utah and receive integrated training in applied research, non‐technical skills, and global competencies. Similar to the previously described components, the emphasis on the exchanges and training is the Water SDG. For example, the recent mission had joint research group meetings where alignment of research with the Water SDG was emphasized, a curriculum streamlining meeting that assessed the degree programs and their alignment with the Water SDG, and an Executive Seminar on Achieving the Water SDGs in Pakistan. The exchanges and training activities support development of all four capitals, with an emphasis on human
; Zlotkowski, 1998) andis now generally recognized as an important part of higher education as evidenced by CampusCompact, the major society for service-learning in higher education, which boasts more than1,200 university members.Leah Jamieson pioneered service-learning in engineering through the Engineering Projects inCommunity Service (EPICS) program at Purdue (Coyle et al., 1997). This model featuresvertically integrated teams consisting of an equal number of freshman, sophomore, junior, andsenior engineering students who take a course repeating times for semester credit and who worktogether on solving a significant community problem. The EPICS model has been expanded toinclude approximately 20 colleges of engineering nationally and internationally
communities. Morgan works with schools, libraries, and makerspaces to design, document, and open source new lessons, projects, and technical solutions for the community.Dr. Katherine Fu, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Kate Fu is an Assistant Professor at Georgia Institute of Technology in Mechanical Engineering. Prior to this appointment, she has been a Postdoctoral Fellow at Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD). In May 2012, she completed her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University. She received her M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Carnegie Mellon in 2009, and her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Brown University in 2007. Her
Center for STEAM in the Katy Independent School District (KISD). She was responsible for implementing STEAM curriculum, instruction, and projects appropriate for K-12 students. Additionally, Mariam has taught both on-level and AP Physics I (formerly known as Pre-AP Physics) and played an integral role in writing the district physics curriculum consisting of rigorous labs, activities, and projects. Mariam fills the role of Alumni Representative on the UTeach STEM Educators Association (USEA) Board and was also elected Secretary-Treasurer. She is also currently pursuing a Ph.D. in STEM education at Texas Tech University.Dr. Sara Jolly Jones, University of HoustonMs. Victoria Doan, University of Houston
engineeringcurricula, despite a strong dependence between professional attributes and engineeringeducational experiences.1 Studies have demonstrated how courses that incorporate servicelearning as a novel pedagogical approach nurture professional skills while integrating designmethodologies.2-6 Furthermore, such teaching models have an enhanced positive impact onwomen in particular.7,8 We developed, taught and evaluated the impact of a design module onfirst-year engineering students that utilized a service learning project in the context of developingboth professional and leadership skills.9,10 Our analysis revealed an increase in students’confidence in both their technical and professional abilities immediately following the leadershipmodule, especially for
instructors.The Kano kits were appropriately balanced; it allowed students the challenge of constructing theirkits, while also allotting enough time left over to spend learning how to code. Once assembled,students were able to work together in their pre-assigned pairs to follow along step by step withthe content created by a CodeIT day team member.The curriculum introduced the students to the different programming categories and parts thatcould be added (i.e. text and speaker) on Kano’s integrated development environment, KanoWorld. The categories included events, control, logic, math, variables, color, lists and draw. Eachof the nine categories and their sub-functions were introduced to the students individually andthen were combined into several coding
Engineer of 2020 by the National Academy of Engineering7. Theincorporation of professional skills into the undergraduate engineering curriculum is madeformalized by the ABET. Criterion 3, Student Outcomes, requires engineering programs todemonstrate their graduates achieve competency in teamwork, communication, andunderstanding the impact of technology on society and the environment2.An underpinning of LTS is service-learning, which is “a form of experiential learning in whichstudents engage in activities that address human and community needs together with structuredopportunities intentionally designed to promote student learning and development”8. ProjectsThat Matter: Concepts and Models for Service-Learning in Engineering9 is part of a
ways to promote empathy as a valuable social competency for engineeringpractice. Many scholars assert that service learning and other community engagementpedagogies are valuable for helping students further develop their empathic abilities. Thisqualitative study aims at studying an engineering course with an integrated service componentand investigating the role empathy plays in the students’ experiences. Participants are first-yearengineering students in a service-learning course at a large land grant institution. We utilize aphenomenology study and focus on students’ experiences within the course. Data was collectedvia semi-structured interviews conducted through online video conferencing. During interviews,several participants mentioned how
College • Collaborative Projects (2007-2013) – Orange, Lake, Sumter, Seminole and Osceola County Public Schools, Lockheed Martin, Electronic Arts, Girl Scouts, Junior Achievement, Prism, Orlando Science Center, University of Central Florida, Valencia, Seminole and Lake Sumter Colleges • Coordinator of Industry Expert Review Committee: 2008 Math Sunshine State Standards • Member of the Strategic Planning Committee (2011-2012) - Florida Center for Research in Math and Science Education • Medical Scholars Program (2014-present) – Florida A&M University, MCAT prep curriculum developer c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017
Strategy, Operations, and Human Resource Development at KG Reddy College of Engineering and Technology. He also has an adjunct faculty appointment with the Cen- ter for Engineering Education Research at KLE Technological University. He completed his Bachelors of Engineering in Electronics and Communication from Manipal Institute of Technology and Masters in Embedded Systems from Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Hyderabad. His research interests include education policy, faculty development, understanding organizational development in higher ed- ucation, and integration of technology and entrepreneurship in engineering education. He was awarded Young Engineering Educator Scholarship by National Science
invaluable to other not-for-profit organizations to solve theirchallenges. In fact, it is an engineer’s obligation “to serve humanity” and share their skills“without reservation for the public good.”1Service learning has been implemented as a pedagogical strategy in technical communicationclasses for engineering students. In the context of first-year engineering curriculum, servicelearning is a useful pedagogical strategy that integrates community engagement with classroomactivities and critical reflection in order to engage students in their obligations as global citizensearly on in their education. In particular, the experiential aspect of service learning engagesthese new students in the complexity and uncertainty of real-world problems they will
course.Research Question and PurposeThe aim of this paper is to explore the continued practice of service-learning as an effectiveteaching method within an engineering curriculum at a public research institution of highereducation with a mission committed to excellence in teaching, research and communitypartnerships. While some faculty members continue to integrate service-learning in theirteaching, others have discontinued its use. Most studies on faculty involvement with service-learning have focused on factors that influence whether or not faculty adopt service-learningpedagogy, and no study has investigated factors for discontinuing the use of service-learning inengineering. This study examines the motivation for faculty involvement in service
submitted to the team of the social scientist and the architect. This paperwould detail the results of this phase-I project and the implantation model.Introduction: Over the last two decades, materials science and engineering, and manufacturing (MSEM)has evolved into an important, interdisciplinary subject area in the engineering curriculum [1]–[3]. As a result, introductory undergraduate level MSEM class (with or without lab component)has become part of traditional non-MSEM engineering programs such as mechanical andindustrial engineering. In some cases, this type of class is a required component of anundergraduate course curriculum. Covering the depth and breadth of an interdisciplinary andhands-on subject like MSEM in a single semester
learningwithout specifically requiring service learning activities in undergraduate curriculum. Focus onmulti-disciplinary team experience, formulation and solution of engineering problems, andeffective communication1 all comprise the easily achieved outcomes from service learningopportunities.While a single engineering department is capable of developing an experiential learningopportunity for undergraduate students, the development of a robust service-learning programcan be hindered by a lack of resources and inability to provide truly interdisciplinary projects forstudents. Faculty support, continued program maintenance, and overall program managementrequires resources not always available at a department or college level. A formal service-basedor
foundational experience for all of our engineering students that setsthe tone, expectations, and trajectory for their future engineering work.References[1] J. Nagel, R. Nagel, E. Pappas, and O. Pierrakos, "Integration of a Client-based Design Project into the Sophomore Year," presented at the ASME IDETC/CIE 2012, Chicago, 2012.[2] R. Nagel, O. Pierrakos, J. Nagel, and E. Pappas, "On a Client-Centered, Sophomore Design Course Sequence," presented at the 119th ASEE Annual Conference and Expo, San Antonio, TX, 2012.[3] R. L. Nagel, K. Gipson, and A. Ogundipe, "Integrating Sustainable Design and Systems Thinking throughout an Engineering Curriculum," in Pedagogical Innovations for Sustainable Development, K. D. Thomas
anti-foundational goals.This balance is reflected in the model we propose.3. Description of the ModelOur group formulated a model which characterizes 12 dimensions of LTS programs inengineering. This model provides a basis for comparing and contrasting programs. In addition,it can be used as a check list for developing a new LTS program, evolving an existing LTSprogram, integrating LTS into a curriculum, or assessing the quality of an LTS program.The dimensions are formulated to capture the qualities of current LTS programs that are presentacross a wide breadth of engineering institutions. As such the dimensions need to encompass thebroad variety of existing programs as well as take into account future developments in thispedagogy. The
coursedevelopment, leading to complete integration of intent and collaboration processes among thepartners.Early in the curriculum-development effort, faculty committed to following an inquiry-led modelfor the classroom, focusing on student-led collaboration rather than faculty-initiated learningprocedures. To facilitate this approach, the curriculum was developed around key concepts andquestions, rather than around lectures and information dissemination. By creating general areasof inquiry that span across disciplines, multiple faculty could provide the perspectives of theirown disciplines to inform a broader understanding of the topic relevance. For example, on thetopic of environment and society, the engineering faculty led the discussion and
for learning, and a variety of attitude changes.11Inaddition, LTS may help attract and retain a greater diversity of students in engineering.12,13To allow more students to reap the benefits from LTS, faculty must be willing to integrate SLinto their courses and mentor extracurricular LTS activities. However, little is known about thebest practices, benefits, and challenges of LTS from an engineering faculty perspective. Resultsfrom the few studies on faculty to date are summarized below.The SLICE program at UMLhas conducted assessment of faculty via both an annual writtensurvey instrument and in-depth interviews with 14 faculty.14 The reach of this program has beenphenomenal, growing from a single faculty member engaged in SL in 2003 to 37 of
to process and identify connections with environmental, ethical, and societal factors.The components of an effective service learning reflection can be described by the 5 C’s:continuous, connected, challenging, contextualized, and coached [11]. The reflection should becontinuous throughout project, that is, it should happen before, during, and after the experience.The connection component should link the service experience to the course curriculum. Thereflection should challenge students to engage with current issues, while also contextualizing thework in a way that fits the specific project. Finally, coaching is necessary for supporting studentsintellectually, emotionally and academically.Student reflections can also be useful tools for the
personal interactions with professionals working in STEMfields focused on motivating students to visualize themselves on STEM career pathways;family/mentor-focused STEM opportunities intended to broaden students’ educational andemotional support networks; and an integrated STEM-curriculum for teachers to build upon keyconcepts.Background and IntroductionIn 2017, a National Science Foundation (NSF) study [1] projected the adult population of UnitedStates will be more than 50% minorities by 2060, which directly impacts the Science, technology,engineering and mathematic (STEM) workforce and measures to remove barriers in STEMeducation becomes critical. Many universities focus on efforts to recruit students for undergraduateeducation by supporting
institution and constantly strives to promote equity within the academy.Dr. Susanne I Lapp, Florida Atlantic University Dr. Lapp is an Associate Professor in the Department of Teaching and Learning in the College of Educa- tion at Florida Atlantic University where she teaches undergraduate and graduate Content Area Literacy courses. Her research interests include the integration of mobile learning devices in k-12 classrooms.Dr. Dilys Schoorman, Florida Atlantic University Dilys Schoorman is Professor and the Chair of the Department of Curriculum, Culture and Educational Inquiry in the College of Education at Florida Atlantic University where she teaches courses in Multicul- tural/Global Education, Curriculum Theory, and
lastsummer, 70 high school students participated in the week-long cybersecurity summer campevent at North Dakota State University in Fargo, North Dakota.The cybersecurity summer camp curriculum is facilitated by junior counselors (students whohave completed high school that have a strong interest in cybersecurity), counselors (collegestudents with cybersecurity experience), and university faculty & staff. This paper studies theimpact of having counselors and junior counselors integrated into the cybersecurity summercamp experience and evaluates the impact that being a counselor has on the students thatparticipate in that role. These impacts facilitate cybersecurity community engagement.1. IntroductionThe need for quality cybersecurity education
, community engagementIntroductionThe benefits of community engagement for the education of engineering students are widelyknown and described [1-3]. Typically, universities offer academic spaces for community servicein the curriculum of certain programs. In the case of the Electronic Engineering (EE) major of thePontificia Universidad Javeriana University in Colombia, there is a course called University SocialProject (Proyecto Social Universitario, PSU). During more than 30 years of different iterationsand changes, this course has promoted the commitment and responsibility of EE students withvulnerable populations and institutions that the university has built a partnership with [4]. Its goalis to generate in students an attitude of reflection and
they could integrate into an existing framework without a big commitment of time.Measures of impactThe Afterschool Alliance states that STEM programs have three types of benefits: improvedattitudes toward STEM fields and careers, increased STEM knowledge and skills, and higherlikelihood of graduation and pursuing a STEM career [2]. In their annual survey of a sample ofClub members, BGCA has only recently added questions that can measure these impacts, so wecannot document any effect of our activities over time, but the data do suggest that the BGCPCmembers have positive outcomes in these areas. The following data are for a sample of studentsfrom the specific Club targeted for our activities; not all those surveyed participated in events
. Dr. Soares then worked for Medtronic as a full- time integrated circuit designer until November 2003. He started his pursuit of the Doctor of Philosophy degree at the Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University in January 2004 under the supervision of Dr. Reginald Perry. Upon completion of his Ph.D., Dr. Soares was immediately hired as an assistant professor (Tenure-Track) in the Electronic Engineering Technology department at FAMU. Dr. Soares is conducting research in education (STEM), Optoelectronics, nanotechnology and robotics.Prof. Rabbani Muhammad, Florida A&M University Rabbani Muhammad has received degrees from the Pennsylvania Institute of Technology, Howard Uni- versity, Harvard University, and
deeper overall educationaloutcomes within the engineering curriculum. A professors understanding of the outcomesof engagement shows a more broad perspective on how students participation inengagement leads to deeper development of social skillset:“Increasing [engagement] would give our students social development that they are currently not receiving here. A peripheral development that includes the virtues of social responsibility, an environmental awareness.”And lastly, an excerpt from an interview with university leadership shows theengagement outcomes on a societal scale at large: “[A shift in culture towards engagement] is positive not just for USP but for society at large because it
AC 2012-3801: ENGINEERING SERVICE LEARNING: CASE STUDY ONPREPARING STUDENTS FOR THE GLOBAL COMMUNITYDr. Shoba Krishnan, Santa Clara University Shoba Krishnan received her B. ech. degree from Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, India, in 1987, and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Michigan State University, East Lansing, in 1990 and 1993, re- spectively. From 1995 to 1999, she was with the Mixed-Signal Design Group at LSI Logic Corporation, Milpitas, Calif., where she worked on high-speed data communication IC design and testing. She is an As- sociate Professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering at Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, Calif. Her research interests include analog and mixed-signal integrated
from instances like the Toilet Challenge. To put trained andqualified engineers out into the world, it is necessary to supplement engineering education withculturally aware project-based curriculum. In ensuring global impact, meshing together thetechnical, social and cultural aspects of an engineer’s humanitarian effort is crucial.However, this is not frequently seen in the context of engineering projects with the internationalcommunity. The need for these specific skills and research is even more integral in the study ofstigmatized, or taboo, topics that engineers may find themselves addressing in their projects,where the approach can be key to the success of an intervention. Taboo issues consist of acts thatare considered to be forbidden
resources in a low impact environ- ment, developing globally competent engineering graduates and integrating active learning methods into engineering curriculums.Matthew E Verbyla, University of South Florida Matthew Verbyla is a Ph.D. candidate and National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow at the University of South Florida, where he studies pathogen removal and microbial risk of water reuse in wastewater treatment pond (lagoon) systems. Matthew obtained his B.S. in Civil Engineering from Lafayette College in 2006, and his M.S. in Environmental Engineering from the University of South Florida in 2012. Matthew is an E.I.T. and a LEED Green Associate with several years of work experience both in the United