Conference Session

Computer Hardware and Simulation

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Krista M Hill, University of Hartford; Ying Yu, University of Hartford

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

. Cole, M. Dabacan, and S. Sexton, “Extensive Use of Advanced FPGA technology in Digital Design Education,” ASEE National Convention, 2008, session 2139 3. R. Coowar, “The Development of a Course in Programmable Digital Devices,” ASEE National Convention, 1996, session 2648 4. K. Nickels, “Pros and Cons of replacing discrete logic with programmable logic in introductory digital logic courses,” ASEE National Convention, 2000, session 2532 5. G. Wang, “Teaching Digital Logic Using CAD Tools in a Teaching-Oriented University,” ASEE Annual conference, 2005 6. Xilinx Corp., Homepage, http://www.xilinx.com 7. K. Hill, “Schematic Capture – ISE 10.1,” http://uhaweb.hartford.edu/kmhill

Conference Session

Tablets, Mobile and Technology

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Frank V Kowalski, Colorado School of Mines; Susan E. Kowalski, Colorado School of Mines; Tracy Q Gardner, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

Kappan, 89 (2),Oct. 2007, pp. 140-145.14. Shepard, L.A., “Linking Formative Assessment to Scaffolding,” Educational Leadership, 63 (3), Nov. 2005, pp.66-70.15. Leahy, S., C. Lyon, M. Thompson, & D. Wiliam, “Classroom Assessment: Minute by Minute, Day by Day,”Educational Leadership, 63 (3), Nov. 2005, pp. 19-24.16. Heritage, M., J. Kim, T.P.Vendlinski, & J.L. Herman, “From Evidence to Action: A Seamless Process inFormative Assessment?” CRESST Report 741, University of California, National Center for Research onEvaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), Los Angeles, CA: July 2011.17. Frohbieter, G., E. Greenwald, B. Stecher, & H. Schwartz, “Knowing and Doing: What Teachers Learn fromFormative Assessment and How They Use the

Conference Session

Tablets, Mobile and Technology

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven Chingnam Goh, University of Southern Queensland; Linda Ann Galligan, University of Southern Queensland; Harry Ku, University of Southern Queensland

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

/vol9_no2/papers/current_practice/loch_donovan.htm4. Walker, D. G., Stremler, M. A., Johnstone, J., Bruff, D., Brophy, S. P. (2008), Case study on the perception of learning when tablet PCs are used as a presentation medium in engineering classrooms. Int. J. Engng Ed., 24(3), 606-615.5. Galligan, L and Loch, B.I., McDonald, C. and Taylor, J.A. (2010) The use of tablet and related technologies in mathematics teaching. Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 24 (1). pp. 38-51. ISSN 0819-45646. Reins, K. (2007). Digital TabletPCs as new technologies of writing and learning: A survey of perceptions of digital ink technology. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(3), 158-177.7

Conference Session

Computer Education Innovations

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Claudia E. Vergara, Michigan State University; Mark Urban-Lurain, Michigan State University; Cindee Dresen, Corporation for a Skilled Workforce; Tammy Coxen, Corporation for a Skilled Workforce; Taryn MacFarlane, Corporation for a Skilled Workforce; Kysha Frazier, Corporation for a Skilled Workforce; Daina Briedis, Michigan State University; Neeraj Buch, Michigan State University; Louise Paquette, Lansing Community College; Jon Sticklen, Michigan State University; Jeannine LaPrad, Corporation for a Skilled Workforce; Thomas Wolff, Michigan State University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

Labor by the National Center for O*NET Development.[5] www.transana.org[6] Committee on the Engineer of 2020, Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 2005.[7] Educating Engineers: Designing for the future of the field. The Carneige Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching 2008.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under award 0722221. Anyopinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and donot necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation (NSF

Conference Session

The Best of Computers in Education

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Reeping, Virginia Tech; John K. Estell, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

Progress: Developing Single Point Rubrics for Formative Assessment," in Proceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 26-29 June 2016, New Orleans, LA [Online]. Available: ASEE Conferences, https://peer.asee.org/27221. [Accessed: 25 Jan. 2018].25. E. Ries, The Lean Startup. New York: Crown Business, 2011.26. J. K. Estell and S. Howe, "Development and Use of a Client Interaction Rubric for Formative Assessment," in Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 25-28 June 2017, Columbus, OH [Online]. Available: ASEE Conferences, https://peer.asee.org/28157. [Accessed: 25 Jan. 2018].27. D. Fisher and N. Frey. Checking for Understanding: Formative Assessment