and fail to grasp the actual concepts that the software wassupposed to reinforce. One course of action to eliminate this problem is to stream line thesoftware tools used throughout the curriculum. This would require a conscious, program-wideeffort to redesign the course curriculum using only one CAD/E product and is not a feasiblesolution to our problem. Instead, we propose a coordinated software effort within a program andan assessment program geared specifically towards the CAD/E tools used in each course to helpinstructors enhance classroom instruction and out-of-class independent student learning of newCAD/E Software. This paper will focus on the software application Active-HDL, theprogramming language VHDL, and an assessment tool we use
Paper ID #9265Technology in classrooms: How familiar are new college students with thepedagogy?Dr. David B Knight, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education David Knight is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education and affiliate faculty with the Higher Education Program at Virginia Tech. His research focuses on student learning outcomes in undergraduate engineering, interdisciplinary teaching and learning, organizational change in colleges and universities, and international issues in higher education.Mr. S. Cory Brozina, Virginia TechMr. Steven Culver, Virginia Tech
State. He has forty years experience teaching design related and solid mechanics courses, and has developed expertise in the areas of robotics systems, and micro-robotics. He is an ASEE and ASME member.Timothy G. Southerton, RIT Mechanical Engineering Tim Southerton is currently a fifth year mechanical engineering student at RIT in the BS/MEng Dual Degree program. As a student who enjoyed the Stamp-based Robotics class as an undergraduate, he was very interested in an opportunity to restructure the curriculum for Arduino compatibility. Once involved in the project, he decided to see it through as the teaching assistant for the lab portion of the revamped course, which proved to be an enriching experience. After
# Curriculum Objectives Fundamental Objectives 1 Demonstrate competence in the operation of Psychomotor software simulation tools and hardware design environments. 2 Simulate quantization noise effects and theoret- Models ically predict quantization noise power spectra at the output of a fixed–point filter. 3 Synthesize basic digital logic and basic DSP Design functions (buffering, table lookup, arithmetic, etc.) in an FPGA. 4 Design filters that meet a given set of realistic Design, Creativity system parameters. 5 Implement filters of various flavors and com- Instrumentation, Data Analysis plexities that execute on an FPGA using dis- tributed arithmetic. 6
to frequent changes in available tools, challenges mightnever go away as far as transferring curriculum inventories and PD content to new circumstances.Furthermore, teaching with technology often requires customization and the needed technologies must beboth content specific and pedagogically suitable at the same time.28 While latest technologies offer morecapacity for applicability, their optimum utilization may necessitate knowledge of tools’ operationalunderlying principles for easier transfer into new circumstances and better integration.21, 28, 44, 69, 73There is an important feature of interdisciplinary education that can be best described by Aristotle’s well-known statement, “the whole is more than the sum of itsparts,” or the theory
do notfeel stretched to meet their full potential for a multitude of reasons. The reasons include the "nochild left behind" clause, where more focus is being placed on those students who are struggling.This practice leaves more advanced students bored and neglected. This issue highlights thenecessity for a more challenging curriculum, instead of just meeting the minimum criteria. Inorder to uphold the state requirements, teachers have to be focused on all their students passingthe assessment exams to graduate on to the next grade rather than imparting education tostimulate their minds. This is an issue that needs to be addressed at a fundamental level.There is a need to be truly innovative in education to address the needs of all students
. He is integrally involved in the design and delivery of the Pre-Freshman and Cooperative Education Program and others of that ilk at OSU, as a part of his specific interest in soft skill development, diversity, recruitment and retention initiatives.Mr. Nicholas Rees Sattele, Ohio State University Nicholas is an Undergraduate Research Associate with The Ohio State Department of Engineering Ed- ucation. He is in the process of completing a B.S. in Computer Science and Engineering in the In- tegrated Business and Engineering Honors Program at Ohio State. His interests include incorporating Entrepreneurial Minded Learning into engineering coursework and interdisciplinary innovation. c
, withproblem-based learning. Cassel et al.2 coordinate the activities of Ensemble - Computing Portalwhich is a NSF sponsored National Science Digital Library (NSDL) Pathways project for comput-ing education materials, and provides access to other repositories, e.g., YouTube Education.Several educators and researchers have done work on integrating testing into CS/IT courses through-out the college curriculum. Wong20 describes an approach that integrates software testing through-out the CS curriculum starting from CS1 through to the final senior project course. The approachemphasizes introducing testing modules (possibly the same module) into several courses in thesequence (varying the breath and depth of delivery) using a minimally intrusive and non
percentage of student transfers are unable to keep a tightly controlledcohort of students progressing through the curriculum. Students usually have varied course loadsand different priorities due to family, financial needs or other responsibilities. Therefore, there isa need for an individualized approach to advising. The school’s administration faces challengesscheduling courses and allocating diminishing resources to satisfy student demand. In addition,faculty needs to assess the efficacy of their curriculum in a program, and collecting longitudinalstudent data is difficult. A web application system (mobile compatible) using a multi-agent approach has beendeveloped to allow the students (agents) to take more control over their
Technology Officer, at UT Brownsville, he implemented state of the art networking using campus wide fiber ring with redundant links. He established diskless computer labs to provide uniform computing platform across campus, and modernized classrooms to make them congenial to online learning. He was the PI on NSF funded BCEIL (Beowulf-based Curriculum Enrichment Integrated Laboratory) and Co-PI on NSF funded MCALL (Multimedia based Computer Assisted Learning Lab).Dr. Hansheng Lei c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A Holistic Approach for Enhancing Distributed Education with Multi-Campus Course Delivery MethodsAbstractTo create an emerging teaching and
onlyencourage students to take ownership of their learning outcomes, but also allow the instructorsmore in-class time for hands-on programming sessions.On another note, an interesting perspective is the apparent extensive use of the tutorials globally(a total of 44,926 views as of 12-27-2012, 3,751 of which are within the state of Georgia and16,376 within the U.S. as tracked by YouTube Analytics). This work lays the foundation for theeffective integration of the VLE into the global engineering community – to be used as asupplement in face-to-face traditional, hybrid and/or fully online programming courses asrepresented by the current trend in the engineering curriculum 16.Conclusions and Future WorkThis paper presents an overview of MatLab Marina – a
curriculum.IntroductionSince 2006 the popularity of computational thinking (CT) - skills for solving problems byadopting the theoretical concepts of computer science - has been increasing substantially,leading to an increase in the amount of research and experiments on the CT method. Yet,there are limited numbers of inquiry investigate approaches to incorporated CT into acurriculum. Betül Czerkawski researched ways to integrate CT across all curriculum, throughsurveying instructional CT designers. She constructed the survey using the ADDIEinstructional design model. One of her findings showed that the Mind Map(s) (MM) strategycan establish a better connection between CT and instructional design [1]; however, verylittle research existed to investigate the correlation
increase in student learning. Wang2 reportspositive student feedback and outlines the controversy regarding the use of schematicsversus the use of a hardware description language (HDL), expressing a concern thatemphasis on an HDL may distract students from the fundamentals of digital logic systems.Wang suggests an integrated approach incorporating breadboard debugging techniques,design and simulation with CAD tools, and verification on a development board. Wangsuggests that an HDL be taught later at the junior level. Radu et al1 emphasizes schematics,introducing an HDL in the context of code fragments and writing test benches. We alsoused an integrated approach, based on schematic capture.Radu, et al1 emphasize the use of development boards and
supplemental materials for transient topicalinterest to seeing digital tools as a significant catalyst for change in teaching and learning. Fromthe many challenges facing K-12 teachers, we isolated two critical hurdles that must besurmounted in order to improve middle school STEM instruction:≠ The ever-widening gap between the production of quality, web-delivered instructional new media and most middle school teachers’ ability to meaningful integrate these advancements into their curriculum and their classroom activities; and≠ The demands placed on teachers by new reform guidelines -- both state and national -- that call for less dependence on textbooks, lectures, and de-contextualized lab work and more emphasis on inquiry-based
Page 23.919.3communication learning experiences for undergraduate engineering and information sciencestudents. These educational resources and case studies include: 1) a multi-robot design challengefor a regional robot contest, 2) multi-robot classroom activities for an introductory roboticsmodule and a computer science course, and 3) a programmable wireless controller for multi-robot communication. The capabilities of these development tools also support multi-robotsolutions across several commonly-used mobile robot platforms, including VEX, Lego NXT, andArduino systems. The overall objective is to provide educators with successful tools andresources to integrate multi-robot communication and technology into the curriculum andoutreach
Paper ID #34200Work in Progress: Remote Instruction of Circuitry in a MultidisciplinaryIntroduction to Engineering First-year CourseDr. James E. Lewis, University of Louisville James E. Lewis, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals in the J. B. Speed School of Engineering at the University of Louisville. His research interests include paral- lel and distributed computer systems, cryptography, engineering education, undergraduate retention and technology (Tablet PCs) used in the classroom.Dr. Nicholas Hawkins, University of Louisville Nicholas Hawkins is an Assistant Professor in the
reference anoutline for the introduction of UGS – UNIGRAPHICS® into a mechanical engineeringundergraduate curriculum was discussed. Students can achieve a good level of proficiency with atype of software package that they will likely use when working in an industrial environment. CAE tools also provide an excellent teaching aid, which can be used to illustrate theory andconcepts by means of computer simulations. This issue has also been discussed in previousworks 2, 3 , where simulation tools are shown to allow for an improved understanding of conceptspresented in design courses. In this work a simulation project is discussed, which can improve student understanding ofundergraduate solid mechanics, kinematics / dynamics and mechanism design
programmers. Studies in both K-12 and post-secondaryprogramming education hint that an inclusive and supportive learning environment canimprove student motivation and confidence more than any particular pedagogicaltechnique of tool (10, 18, 20). Studies in motivation and self-determination support thevalue of autonomy, competence and relatedness as integral to academic success (7).Class Environment and Student PopulationOur study was conducted over six academic semesters of an introductory computer-programming course at a large Midwestern university from the spring 2011 semesterthrough fall 2013. The class is a required course for majors in the department, and is theonly required programming course they will take. Second-year students are the
(LMS), which are the learning centre inUniversities (Figure 2). Figure 2. Lab services through a LMSThanks for this new scenario, students will have the opportunity to use the modules alreadyavailable in these platforms, such as content manager, communication methods (chat rooms,forums and e-mail), evaluation questionnaires (IMS QTI), etc. Otherwise, if each Universitydevelops its own labs and its own modules associated to them, it is likely to re-invent the wheelevery time. With this architecture, each service (lab) will offer a common interface that willallow easy integration in an LMSs.Internally, the architecture consists of different layers, which will allow the student tocommunicate with a hardware device
11.527.11faculty can take advantage of Portfolio integration and sharing to provide better advising. Futureversions that expand the archival capabilities and permit tailored assessment tools will greatlyenhance the department’s ability to assess curriculum. Taken all together, electronic portfolioshave the potential to revolutionize the way we handle our personal, educational, and professionalinformation in ways previously not possible.Bibliography1. "Portfolio" Def. 1a,b. Oxford English Dictionary. Online Ed. 19892. Black, P. and D. William, Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment, in Phi Delta Kappan International. 1998.3. Electronic Portfolio Consortium, , last accessed 1/15/064. Barrett, H.C., Electronic Portfolios, in
, e.g., capstone projects.However, students would benefit from, and are interested in, integrating holistic educationthroughout the curriculum. Moreover, university engineering programs that are accredited byABET are required to meet these objectives. In their recent redevelopment of the student outcomescriteria, ABET [1], [2] identified seven primary outcomes for students. Of these, items two andfour focus on holistic engineering, emphasizing global cultural, social, environmental, andeconomic factors.To address all of the critical aspects of engineering projects, students must successfully analyze therequirements, synthesize information, and evaluate several design options for a given problem.These cognitive skills match well with Bloom’s
context motivatesstudents and engages them to a point where they become active participants in the learningprocess. An effective approach to discovering what will motivate and engage students is to focuson student’s interests, goals, aspirations, and values. With a better understanding of students it ispossible to develop an effective learning environment or activity that is embraced by students,leads them to a deeper level of learning, and entices them to become lifelong learners. Thisapproach was the starting point in the development of an online artificial intelligence or“chatbot” named Anne G. Neering (EnGiNeering). The chatbot is a computer program deliveredon course websites that serves as a text based conversational agent. The purpose of
AC 2009-676: COMPUTING ACROSS CURRICULA: THE VIEW OF INDUSTRYLEADERSEric Wiebe, North Carolina State University Dr. Wiebe is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education at NC State University. He received his Doctorate in Psychology and has focused much of his research on issues related to the use of technology in the instructional environment. He has also worked on the integration of scientific visualization concepts and techniques into both secondary and post-secondary education. Dr. Wiebe has been a member of ASEE since 1989.Chia-Lin Ho, North Carolina State UniversityDianne Raubenheimer, North Carolina State UniversityLisa Bullard, North
scope of an engineering curriculum? (3) What are the characteristics of a middleware framework that will allow the inclusion of real-world data sources within the classroom?2. Sensor data in engineering learning environmentsThe major challenge of incorporating large-scale real-world sensor data into engineering learningenvironment is the infrastructure, knowledge, and equipment prerequisite for utilizing sensordata. Typically speaking, engineering students must at first have fundamental knowledge ofsensors and data acquisition in order to understand what the sensors measure, how sensorstransmit data, and how to acquire the sensor data prior to learning how to represent the data andconduct statistical analyses using the
University for five years. In 2010, she was hired as an external evaluator to conduct research on community/university partnership relations at the University of Cincinnati. She has received several awards including the: 1) UW College of Education outstanding research award (2015); 2) UW College of Education outstanding service award (2016); and 3) Honored College of Education Faculty at Fall Convocation (2017). Her research interests include partnerships within pre-service and in-service teachers in STEM Education with a focus on engineering education and integrated STEM. An active mem- ber of AERA, ASEE, ASTE, NARST, and NSTA, Dr. Burrows has presented at numerous conferences, published in ranked journals (e.g. Journal
Paper ID #12018A Blocks-based Visual Environment to Teach Robot-Programming to K-12StudentsMr. Raghavender Goud yadagiri, NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering Raghavender Goud Yadagiri received his B.Tech degree in Electronics and Communication Engineering from JNTUH, Hyderabad, India, in 2011. After obtaining his B.Tech he worked as an Embedded As- sociate at Thinklabs Technosolutions Pvt. Ltd for two years. He is currently pursuing a M.S degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering with specialization in Computer Engineering. Raghavender con- ducts research in the Mechatronics and Controls Laboratory at NYU Polytechnic
Table 1). All courses included an onlinecourse interface delivered though a common course management system, Blackboard Learn.Online courses used the Blackboard Learn interface as the exclusive delivery system for thecourse, while face-to-face and hybrid courses used the interface to supplement traditional in-person course delivery and management practices.Table 1 Courses Used for Survey Administration Course Level Format Information Systems Applications (2334) Lower division (sophomore) Face-to-Face Integrated Information Systems (3355) Upper division (junior) Face-to-Face Visual Merchandising (3304) Upper
at the University of Georgia,and when combined with the existing Computer Systems Engineering B.S. degree, an emphasisarea in Robotics is looking very viable to be developed for undergraduate students enrolled in theabove three degrees at UGA. As an initial step, we are looking at using robotics as aninstructional approach to integrate hardware, software and communication technologies at asenior-year level course 3,4 whereas students would already have taken courses onMicrocontrollers, Sensors and Transducers, Kinematics, Dynamics, Machine Design and ControlSystems. The goal is to provide students with a basic practicum in Embedded Robotics whereinthe students will learn about the programming of embedded controllers, the actuation of
reluctant to respond to questions asked in class and itis hard to tell whether it was due to fear of failure or some other force.Key Words:Classroom Response Technology, Top Hat, measuring effectiveness, assessment, andevaluation of learning.1. Background There has been research related to integrating technology into the pedagogy ofdifficult subjects like Integral Calculus [1]. Other research gathered student’s opinionsabout the implementation of Classroom Response Systems in university lectures [2]. Thefindings of the Procedia research showed that students gave an overall positiveevaluation of the Classroom Response System (CRS). It also identified CRS’s asenhancers of attention, participation, classroom dynamics, and learning. In 2016
thinking because it involves an integration of several engineeringdisciplines. Topics in this course included control, actuation, wireless, signal transmission andanalog to digital conversion. Rahnavard’s robot was different from other educational robots because it was possible toaccess all of the components through the low-level integration, which is different from most robots,which have a high-level integration of components and software control. Students would haveaccess to signals on the robot that could be measured with standard equipment. The robot partsincluded discrete electrical, electronics, and integrated circuit elements. The robot has two analogcommands for velocity and direction, six digital commands, and analog data that can