, additional examples will be presented during theestimating chapter, as this was the area with the least improvement.References 1. Prince, M. and Felder, R. (2007) The Many Faces of Inductive Learning, Journal of College Science Teaching, 2. Thomas, J.W. (2000) A Review of Research on Project-Based Learning, The Autodesk Foundation, San Rafael, CA. 3. Pan, W. and Allison, J. (2010) Exploring Project and Problem Based Learning in Environmental Building Education by Integrating Critical Thinking, International Journal of Engineering Education, Volume 26, No. 3. 4. Overton, T. (2003) Key aspects of teaching and learning in experimental sciences and engineering , In Fry, H., Ketterridge, S. and Marshall
:30pm (M-F) ANYTIME (S-S) Figure 15. Sample of a Construction Drawing Table 5 Brief Description Of The Construction Sequence Of ActivitiesTimeframe Description02-16-01 - 2-22-01 Placed median barriers southbound02-23-01 - 03-13-01 Placed median barriers northbound03-20-01 Closed Natchez Trace Parkway (NTP) Bridge & West ramps of NTP10-03-01 - 10-12-01 Placed median barriers southbound to put traffic on newly constructed inside lane (becomes shoulder when complete)11-01-01 - 11-09-01 Placed median barriers northbound to put traffic to the newly constructed inside lane
, electrical and building codes) are available online or in theCollege library and are accessible to the student work crews during the class meeting. Thesubmittals required the use of a digital drawing package to prepare sketches, simple explorationof building codes and manufacturers’ and vendors’ specifications and group work planning andcommunication including safety considerations.The Lab 4 safety plan required the following planning: • Assign a responsible person for administering the safety plan – primarily to make sure all workers wear safety protection and someone is always monitoring the work and work area during the installation process. • A plan to control movement thru work areas – identify a responsible person(s) to
shift in construction education is vital for the future of our profession. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2005. 131(5): p. 533-539.2. Schexnayder, C. and Anderson, S., Construction engineering education: History and challenge. 2011. 137: p. 730-739.3. Tatum, C.B. Construction engineering education: Need, content, learning approaches. 2010. Banff, AB, Canada: American Society of Civil Engineers.4. National Academy of Engineering - NAE, Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. 2005: The National Academies Press.5. Wang, Y., Sustainability in construction education. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 2009
) 2. Attention to detail (1-10 points) 3. Use of provided material(s) (1-10 points) 4. Oral presentation (1-25 points) 5. Enthusiasm (1-10 points) 6. Reason for participation (1-10 points) 7. Bonus points (Judge must state reason) (1-10 points) Students constructing their projectsEach grade level is awarded prizes for first, second and third place. Prizes awarded include toolboxes, tools, toy construction equipment, hats, pizza coupons, and gift cards. Then all the firstplace winners are judged to determine first, second and third overall. The prizes for overallwinners have been $100, $75, and $50 U. S. savings bonds
. Jones, S., Schoenberg, A. (2003). Construction Equipment Industry Adopts Wireless Page 14.362.15Technology to Improve Profitable and Service. Available online: www.accenture.com.(2005, February, 23)13. Kapur, K, S., Dedonatis, R. (2001). Equipment today, Service tomorrow. The total cost ofownership vision. Available online:http://a456.g.akamai.net/7/456/1701/561a3dfa6f8362/www.accenture.com/xdoc/en/Industries/Products/industrial/TCO.pdf. [2005, February, 24]14. McNamara, P. (1999). Why ‘better’ isn’t always what gets bought: Telematics services in the constructionequipment industry -A study on how to achieve user acceptance
is Difficult to Introduce eLearning into Schools And Some New Solutions”; J.UCS 9,10, 2003. 12. Levitt, R. E. (2007). “CEM research for the next 50 years: Maximizing economic, environmental, and societal value of the built environment.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 133(9), 619-628. 13. Masrom, M., Zainon, O. & Rahiman, R. (2008). E-learning critical success factors: institutional and technological aspects. E-Learning Issues in Malaysian Higher Education, 49-63.14. Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.15. Musa, M.A. & Othman, M. S. (2012). Critical success factor in e-Learning: an examination of technology and student factors. International
topic was question D4, in which the students’ appeared to understand theimportance of effective communication on the job site. There was also improvement in allobjective questions, with three questions scoring a 100% in the late semester showing ofthe video. This is likely due to the fact that these topics are covered extensively throughoutthe semester. The question that scored the lowest was question D9, which was thedefinition of the USCS acronym. The lower than expected result was due to strict gradingadopted by the professor. All four words had to be identified, spelled correctly, and in thecorrect tense. If a student defined the first “S” as Soils, then the answer was incorrect as thefirst “S” is not plural (i.e. Soil). After the
the take-awayhas a new element the students can research.The transformation of the class proved successful. The major elements of the structure of theclass have been laid out and show significant positive results. However, further fine-tuning onthe minor elements mentioned above should be considered for future research.References:1. Azhar, S., Grau, D., Burt, R., and Gibson, G."State-of-the-Art Best Construction Practices Integration into Higher Education Curricula." Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 0(0), .2. Badger, W. and Robson, K. (2000) Raising Expectations in Construction Education. Construction Congress VI: pp. 1151-1164.3. Brint, S. Cantwell, A. Hanneman, R. (2008). The Two Cultures
Associated Schools of Construction International, USA, 36, 267-276.8. Gasperow, R. (1992). Construction industry employment/unemployment trends: Statistical update. ConstructionLabor Resident Council. Washington D.C.9. U..S Green Building Council webpage Green Building Research. Retrieved May, 2008, fromhttp://www.usgbc.org/DisplayPage.aspx?CMSPageID=171810. Victaulic webpage, Retrieved May, 2008, from http://www.victaulic.com. Page 14.1028.10
D E14. List the strengths of this class: 1) 3) 2) 4)15. In what way(s) do you think this course will be more useful to you in the future? Page 14.372.10
.”Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012). Puerto Rico Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (CFOI).Clevenger, C., López del Puerto, C., and Glick, S. (2015). “Interactive BIM-enabled Safety Training Piloted Construction Education AND.” Advances in Engineering Education, 1–14.Excavations, 29 C.F.R. (1926). Subpart P, 366–403.Hallowell, M., and Gambatese, J. (2009). “Construction Safety Risk Mitigation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 135(12), 1316–1323.OSHA. (1970). The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. AJN, American Journal of Nursing.OSHA. (2014). Fact Sheet: Trenching and Excavation Safety. U.S. Department of Labor.OSHA. (2015). Trenching and Excavation Safety.Rivera Olivencia, E., and Lopez del Puerto, C. (2016). “An Exploratory Study
/spanish_dictionaries.htmlOccupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Susan Harwood (n.d). Susan Harwood Training GrantProgram, [www document] https://www.osha.gov/dte/sharwood/Olbina, S., Hinze, J., & Ruben, M. (2011, April). Safety in Roofing: Practices of Contractors That Employ HispanicWorkers. Professional Safety , pp. 44-52. Page 26.488.8
program features andtools. The Northern Alberta Institute of Technology (NAIT)’s Architectural Technology programappears to be the only provision with an established post-secondary curriculum covering BIMoperation in 3 of the 4 program semesters, but still lacks inter-disciplinary integration. BIMtraining provisions in Alberta are listed on Table 1. Page 26.596.7INSTITUTION/ORGANIZATION COURSES OFFERED CITY BIM 101 - Introduction to BIMEdmonton Construction BIM 201 - Introduction to Revit ArchitectureAssociation BIM 201
: Fundamentals of Project Delivery, Principles ofDesign-Build Project Delivery and Post-Award Design-Build Project Delivery3. Fundamentals ofProject Delivery “provides a general overview of the attributes of all the major project deliverysystems, procurement methodologies and contracting approaches”, Principles of Design-BuildProject Delivery “addresses the use of design-build as a project delivery method, focusing onessential concepts and characteristics, as well as critical elements of the RFQ/RFP process andoverall project management”, and Post-Award Design-Build Project Delivery “provide[s] anoverview of the construction and design-build contract management processes that are importantas the construction phase ramps up” 3.The course also included
). Third dimension line: distances between the grid lines Fourth dimension: overall dimension of the building. p. Tags: Tags, in sequential order, must be included for all the doors, windows and rooms (room name, number and room area). Rooms shall be renamed to reflect their usage, e.g. Conference Room, Office, etc. (2 points) q. 3D Camera View: Create a view looking from the front of the building. (2 points) r. Sheets: At least two sheets must be created, one for the floor plans and one for the elevation and section plans. (2 points) s. Exterior Rendering: A realistic exterior view shall be created at a “medium” detail level, and saved to as a JPG file. (2 points) t. Create a Walkthrough: starting from
variety of institutions across the US and those in the queue clearlyhold a positive view in regards to attaining tenure.References 1. Varma, R. (2004). “The tenure system and engineering institutions.” Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 20-23, Salt Lake City, UT. 2. McKenzie, R. (1996). “In Defense of Academic Tenure.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 152(2), 325-341. 3. Sowell, T. (1993). Inside American Education: The Decline, the Deception, the Dogmas. Free Press: New York. 4. Aigner, D. (1993). “Quality Revolution due at Universities.” Orange County Register, July 25, B10. 5. Epstein, R. and S. MacLane (1991). “Keep Mandatory Retirement for Tenured Faculty
courses.References 1. Bennett, S. (2007). Designing for uncertainty: Three approaches. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(2), 165-179. 2. Hearn, J., Lewis, D., & Kallsen, L. (2006). Incentives for managed growth: A case study of incentives-based planning and budgeting in a large public research university. Journal of Higher Education, 77(2), 286-316. 3. Design and Construction, n.d. http://www.colorado.edu/fm/planning-design- construction/design-construction 4. Gransberg, D.D., Jeong, H.D. and Hunter, K.D., Preconstruction Services Estimating Guidebook, Interim Research Report, NCHRP Project 15-51, 2014, 149pp. 5. USGBC, n.d., http://www.usgbc.org. 6. Grimsey D, Lewis MK. Public Private Partnership, the
). Retrieved from http://www.cagbc.org8. Living Building Challenge (2016). Retrieved from http://living-future.org/lbc9. The Mosaic Centre (2016). Retrieved from http://the mosaiccentre.ca10. Korkmaz, S. (2012). "Case-Based and Collaborative-Learning Techniques to Teach Delivery of Sustainable Buildings." J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 10.1061, 139-144.11. MacDonald, J and Mills, J (2013) ‘An IPD approach to construction education’, Australasian Journal of Construction. Economics and Building, 13 (2) 93-103.
. Page 12.401.82. Russell, J. S. and Stouffer, W. B., “Survey of the National Civil Engineering Curriculum”, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, ASCE, April 2005, pp. 118-128.3. Body of Knowledge Committee of the Committee on Academic Prerequisites for Professional Practice, “Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century; Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future”, American Society of Civil Engineers, January 12, 2004.4. Meade, R.B., Pocock, J.B., and Riester, N., “Civil and Environmental Engineering Education at the Air Force Academy”, The Military Engineer, Vol. 94, No. 616, May-June, 2002.5. Pocock, J.B. and Ridilla, P.A., “Project-Based Construction Education
40142 1992 41310 1993 40532 1994 ------- 1995 40880 1996 40744 1997 40842 1998 41243 1999 42731 2000 43294 2001 43552 2002 44688 2003 44334 2004 43966 2005 41781 2006 41691 Page 12.1305.6 Average Annual Daily Traffic AADT = - 346883 + 194.6 year 45000 S 1095.11 R-Sq 49.8% R-Sq(adj) 46.5% 44000 43000AADT 42000 41000 40000 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
/Tunnel design.” CE News, September 2006, pp. 16-17. 3. Ibid. 4. Ross, Steven S. “Construction Disasters: Design Failures, Causes, and Prevention.” McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1984. 5. Ibid 6. Ibid 7. Feld, J., and Carper K. “Construction Failure.” John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1997. Page 12.925.9
/The_ASC_Doctoral_Task_Force.pdf2. Barlish, K., Sullivan, K., De Marco, A. (2012). Education and Simulation of Best Value in an International Academic Setting: A Case Study. Journal for the Advancement of Performance Information and Value, 4 (1), pp44-62.3. Davenport, J., and Davenport, J., A. (1985). A Chronology and Analysis of the Andragogy Debate. Adult Education Quarterly, 35 (3), pp. 152-159.4. Dowlatshahl, S. (1996). An Empirical Assessment of Continuing – Education Needs. Journal of Management in Engineering, 12 (5), pp37- 44.5. Epstein, H., I. (1987). Continuing Education – A Look to the Future. Journal of Professional Issue in Engineering, 113, pp2-9.6. Gagne, R. M., Driscoll, M. P. (1988). Essentials of Learning for Instruction
4.72 5 subject. 5. The examples and activities helped me 57 35 6 0 0 4.52 5 understand the information. 6. I could follow along with the instructor(s) in 78 19 1 0 0 4.79 5 the student guide. 7. I was encouraged to ask questions and 79 15 3 1 0 4.76 5 participate throughout class. 8. The course prepared me for the test. 77 19 2 0 0 4.77 5 9. I would recommend this course to others. 76 19 2 1 0 4.73 5 10. Overall, the course met my expectations. 71 24 2 1 0
control in many different perspectives. It can be forecasted that students can gainBIM knowledge and skills more thoroughly within a current curriculum. The steps are listedbelow: Determine the goals to be achieved by applying BIM into teaching. Choose method(s) to apply BIM into courses. At this step, it was determined to use several existing courses. Employ different teaching styles. The selection of teaching style depends on various stages of BIM knowledge and applications, the nature of courses, and the teaching expertise of course instructors. Set up a course framework that integrates BIM concepts and determine changes to be made to the current construction
further improve the curriculum design in thesecond round of updates of all construction related courses on the curriculum.References1. U.S. GSA. 3D-4D Building Information Modeling. 2011. Available at:http://www.gsa.gov/portal/category/21062 [Accessed February 21, 2011].2. Li N, Becerik-Gerber B. Performance-based evaluation of RFID-based indoor location sensingsolutions for the built environment. Advanced Engineering Informatics. 2011. Available at:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2011.02.004 [Accessed March 26, 2011].3. Taneja S, Akinci B, Garrett J, et al. CEC: Sensing and Field Data Capture for Constructionand Facility Operations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2010;1(1):232.Available at: http://link.aip.org/link/doi
15.730.8curriculum and the relevancy of the information will also be evaluated using the informationreceived from the students. The results of the assessment will be the subject of future studies.Bibliography1. Wahby, W.S. Industry and ET education collaborations from a construction engineering perspective. in 2004 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. 2004: American Society of Engineering Education.2. Viswanathan, S. and H. Evans, Harnessing industry collaboration in developing graduate-degree programs, in 2009 ASEE National Conference. 2009, American Society of Engineering Education.3. Dobrowski, T. University and industry collaboration ideas beneficial to both. in 2006 National ASEE
. Gransberg, D., Korkmaz, S., McCuen, T., Molenaar, K., Riley, D, and Sobin, N. (2010). Influence of Project Delivery on Sustainable, High Performance Buildings. A Research Report to the Charles Pankow Foundation, Claremont, CA. Retrieved from (April 8, 2011)10. Kent, D.C. and Becerik-Gerber, B., 2010, Understanding construction industry experience and attitudes toward integrated project delivery." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 136(8), pp. 815-82511. Lopez del Puerto, C., Gransberg, D.D. and Shane, J.S., 2008, Comparative Analysis of Owner Goals for Design/Build Projects, Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 24 (1), pp. 32-3912. Pickvance. (2001). “Four varieties of comparative
Cognitive Learning Jean Piaget’s Cognitive Development Lev S. Vygotsky’s Cultural-Historical Theory of Psychological Development Albert Bandura’s Social-Cognitive Learning Bernard Weiner’s Attribution Theory Table 5 Instructional Development Models7 Type of Model Name of Model Classroom Oriented Models Gerlach and Ely Heinich, Molenda, Russell and Smalindo Newby, Stepich, Lehman
from the worksite and not from an academic setting. Page 22.535.8Bibliography1. Gharehbaghi, K., & McManus, K. (2003). "Effective construction management." Leadership and Management in Engineering, 3(1), 54-55.2. Bratton, D. A. (1998). "Develop a framework of core competencies." Credit Union Magazine, 64, pp.17-18.3. Rigolosi, S. A. (2001). Tools for success; soft skills for the construction industry, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.4. Cline, R. C. (2008). "Teaching key competencies of effective construction project managers to adults in higher education," Ph.D. dissertation, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID.5. American Council