Asee peer logo
Displaying results 31 - 60 of 79 in total
Conference Session
Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 6 - Technology & Simulation
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Long Duy Nguyen P.E., Florida Gulf Coast University; Robert O'Neill P.E., Florida Gulf Coast University; Simeon J. Komisar, Florida Gulf Coast University
Tagged Divisions
Construction Engineering
resulted in higher retention8. Over dependence on an SRS,student anxiety and technical sophistication were among the weaknesses if a SRS was not usedappropriately11. Nevertheless, much of the previous research was based on the use of thetraditional SRSs (i.e., clickers) while cloud-based response systems (hereafter referred to as pollapp) have been prevalent due to a majority of students owning an Internet-connected devicenowadays12.The goal of this paper is to assess the use of a poll app called Poll Everywhere in an engineeringproject management course namely “Project Planning and Regulations”, which is required forcivil and environmental engineering majors. Previous studies differentiated three categories ofusing response systems: (i
Conference Session
ConstDiv Technical Session 2 - Safety
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
George D. Ford, Western Carolina University; Saeed Rokooei, Mississippi State University
Tagged Divisions
Construction Engineering
industry is well established and active in all sectors ofconstruction. Most construction managers have attended training to receive their 10-hour or 30-hour safety cards. Few programs exist in higher education where students receive a safety card,but the number of programs providing students with a safety card upon course completion isgrowing. At Mississippi State University, students in the Building Construction Science programobtain their 30-hour construction safety card in the third year program curriculum. Studentslearn about federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) construction safetyrequirements. They also write site specific safety plans to meet accreditation requirementsthrough the American Council on Construction
Conference Session
Architectural Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Scott Walbridge P.E., University of Waterloo; Rania Al-Hammoud P.Eng., University of Waterloo
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Architectural Engineering, Construction Engineering
introduces new ideas to the classroom that increases their engagement. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Challenges and Opportunities Observed in the Implementation of a New Architectural Engineering Undergraduate Academic ProgramAbstractIn the fall of 2018, a new, first-of-its-kind in Canada architectural engineering undergraduateprogram was launched. The program features 24 months of compulsory / inclusive coop workexperience, along with a series of core studio courses in each of the eight academic terms. Eachof these courses will involve the planning and execution of a series of design projects thatintegrate and put into practice concepts covered in the other courses the students
Conference Session
ConstDiv Technical Session 1 - Capstone & Case Study
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tyler Jack Moravec, The University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Kelli R Kopocis, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Terry Lee Stentz, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Tagged Divisions
Construction Engineering
graduation, an undergraduate financestudent should have the following general knowledge skills due to their course work: • Financial mathematics, management, planning and reporting – This is a key skill as it makes up the basic understanding of everything finance. The common misconception is that finance students are only studying to learn about markets and how to manage personal finances. However, finance students focus on much more than that. They carry an innate ability to understand budgets, interpret meaning from these budgets, and make important decisions that are in the best interest of the financial wellbeing of all of those involved. Along with this
Conference Session
ConstDiv Technical Session 4 - Pedagogy & Accreditation I
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rajarajan Subramanian, Penn State Harrisburg; Fazil T. Najafi, University of Florida
Tagged Divisions
Construction Engineering
, seminars, and workshops, and has developed courses, videos and software packages during his career. His areas of specialization include transportation planning, Engineering and management, legal aspects, construction contract administration, Renewable Ener c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Flipping the Construction Management Class: Beneficial?AbstractFlipping the class means changing the traditional style of teaching (via lectures) to facilitate self-learning through engaging the students. The students’ attention span is as short as 15 minutes;hence, the traditional lecturing does not promote effective learning. Sometimes, flipped classlooks chaos when 50 or more students
Conference Session
Architectural Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Adriana Rios Santiago, Texas Southmost College; Anabel Pineda-Briseño, Tecnologico Nacional de Mexico/Instituto Tecnologico de Matamoros; Jesus A. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley; Uriel Saul Huerta P.E., Tecnologico de Leon
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Architectural Engineering, Construction Engineering
interest is in the mechanical properties of glass at room and high temperature. Dr. Gonzalez has also a broad experience in the glass industry, specifically in fabrication of automotive safety glass. He worked for Vitro Glass Company for more than 19 years where he held different positions such as Process Engineer, Materials Planning and Logistics Manager, Production Superintendent, Manufacturing Engineer and Glass Technologist. During his time in the company, he co-authored two patents related to glass fabrication and glass coatings pro- cessing. Dr. Gonzalez is a Six-Sigma Black Belt and has participated in numerous process improvement projects. He has been trained as well in the Methodology of Inventive Problem
Conference Session
Architectural Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Eugene Kwak, Farmingdale State College, State University of New York
Tagged Divisions
Architectural Engineering, Construction Engineering
. Subsequently, thescholarship has been awarded to provide funding for the construction material. The planning ofthis project also involved coordination with the regional food bank, Island Harvest, who iscurrently operating a community garden on a leased plot on campus. The garden providedsufficient context for the participating students to generate a wide range of design schemes.Also, faculty from the Department of Urban Horticulture & Design collaborated during theplanning phase. Two of the Architectural Engineering Technology students from the author’sprevious courses, Konstantinos Neofitos and Daniella Lima De Freitas Smyth, volunteered toparticipate in this research.ProcessPedagogical ApproachThe pedagogical strategy for this pilot project
Conference Session
Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Andrew Richard Kline, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Fernanda L. Leite, University of Texas, Austin; Eduardo Luis Isatto, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
Tagged Divisions
Architectural Engineering, Construction Engineering
; 3D modeling for construction planning; autonomous 3D model generation; and virtual reality.Dr. Eduardo Luis Isatto, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Eduardo Isatto is an Associate Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) and a member of the Building Innovation Research Unit (NORIE) since 1997. He has a doctoral degree in Civil Engineering and a master’s degree in Industrial Engineering, from the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. His main research interests are connected with the application of lean production to the construction industry, comprehending research areas as BIM, project management, production systems design, procurement
Conference Session
ConstDiv Technical Session 7 - Poster Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael Shenoda, Farmingdale State College
Tagged Divisions
Construction Engineering
comparison to assessmentresults in a traditional course offering.BackgroundThe study of Construction Engineering involves courses in areas of construction practice such asestimation, scheduling, safety, project management, and plan reading and production. Suchcourses normally involve expenses for students in terms of textbooks, equipment, and software.The expenses for course textbooks and materials can be quite high. These include prices rangingto over $300 for individual textbooks in engineering [1], [2], to $700 per semester [3], toupwards of $1200 a year on average for civil engineering programs [4]. These costs also increaseat an exorbitant rate, with textbook costs estimated to have been increasing 1500%, or nearlythree times the overall rate
Conference Session
Architectural Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Darrell D. Nickolson, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Katie Pruitt
Tagged Divisions
Architectural Engineering, Construction Engineering
(floorplan development, dimensioning, simple drawing annotation), and introduce new concepts ofbuilding details. Student will be asked to do a self-review of existing documents, and makemodifications to prep for new details. • Recall dimensioning style for wood frame structure • Review simple construction document annotation • Introduce Uniform Drawing Standards • Introduce development of building sectionsAssignment Task: • Review existing plans for errors and omissions. • Introduce footer and foundations criteria • Introduce building codes • Re-created building sectionsAssignment Criteria: • Develop floor plan with notes, dimensions • Develop elevations with notes and dimensions
Conference Session
Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Nicholas Tymvios, Bucknell University; Miles Book, Bucknell University
Tagged Divisions
Construction Engineering
placed first and out of sequence fromthe real construction process, and it is followed by the reinforcement and the concrete slab, asshown in Figure 11. Figure 11: First floor Pieces (left), and First Floor Placed on the Site (right)The final step requires the removal of all the formwork (Figure 12), and the backfill of theexcavation as shown in Figure 13. Figure 12: Site with all Formwork Removed Figure 13: Site Backfill Pieces (left), and Completed Site (right)LimitationsSimilar to many other educational props, this model does have limitations. Due to the time ittakes to print all the pieces in the model, this prop requires some forethought and planning, and itis not meant to be prepared the day
Conference Session
Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 6 - Technology & Simulation
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Fadi Castronovo, California State University, East Bay; Dragana Nikolic, University of Reading; Silvia Mastrolembo Ventura, Politecnico di Milano & University of Brescia; Vrinda Shroff, California State University, East Bay; Anh Nguyen; Nguyen H.P. Dinh, Mission College; Semih Yilmaz, California State University, East Bay; Reza Akhavian, California State University East Bay; Cristian Gaedicke, California State University East Bay
Tagged Divisions
Construction Engineering
educational virtual reality game, the Design Review Simulator (DRS) with the aim to helpstudents build design review skills. The game was designed to challenge the students in findingand evaluating various types of design mistakes. In this paper, we discuss the development of thegame and frame it in light of the existing literature to further understand the value of VR in thedesign process. In addition to the development experience, we offer a plan for the implementationand evaluation of the game with an assessment instrument designed for the game.2. LITERATURE REVIEW2.1. Design Review and Visualization With the growing adoption of building information modeling (BIM) approaches, severalinnovative technology applications for various use cases
Conference Session
Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Mohamed Elzomor, Florida International University; Piyush Pradhananga, Florida International University; Rubaya Rahat, Florida International University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Construction Engineering
Students, Contract DeliveryMethods, Construction Management CurriculaBackground and MotivationAccelerated Bridge Construction (ABC) is an innovative bridge construction technique that hasdrastically improved highway construction practices through the integration of effective plans,high-performance materials, safe designs, and reducing the overall construction time of newbridges or rehabilitation of existing bridges. However, recent studies have highlighted majorissues in the ABC technique which include the high initial cost of ABC, lack of standardization,inexperienced contractors, and inefficacy of traditional project delivery methods [1]. Traditionalproject delivery methods such as Design-Bid-Build (DBB) involve solicitation of theconstruction
Conference Session
Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Mohamed Elzomor, Florida International University; Piyush Pradhananga, Florida International University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Construction Engineering
. Cosgriff, “Problem-Based Learning: A Bridge Between Planning Education and Planning practice,” J. Plan. Educ. Res., 1998.[6] N. Postman and C. Weingartner, Teaching as a subversive activity, vol. 53, no. 9. 1969.[7] E. Forcael, V. González, F. Orozco, A. Opazo, Á. Suazo, and P. Aránguiz, “Application of problem-based learning to teaching the critical path method,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 141, no. 3, pp. 1–11, 2015, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000236.[8] N. Capon and D. Kuhn, “What ’ s So Good About Problem-Based Learning ?,” Cogn. Instr., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 61–79, 2010, doi: 10.1207/s1532690Xci2201.[9] P. N. Chou and H. C. Hsiao, “An alternative learning strategy to support engineering
Conference Session
Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Kimberly Grau Talley P.E., Texas State University; Bobbi J. Spencer, Texas State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Construction Engineering
;Cohen, 2007). Mendoza-Denton et al. (2006) indicate that social support can mitigate thesechilling effects. Further, Mendoza-Denton et al. (2006) cited mentoring and cross-groupfriendships (so forming friendships with those in the other group – between genders or betweenethnicities/races, e.g.) as forms of social support that they found to have such a mitigatingeffect. Therefore, the proposed student tutoring and resource center is also planned to providesome social events to encourage student friendships, such as these important cross-groupfriendships in addition to the natural mentoring that can develop through tutoring.Belonging has been tied to self-efficacy and engagement, which also are tied to positive careeroutcomes (aka persistence in
Conference Session
ConstDiv Technical Session 1 - Capstone & Case Study
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Fei Yang, Ohio State University; Michael Parke, Ohio State University; Fabian Hadipriono Tan P.E., Ohio State University; Adrian Hadipriono Tan; Shilun Hao, Ohio State University
Tagged Divisions
Construction Engineering
such an extraordinary structure. The objective of this research is to introducean interactive system that allows users to learn how this ancient pagoda was built almost 1,400 years ago,aided by three-dimensional images of building components of the substructure (foundation) andsuperstructure (pagoda) of the Dayanta. Students will be guided through the correct construction sequenceand operations with the assistance of animation and ample descriptions of the use of materials, equipment,and technology. To verify the effectiveness of this interactive system, the authors plan to conduct a surveyassessing the usefulness and ease of use of the system and the realism of the construction sequence andoperations of the Dayanta as well as both immediate
Conference Session
Construction Division Technical Session 3: Case Studies
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jing Wen, Ohio State University; Jin Rong Yang, Ohio State University; Michael Parke, Ohio State University; Adrian Hadipriono Tan, Ohio State University; Fabian Hadipriono Tan Dr.Eng., Ohio State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Construction Engineering
the same as the previous “Return” buttons.After reviewing above tabs, students have learned construction information of a sluice gate fromperspective of construction materials, masonry work, earthwork and foundation. In the followingtabs, students will experience the construction process of a sluice gate by virtually building asluice gate by themselves. The Construction Process Simulation tab is unique to the previoustabs. There are seven sub-tabs under this tab, which are Start, Construction Plan, Foundation,Bottom Layer, Middle Layer, Top Layer, and Finish, working as a step-to-step process to build asluice gate. Figure 8 shows the Start tab and Construction Plan tab. Figure 8: MUSSN Construction Process Simulation Tab and Construction Plan
Conference Session
Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Piyush Pradhananga, Florida International University; Mohamed ElZomor, Florida International University; Gabriella Santi; Arif Mohaimin Sadri, Florida International University
Tagged Divisions
Architectural Engineering, Construction Engineering
. González, F. Orozco, A. Opazo, Á. Suazo, and P. Aránguiz, "Application of Problem-Based Learning to Teaching the Critical Path Method," Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 141, no. 3, 2015.[11] L. Prieto, "Active learning in the college classroom: A case study of problem-based learning.," (in Spanish), Miscelánea Comillas: Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales (Spanish), no. 64(124), pp. 173–196, 2006.[12] A. Shepherd, Cosgriff, Bryna, , "Problem-Based Learning: A Bridge between Planning Education and Planning Practice," Journal of Planning Education and Research, 1998.[13] B. Tomkinson, R. Tomkinson, H. Dobson, and C. Engel, "Education for sustainable development – an inter‐disciplinary
Conference Session
Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Rebekah Burke P.E., The Citadel; Mostafa Batouli, The Citadel; Timothy Aaron Wood, The Citadel
Tagged Divisions
Construction Engineering
) learned that construction engineers will focus on “Business,Management & Contracts” (68%), and construction engineering students (ConE) provided “Cost& Budget” (76%) as the most prominent theme described. These themes tie directly to the riskand reward scenarios of different contract types that are presented in lecture, and then practicedin the game. Other themes included: “Planning” (41% CivE, 24% ConE), “Owner/CivilCommunication Coordination” (32% CivE, 35% ConE), “Construction and Execution” (19%CivE, 12% ConE), and “Risks” (14% CivE, 6% ConE). 46% of the CivE responses (n=37) and41% of the ConE responses (n=17) were coded to multiple themes. Most coded categories aresimilar in the percentage of civil and construction engineering
Conference Session
Construction Division Technical Session 2: K-12 through Adult Learning
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Anthony Torres, Texas State University; Vedaraman Sriraman, Texas State University; Araceli Martinez Ortiz, Texas State University; Kristin Marie Kibling, Texas State University
Tagged Divisions
Construction Engineering
Education from Tufts University.Ms. Kristin Marie Kibling, Texas State University Ms. Kristin Kibling is a graduate student, completing her Masters of Science in Technology Management with a concentration in Construction Management at Texas State University. She is a full time professional in the construction industry with over 15 years’ experience in the private and public sector of commercial preconstruction, marketing, business development and project management. Kristin currently holds a position in Texas State University’s Facilities Planning, Design and Construction department where she is responsible for planning, estimating, directing, scheduling, inspecting and coordinating construction activities for campus
Conference Session
Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Sanjeev Adhikari, Kennesaw State University; Rachel Mosier P.E., Oklahoma State University; Sandeep Langar, The University of Texas at San Antonio
Tagged Divisions
Architectural Engineering, Construction Engineering
struc- tural engineering and project management. Dr. Mosier has received regional and international teaching awards through the Associated Schools of Construction. Research interests include the cost of sustainable construction to owners and engineering education.Dr. Sandeep Langar, The University of Texas at San Antonio Dr. Sandeep Langar is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Construction Science in College of Architecture, Construction, and Planning at The University of Texas at San Antonio. He received his Ph.D. in Environmental Design and Planning from the College of Architecture and Urban Studies at Virginia Tech. He is also a licensed architect in India. Dr. Langar has authored multiple publications
Conference Session
Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Krishna Prasad Kisi, Texas State University; Kimberly Grau Talley P.E., Texas State University; Snigdha Rangineni, Texas State University; Guntulu S. Hatipkarasulu, Texas State University; Bobbi J. Spencer, Texas State University
Tagged Divisions
Construction Engineering
using game-based learning will demonstrate higher mathematicsGPA than the control group of students in the construction science and management program.For the second test, the study will divide students into adequate numbers of control andexperimental sample size groups.The research team plans to add more modules to the PCLG. The additional modules will bebased on the game leveling concept. The PCLG will use the student’s level of Pre-Calculusknowledge as a way of measuring the average statistics of their character – making questionseasier or harder to compensate their learning. To motivate student learning, the game willaddress the psychology of getting the rewards of leveling up.As a pilot study, the research team plans to include this game
Conference Session
ConstDiv Technical Session 4 - Pedagogy & Accreditation I
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Bashar Haddad, Western Kentucky University
Tagged Divisions
Construction Engineering
, 2019 Risk Allocation Practices at the Bid Phase of the Construction Project: A Look at Factors that Impact Risk Premiums at the Bid Phase of the Construction ProjectAbstractExculpatory clauses are often used by owners in construction contracts to shift potential risks ofconstruction to the contractor. Conversely, to mitigate those risks, contractors use a risk premiumas part of their contingency plan to reduce the risks associated with accepting exculpatory clauses.The study identified five risks commonly used in construction contracts; namely, design errors,differing site conditions, construction errors, risks of payments, and damage for delays. The studyexamined the correlation among the contractor’s years
Conference Session
ConstDiv Technical Session 5 - Pedagogy & Accreditation II
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tom Michael Leathem, Auburn University; Eric M. Wetzel, Auburn University
Tagged Divisions
Construction Engineering
scheduling, operational costs, and life-cycle costs. D.1: Stakeholder Roles in Architecture: Understanding of the relationships among key stakeholders in the design process—client, contractor, architect, user groups, local community—and the architect’s role to reconcile stakeholder needs. D.2: Project Management: Understanding of the methods for selecting consultants and assembling teams; identifying work plans, project schedules, and time requirements; and recommending project delivery methods.Considering many of these performance criteria are fundamental skills taught in any constructionprogram and that these skills are required of architecture and construction professionals, thisappears to be a natural
Conference Session
Architectural Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Christina McCoy P.E., Oklahoma State University; John J. Phillips, Oklahoma State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Architectural Engineering, Construction Engineering
the beams. Despite this,prompting the students to think about shear failure in this context improved their understandingof this topic. It should also be noted that a few students commented in the survey that theywished lecture had provided more guidance as to how to layout reinforcing prior to beamfabrication. While the request is understandable, the variety in reinforcing configurations alsoadded a creative component and a wider sample of results. This would not be the case iflectures had a more prescriptive approach to reinforcement for the lab. The individuals thatrequested this may have brought down the score for lecture preparedness slightly, but the overallscore was still strong and there are no plans to modify this approach in future
Conference Session
Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Sanjeev Adhikari, Kennesaw State University; Rachel D. Mosier, Oklahoma State University; Sandeep Langar, University of Texas, San Antonio
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Construction Engineering
professional engineer in Construction and Structural Engineering. Her masters and doctoral degrees are from the University of Oklahoma in Construction Administration and Engineering respectively.Dr. Sandeep Langar, The University of Texas at San Antonio Dr. Sandeep Langar is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Construction Science in College of Architecture, Construction, and Planning at The University of Texas at San Antonio. He received his Ph.D. in Environmental Design and Planning from College of Architecture and Urban Studies at Virginia Tech. He is also a licensed architect in India. Dr. Langar has authored multiple publications analyzing the implementation of Building Information Modeling (BIM) and its impact
Conference Session
Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Kimberly Grau Talley P.E., Texas State University; Bobbi J. Spencer, Texas State University; Guntulu S. Hatipkarasulu, Texas State University ; Krishna Prasad Kisi, Texas State University
Tagged Divisions
Construction Engineering
successful training and consistent participation of theconstruction workforce to minimize accidents on jobsites. While traditional safety training hasfeatured classroom lectures and quick toolbox talks, the emerging technology of AugmentedReality/Virtual Reality (AR/VR) has recently been utilized by several different groups to attemptto improve construction safety training programs. This paper is presenting the current state of awork-in-progress project to investigate both the acceptance and efficacy of existing AR/VRconstruction safety programs and develop an improved AR/VR construction safety game. Thecurrent stage is the baseline measurement of efficacy using traditional classroom lectures as wellas early planning/creation of the improved AR/VR
Conference Session
Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Sanjeev Adhikari, Kennesaw State University; Pavan Meadati, Kennesaw State University
Tagged Divisions
Construction Engineering
3D model.9 Clash Detection Students learn to coordinate between the architect, structural and engineer, and mechanical engineer to create 3D models of a Coordination single-story small commercial building. They explore to visually represent the physical clashes between the components through 3D models. They also explore the usefulness of 3D models for coordination to resolve constructability problems.10 Object Students learn to depict the challenges in a small residential Animation construction site logistics plan through the 3D model.These activities
Conference Session
Construction Division Technical Session 1: Assessments
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Thahomina Jahan Nipa; Sharareh Kermanshachi, University of Texas at Arlington
Tagged Divisions
Construction Engineering
• Phase 2: System questionnaire survey analysis planning of the Development Process • Collection of grades approach for the study • Analysis of grades • Phase 3: Post- for studetns studied System Development with OER and process without OER Fig. 1. Research Methodology ProcessThe third step was the data collection part of the study. One set of data was collected from aquestionnaire survey conducted at the end of the semester to anonymously record
Conference Session
Construction Division Poster Session
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gad M. Ghada, California State Polytechnic University; Jinsung Cho; Yasser Salem
Tagged Divisions
Construction Engineering
manner that allowsfor continuous improvement [1, 2].In addition to being an accreditation requirement for engineering programs, assessment effortshelp educators plan forward their education process with robust sound methods and data, ratherthan arbitrary methods based on trials and errors. The challenge of any program assessmentprocess has always been the development of a structured, systematic, and effective process thatencompasses all stakeholders, and provides opportunity for continuous improvement, as poorlyconstructed assessments can lead to loss of time, money, and educators’ energy [3]. Systematicassessments, though challenging, are necessary for program improvement [2, 4]. With the moveof California State Polytechnic University, Pomona’s