Hispanic Serving Institutionnature of the university where this study takes place. The University of Puerto Rico is a systemthat serves over 60,000 students, of which 99% are Hispanic, with Spanish as their primarylanguage.The project has two main expected outcomes: 1) Capacity Building through Critical Transitionsand 2) Capacity Building through Cross Sector Partnerships. Capacity Building will be reachedthrough the development of a sequence of courses and experiential learning experiences that willlead to a minor degree. Regarding Cross Sector Partnerships, they will be reached by means ofan Advisory Board composed by government agency representatives and faculty, and throughthe development of a plan for hands-on experiences for participating
has been integrating innovative and novel educational paradigms in STEM education to support student engagement, retention, and diversity.Prof. Omar Youssef, University of Arizona Dr. Omar Youssef is a Lecturer at University of Arizona (UofA), College of Architecture, Planning, and Landscape Architecture, and the School of Sustainable Built Environments. A Building Scientist in the Institute on Place and Wellbeing Performance. An Architecture Designer in Practice focusing on Environmental Application within the Industry. Dr. Youssef has extensive industry experience of constructed large-scale projects. Omar’s interdisciplinary background combines between Architecture Practice, Environmental Sciences, Health and
2016 to 2026 makingthe severe workforce shortages of the construction industry a nationwide crisis [1] [2][3][4].Coupled with workforce shortages, lack of diversity and challenging student transitions into theconstruction profession remain a huge concern. These emphasize the need for constructioneducators to attract and prepare minority students who persist into construction professional (CP)roles towards a more competent and diverse construction workforce for improved 21st centurybuilt environments [4]. CPs play a critical role in the design, engineering, planning,development, management, operation, maintenance, sustainability, deconstruction, anddemolition of built environments. The dynamic and competitive construction industry is
, building inspectors, suppliers,subcontractors, contractors, construction developers, real estate developers, researchers, andeducators [2][3]. However, most construction curricula are highly tailored to prepare students forproject management and estimating roles. Generally, project managers plan, budget, oversee, anddocument all aspects of their construction projects, while estimators determine the quantities andcosts of construction projects. Furthermore, many construction programs are structured to preparestudents mostly for commercial construction projects [1]. This is logical as most of the employersof undergraduate Construction students offer student opportunities to work on commercialconstruction projects. With the current focus of
transition into these professional roles in the residential construction sector.Several undergraduate construction programs have modified program curricula to preparestudents for the 21st century career demands by equipping them with relevant knowledge andskills in recent technologies such as building information modeling (BIM) technologies [7].Also, various strategies are being implemented to strengthen students’ career identities andsmoothen their transitions into professional roles upon graduation. The development ofresidential professional career identities in undergraduate students is critical for their sustainedinterests, persistence into residential construction professional roles, and their eventualcontribution to the planning and
provides a laboratory ofcommon experience for development of language, logic, and problem-solving skills in theclassroom; 3. A democracy demands that its citizens make personal and community decisionsabout issues in which scientific information plays a fundamental role, and they hence need aknowledge of science as well as an understanding of scientific methodology; 4. For somestudents, it will become a lifelong vocation or avocation; and 5. The nation is dependent on thetechnical and scientific abilities of its citizens for its economic competitiveness and nationalneeds [12].Upon graduation from undergraduate construction programs, graduates are engaged in thedesign, planning, engineering, construction, estimating/budgeting, management
expectations and the process to tenure and to make a plan to separate work from personallife [10]. Becoming aware of the expectations is key, since vagueness in what is expected can bedetrimental to a faculty members psyche.References[1] R. Varma, “The tenure system and engineering institutions,” in 2004 ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition, June 20-23, 2004, Salt Lake City, UT.[2] AAUP, “History of the AAUP,” American Association of University Professors,https://www.aaup.org/about/history-aaup. [Access date 1/11/2019][3] R. McKenzie, “In Defense of Academic Tenure,” Journal of Institutional and TheoreticalEconomics, pp. 325-341, 152(2), 1996.[4] T. Sowell, Inside American Education: The Decline, the Deception, the Dogmas. Free Press:New York, 1993.[5
workforce research characterizing, expanding, sus- taining, measuring and training the technical and professional construction workforce in the US. The broader impact of this work lies in achieving and sustaining safe, productive, diverse, and inclusive project organizations composed of engaged, competent and diverse people.Meltem Duva, Michigan State University Meltem Duva is a PhD student and graduate research assistant in the Construction Management Program in the School of Planning Design and Construction at the Michigan State University. She holds a B.S. de- gree in architecture and M.S. degree in construction management. She has worked for several companies and projects prior to starting PhD. Meltem Duva pursues
style for today’s construction industry. Cultivating thistype of leadership can improve competitiveness in both domestic and international construction.Incorporating Leadership into Construction Management TeachingConsidering the dynamics both in the domestic and international construction markets, the authoremploys several strategies to bring leadership skills’ development into the course content. The College of Architecture, Construction, and Planning at the University of Texas at SanAntonio has initiated a collaborative course for Construction Science and Civil Engineeringstudents. Construction Capstone for construction students and Civil
other groups and instructors,and ultimately built four hunting cabins. The results of this paper were produced from the data gathered atthe end of this camp. The main objective of this study was to explore students’ perceptions toward thecamp and use their feedback and preferences in subsequence camps. The students’ perceptions are animportant input for the construction educator to plan accordingly and increase the quality of academicpreparation and the quantity of student enrollments. The survey aimed to consider factors that impactstudents’ perceptions before entering construction programs. Students expressed their expectation ofsalary and time on the job requirements. The reported numbers were close to the reality which eliminatesthe blind
structural courseworkrequirements and overlapping industry relationships. As all of these graduates will end up in theconstruction related industry, it is of interest how their perceptions vary.IntroductionStudents and faculty alike can question the validity of certain coursework to a degree program.As the ABET requirements change over time, programs respond to the change with curriculumchanges [1} Additionally, as a student progresses into their career, their perception of self alsochanges. A student may see themselves as a mediator between science and math, a tinkerer or asocial servant striving to better the world [2]. Student thoughts about their future career or“career thoughts” may also affect attitudes, behaviors, beliefs, feelings, plans
it is a requirement for being hired to understand this technology and these programs. Oneadditional survey involved students exposed to this new technology. Students were asked to respondto a series of statements pertaining to the inclusion of BIM for the purpose of structural design as partof the intermediate design courses taught within the authors’ program. With the data from the resultsof these surveys, a plan can be formulated for the inclusion of these new technologies into theteachings of engineering students.For the survey sent to engineering programs, the 24 ABET accredited architectural engineeringprograms were contacted, as well as similar programs at other universities. A total of 32 programswere sent the survey, with 20
site in Panama. This second structure will also be used as a trainingdemonstration site for mission teams to visualize and help plan for construction when in Panama.Shop drawings were created based on the design and implementation. This research involvedcommunity-based activity and engagement in Cieneguita, Panama as well as Lineville, AL.This research is the second phase of a multi-phase research effort. The research wasaccomplished as part of a scholarly capstone project in the Auburn University’s McWhorterSchool of Building Science (BSCI) Master of Building Construction (MBC) Program. Thepurpose of the capstone project is to demonstrate the student's ability to independently explore anew topic, demonstrate appropriate application of the
it for the program”. Addressing the concerns of the affected faculty will help reduce the resistance and pave the way for the change to settle-in. 6- Confirming that the change is going in the right direction by planning for and creating short-term wins. Visible and measurable performance improvements should be assessed and documented, while rewarding the faculty and the change team members involved in these improvements. The low-hanging fruit should be targeted and success results such as improved student performance, successful deployment of new systems, or introdution of new concepts or technologies should be shared with all stakeholders. These early wins will encourage faculty to
achievement level for the use of the more recent technology (i.e., the cloud-based SRS) inthe subject section. Nevertheless, two-sample t-tests showed that the differences in theachievement level were not statistically significant: p-values = 0.157, 0.101 and 0.471 for costestimating, engineering economy, and project planning and control, respectively (Table 3).Hypothesis H2 was therefore not supported.Table 3. Summary of t-tests on actual learning Description Cost estimating Engineering economy Scheduling/control Control Subject Control Subject Control Subject Mean 0.859 0.833 0.810 0.838 0.820 0.834 Variance
.[2] S. Cerri, “EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION SKILLS FOR ENGINEERS,” pp. 625– 629, 2000.[3] G. Tryggvason and D. Apelian, “Re-Engineering Engineering Education for the Challenges of the 21st Century,” JOM, no. 1, p. 1610, 2006.[4] T. J. Kennedy and M. R. L. Odell, “Engaging Students In STEM Education,” Sci. Educ. Int., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 246–258, 2014.[5] Society of Manufacturing Engineers Education Foundation, “Manufacturing Education Plan: Phase 1 Report—Industry Identifies Competency Gaps Among Newly Hired Engineering,” 1997.[6] A. L. Darling and D. P. Dannels, “Practicing engineers talk about the importance of talk: A report on the role of oral communication in the workplace,” Commun. Educ
opportunity to deepen the technical knowledge in a way that was not initially planned as “I was working out of the main office, because of coronavirus cutting short my internship I was not able to be stationed at a specific job long enough to engage in an in-depth study of a particular area. On the contrary, being based out of the headquarters, I was able to study a broad spectrum of projects and areas.”• Essential skill development Like many industries, technical skills are required for the construction industry, but essential skills like interpersonal communication, time management, and problem-solving are not always as developed in students’ experiences as they need for their careers. Employers often remark about the
Paper ID #28604Evaluating the Evolution of Construction Management Students’ ConflictManagement Styles as a Result of Andragogical MethodsDr. David Wesley Martin, Central Washington University Certified Professional Constructor with twelve years professional experience in civil and construction project management encompassing over $400,000,000 worth of vertical and horizontal construction. An additional fifteen years involved in college level construction management instruction and administration including contract and project management techniques, estimating, disputes resolution practices, planning and scheduling, safety
] recommendation to not perform statistical adjustments in the resultswhen a small number of planned comparisons are performed. The items included in the secondhypothesis were: • Women are not fit to be in a jobsite • There is gender discrimination in the construction field • Men are more capable than women in the construction domain • Women in construction are a better fit for office jobs rather than being on the field • I feel recruiters for construction companies prefer hiring males over females for jobsite- related positionsResultsWe have obtained 68 responses to our survey, with 67 respondents being in a constructionrelated major and one being in a construction related minor. Considering the total major studentsin the