design) and designintegration and presentation. The students learn how architects and engineers work together inmulti-disciplinary teams to complete a building design project. The course is assessed each yearthrough course assessment plans, course assessment reports, student course critiques andprogram graduation surveys. Quantitative and qualitative assessment data are presented. Itsupports multiple ABET student outcomes and criteria. Students rate it among their favoriteundergraduate courses. More importantly, it prepares them for their future roles in designing andmanaging real building projects.Keywords: ABET, architecture, civil engineering, engineering design, interdisciplinary, BIMIntroductionUndergraduate civil engineering programs
) and Safety Data, Analysis and Evaluation (ANB20). Former President and General Manager of the Metropolitan Bus Authority (MBA) and Former Executive Director of the Puerto Rico Integrated Transit Authority (PRITA).Dr. Benjamin Colucci, University of Puerto Rico at MayaguezMs. Roc´ıo Juliana Sotomayor-Irizarry, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Developing an Educational Module to Increase Engineering Students’ Knowledge of Highway Work Zones and Temporary Traffic Control PlansAbstractMotor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of fatalities of road users and construction workersin highway work zones. Temporary Traffic Control (TTC) plans are
finished at the same time, one might have to wait until the second is done; parallel teaching – in this mode, the instruction is planned jointly by both (or more) teachers, but it is delivered to only half of the class. An example given by researchers is the use of this type of teaching to explain different points of view of a same topic where each half of the class is instructed on the same topic, but through two different points of view. Then, the whole class can come back together and discuss on the topic using those two points of view; alternative teaching – in this type of co-teaching, one instructor is responsible for a larger
practice plan reading. The main motivation for instructors to incorporatethis software in their classes is to expose students to technology they will encounter aspractitioners, especially significant since contractors view these drawings as a legal descriptionof their scope of work. Therefore, the production and interpretation of the documents requiresthat they exhibit a high level of accuracy, specificity, and clarity.This paper focuses on the use of Bluebeam markup and grading in architectural engineeringcourses to enable communication between faculty and students during the iterative structuraldesign process. The paper provides sample student hand calculations, sketches, and CADstructural drawings with Bluebeam markups provided by practitioner
including construction schedul- ing, planning and control and sustainable building construction and design. Her research is in sustainable built environments, occupant comfort and behavior, indoor environmental quality, and building energy consumption. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Importance of Active Learning in an Undergraduate Course in Construction SchedulingAbstractStudents in construction majors require a variety of skills and knowledge to thrive and leadchange in the industry. The learning process should incorporate strategies that ensure studentsacquire knowledge in the right environment, using up-to-date tools and technology that willsupport
industryadvisors serve as mentors and coaches. The event climax is an intensive one week work periodthat simulates the construction industry environment they will experience after graduation.During this sprint to the finish, students complete their design and construction plans, assembletheir final deliverables, and brief a panel of judges to include real project stakeholders. The paperoutlines assessment of both the event and the student deliverables, with linkages to ABEToutcomes. This case study should prove useful to educators exploring innovative approaches totheir capstone course, those looking to conduct a culminating event in a compressed timeframe,as well as those interested in providing leadership development opportunities for
Paper ID #31322The Outer Space Also Needs ArchitectsDr. Sudarshan Krishnan, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Sudarshan Krishnan specializes in the area of lightweight structures. His current research focuses on the structural design and stability behavior of cable-strut systems and transformable structures. He teaches courses on the planning, analysis and design of structural systems. As an architect and structural designer, he has worked on a range of projects that included houses, hospitals, recreation centers, institutional buildings, and conservation of historic buildings/monuments. Professor
planning, sustainability rating system, and environmental plan assessment.Dr. Elaine Rawley Goetz, Ohio University Office of Sustainability Elaine Goetz is the Director of Sustainability at Ohio University. She has a PhD in Civil Engineering and is a LEED AP O&M. Elaine taught a Sustainable Construction course at Ohio University, a precursor to the LEED Lab course, in the spring of 2018. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Student Construction Sustainability Evaluation: A LEED Lab Case StudyAbstractConstruction sustainability involves processes, decisions, and actions during a project life cycle toenhance the project’s social, economic, and environmental performance. Much of the
. Students write about their experience during the last ten (10) minutes of class. Students wrote they felt “refreshed” after the meditation experience and were going to try to add reflective time to focus on stress management into their schedules. Many students were very concerned about their Life Stressors Index and wrote about coping mechanisms they plan to employ in order to improve their own lives. They also wrote about how they will look for signs of distress in their construction crews and work to improve work-life balance for themselves and their subordinates.Week 4 – Leadership, Personality, and Learning Styles The module begins by juxtaposing the definitions of leadership and management. For this first class in the
introduces new ideas to the classroom that increases their engagement. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Challenges and Opportunities Observed in the Implementation of a New Architectural Engineering Undergraduate Academic ProgramAbstractIn the fall of 2018, a new, first-of-its-kind in Canada architectural engineering undergraduateprogram was launched. The program features 24 months of compulsory / inclusive coop workexperience, along with a series of core studio courses in each of the eight academic terms. Eachof these courses will involve the planning and execution of a series of design projects thatintegrate and put into practice concepts covered in the other courses the students
interest is in the mechanical properties of glass at room and high temperature. Dr. Gonzalez has also a broad experience in the glass industry, specifically in fabrication of automotive safety glass. He worked for Vitro Glass Company for more than 19 years where he held different positions such as Process Engineer, Materials Planning and Logistics Manager, Production Superintendent, Manufacturing Engineer and Glass Technologist. During his time in the company, he co-authored two patents related to glass fabrication and glass coatings pro- cessing. Dr. Gonzalez is a Six-Sigma Black Belt and has participated in numerous process improvement projects. He has been trained as well in the Methodology of Inventive Problem
. Subsequently, thescholarship has been awarded to provide funding for the construction material. The planning ofthis project also involved coordination with the regional food bank, Island Harvest, who iscurrently operating a community garden on a leased plot on campus. The garden providedsufficient context for the participating students to generate a wide range of design schemes.Also, faculty from the Department of Urban Horticulture & Design collaborated during theplanning phase. Two of the Architectural Engineering Technology students from the author’sprevious courses, Konstantinos Neofitos and Daniella Lima De Freitas Smyth, volunteered toparticipate in this research.ProcessPedagogical ApproachThe pedagogical strategy for this pilot project
; 3D modeling for construction planning; autonomous 3D model generation; and virtual reality.Dr. Eduardo Luis Isatto, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Eduardo Isatto is an Associate Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) and a member of the Building Innovation Research Unit (NORIE) since 1997. He has a doctoral degree in Civil Engineering and a master’s degree in Industrial Engineering, from the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. His main research interests are connected with the application of lean production to the construction industry, comprehending research areas as BIM, project management, production systems design, procurement
(floorplan development, dimensioning, simple drawing annotation), and introduce new concepts ofbuilding details. Student will be asked to do a self-review of existing documents, and makemodifications to prep for new details. • Recall dimensioning style for wood frame structure • Review simple construction document annotation • Introduce Uniform Drawing Standards • Introduce development of building sectionsAssignment Task: • Review existing plans for errors and omissions. • Introduce footer and foundations criteria • Introduce building codes • Re-created building sectionsAssignment Criteria: • Develop floor plan with notes, dimensions • Develop elevations with notes and dimensions
;Cohen, 2007). Mendoza-Denton et al. (2006) indicate that social support can mitigate thesechilling effects. Further, Mendoza-Denton et al. (2006) cited mentoring and cross-groupfriendships (so forming friendships with those in the other group – between genders or betweenethnicities/races, e.g.) as forms of social support that they found to have such a mitigatingeffect. Therefore, the proposed student tutoring and resource center is also planned to providesome social events to encourage student friendships, such as these important cross-groupfriendships in addition to the natural mentoring that can develop through tutoring.Belonging has been tied to self-efficacy and engagement, which also are tied to positive careeroutcomes (aka persistence in
. González, F. Orozco, A. Opazo, Á. Suazo, and P. Aránguiz, "Application of Problem-Based Learning to Teaching the Critical Path Method," Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 141, no. 3, 2015.[11] L. Prieto, "Active learning in the college classroom: A case study of problem-based learning.," (in Spanish), Miscelánea Comillas: Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales (Spanish), no. 64(124), pp. 173–196, 2006.[12] A. Shepherd, Cosgriff, Bryna, , "Problem-Based Learning: A Bridge between Planning Education and Planning Practice," Journal of Planning Education and Research, 1998.[13] B. Tomkinson, R. Tomkinson, H. Dobson, and C. Engel, "Education for sustainable development – an inter‐disciplinary
the beams. Despite this,prompting the students to think about shear failure in this context improved their understandingof this topic. It should also be noted that a few students commented in the survey that theywished lecture had provided more guidance as to how to layout reinforcing prior to beamfabrication. While the request is understandable, the variety in reinforcing configurations alsoadded a creative component and a wider sample of results. This would not be the case iflectures had a more prescriptive approach to reinforcement for the lab. The individuals thatrequested this may have brought down the score for lecture preparedness slightly, but the overallscore was still strong and there are no plans to modify this approach in future
professional engineer in Construction and Structural Engineering. Her masters and doctoral degrees are from the University of Oklahoma in Construction Administration and Engineering respectively.Dr. Sandeep Langar, The University of Texas at San Antonio Dr. Sandeep Langar is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Construction Science in College of Architecture, Construction, and Planning at The University of Texas at San Antonio. He received his Ph.D. in Environmental Design and Planning from College of Architecture and Urban Studies at Virginia Tech. He is also a licensed architect in India. Dr. Langar has authored multiple publications analyzing the implementation of Building Information Modeling (BIM) and its impact
has been integrating innovative and novel educational paradigms in STEM education to support student engagement, retention, and diversity.Prof. Omar Youssef, University of Arizona Dr. Omar Youssef is a Lecturer at University of Arizona (UofA), College of Architecture, Planning, and Landscape Architecture, and the School of Sustainable Built Environments. A Building Scientist in the Institute on Place and Wellbeing Performance. An Architecture Designer in Practice focusing on Environmental Application within the Industry. Dr. Youssef has extensive industry experience of constructed large-scale projects. Omar’s interdisciplinary background combines between Architecture Practice, Environmental Sciences, Health and
other groups and instructors,and ultimately built four hunting cabins. The results of this paper were produced from the data gathered atthe end of this camp. The main objective of this study was to explore students’ perceptions toward thecamp and use their feedback and preferences in subsequence camps. The students’ perceptions are animportant input for the construction educator to plan accordingly and increase the quality of academicpreparation and the quantity of student enrollments. The survey aimed to consider factors that impactstudents’ perceptions before entering construction programs. Students expressed their expectation ofsalary and time on the job requirements. The reported numbers were close to the reality which eliminatesthe blind
structural courseworkrequirements and overlapping industry relationships. As all of these graduates will end up in theconstruction related industry, it is of interest how their perceptions vary.IntroductionStudents and faculty alike can question the validity of certain coursework to a degree program.As the ABET requirements change over time, programs respond to the change with curriculumchanges [1} Additionally, as a student progresses into their career, their perception of self alsochanges. A student may see themselves as a mediator between science and math, a tinkerer or asocial servant striving to better the world [2]. Student thoughts about their future career or“career thoughts” may also affect attitudes, behaviors, beliefs, feelings, plans
it is a requirement for being hired to understand this technology and these programs. Oneadditional survey involved students exposed to this new technology. Students were asked to respondto a series of statements pertaining to the inclusion of BIM for the purpose of structural design as partof the intermediate design courses taught within the authors’ program. With the data from the resultsof these surveys, a plan can be formulated for the inclusion of these new technologies into theteachings of engineering students.For the survey sent to engineering programs, the 24 ABET accredited architectural engineeringprograms were contacted, as well as similar programs at other universities. A total of 32 programswere sent the survey, with 20
achievement level for the use of the more recent technology (i.e., the cloud-based SRS) inthe subject section. Nevertheless, two-sample t-tests showed that the differences in theachievement level were not statistically significant: p-values = 0.157, 0.101 and 0.471 for costestimating, engineering economy, and project planning and control, respectively (Table 3).Hypothesis H2 was therefore not supported.Table 3. Summary of t-tests on actual learning Description Cost estimating Engineering economy Scheduling/control Control Subject Control Subject Control Subject Mean 0.859 0.833 0.810 0.838 0.820 0.834 Variance
.[2] S. Cerri, “EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION SKILLS FOR ENGINEERS,” pp. 625– 629, 2000.[3] G. Tryggvason and D. Apelian, “Re-Engineering Engineering Education for the Challenges of the 21st Century,” JOM, no. 1, p. 1610, 2006.[4] T. J. Kennedy and M. R. L. Odell, “Engaging Students In STEM Education,” Sci. Educ. Int., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 246–258, 2014.[5] Society of Manufacturing Engineers Education Foundation, “Manufacturing Education Plan: Phase 1 Report—Industry Identifies Competency Gaps Among Newly Hired Engineering,” 1997.[6] A. L. Darling and D. P. Dannels, “Practicing engineers talk about the importance of talk: A report on the role of oral communication in the workplace,” Commun. Educ
Paper ID #28604Evaluating the Evolution of Construction Management Students’ ConflictManagement Styles as a Result of Andragogical MethodsDr. David Wesley Martin, Central Washington University Certified Professional Constructor with twelve years professional experience in civil and construction project management encompassing over $400,000,000 worth of vertical and horizontal construction. An additional fifteen years involved in college level construction management instruction and administration including contract and project management techniques, estimating, disputes resolution practices, planning and scheduling, safety