Conference Session

Distance Education and Engineering Workforce Professional Development

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vedaraman Sriraman, Texas State University, San Marcos; Wayne W. Wheatley; Valerie Ann Little

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

sponsor. Review potential industry projects and match with intern’s interests. ii. Begin the NDA process with Legal department b. Three Months before assignment i. Complete the NDA process ii. Review and select industry project(s) c. One Month before assignment Page 23.593.6 i. Start the onboarding process. 1. Background check 2. Drug Screening ii. Pre-work for industry assignment 1. General background information on assigned project (non

Conference Session

Distance Education and Engineering Workforce Professional Development

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kim A. Scalzo, State University of New York, HQ; Lisa Miles Raposo, State University of New York Center for Professional Development

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

interests and dependent upon the availability offunding campus by campus, as well as on the willingness of others within the system to shareinformation and best practices. Additionally, while there is a Center for ProfessionalDevelopment, not all professional development across SUNY is offered or tracked centrally, soimpact is difficult to measure.In response to the range of challenges being faced, the SUNY Center for ProfessionalDevelopment (CPD) has decided to develop and implement a series of competency-basedcertificate programs to address common and recurring professional development needs for rolesthat exist within targeted CoPs across the system.ApproachBuilding on s successful course development model for online professional master’s

Conference Session

Distance Education and Engineering Workforce Professional Development

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mitchell L Springer PMP, SPHR, SHRM-SCP, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Gary R. Bertoline, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Mark T Schuver, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

. 2nd ed. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.5 Kerzner, H. (2009). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling and Controlling. 10th ed. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons (p. 83).6 Blanchard, B. S. & Fabrycky, W. J. (2011). Systems Engineering and Analysis. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall (p. 34).7 Dessler, G. (2011). Human Resource Management. 12th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall (p. 22).8 Seaman, D. F. & Fellenz, R. A. (1989). Effective Strategies for Teaching Adults. Columbus, OH.: Merrill Publishing (p. 8).9 Kasworm, C., Rose, A. & Ross-Gordon, J. (2010). Handbook of Adult and Continuing Education. 2010 ed. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage

Conference Session

Distance Education and Engineering Workforce Professional Development

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cyrus Habibi P.E., Minnesota State University, Mankato; Tina alaei; Andrew Lillesve, IRE

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

.Sheppard S., Macatangay K., Colby A., Sullivan W. M. (2009), “Educating engineers: designing for the future of thefield, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Base3.Felder R.M., Brent R. (2003),” Designing and Teaching courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering Criteria,” Journal ofEngineering Education, Vol. 92, No 1, pp7-25.4.Thomas, J.W. 2000. A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation.5.Savage R., Chen K., Vanasupa L. (2007),” Integrating Project-based Learning. New York, NY: Routledge Publisher6.Blumenfeld, P.C., Soloway E., Marx R.W., Krajcik J.S., Guzdial M, Palinscar A. (1991),”Motivating Project-BasedLearning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning,” Education Psychologist, Vol. 26, pp. 369-3987.Brito C

Conference Session

Distance Education and Engineering Workforce Professional Development

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ed Alef, Rochester College; Soma Chakrabarti, University of Kansas

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

23.4.5Operating Philosophy:The most efficient way to operate an effective and efficient TCEP is with teamwork. Theprinciple players on the team are: 1. Technical Community Leadership 2. University Partner(s) 3. Human Resource Management 4. Employee University Partner 1. Tailored Curriculum 2. Application-Oriented Faculty 3. Technical Graduate DegreeHuman Relations Technical Community 1. Career Path Management 1. Champion the TCEP 2. Efficiency of Operations 2. Content

Conference Session

Faculty and Course Evolution: Teaching With Technology, Online Delivery, and Addressing Emerging Student & Industry Needs

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mitchell L Springer PMP, SPHR, SHRM-SCP, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Mark T Schuver, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

Incoming Working Professional Students. In Proceedings of the 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. San Antonio, TX.: American Society for Engineering Education.6 Triola, M. (2010). Elementary Statistics. 11th Ed. San Francisco, CA.: Addison-Wesley.7 College of Technology (2012). 2012 MS Student Handbook. West Lafayette, IN.: Graduate Office, College of Technology.8 Dyrenfurth, M., Newton, K., Schuver, M. & Elliott, S. (2009). ROI: Return on Investment as a Factor in Designing Graduate Research Projects for Mutual Benefit. In Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. Austin, TX.: American Society for Engineering Education. Page 23.1276.9

Conference Session

Faculty and Course Evolution: Teaching With Technology, Online Delivery, and Addressing Emerging Student & Industry Needs

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael J. Richards, U.S. Air Force Academy; Daniel D. Jensen, U.S. Air Force Academy; Jason Daniel Christopher, USAFA/DFEM

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

. Adams, R.S., and Felder, R.M. (2008). Reframing Professional Development: A systems approach to preparingengineering educators to educate tomorrow’s engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 239–240.2. Boice, R. (2000). Advice for New Faculty Members: Nihil Nimus. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.3. Felder, R.M., Brent, R.,and Prince, M. J. (2011) Engineering instructional Development: Programs, BestPractices, and Recommendations. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 89-122.4. Fink, D.L., Ambrose, S. and Wheeler, D. (2005). Becoming a professional engineering educator: A new role for a Page 23.1356.9new era. Journal of

Conference Session

Distance Education and Engineering Workforce Professional Development

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tim Boyd, Northrop Grumman Corporation; Eric Paul Pearson, Northrop Grumman, Electronic Systems; Noah Miller, Northrop Grumman, Electronic Systems

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

Page 23.158.11Planner / Leader(s) (2-4)The planners are the key to the successful creation, development and execution of a leadershipweekend summit. Between two and four extreme leaders who have completed their LTPexperiences volunteer their time, thoughts and personal visions to create a weekend summitretreat. They spend between six and twelve months creating a theme, developing a programstructure, soliciting a cadre of volunteers to assist in the development and execution phases of theprogram and leading the four day/three night experiential leadership event for up to ninetyvolunteer participants, coaches, session champions and group coaches.The efforts are similar to serving as a program manager who has won a project, must select andlead a

Conference Session

Distance Education and Engineering Workforce Professional Development

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Noah Miller, Northrop Grumman, Electronic Systems; Timothy Boyd, Northrop Grumman Corporation; Eric Paul Pearson, Northrop Grumman

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

likewooden dowels, plastic wheels, rubber bands and LEGOs.Participants are expected to maintain full engagement, share personal experiences with others Page 23.1403.15and work through common goals during challenges, case studies, community service, design-to-build competitions and feedback sessions. These activities occur between 6:00 P.M. onThursday and 11:00 A.M. on Sunday morning. Few hours are wasted on sleep and relaxation asthe participants become fully integrated into their team responsibilities and cherish theopportunities to network and practice leadership sessions. Offsite Weekend Leadership Summit Participants (Sample #s