Conference Session

CPDD Session 1 - Generating Intellectual Excitement for Professional Learners

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ben Bernard, North Dakota State University; Jeremy Straub, North Dakota State University

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

section of the paper provides detail on the experimental design comparing cybersecurityeducation provided in the intensive ‘boot camp’ format to traditional academic semester courseformat and how both qualitative and quantitative data is collected and analyzed.Instructional staff will offer the same cybersecurity curriculum via the traditional academicsemester three credit hour format and an intensive two-week boot camp to provide a directcomparison of strengths and weaknesses of the two course delivery models.Instructional staff will offer cybersecurity boot camps teaching both defensive network securityand ethical hacking. The boot camp cohort will study a minimum of forty hours per week overtwo weeks per subject; defensive network security

Conference Session

CPDD Session 1 - Generating Intellectual Excitement for Professional Learners

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kerrie A. Douglas, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Hillary E. Merzdorf, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

is a PhD student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research inter- ests are in assessment of digital engineering learning environments, evaluation of educational technology, and the ethical use of student data. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Framework for Evaluation of Large Online Graduate Level Courses for Engineers AbstractMassive open online course (MOOC) platforms have evolved from providing primarily coursesthat are free or low-cost to working with industries and universities to offer credentials, advanceddegrees and professional education. As more engineering schools and corporations developpartnerships with MOOC

Conference Session

CPDD Session 2 - Professional Development - Where Are We Going?

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Mitchell L. Springer PMP, SPHR, SHRM-SCP, Purdue Polytechnic Institute; Kathryne Newton, Purdue Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

 Corporations, States, education..The authors [p. 7] characterize this generation as:  Wanting to find solutions to problems  Knows how to use technology to do so  Having a strong work ethic like Boomers  Responsible and resilient like their Gen X parents  Technologically savvier than Millennials (Gen Y)  Describe themselves as:  Loyal (85%), thoughtful (80%), compassionate (73%), open-minded (70%), responsible (90%)While individual studies are important in that they provide data for future comparison andunderstanding, by themselves, they are simply a snapshot in time. To truly understand cohortcultural change over time, specific ages of individuals within one cohort must be compared toages of