agencies, national labs, and non-profits. We have established a purpose-built model to accel- erate Cincinnati as a talent hub and beacon for innovation–in years, not decades.Josefine Fleetwood, Oregon State University American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Virtual Internships: Accelerating Opportunity Through Disruption Abstract Experiential learning programs like internships and capstone projects are high-impact practices that allow engineering students to build a professional network, apply technical skills in a real-world context, and
complex engineering design projects. Her scholarship is grounded in notions of learning as a social process, influenced by complexity theories, sociocultural theories, sociolinguistics, and the learning sciences.Ms. Kate FisherProf. Zachary Holman, Arizona State UniversityMathew D. Evans, Arizona State University Mathew D Evans is currently a doctoral candidate at the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Fostering Belonging through an Undergraduate Summer Internship: A Community of Practice model for engineering research educationIn the 21st century, it is not sufficient for engineering students to acquire good
years.The paper concludes with a discussion of the program’s efficacy and participant benefits.Planned future changes and activities are also discussed.2. BackgroundThis section presents prior work in two areas relevant to the current study. First, prior work onexperiential education and project-based learning is presented. Next, prior relevant work incybersecurity is discussed.2.1. Experiential Education & Project-based LearningUndergraduate research experiences, as the name would suggest, fall squarely in the category ofexperiential education. Undergraduate research is a project, with answering the identified researchquestions as its key goal (from students’ perspectives). For educators, undergraduate researchprojects seek to provide students
considered. Potential topics for future investigation are also identified.2. BackgroundThis section provides background on prior work in three relevant areas. First, REU sites aredescribed. Next, prior work on experiential education, project-based learning and theirassessment is reviewed. Finally, prior research on cohort-creation and team bonding for college-age students is presented.2.1. REU sitesThe National Science Foundation REU program brings together cohorts of undergraduatestudents to study topics within NSF supported disciplines. Many REU sites have an overarchingtheme to them that relates to a sub-discipline or interdisciplinary collaboration.REU sites inherently vary from institution to institution, as each institution proposes
(WIP) paper will explore the Grand Valley State University (GVSU)Seymour & Esther Padnos College of Engineering & Computing’s (PCEC) commitment todeveloping and sustaining industry and K-12 partnerships. Our engineering programs weredeveloped at the request of, and in collaboration with, industry stakeholders in order to bolsterthe professional workforce in West Michigan. Since conception, our programs have grownstrategically in response to the changing needs of local employers. Recently, the addition of anew Innovation Design Center with dedicated space for K-12 outreach, industry project work,and applied research and development has inspired us to think creatively about the ways inwhich we are engaging with industry and the
- cialization Fund (TCF), DOE-NE’s Consolidated Innovative Nuclear Research- Construction Group, and Oak Ridge Institute of Science and Education (managed by Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU) for DOE). Dr. Raheem has a research portfolio of more than $2 million with projects funded by various U.S. federal agencies and non-profit organizations such as the U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Department of State, U.S. National Science Foundation and VentureWell. Her research interests include sustainable cities, construction safety, construction management, and sustainable construction. She is an EnvisionTM Sustainability Professional (ENV SP), a certified associate member of the Design-Build Institute of Amer- ica (Assoc
graduation. A summer research project with a faculty-directed laboratorybefore the sophomore year and a self-directed research project prior to the junior year were usedto build project management experience, along with a paid, external internship in a professionalorganization likely to hire within the student’s major. Based upon the limited data collected sofar, the researchers seem to have been conclusively demonstrated that a structured, ‘high-touch’program with a heavy experiential component can successfully move low-SES students withSTEM inclinations through a highly ranked institution. Counselling to reduce the anxietysurrounding the collegiate process for first generation students and some form of scholarshipsupport to reduce the financial
that they are gainingknowledge, skills, and abilities in research; (2) having a mentor to guide and learn from; (3)working on a real-world cybersecurity problem; (4) working in a team that is cohesive; and (5)do not feel they have a short amount of time to work on a project. It is important to note that theresults should be interpreted carefully, because of the small sample and large variances.IntroductionCyber technologies are growing at a substantial rate and are impacting almost every sector ofsociety. These cyber technologies provide innumerable benefits that mostly result in improvingmodern life. However, along with the benefits, cyber threats are increasing in occurrences,unpredictability, size, and speed [1]–[3], and that affects our
(STEM).Dr. Tamara Ball, University of California, Santa Cruz Dr. Tamara Ball is a project-scientist working with several education and research centers at the Univer- sity of California, Santa Cruz. Her work with the Institute for Science and Engineer Educators focuses on informing efforts to redesign undergraduate STEM education to reflect workplace practice and engage stu- dents in authentic scientific inquiry and problem solving through design. Her work Sustainable Engineer- ing and Ecological Design (SEED) collaborative at has focused on developing programmatic structures to support interdisciplinary and collaborative learning spaces for sustainability studies. She is the program director for Impact Designs
and graduate students. This survey includes a number ofkey questions which include: I am interested in seeking employment in the field that I participated in: I believe that participation will aid me in securing employment when graduating: On a scale of 1 to 9, please rate your technical skill in your area of focus before starting work on the project: On a scale of 1 to 9, please rate your level of comfort with the contest activities topic before starting work on the project: On a scale of 1 to 9, please rate your level of excitement with the contest activities topic before starting work on the project: On a scale of 1 to 9, please rate your
, persistence, and ability to attain a co-op?”BackgroundThe data in this paper is being derived from the students’ perspective in a new program calledthe Bell program. The Bell program, a Bachelor of Science in Engineering program, wasestablished in 2019 with an aim to increase student success, decrease student debt, and allowstudents to gain up to two years of on-the-job experience prior to graduation. In the process ofprogram development, the Bell program has been identified, in a study by MIT, as an “emergingglobal leader in engineering education” [4].This engineering education model featuring project-based learning is based off an existingprogram, Iron Range Engineering, which has been around for over ten years. Iron RangeEngineering continues to
the programfor continuing to improve the experience and success of future cohorts.I. Design-Based Research MethodThe curricular development work for this project-based learning (PBL) program began in 2016[1] utilizing design-based research (DBR) as the methodology for both design and research.Design-based research (DBR) was adopted as the methodology to 1) address learning theories, 2)to study learning in context, 3) to develop measures of learning, and 4) to contribute to newdesigns and learning theories [2] for the program development. The work incorporates the fourphases of DBR identified by Kolmos [3]: design; implementation; data collection and analysis;and findings and conclusions. The DBR phases were adapted and combined with
instruction to students as they progress through the senior capstone project and develop relationships with project stakeholders in industry. She also supports engineering communications program development, research, and implementation. In addition to her Ph. D. research interests in service learning, program de- sign, and qualitative research, she is also collaborating on research in the areas of communications-related success factors of recent engineering graduates in industry and effective tools for instructors of integrated engineering and communications courses. Donald Heer: Donald Heer received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Computer Engineering from Oregon State University in 2001 and 2003, respectively. In 2003, Mr
education curriculum with a focus on laboratory courses for the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department. His courses leverage project-based learning, experiential learning, and self-paced activities. David has over ten years of industry experience specializing in mixed-signal RF integrated circuit design, power systems, and power electronics.Mr. Ben Guengerich, University of Minnesota - Anderson Student Innovation Labs Ben Guengerich is the Manager of the Anderson Student Innovation Labs at the University of Minnesota. The labs provide engineering students open access to prototyping equipment and give them the freedom to work on projects aligned with their personal and
Paper ID #34183Virtual Globalization: An Experience for Engineering Students in theEducation 4.0 FrameworkDr. Patricia Caratozzolo P.E., Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey Patricia Caratozzolo was born in Buenos Aires, Argentina. She received the Ph.D. degree from the Uni- versitat Polit´ecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, in 2003. Since 2005 she has been a member of the faculty of Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey, Campus Santa Fe, where she is Assistant Professor of Power Energy Systems in the Mechatronics and Sustainable Development Department. She is leading different projects in the area of educational innovation, teaching
the Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education & Prac- tice (ISTEP) in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, which serves as a hub for pedagogical innovation and transdisciplinary engineering education. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Post-Secondary Work Integrated Learning through STEM OutreachAbstractThis work in progress paper reports on a multi-year project designed to articulate the learningand employability skills gained by a pan-Canadian group of undergraduate students, by way oftheir training and work experience as youth program “instructors” delivering
engineeringdisciplines, and the context of their research varied considerably. Some students were part oflarge, established experimental laboratories while other students worked individually or in smallgroups on computational or theoretical projects. As this course was launched in Fall 2020,students in this class experienced the additional challenge of starting college (and undergraduateresearch) remotely during a global pandemic. The design and content of this course wereevaluated using anonymous feedback and a review of reflective discussion posts in order todetermine whether the course supported the stated learning goals. This evaluation indicates thatstudents found the course material helpful in understanding their role as undergraduate researchassistants
and group problem solving, which was anideal fit for a research problem focused on providing better resources for a group of highlyinvolved, capable students with a lot of thoughts and ideas to contribute. The specific designthinking model used in the study was the nonlinear, five-step process popularized by Stanford’sd.school. An image showing the design thinking process is included below in Figure 1 [7].Figure 1: Stanford d.school Design Thinking ModelThis paper encompasses the first three stages in the design thinking process, stopping just shortof the prototyping phase. The prototype and test phases of the project are ongoing, but are largelyoutside the scope of what could reasonably be contained in this publication. Because the
Collaboration, Experiential Learning, and Design ThinkingGiven the national and local significance of public infrastructure decline and current policydebates over how to fund replacement and repair, we developed a course that explicitly focusedon the problems with Syracuse’s aging wastewater system [24], [25]. In order to provide contextand relevance, we used a collaborative framework to create an experiential learning project inwhich student teams collaborated with local stakeholders to explore the real world challenges ofmaintaining wastewater systems in a resource-constrained city. In addition, we integrated adesign thinking process to engage students in empathy/ethics-based methods and approaches toproblem solving.Collaborative FrameworkThe course
of the scales and an acceptable level of internal consistency wasestablished for each dataset (Table 2).The Innovation Self-Efficacy (ISE) scale represents an average of five items that measureconfidence in one’s ability to “ask a lot of questions,” “experiment as a way to understand howthings work,” and “connect concepts and ideas that appear, at first glance, to be unconnected.”ISE was measured on a five-point Likert scale ranging from “Not confident” (0) to “Extremelyconfident” (4).Engineering Task Self-Efficacy (ETSE) also measures confidence in one’s ability to “conductexperiments, build prototypes, or construct mathematical models to develop or evaluate adesign,” “design a new product or project to meet specified requirements,” and
’ career and professionaldevelopment. When interpreting Figure 1, it should be noted that the Senior Design programintersects with the SEE Initiative but is not part of the new initiative. Because the Senior Designcourse is already a prominent and well-established part of students’ senior year, the SEEInitiative focuses primarily on students’ experiences in the department prior to their senior year.The Senior Design course provides an opportunity for students to work closely with industrythrough sponsored design projects. It is structured to emulate an industry-based engineering teamenvironment and has been very well reviewed by students, faculty and industry sponsors with thecourse consistently rated above its targets (4.0 on a five point rating
collected however, the sample was approximately evenlydivided between men and women.Interns were recruited to participate in the interview by email invitation from the Director ofHuman Resources in the Product Development division. The purpose of the interview was tolearn more about the interns’ journey at the company, get their feedback with the intent ofimproving the internship experience, and to better understand the transition process between anacademic setting to a corporate environment. While all interns worked in product development,their internship assignments varied in level of technical focus, from projects focused onelectronics and programming to project management.The audio interviews were conducted over the phone and lasted
participation in non-engineering clubs orhumanitarian engineering projects to be significantly associated with students’ interdisciplinaryskill development. The researchers suggested the benefits of students interacting with students innon-engineering majors through these activities.Typologies of involvement. Student typologies provide an additional approach to investigatingthe distinct effects of involvement for different students [29], [67]–[71]. These approachesconsider student subcultures by classifying students according to common characteristics,including types of involvement [72]. Researchers have further linked student typologies todifferences in self-reported development [70]. Contradicting some previously discussed findings,these studies have