University of Washington’s Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching (CELT). His research and teaching interests include engineering design, major choice, and professional portfolios. He completed an A.B. in computer science at Dartmouth College and a Ph.D. in computer science and engineering at the University of Wash- ington. When he finds the time, he enjoys cooking, photography, bicycle repair, and cycling (instead of owning a car). Page 23.380.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Designing for Communities: The Impact of Domain Expertise
and their coaches. Withhelp from the best faculty coaches, and guidance from published literature on team dynamics and“coaching for success,” a “how-to” guide was developed as a resource for faculty projectcoaches. This guide includes elements such as an overview of the IPPD program, roles andresponsibilities for various stakeholders, a collection of best practices for mentoring and conflictmanagement, and a frequently-asked-questions section. Since the IPPD program ismultidisciplinary, an appendix with a set of expectations for each participating undergraduatediscipline was developed.The IPPD Coach Guide is intended to be a framework for capturing and sharing with thecapstone design community a set of best practices for team
students have in idea generation and development and the impact that instruction canhave on their incorporation of best practices.IntroductionTo solve major challenges of the 21st century, engineers must be prepared to use designprinciples that lead to innovative solutions [1]. ABET also emphasizes the importance of trainingundergraduate engineering students to develop design skills [2]. In a design process, ideageneration and development are important steps that contribute to the innovative designoutcomes [3]. However, research indicates challenges for students in generating creativeconcepts for open-ended design problems [4]. Successful implementations of creative ideas can lead to innovation. Ideally, ideageneration and development
Paper ID #16011The Prototype for X (PFX) Framework: Assessing Its Impact on Students’Prototyping AwarenessMs. Jessica Menold, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Jessica Menold is a third-year graduate student interested in entrepreneurship and the design process. She is currently conducting her graduate research with Dr. Kathryn Jablokow and Dr. Timothy Simpson on a project devoted to understanding how prototyping processes affect product design. Jessica is interested in exploring how a structured prototyping methodology, Prototype for X, could increase the end design’s desirability, feasibility, and
Academy.Dr. A. Fort Gwinn, Lipscomb University Dr Fort Gwinn is associate dean of the Raymond B Jones College of Engineering at Lipscomb University and also teaches Mechanical Engineering courses in machine design, vibrations, and finite element anal- ysis. Prior to coming to Lipscomb University in 1999, he spent 22 years in the automotive and aerospace testing industry where he gained valuable insights in engineering design and analysis. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Human-Centered Design Incorporated in the Freshman Year through an Active Learning Engineering Design Lab: Best Practices, Lessons Learned, and Proposed ImprovementsAbstractEngineering
innovation unit (CEIT), an educational designer, the first-semester course coordinator, various academics from the Faculty of Engineering from theExecutive Dean to engineering materials research experts, and machine shop staff. Inaddition, peers from other institutions were given various conceptual drafts for theircomment.With the context of the course mapped, and stakeholders engaged, the next step was to setrealistic learning goals based on a “rationale that reflects the beliefs, theories and assumptionsabout engineering practice, educational goals and learning”5 (p.148). The new course needed toshift in its treatment of design from the preceding first-semester course towards theapplication of virtual prototyping and physical manufacturing of
lecture courses on developing creativity and research skills. Her current research focuses on identifying impacts of differ- ent factors on ideation of designers and engineers, developing instructional materials for design ideation, and foundations of innovation. She often conducts workshops on design thinking to a diverse range of groups including student and professional engineers and faculty member from different universities. She received her PhD degree in Design Science in 2010 from University of Michigan. She is also a faculty in Human Computer Interaction Graduate Program and the ISU Site Director for Center for e-Design.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of MichiganEli M. Silk, Rutgers, The State University of New
and light gauge steel design and construction. Page 13.1130.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Sustainable Research and Design in a Civil Engineering Senior Design CourseAbstractIn an effort to help students understand the broader impacts of land development, a significantsustainability component was added to a capstone senior design project course in a small civilengineering program. This year-long course traditionally involves students completingstraightforward designs in the areas of structural, transportation, geotechnical, and municipalenvironmental engineering. In a
Paper ID #12879Exploring the Impact of Cognitive Preferences on Student Receptivity to De-sign ThinkingMs. Jessica Menold Menold, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Jessica Menold is a second year graduate student interested in entrepreneurship, the design process, and innovativeness of engineering graduates and professionals. She is currently working as a student mentor in the Lion Launch Pad program, where she works to support student entrepreneurs. Jessica is currently conducting her graduate research with Dr. Kathryn Jablokow on a project devoted to the development of a psychometric instrument that will
Paper ID #22268The ’Structured’ Engineering Design Notebook: A New Tool for Design Think-ing within a Studio Design CourseMs. Kristen Clapper Bergsman, University of Washington Kristen Clapper Bergsman is the Engineering Education Research Manager at the Center for Sensorimo- tor Neural Engineering at the University of Washington, where she is also a doctoral student and graduate research assistant in Learning Sciences and Human Development. Previously, Kristen worked as an ed- ucational consultant offering support in curriculum design and publication. She received her M.Ed. in Curriculum and Instruction (Science Education
advantageous opportunity toprepare future engineers analytically, practically, and morally. Integrated ethics content canencourage students to practice “what is right to do and how will my decisions impact thesociotechnical and societal norms within society?” The process of seeking answers for thesequestions can help students to recognize the ethical and moral conflicts as a part of designproblems. In a complex design process, there are often conflicts, and these potential conflictsshould be considered simultaneously by design engineers [7].Researchers conceptualize the design process and propose moral reflections with distinctapproaches that are informed by empirical research in socio-technical contexts [6]. While someempirical studies look into
Paper ID #8886Exploring the Impact of Cognitive Style and Academic Discipline on DesignPrototype VariabilityDr. Kathryn Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Kathryn Jablokow is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Design at Penn State University. A graduate of Ohio State University (Ph.D., Electrical Engineering), Dr. Jablokow’s teaching and research interests include problem solving, invention, and creativity in science and engineer- ing, as well as robotics and computational dynamics. In addition to her membership in ASEE, she is a Senior Member of IEEE and a Fellow of ASME. Dr
students for the changingdesign processes they will encounter after graduation.17,18 Incorporating stakeholder interactioninto the design process can be challenging for students who do not typically encounter thesetasks during early engineering coursework. Prior research on student understanding and use ofstakeholder interaction during the design process has found that students do not always interactwith stakeholders successfully (as outlined in the design practice literature).19–21 Some of thedifficulties student encounter when attempting to interact with stakeholders causes them toneglect or dismiss stakeholder interaction during design.20,22 Thus, more research is needed todevelop pedagogy for teaching these complex processes.This study sought
GE’s Design for Six Sigma initiative. Dr. Steiner has taught advanced design methods to hundreds of new and experienced engineers. His research interests include; design education, product architecture, mechanical reliability, design for manufacture and quality. Mark graduated from Rensselaer with a B.S. in mechanical engineering in 1978 and a Ph.D. in 1987. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Framework for Developing a Deeper Understanding of the Factors that Influence Success and Failure in Undergraduate Engineering Capstone Design ExperiencesAbstractThe engineering undergraduate curriculum presents substantial opportunities for
Virginia. Her research interests include engineering design education (especially in regards to the design of complex systems), student preparation for post-graduation careers, approaches for supporting education research-to-practice. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Preparing Students for a Collaborative Engineering Design Work Environment: A Study of Practicing EngineersAbstractRecent studies within design and engineering education have focused on better preparingengineering graduates to function within an industry design environment. Increased emphasis inthis area is motivated by a growing concern that graduates are entering industry with littleexperience engaging
Paper ID #18835Designing a Course for Peer Educators in Undergraduate Engineering De-sign CoursesMs. Gina Marie Quan, University of Maryland, College Park Gina Quan is a doctoral candidate in Physics Education Research at the University of Maryland, College Park. She graduated in 2012 with a B.A. in Physics from the University of California, Berkeley. Her research interests include understanding community and identity formation, unpacking students’ relation- ships to design, and cultivating institutional change. Ms. Quan is also a founding member of the Access Network, a research-practice community dedicated to
the bottom of pages for the author’s signature, a witness’s signature, and a 2date of completion. Recently, as technologies develop, the use of electronic engineering 36notebooks has been a focus of research (in both engineering and science) , although they have 710never been fully implemented as standard engineering practice. A variety of electronic formats have been envisioned for documenting student design project progress examples of which 9 1112 13 14include online
Paper ID #28780Student practices developing needs statements for design problemsMr. Robert P. Loweth, University of Michigan Robert P. Loweth is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. He earned a B.S. in Engineering Sciences from Yale University, with a double major in East Asian Studies. He also holds a Graduate Certificate in Chinese and American Studies, jointly awarded by Johns Hopkins University and Nanjing University in China. His research focuses on how undergraduate engineering students solicit information from stakeholders and use this information to assess
on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2011 Dr. Sheppard was named as co-PI of a national NSF innovation center (Epicenter), and leads an NSF program at Stanford on summer research experiences for high school teachers. Her industry experiences includes engineering positions at Detroit’s ”Big Three:” Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation, and Chrysler Corporation. At Stanford she has served a chair of the faculty senate, and
theories of situated learning and identity development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication, effective teaching practices in design education, the effects of differing design pedagogies on retention and motivation, the dynamics of cross-disciplinary collaboration in both academic and industry design environments, and gender and identity in engineering.Mr. Sidharth Arunkumar Sidharth Arunkumar is pursuing his Masters in Mechanical Engineering at New Mexico Tech. His key area of interest is solid mechanics, and his research involves the study of conductive layers on wind turbine blades. He has worked on aircraft internal structures and Turbine casings for MNC clients as a Design
machine references. Our proposal is to replace dated terminologywith more current references. For example, replace the term “adding machine” with “calculator.”Through our analysis of the responses, our team sought more information about our participants.The participant information collected was designed for a semi-direct comparison with theoriginal study’s results. Our current questionnaire allows us to directly compare results acrossgender and occupation, which we have reinterpreted as education (i.e. engineering students vs.non-engineering students/professionals). Through our research of the subject of engineeringdesign education and the impact of cultural and societal influences, we are looking to collectadditional information of our
informal learning environments and educational technologies. She currently conducts research with the Lawrence Hall of Science on their engineering exhibits and works to improve the facilitation and design of the exhibits. Her research fo- cuses on how science center visitors engage and tinker at engineering activities and the impacts of these open-ended tinkering activities in terms of STEM learning and engineering understanding. Page 23.752.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Ingenuity Lab: Making and Engineering through Design
progress through the various stages of the designloop. Student teams also had access to the mechanical engineering machine shop with adedicated staff member to assist with various fabrication tasks.The stated learning objectives of both the drill-powered vehicle project and the adapted tricycleproject were to: • Learn professional skills essential for engineering, including project management, working in a team, and technical design report writing • Plan and implement the stages of the design loop • Learn how to practically apply course concepts • Learn how to research information that is not explicitly given in a formal classroom settingPBL: Drill-powered Vehicle ProjectThe challenge presented to the students was to
also provide asound basis for reliable peer assessment of teammate performances [31].Roles are not the same as responsibilities, but they are related. Both are important to teamperformance and to member self-efficacy [18]. Here we define roles and responsibilities as: • Roles are job titles or names given to the type of contribution a person makes (e.g., team leader, project manager, website developer, sponsor liaison) • Responsibilities are lists of tasks for which a person is held accountable (e.g., posting meeting minutes within 12 hours of meeting adjournment, coordinating design activities associated with power system design, oversight of market research
. Hertzberg is currently Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at CU-Boulder. She teaches graduate and undergraduate courses in measurement techniques, thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, heat transfer, design and computer tools. She has pioneered a spectacular course on the art and physics of flow visualization, and is conducting research on the impact of the course with respect to visual perception and educational outcomes. Her disciplinary research centers around pulsatile, vortex dominated flows with applications in both combustion and bio-fluid dynamics. She is also interested in a variety of flow field measurement techniques. Current projects include electrospray atomization of jet fuel and velocity and
. To overcome the aforementioned drawbacks of different capstone design patterns, thereform of the capstone design course was conducted at the School of MechanicalEngineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University. This reform focuses on cultivatingengineering students by paying attention to both individual and team abilities. This paperpresents the methodology of the redesign of capstone design course in Shanghai Jiao TongUniversity, and the results of a three years’ practice of the capstone design course are alsoanalyzed.2. Related Works Prior research reported capstone design and courses’ positive impact on developingengineering students’ both professional and comprehensive quality and ability, includingmore competitive employability skills [4
. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2011 Dr. Sheppard was named as co-PI of a national NSF innovation center (Epicenter), and leads an NSF program at Stanford on summer research experiences for high school teachers. Her
analysis of the survey responses indicate the peer grading method successfullyreinforces and improves understanding of engineering design concepts. Proposals for revisionand improvement of the peer grading method based on the survey results are also discussed andremain as future work.1. IntroductionAccording to Torrance et al., the practice and study of assessment in education has experiencedthree major transitions – ‘assessment of learning’ to ‘assessment for learning’ to ‘assessment aslearning’ where assessment dominates learning experiences [1]. Considering the potential ofassessment to significantly contribute to student learning, a peer grading method is integratedinto a graduate-level engineering product design course. Peer grading is a well
students timely access toreliable instruction, that would normally be delivered in-person, during an emergency or crisis.Conversely, the development of courses intended specifically for on-line teaching and learningrequire deeper understanding of pertinent literature, research-based practices and specializedpedagogy [8]. Evaluation plans for the ERT offering of ENG 003 course in spring 2020 beganafter the course was completed with a backward design approach, utilizing student data collectedas part of regular teaching and learning. Mixed-method data is normally used in the ENG 003course to assess student’s attitudes towards the course format (i.e., midquarter feedback survey),engineering design self-efficacy (i.e., pre/post EDSE surveys) and their
Education, 2017 Switching Midstream, Floundering Early, and Tolerance for Ambiguity: How Capstone Students Cope with Changing and Delayed ProjectsAbstractIndustry-sponsored projects are a staple of senior capstone design, and provide our advanced levelstudents with valuable real-world experience. Because of the many players involved in an industrial-sponsored project, there are occasionally changes of scope or project goal adjustments that may occurmidstream; this can be frustrating to students, despite best practices in selecting and vetting all projectsources. Similarly, there have been research-based as well as industry-based projects that have been slowto launch, taking an inordinate amount of time in the first of the two capstone