ProjectsAbstractIn this paper, the use of impromptu design as a tool for introducing the engineering designprocess is discussed. In a typical impromptu design exercise, a simple design problem, capableof being completed in a short amount of time, is solved by teams of engineering students. Insolving the design task, the students organically progress through the engineering design process.This provides a unique opportunity to introduce beginning engineering students to the designprocess and to reinforce engineering design concepts for more senior students. This paperfocuses on the development of impromptu design projects, the use of this activity to introducethe engineering design process, and thoughts and observations gained over three years of usingthis
itsengineering students to solve, without supervision, a very difficult problem that they (andwe) can be very proud of. We suggest in conclusion that though project G in its currentform would not yet be suitable for a senior design capstone project, it would be a verygood example for a multi-disciplinary engineering design project.BackgroundIn the summer of 2005, nine students served as camp counselors for the Introduction toEngineering Program1 (IEP) at the University of Notre Dame 2. IEP is a summerengineering camp for high school students who have just completed their junior year.There are two sessions of three weeks each. IEP’s purpose is to provide participants withan overview of all fields in engineering, while giving the students a taste of
Paper ID #31251Interdisciplinary Design Project Teams: Structuring an ImpactfulExperienceProf. Jeanne M Homer, Oklahoma State University Professor Homer received her Bachelor of Science from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and her Master of Architecture from Arizona State University in Tempe. She has been a practicing ar- chitect in Chicago, Phoenix, and Oklahoma. While she was practicing, she taught at the Art Institute of Chicago and at Arizona State University before teaching in Stillwater full time for 17 years. Profes- sor Homer received the 2013 International Education Faculty Excellence Award, the
can lead to mismatches in expectations as wellas missed opportunities for fruitful collaboration.This paper explores the perceived value of participating as an industry-sponsor tomultidisciplinary engineering design capstone courses. Four industry partners wereinterviewed in the beginning, middle and end of two project-based courses (and one industrypartner once) to track what value they expected from the course and what value theyperceived to be delivered. The thirteen in-depth interviews averaged 50 minutes, were audio-recorded and transcribed for analysis.Based on the qualitative analysis, the motivation to take part as a sponsor in these project-based courses initially centered around new innovative products. However, there was acontinuum
hundreds of new and experienced engineers. His research interests include; design education, product architecture, mechanical reliability, design for manufacture and quality. Mark graduated from Rensselaer with a B.S. in mechanical engineering in 1978 and a Ph.D. in 1987.Mr. Kurt Stephen Stresau, University of Central Florida c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 A Case Study Approach for Understanding the Impact of Team Selection on the Effectiveness of Multidisciplinary Capstone TeamsAn important ingredient for capstone project success is teamwork. Most, if not all, capstoneteams will deal with issues such as poor communication, social
Faculty Advisor for Senior Capstone Design and graduate-level Challenge Projects in Northeastern’s Gordon Engineering Leadership Program. Dr. Jaeger has been the recipient of numerous awards in engineering education for both teaching and men- toring and has been involved in several engineering educational research initiatives through ASEE and beyond. Page 26.852.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 How Did We End up Together? Evaluating Capstone Project Success as a Function of Team and Project Formation Methods and
within multidisciplinary versus single-disciplinary teams for substantive engineeringdesign projects. There has been much emphasis placed on the benefits of multidisplinaryinstruction and teaming [3-5] with little evidence to support such claims, in part becauseopportunities to directly compare multidisciplinary versus single-disciplinary teamingexperiences are relatively rare. The capstone engineering course, Senior Design, historically has been a 6-credit, onesemester course in fall semester for senior mechanical engineering undergraduates at a mid-sized, research-intensive university [1,2]. For the past three decades, Senior Design has involvedteams of 4-5 students working on one of 15-25 projects sponsored by local industry
first year of integration, these effortsfocused on technical analyses. In the second year of integration, the focus was on enhancedcommunication skills. In the technical analyses, students in a sophomore level Fluid Mechanicscourse worked in teams to analyze the material balance tables and pump sizing specificationsproduced by twenty Capstone Design groups. Each team was responsible for analyzing oneunique design project. Also, in that year students in a junior level Heat Transfer course used thesame design projects to validate the design specifications of heat transfer equipment pertinent toeach project. Assignments were timed such that the sophomore and junior students had justlearned relevant technical information pertaining to these tasks
. His current engineering education research interests focus on learning through service-based projects and using an entrepreneurial mindset to further engineering education innovations. He also researches the development of reuse strategies for waste materials. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Incorporation of Ethics and Societal Impact Issues into Senior Capstone Design Courses: Results of a National SurveyAbstractThis paper provides an overview of the ways that ethics and societal impacts (ESI) are taught andassessed in senior capstone design courses by engineering faculty. A national survey wasconducted in spring 2016 that asked engineering and computing
Senior Engineering Capstone DesignCourse Learning with a Variation on the TIDEE Design TeamReadiness Assessment I and IIAbstract:Efficacy of engineering design education in an interdisciplinary team-based course setting,with exposure to the broader concerns of business, finance and management, interestsmany educators. This paper reports on the use of design knowledge assessment patternedafter the Transferable Integrated Design Engineering Education (TIDEE) Design TeamReadiness Assessment (DTRA) I and II [1,2,3,4] to evaluate what aerospace, mechanical,electrical and computer science students learned about engineering design as a result ofparticipating in a Boeing-supported, two-semester, project-based senior capstone designcourse at Texas A&
Research Forum.The JagBot project included four CSEM students, two from CIS and two from ECE. Topicsincluded route planning, the creation of a sensor database (CIS), robot safety systems, and thecreation of navigation algorithms based on image processing (ECE).4.3.1.3 Senior design projectsThe students in the ECE department are expected to complete a senior capstone design project asa required part of their educational experience. The projects address design issues that thestudents are likely to encounter on their jobs, so they are required to specify multiple designapproaches, select a particular approach based on design principles, and implement thatapproach. The JagBot project was an excellent opportunity for senior design projects.Three ECE
; engineering design decisions are consequential for the design and how it performsupon implementation. To use a spoon, the person may need to like the color; and the material ofthe blade must be strong enough for an endurance task. Because design decisions areconsequential, undergraduate engineering programs have a responsibility to prepare students asdecision makers.Capstone design courses allow undergraduate engineering students to experience open-endeddesign projects before starting their professional careers. As such, capstone serves as anopportunity to develop students’ ability to make decisions in an ill-structured setting. Typically,explicit instruction related to decision making includes an introduction to rationalistic tools, suchas decision
manufacturing machinery and machinecomponent design. The second course in the sequence, ME404, is dedicated to learning andapplying the design process. ME404 covers the process from gathering customer requirementsto creating and implementing a test plan to ensure the product successfully meets thoserequirements. The students work through an in-class example based on an illumination deviceand develop their own solution to a storage container out of class. They are required to producea prototype of their container using skills from ME403. The final course, ME496, is dedicated toa senior group capstone project that the student selects. This course allows the student to applythe design process to a more complex problem and relies heavily on the
Paper ID #9982Student Perceptions of Project Mentoring: What Practices and BehaviorsMatter?Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co- directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on com- munication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring com
comparable courses in the subjects of mechatronics and embeddedsystems given at KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. In the capstoneproject described here, students work in teams of about 10 students, over a period of aboutnine months.Six capstone projects are studied; three of these were organized according to scrum [1] andthree according to more formal methods. The six projects involved in total 54 students. Thesix capstone projects were divided into two groups, following two different courses. Studentsof both courses took a course in project management, either prior to the capstone course or inparallel. One of the two project management courses emphasized agile methods, the othermore formal methods. The student teams who followed
Bachelor of Science degree from West Point, a Master of Science degree in Engineering Management from Missouri S&T, a Master of Science degree in Civil Engineering from Virginia Tech, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin. Aaron has served in the military for 23 years as an Engineer Officer with assignments around the world to include Afghanistan, Egypt, and Bosnia- Herzegovina. He is a licensed professional engineer in Virginia and a Project Management Professional. Aaron’s primary areas of research are engineering education, the behavior of steel structures, and blast. Aaron mentors students by serving as an advisor for capstone projects and through service as an Officer
epistemological thinking at the starting point before the SDPsexperiences. This was designed in such a manner because of our limited access toopportunities to distribute surveys among the students. Qualitatively, an interview protocol was designed to explore the roles of students,their peers/teammates, and advisors in the context of SDPs and relevant factors. Sampleinterview questions include descriptive questions such as, can you describe theprocesses of completing your capstone project briefly? What roles did you play in acapstone project? What method did you use in order to finish your task? As you thinkabout your instructors, professors, advisors, what role do you think they have played?What kinds of interactions with them helped you with your
of mobile computing. He holds three degrees in computer en- gineering including a B.S. from North Carolina State University and an M.S. and Ph.D. from Virginia Tech. Page 24.148.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Aligning Design to ABET: Rubrics, Portfolios, and Project ManagersAbstractThis paper discusses on-going modifications to a two-semester capstone design sequence inelectrical and computer engineering intended to both improve student learning in design andbetter utilize the artifacts produced by the course to
to promote written and oral communication, business skills,project management, and critical thinking within a group setting21, 22. Capstone design projectscan also indicate to faculty areas in which the curriculum can be improved upon. Areas wherestudents struggle can be emphasized in future courses or in revisions to existing courses23.While students are attracted to the hands on nature of building instrumental skills throughproject-based learning and multiple design projects, they often experience a shock when theybegin a curriculum where projects drive the majority of the learning process. Students may notdo as well as expected, in part, because of the transition from lower division programs, whereclasses are more likely to be taught in
provide students with multiple opportunitiesto experience a realistic design challenges before their Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) mandated capstone design-build project.1,2 The literature shows the Page 26.202.2importance, effectiveness and student enthusiasm for real-world design projects performed aspart of capstone design experiences.3-5 However, creating exciting, customer driven andrelevant design experiences for classes other than the capstone design classes has provenchallenging.In the past the authors have struggled to integrate customer driven design and build projects intoexisting courses. When a working
the introduction of a particular design thinking tool orheuristic and suggest ways in which the tools might be simplified for introduction in earlydesign tasks, for example Kline, et al. [25] discussed the modification of a 'design canvas' formore and less complex use in capstone and first year courses respectively. In their discussionof CDIO, Edström and Kolmos [26] refer to progression in complexity of projects, wherecomplexity increases in multiple dimensions including group size, duration of project, andscope of knowledge required. They suggest that the most complex projects are open ended,ill-defined, and have contradictory objectives. However, they don't provide much detail onconstructing a sequence of tasks.At a more general level
models for effective collaboration between universities and industry in studentdesign projects in the area of embedded computing systems. The first of these at ClarksonUniversity is a senior capstone design project in computer engineering. The second at CaliforniaUniversity of Pennsylvania is a junior level course in embedded systems for students in computerengineering technology or electrical engineering technology. In each case the student work isbased on the Freescale Cup platform offered by the Freescale Corporation. The Freescale Cupplatform is used in the Freescale Cup competition sponsored by the Freescale Corporation thatchallenges students to design an autonomous model race car that must follow a black line trackas fast as possible
AC 2008-2381: GROUP SELECTION TECHNIQUES FOR A MECHANICALENGINEERING SENIOR DESIGN PROJECT COURSEGregory Watkins, California State University, Chico Page 13.656.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Group Selection Techniques for a Mechanical Engineering Senior Design Project CourseAbstractThe mechanical engineering program at California State University Chico utilizes a two-semester capstone course in senior design project. It is required that students perform the projectwork in groups, as that is a measured outcome in the course. Assigning students to groups haslong been problematic, with no satisfactory solution despite numerous
their knowledge and skills for the enhancement of human welfare, and motivatesthem to strive for increasing the competence and prestige of engineering profession.4.6 Demonstrate knowledge of contemporary issues Knowledge of contemporary issues such as economical, environmental, social, and ethicalfactors are crucial in the design process of any engineering system. Engineering students prior tograduation must be able to identify these factors and make appropriate judgments in any projectthey undertake. The TGR platform in capstone senior design is ideal to educate the students inthis process. For instance, consider a project designed to assist a blind person navigate inside abuilding. Two primary challenges faced by a blind person are
engineeringprograms. As summarized by Jerry Jenkins, CEO of Texas Instruments; “Most engineering jobsinvolve design and practice, not theory and research.”7 A 1997 National Science Foundationreport8 called for engineering programs to place more emphasis on teamwork, project-basedlearning and close interaction with industry. With the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) explicitly requiring engineering design content in the curriculum, senioryear capstone design classes, freshman cornerstone design classes and in some cases, designcourses throughout the curriculum, were introduced into engineering programs. Interestingly, thecornerstone design course was introduced in part to improve student retention in engineeringprograms by exposing
2006-832: HOW WOMEN PERFORM ON INDIVIDUAL DESIGN PROJECTSCOMPARED TO MENRichard Bannerot, University of Houston Richard Bannerot is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Houston. His research interests are in the thermal sciences and in engineering design education. For the past fifteen years he has taught the required "Introduction to Design" course at the sophomore level and has been involved in the teaching of the department's capstone design course. He is a registered professional engineer in the State of Texas. Page 11.704.1© American Society for Engineering Education
Senior Design ProjectsAbstractIn the past, teams from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte College of Engineering twosemester capstone senior design class first presented their project design at the end of the firstsemester. Their design consisted of a report and a poster presentation submitted to the facultymentors, course instructors and company sponsors.At the poster presentation (and in their report) we found that 35% of the teams did not includeenough design detail and 25% had virtually no design details, which indicated they had not spentmuch time on the design effort. This caused project teams to start their second semester effortsbehind schedule. By the end of the second semester, about 28% of all
Marymount University Dr. Matthew T. Siniawski is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles, CA. He teaches the senior capstone design project courses and has recently begun mentoring students on the design of assistive devices for children with disabilities. One of his research interests lies in understanding how these Learning Through Service projects impact participating engineering students and community partners. He is also interested in researching classroom-based peda- gogies of engagement and developing a standards-based grading system for engineering project courses.Dr. Adam R Carberry, Arizona State University Adam R. Carberry, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor
due dates. The EGR 481 syllabus is as follows:Course Syllabus: EGR 481 - Fall 08 Project Design Principles and ApplicationsProfessor’s name: Dr. S. MonemiOffice location & phone: 9-527, 909-869-2520Email: ssmonemi@csupomona.eduClass time and location: MW 1:00-1:50 PM, Room 9-329Course prerequisites: Upper division standingOffice Hours: Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday 8:00 - 10:00 AMTextbook: Class notes and handoutsCourse Description: Completion of a capstone senior design team project under faculty supervision. Results are presented in a formal report.Course Coverage: Learn how to design, develop, and analyze
team-based project. In particular, team-based designprojects (cornerstone, capstone, or discipline specific) are ideal candidates as they requireeffective teamwork to facilitate the development of an optimal design solution. The toolcomprises four areas where students can engage in learning from their team experience. Theseareas allow students to: • self-reflect and provide feedback on their teammates • review the feedback they have received • access tools and techniques to improve their understanding of team-effectiveness • engage in exercises to practice their team-effectiveness competenciesThis section outlines our proposed method of integrating this learning tool into a course and itsteam-based project. Figure 1 demonstrates