– that becomes the hunt for möjligheterfor us as engineering educators.Works Cited1. Sfard, A. On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One. Educ. Res. 27, 4–13 (1998).2. Frezza, S. T. A knowledge basis for engineering design. Proc. - Front. Educ. Conf. FIE 2015–Febru, (2015).3. Eris, O. Effective Inquiry for Innovative Engineering Design. (Kluwer, 2004).4. Chi, M. T. H. in Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (eds. Ward, T. B. & Smith, S. M.) 209–234 (American Psychological Association, 1997).5. Robinson, K. Out of Our Minds: Learning to be Creative. (Wiley Capstone, 2011).6. Amabile, T. M. Creativity in Context: Update to the social
Paper ID #25477Teaming with Confidence: How Peer Connections in Problem-based Learn-ing Impact the Team and Academic Self-efficacy of Engineering StudentsMs. Marsha Maraj, Imperial College London Marsha has been an educator in higher education for over 14 years. She is currently a Senior Strategic Teaching Fellow in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Imperial College London (ICL) where she teaches mechanical design to third-year chemical engineering students. She is enthusiastic about using collaborative approaches and student partnerships in the scholarship of learning and teaching. Her current educational research
Children in the Regular Classroom and SpiritualIntelligence: Developing Higher Level Consciousness; coauthor with Susan Israel and Cathy Block ofCollaborative Literacy: Using Gifted Strategies to Enrich Learning for Every Student; and co-author withMichele Kane of Planting Seeds of Mindfulness. In addition, she has contributed numerous articles andchapters in books on gifted education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Application of 3D CAD and 3D printing in RET Program to Enrich Engineering Design Education Xinyu Liua*, Xuejun Fanb, Julia Yooc , Nicholas Braked, , Jiang Zhoub, Xianchang Lib , Dorothy Siskc a
Paper ID #23448Human-Centered Design Incorporated in the Freshman Year through an Ac-tive Learning Engineering Design Lab: Best Practices, Lessons Learned, andProposed ImprovementsDr. Kirsten Heikkinen Dodson, Lipscomb University Dr. Kirsten Dodson is an assistant professor in the mechanical engineering department in the Raymond B. Jones College of Engineering at Lipscomb University. She graduated from Lipscomb University with her Bachelors degree before moving on to Vanderbilt to finish her Doctoral degree. Upon completing her research at Vanderbilt, she joined the faculty at her alma mater where she has focused on thermal
contribute to thecurrent syllabus content related to learning outcomes and aimed at exploring the student mind-set.The Department expected the experiences gained through interclass collaborations and activefeedback would enable a better EDM and SDP course structure. The integrated activities wouldalso improve syllabus material drawn from surveys to afford the students’ subject mastery.I. IntroductionAcross engineering departments in universities, the Capstone Design course is arguably the mostinfluential course for engineering students. Fundamentally, the Capstone Design course is thesummative assessment of the engineering curriculum, which pushes students to reach the createlevel in the revised Bloom’s Taxonomy [1]. In addition, many universities
Paper ID #26485Building a Functional Cardiograph Over Four Semesters: Part 2 – Program-ming a MicrocontrollerDr. Gail Baura, Loyola University Chicago Dr. Gail Baura is a Professor and Director of Engineering Science at Loyola University Chicago. While creating the curriculum for this new program, she embedded multi-semester projects to increase student engagement and performance. Previously, she was a Professor of Medical Devices at Keck Graduate In- stitute of Applied Life Sciences, which is one of the Claremont Colleges. She received her BS Electrical Engineering degree from Loyola Marymount University, her MS
interventions are intended to promote ideation flexibility,one’s ability to switch between preferred and non-preferred methods of concept generation aspreferred by the problem. Given insight into how the three interventions impact idea quality,engineers, educators, and students will be able to make informed decisions about whichinterventions to use under different conditions with different concept generation goals in mind.1.1 Concept GenerationConcept generation or ideation is the primary means by which solutions are created. Thesesolutions to engineering problems, frequently referred to as ideas or concepts, undergo a vettingprocess to select which solutions warrant further development. The outcomes of conceptgeneration and selection can have far
into Engineering Education, National Academies Press, ISBN 978-0- 309-30719-2, 2012. 6. Nelson Laird, T. F., Shoup, R., Kuh, G. D., & Schwarz, M. J., “The Effects of Discipline on Deep Approaches to Student Learning and College Outcomes,” Research in Higher Education, 49(6), 469–494, 2008. 7. T. A. Litzinger, L. R. Lattuca, R. G. Hadgraft and W. C. Newstetter, Engineering Education and the Development of Expertise, Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 2011, 123-150. 8. D.A. Kolb, Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984.9. J.D. Bransford, A.L. Brown and R.R. Cocking, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience
Peer Project Management for Capstone Design TeamsAbstractThe mechanical and mechatronic engineering programs at California State University Chicoconclude with a robust, externally funded, two-semester capstone design experience. Students inboth majors work in interdisciplinary teams on year-long design projects sponsored by industrialpartners. Project teams are assigned a faculty advisor whose role [1] is multi-faceted, but doesnot include day-to-day project management or responsibility for project success.Design projects in industry typically have an assigned project manager (PM) with responsibilityfor overall project success as well as a lead role in initiating, planning, executing, monitoring,and controlling the project
place towork. While it is good to see users appreciated the makerspace as a workshop, other themeswere more interesting. Around 30% of responses noted the sense of community among users,which includes helping and teaching one another, providing support for items #10 and #11. Thetheme of innovation appeared in about 10% of responses, providing support for item #1. Twoother themes appeared in the data, which dealt with creativity (16% of responses) andextracurricular learning (17% of responses). One user response was very approving of theuniversity’s efforts thus far: “A convenient place to find like-minded engineers. It feels like home. Make almost anything free of cost. Lots of resources to learn, make, discover, and innovate. I
Paper ID #26674A Multi-semester Integrated Systems Design ExperienceDr. Geoffrey Recktenwald, Michigan State University Dr. Recktenwald is a lecturer in Mechanical Engineering at Michigan State University where he teaches courses in in mechanics and mathematical methods. He completed his degree in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics at Cornell University in stability and parametric excitation. His active areas of research are dynamic stability, online assessment, and instructional pedagogy.William F. Resh, Michigan State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A multi
2006-1444: ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK FOR CAPSTONE DESIGN COURSESSteven Beyerlein, University of Idaho Steven Beyerlein is professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Idaho, where he coordinates the Mechanical Engineering and Electrical Engineering capstone design program and where he regularly participates in ongoing program assessment activities. For these efforts he won the UI Outstanding Teaching Award in 2001. He has been an active participant in the Transferable Integrated Design Engineering Education (TIDEE) Consortium for the last five years and collaborates with other authors on the NSF/ASA grant.Denny Davis, Washington State University Denny Davis is professor of
AC 2012-5385: OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF STUDENTS’ INDIVIDUALHEURISTICS WHEN SOLVING TECHNOLOGICAL PROBLEMSMr. Jonathan Gerard Spillane, University of LimerickDr. Niall Seery, University of LimerickMr. Donal Canty, University of LimerickDr. Diarmaid Lane, University of Limerick Page 25.986.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Observational study of students’ individual heuristics when solving technological problemsAbstract:The overall aim of education is the development of creative, critical thinking and problem-solvingfuture citizens who will be able to positively contribute
and remote access to hardware-in-the-loop simulation platforms.The eDesign portal can readily be extended to other engineering courses that involve laboratoriesand large groups of remote students, as discussed by the authors in another paper21. Pedagogicalimplications of eEngineering, and eDesign in particular, are yet to be examined thoroughly.Some crucial issues must be addressed as to whether and how human mind can transform fromthe traditional approaches of knowledge acquisition and construction to new paradigms wherephysical presence becomes less relevant to the learning process in order to gain a wider scope ofthe learning subject.7. References1. M. Huysman, C. Steinfield, C.Y. Jang, K. David, M.H. Veld, J. Poot, and I. Mulder
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.2 Gelmon,S.B. (2000). How do we know that our work makes a difference? Metropolitan Universities, 11(2), 28-393 ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. (2010). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents-UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/E001%2008- 09%20EAC%20Criteria%2012-04-07.pdf.4 Schuburt, T. F., Jacobitz, F. G., & Kim. E. M. (2012). Student perceptions and learning of the engineering design process: an assessment at the freshmen level. Research in Engineering Design, 23, 177-190. DOI 10.1007/s00163-011-0121-x5 Carberry A
design product lines. Page 25.355.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Creating Actionfunction Diagrams for User Centric DesignIntroductionUsers are perhaps the most important aspect of consumer product design. There is a significantbody of research about the ways to measure and achieve user-friendliness in a product. Acustomer-driven approach to product design aims for greater user comfort and better productexperience. Design tools that keep the user in mind during early stages of design can greatlyimprove the usability of the end product.Systematically breaking down a product into
theUAHuntsville IPT program they all changed their mind and enrolled in AP Science and/or Mathcourses their senior year. They also asked for more opportunities like the IPT program. Theenthusiasm, engagement, and impact of the pilot program caused the course instructors toseriously consider developing a high school outreach component to the UAHuntsville IPTProgram. Thus the InSPIRESS initiative was created. InSPIRESS is in some ways an extensionof the freshman level design experiences that many engineering colleges have implemented overthe last 20 years.5,7,8,9,10 The purpose of these classes is to help the participants better understandwhat engineers do. InSPIRESS seeks to do this during the high school years so that students gaina better understanding
effective design. The reflective components of service-learning functioneffectively as methods to guide students in their exploration and understanding of the users. Theconcept of reciprocal partnerships raises the stature of the users in the mind of the designers andcan empower the kind of relationship and interaction sought by a human-centered approach.While students are practicing the characteristics of high quality service-learning, they are alsodeveloping their skills as human-centered designers.Curricular ProgramThe EPICS Program is a nationally recognized model for engineering-centered, service-learningdesign10, 11. In EPICS courses, students learn design by participating in design teams thatdevelop solutions to meet the needs of the local
Paper ID #9982Student Perceptions of Project Mentoring: What Practices and BehaviorsMatter?Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co- directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on com- munication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring com
Paper ID #6204Using Mini Design Competitions in CapstoneCapt. Joseph Anders Wahlquist, US Air Force Academy Joseph Wahlquist is an instructor in the department of engineering mechanics at the United States Air Force Academy. He teaches courses in Mechanical Behavior of Material and leads a Capstone Design team focusing on Small Unmanned Aerial Systems. He received his MS in Aeronautical engineering from the Air Force Institute of Technology in Dayton Ohio and a BS in Mechanical Engineering from Brigham Young University in Provo Utah. He has also worked as a structural engineer on the F-16 and a mechanical systems engineer
and engineering. These connections were not explicitly taughtin the class but were implicit through various class activities and projects. Figure 10 illustrates amind map created by a student showing the connections they were able to make betweenstorytelling and engineering. This mind map was developed as part of reflection for the finalproject. The components of storytelling as identified by the student include characters, timeline,visuals, moral/theme, and planning. The components of engineering include stakeholders,documentation, design, tools, and building. The student was able to create interestingconnections between storytelling and engineering. For example, characters in a story are like thestakeholders for engineering problem
Paper ID #33808Student Reflections on Sustainability and Empathy: The Outcomes of aSustainability Workshop in First-year Design CoursesMr. Rohan Prabhu, Pennsylvania State University Rohan Prabhu is a PhD Candidate in Mechanical Engineering at Penn State with a doctoral minor in Psychology. He holds a master’s degree in Engineering Design and a bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering. His research interests are to study designers’ use of design for additive manufacturing in their creative problem-solving process. He is also studying the development of effective educational interventions on design for additive
experience in construction as a builder and design as the principal of his own residential design and con- sulting firm. Clarke has written three books and numerous articles on alternatives to standard construction methodologies. He is currently an Industry Associate Professor in the Department of Civil, Environ- mental, and Ocean Engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology where he teaches design and works to develop and teach methodologies for merging engineering and architectural workflows for low energy building design.Mr. Emil Pitz, Stevens Institute of Technology Emil Pitz is a mechanical engineering PhD student at Stevens Institute of Technology. His research focuses on stochastic failure analysis of composites
Paper ID #29636Using A Modularity Analysis to Determine Tool and Student Roles withinMakerspacesMr. Colton Daniel Brehm, Texas A&M University Colton Brehm is a graduate student in the Mechanical Engineering program at Texas A&M University in College Station, TX. His research interests include bio-inspired design of complex human networks and industrial networks with a focus on Eco-Industrial Park design.Dr. Julie S Linsey, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Julie S. Linsey is an Associate Professor in the George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineer- ing at the Georgia Institute of Technological. Dr. Linsey
Paper ID #30384Validation of a Mental Model Elicitation Instrument through Deploymentof Control Groups in an Undergraduate Engineering ProgramAlexander R. Murphy, Georgia Institute of Technology Alexander R. Murphy is a graduate student at the Georgia Institute of Technology and is pursuing a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering. He was born and raised in Tampa Florida, where he received a B.S. in mechanical engineering with a minor in creative writing from the University of South Florida. He is proud to have received a NSF GRFP fellowship this past spring of 2018. Currently, he is interested in exploring students’ and
Paper ID #30456WIP: Introducing Students to Human-Centered Design in a Design forManufacturability CourseMr. Alexander Pagano, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Alex Pagano is a PhD student studying a variety of research questions related to engineering technology and education. He received his B.S. in Materials Science and Engineering from the University of Arizona in 2015 and his M.S. in Mechanical Science and Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign in 2018.Dr. Saadeddine Shehab, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign A Postdoc Research Associate at the Siebel Center for Design at
AC 2007-2705: ENABLING PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONDURING THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PHASE: FUNCTION-BASED RISKANALYSISKatie Grantham Lough, University of MissouriRobert Stone, University of Missouri Page 12.603.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Enabling Probabilistic Risk Assessment Instruction During the Conceptual Design Phase: Function Based Risk AnalysisAbstractMost decisions about a product, i.e. form, function, aesthetics, etc, are made during theconceptual phase of product design. Since those decisions not only impact productperformance but also product failures, methods to address the potential product failures(risks) should be
was due in part to the process ofproposing new, “workable” problems and in part due to the heavy load of grading the many documents required Page 12.235.5from the students. In addition to this pressure, several other factors were coming to bear upon the junior level courseas well. It became apparent that entrepreneurial and project management skills were becoming increasinglyimportant in engineering. Changing community needs resulted in an increasing number of requests from non-profitand charitable organizations for product development. With these factors in mind, the junior level course wasrevised to reflect a more service
heardtogether, images of a pint-size Formula SAE car are brought to mind. This race car is completelydifferent. Although not quite as long as a true F1 race car, this car has a comparable track widthand a wheelbase that is approximately two-thirds as long as a true Formula one car.The power train used is a 2.0 Liter GM Ecotec engine that is both turbocharged and supercharged.This year’s vehicle will run off of gasoline. Approximate engine brake horsepower is estimated at500 HP. Future projects could include the exploration of an ethanol-powered engine as well asthe use of composite materials in the chassis design.Finally, four different industrial design schools have designed bodies for the car. One of thesebodies was selected for manufacture on a 5
AC 2009-919: SELF-ORGANIZING UNITS TO PROMOTE INTERDISCIPLINARYTEAMING IN A COURSE FOR PERVASIVE COMPUTING DESIGNLisa McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa McNair is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center. She received her Ph.D. in Linguistics from the University of Chicago in 2002. Her research explores collaboration in interdisciplinary and distributed settings, and institutional structures that encourage transformational learning.Chad Newswander, Virginia Tech Chad Newswander is a graduate student in the Center for Public Administration and Policy at Virginia Tech, studying