Asee peer logo
Displaying results 301 - 330 of 330 in total
Conference Session
Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yoselyn Walsh, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Tugba Yuksel, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Vojtech Krs, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Ida B. Ngambeki, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Edward J. Berger, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Bedrich Benes Ph.D., Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
Computer and Information Technology at Purdue Univer- sity. Dr. Ngambeki graduated from Smith College with a B.S. in Engineering and from Purdue University with a PhD in Engineering Education. Dr. Ngambeki’s research is focused on the intersection of human behavior and computing, specifically how educational and policy interventions can be used to improve human interactions with technology. Dr. Ngambeki’s key areas of research interest include: STEM Education, Cybersecurity Education, Cybersecurity Policy, Social Engineering, Information Technology Ethics, and Cybersecurity Workforce Development.Dr. Edward J. Berger, Purdue University, West Lafayette Edward Berger is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and
Conference Session
Student Feedback and Assessment in Design
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jackson Lyall Autrey, University of Oklahoma; Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma; Farrokh Mistree, University of Oklahoma
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
Conference Session
Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nirmala Gnanapragasam, Seattle University; Nathan E Canney PE, Seattle University
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
engineering educa- tion, specifically the development of social responsibility in engineering students. Other areas of interest include ethics, service learning, and sustainability education. Dr. Canney received bachelors degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Seattle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stan- ford University with an emphasis on structural engineering, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado Boulder. Page 26.1747.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Work in Progress: Rubric development for year-long
Conference Session
Design Communications
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Edward Lumsdaine, Michigan Technological University; Monika Lumsdaine, E&M Lumsdaine Solar Consultants, Inc.
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
of leadership Learn the 11. Realistic constraints (including DFX, Conceptual economic factors, etc.) Design 12. Development of related communication skills Process 13. Production of required documentation 14. Ability to do whole-brain thinkingMeet Project 15. Ability to apply the creative problem solving Sponsor process to a conceptual design problemRequirements 16. Ability to apply engineering analysis in complex open-ended problems 17. Use of quality tools (QFD, FMEA, robust engineering, etc.) 18. Engineering ethics, intellectual property, other just-in-time topics depending on project needs 19
Conference Session
Multidisciplinary Design in the Classroom
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Dominic Halsmer, Oral Roberts University; Nicholas Halsmer, Oral Roberts University; Robert Johnson, Oral Roberts University; James Wanjiku, Oral Roberts University
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
Conference Session
Capstone Design II
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Susannah Howe, Smith College; Ron Lasser, Tufts University; Katie Su, Smith College; Sarah Pedicini, Smith College
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
Conference Session
Design in Engineering Education Potpourri
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Dominic Halsmer, Oral Roberts University; Nate Roman, Oral Roberts University; Tyler Todd, Oral Roberts University
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
engineering students communicate better,become more ethical, and see the task of engineering in a larger cultural context. This is as itshould be, but is it possible that the field of design engineering might lend insight and wisdomback to the humanities? If engineering design principles are so helpful in unraveling themysteries of biology, might they also be useful in the social sciences? These are just some of thequestions being posed in an engineering elective course at Oral Roberts University (ORU),where undergraduate students wrestle with advanced concepts in reverse engineering. A recentarticle in ASEE Prism1 touts the benefits of having engineering students engage in the dissection
Conference Session
Student Feedback and Assessment in Design
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Andreas Febrian, Utah State University, Engineering Education; Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
strategies, researchers can distinguish various design engagements and also designer'spriority during the problem definition phase [8]. Table 1 presents the definition of each designphase and the correspondent design activities, where all refer to the Dym and Little’s framework[15]. Most of the time, there is more than one person involved in a design project, and eachwill assume or be assigned to at least one role [25]. Working as a team is not an easy task; italways adds complexity to the design process. The configuration of the team members’ abilitiesand work ethics will affect the design delivery time and quality [26]. Consequently, managingteam members is an integral part of most design projects. Table 2. Project management aspects and
Conference Session
The Best in DEED
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Susannah Howe, Smith College; Laura Mae Rosenbauer, Smith College
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
25, 7, 440 16 32 60 20 14 0 57 43 23 18 67 28 Concept generation 28, 7, 453 32 36 68 7 14 0 57 29 62 23 80 7 Concept selection 31, 7, 451 32 39 65 6 0 0 57 43 61 24 81 7 Creativity/problem solving 30, 7, 462 40 47 70 3 43 29 71 0 53 24 80 6 Decision making 30, 7, 458 33 43 70 10 29 14 71 0 58 19 80 7 Developing functional specs 25, 7, 455 40 44 64 20 14 14 43 57 56 24 77 12 Engineering ethics 26, 7, 455 50 38 38 19 29 0 29 43 69 30 45 12
Conference Session
Best In DEED
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Robert P. Loweth, University of Michigan; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Kathleen H. Sienko, University of Michigan; Amy Hortop, University of Michigan; Elizabeth Ann Strehl, University of Michigan
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
Conference Session
Design in Engineering Education Division: Design Teams
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jacquelyn Kay Nagel, James Madison University; Christopher Stewart Rose, James Madison University; Ramana M. Pidaparti, University of Georgia; Elizabeth Marie Tafoya, James Madison University; Peyton Leigh Pittman; Wade Knaster, James Madison University
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
Engineering Education, 2019 Preliminary findings from a comparative study of two bio- inspired design methods in a second-year engineering curriculumAbstractThe engineer of 2020 is expected to not only offer technical ingenuity but also adapt to acontinuously evolving environment while being able to operate outside the narrow limits of onediscipline and be ethically grounded in solving the complex problems of the future. To build thecompetencies of the future engineer, undergraduate education must train students to not onlysolve engineering challenges that transcend disciplinary boundaries, but also communicate,transfer knowledge, and collaborate across technical and non-technical boundaries. Oneapproach to train engineers in these
Conference Session
Empathy and Human-Centered Design 2
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Devanshi Shah, University of Georgia; Xiaoou Yang, University of Georgia; Beshoy Morkos, University of Georgia
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
, this class focused on approaches to equip studentswith better understanding of design process and product development. Some of the key featuresof this course were17 : 1. Learning and implementing the skills/approaches used in designing 2. Plan and organize data related to projects 3. Informing students with importance of analysis, evaluation and synthesis in designing 4. Use of important and fundamental concepts of work environment 5. Focused on inculcating ethical values related to work 3.2. Survey Instrument:The survey instrument used in this study comprises of two questionnaires, to measure andanalyze empathy in students of junior year in mechanical engineering. Junior year students indesign methodologies class
Conference Session
Design in Engineering Education Division: Capstone Design Practices
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jonathan Elliot Gaines, University of South Florida; Olukemi Akintewe, University of South Florida; Schinnel Kylan Small, University of South Florida; Terreonn Henry
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
a group with a maximum number of 5 students.7. Individual and Group Assignments: In the first five weeks of the course, students were assigned individual assignments primarily based on computer aided drafting (CAD) software where each student mock up their cosmetic and functional designs. In addition to that, individual assignments on ethics, intellectual property, and professional development were assigned. From the sixth week, students worked in their project groups and the group assignment varied from fabrication of their final CAD designs to design review presentations.8. Peer interactions and Project Roles: Students mirrored real professional interactions. a. Students first worked as individuals and mocked up their ideas
Conference Session
Design in Engineering Education Division: Student Empathy & Human-centered Design
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Devanshi Shah, Florida Institute of Technology; Elisabeth Kames, Florida Institute of Technology ; McKenzie Carol Clark, Florida Institute of Technology; Beshoy Morkos, Florida Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
complete theirdesign project. The course objectives of Design Methodologies are:  Utilize various design tools, techniques, and methods employed in engineering design;  Successfully manage and document projects;  Recognize the role of analysis, synthesis, and evaluation in design; and  Apply the fundamental concepts of professional and ethical responsibilityStudents in the Design Methodologies course are required to provide the instructor with their topthree choices of projects they wish to work on or team mates they want to pair with for the seniorcapstone design course. They are provided with the list of industry, competition, and universityproject topics. Students typically select projects based on personal interest and
Conference Session
Best of DEED
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Susannah Howe, Smith College; Sophia L. Poulos, Smith College; Laura Mae Rosenbauer, Smith College
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
regular progress/status reports; schedules Plan/Manual 29 user manual or training manual; business plan; manufacturing plan General 17 varies; client determined deliverables; many deliverables; the usual Student peer evaluations; ethics assignments; individual reflections; classAccountability 16 attendance and participation Final report Interim reports Final recommendation Patent disclosure Conference or journal paper 0 50 100 150 200 250
Conference Session
Research on Design Learning
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jennifer Wegner, University of Michigan College of Engineering; Stefan M Turcic II, University of Michigan; Gail Hohner, University of Michigan
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
(1%) Professionalism (16%) Communication Skills (11%) Resourcefulness (1%) Critical Thinking (1%) Respect for Self/Others (2%) Data Analysis (1%) Self-Reflection (3%) Determination (3%) Responsibility (2%) Decision Making (3%) Self-Awareness of Achievement (3%) Flexibility (1%) Society/Ethical-Based Thinking (1%) Global Awareness (1%) Technical Abilities/Knowledge (5%) Group Dynamics Navigation (8%) Teamwork (2
Conference Session
Best of DEED
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jessica Menold, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Kathryn W. Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University; Timothy W. Simpson, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Emily A. Waterman, Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
needs within realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, andsustainability”72. A thorough understanding and mastery of the design process is necessary tosolve these difficult challenges; however, one of the most critical stages of the design process,prototyping, has remained largely unstructured and unstudied. This work evaluated the impact onprototyping awareness of a guided prototyping framework. Future work will explore how PFXmay help engineering students test and iterate on designs faster and more effectively.    Finally, our work aligns with the National Science Foundation’s second strategic goal “stimulateinnovation and address societal needs through research
Conference Session
Maker Spaces within the University
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Vincent Wilczynski, Yale University; Joseph Zinter III, Yale University; Larry Wilen, Yale University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
, material selection, engineering standards, projectplanning and ethics, as well as the engineering practices of analysis and experimentation (tocollect data for making design decisions). While these objectives span each of the three designprocess steps, the deliverables are only assigned (and retained for assessment purposes) atspecific stages of the design process. The deliverables include physical artifacts of concepts,prototypes, and final designs, as well as oral and written reports. The collected portfolio is arecord of the design process. Figure 5. Demonstration of Proficiency within Capstone DesignAs examples of the scope of projects pursued, students have designed and constructed amotorcycle-powered dynamometer (and the
Conference Session
Design and the Capstone Experience
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
R. Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; Michael S. Thompson, Bucknell University
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
Conference Session
The BEST InDEED
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Chris Gewirtz, Virginia Tech; Daria A. Kotys-Schwartz, University of Colorado, Boulder; Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder; Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech; Sidharth Arunkumar; Julie Dyke Ford, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology; Susannah Howe, Smith College; Laura Mae Rosenbauer, Smith College; Nicholas Emory Alvarez, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology; Jessica Deters, Virginia Tech ; Cristian Hernandez
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
Conference Session
Studies in Engineering Design
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nicky Wolmarans, University of Cape Town; Jennifer M. Case, Virginia Tech
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
Conference Session
Capstone Design Practices
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Kurt Stephen Stresau, University of Central Florida; Mark W. Steiner, University of Central Florida
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
that they vary significantly in their implementation [33]. From Howe’s work asampling of some of the differentiating characteristics are shown in Table 1 below. Characteristics Representative Examples Duration One to Two Semesters Lecture Topics design process, teamwork, project planning, engineering ethics, intellectual property, etc. Sources of Projects Academic, Student Proposed, Service, Industry, etc. Assessment Methods Project Reports, Design Reviews, Peer Evaluations, Effort Reports, etc. Size of
Conference Session
Assessment
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; Michael S. Thompson, Bucknell University
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
Conference Session
The Best of Design in Engineering
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Eckehard Doerry, Northern Arizona University; Bridget N. Bero, Northern Arizona University
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
teams in the Design4Practice program at NAU for nearly ten years.Bridget N. Bero, Northern Arizona University Bridget N. Bero is an Associate Professor and Chair of the Department of Civil Engineering, Construction Management and Environmental Engineering at Northern Arizona University, where she has been since 1995. Her primary interests are engineering pedagogy, including ethics and design in engineering curric- ula, tribal environmental training programs, forest waste utilization, environmental management systems and international engineering. Page 22.1037.1 c American Society
Conference Session
Empathy and Human-Centered Design 1
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Cristian Eduardo Vargas-Ordóñez, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Morgan M. Hynes, Purdue University at West Lafayette
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
essential for the creation of attitudesrelated to solving social problems as well as for developing the abilities that could help them. This vision has been appropriated for American engineering curricula considering thatengineering can have a humanistic approach through specific courses or methodologies, theassessment of their activities from a perspective of the ethics, and the reflection about therelationship between engineering and technology, including its impacts [8]. In that sense, themain objective is deconstructing engineering from a utilitarian perspective, based on effectivityand loyalty to institutions, to reconstruct it in a libertarian or communitarian perspective based
Conference Session
Design Across the Curriculum 2
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Caroline Grace Sawatzki, Saginaw Valley State University; Rajani Muraleedharan, Saginaw Valley State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
engineering programs [4].Significance and impactChanges in the ABET accreditation criteria for engineering education also indicate a significantneed for educational reform. The new criteria include a need to demonstrate training andexperience in areas specific to design methodology. These skill requirements, such as teamwork,technical communication, economics and ergonomics of system or product design, civicengagement and ethics, reveal that the mere acquisition of technical knowledge is insufficient fora robust, modern engineering education [2].Goals and objectivesThere are several core goals involved in this paper, all centered on improving student experience,learning, and satisfaction in undergraduate education. Content creation for this paper
Conference Session
Teams and Teamwork in Design I
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Edward Lumsdaine, Michigan Technological University; Josh Loukus, Michigan Technological University; Jason Dreyer, Michigan Technological University; Steve Chenoweth, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Monika Lumsdaine, E&M Lumsdaine Solar Consultants, Inc.
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
the beginning of the second term) were well on their way to reaching the performing stage of team development. Page 14.637.11≠ Resolving problems: The teams were enabled to deal with conflict (which often arose from differences in thinking preference18). Scheduling conflicts were another common problem, but most teams found a creative way to deal with those. Lack of motivation, commitment, and a poor work ethic proved to be most difficult. If a student chose not to change and contribute an average of 6-7 hours/week on the project, the consequences were a penalty in points distributed according to the contributions each member
Conference Session
Design for Community and Environment
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Matthew Green, LeTourneau University; Julie Linsey, University of Texas-Austin; Carolyn Conner Seepersad; Kathy Schmidt; Kristin Wood, University of Texas-Austin
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
Conference Session
Studies in Engineering Design
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jackson Lyall Autrey, University of Oklahoma; Shalaka Subhash Ghaisas, University of Oklahoma; Xun Ge, University of Oklahoma; Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma; Farrokh Mistree, University of Oklahoma
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
Conference Session
The BEST InDEED
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kristen Clapper Bergsman, University of Washington
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education