Conference Session

Design for Community and Environment

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Serdar Tumkor, Istanbul Technical University; Karl Haapala, Michigan Technological University; Vishesh Kumar, Michigan Technological University; John Sutherland, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

W. Lawrence Neeley, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; Larry Leifer, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

are prepared for each course in the BLC Table as well as for relevantelective and support courses. These syllabi are standardized; for each course the followinginformation is provided, at a minimum: • Department, number, and title of course • Designation as a ‘Required’ or ‘Elective’ course • Course (catalog) description • Prerequisite(s) • Textbook(s) and/or other required material • Course objectives • Topics covered • Class/laboratory schedule, i.e., number of sessions each week and duration of each session • Contribution of course to meeting the professional component • Relationship of course to program outcomes • Person(s) who prepared this description and date of preparationFor the

Conference Session

Design Methodology and Evaluation 2

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Buelin-Biesecker, North Carolina State University; Eric N. Wiebe, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

classroom projects and assessments for students and teachers that will spur studentstoward meeting their creative potential. Creativity was shown to be a successful studentoutcome of the game art and design project, and the Consensual Assessment Technique showspromise as a method for measuring creativity in technology education laboratory activities aswell as the integrated STEM learning environment.References 1. Todd, S. M., & Shinzato, S. (1999). Thinking for the future: Developing higher-level thinking and creativity for students in Japan--and elsewhere. Childhood Education, 75(6), 342-45. 2. Lewis, T. (2009). Creativity in technology education: providing children with glimpses of their creative potential. International

Conference Session

Capstone Design Projects

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Taskin Padir, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Fred Looft, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; William Michalson, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Michael Ciaraldi, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Eben Cobb, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Kenneth Stafford, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

, synthesis, integration of previous course work, and experimental work. Differentdepartments, majors, areas and topics may have other evidence based criteria to consider.Regardless, it is incumbent on the center advisor(s) to insure that all team members are aware ofthe criteria and that the students are directed along a learning path that will address the criteria.Although WPI has been focused on projects based education for well over thirty years it wasonly in 2009 that outcomes were approved for the capstone design (Table 2). Table 2: Capstone Learning Outcomes Students who complete a Major Qualifying Project will: (a) apply fundamental and disciplinary concepts and methods in ways appropriate to their

Conference Session

Design Realization

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathryn Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University; Katja N. Spreckelmeyer, Stanford University, Dept. of Psychology; Jacob Hershfield; Max Hershfield, Stanford University; Carolyn McEachern, Stanford University; Martin Steinert, NTNU (Norwegian University of Science and Technology); Larry Leifer, Stanford University, Center for Design Research

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Principles of Product Development Flow. Redondo Beach, CA: Celeritas Publishing.12. Dow, S. P., Heddleston, K. and S. R. Klemmer. 2009. The efficacy of prototyping under time constraints. Source, Proc. C&C-09, Berkeley, CA, 165-174, ACM 978-1-60558-403-4/09/10.13. Jablokow, K. W. and M. J. Kirton. 2009. Problem solving, creativity, and the level-style distinction. Perspectives on the Nature of Intellectual Styles (L.-F. Zhang and R. J. Sternberg, Eds.), New York: Springer, 137–168.14. DeFranco, J.F., Jablokow, K.W., Bilen, S.G., and A. Gordon. 2012. The Impact of Cognitive Style on Concept Mapping: Visualizing Variations in the Structure of Ideas. Proc. of the ASEE 2012 Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, TX.15

Conference Session

The Best of Design in Engineering

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cory A. Hixson, Virginia Tech; Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech; James J. Pembridge, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

nature answering questionssuch as; Why do faculty express certain motivation values? and What motivates faculty to teachthe capstone design course? Addressing such questions can help the capstone communitydevelop its most critical resource: dynamic, engaged teachers.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.0846605. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References1. Pembridge, J.J., "Mentoring in Engineering Capstone Design Courses: Beliefs and Practices across Disciplines." Engineering Education, Virginia Polytechnic

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ricardo G. Sanfelice, University of Arizona; Giampiero Campa, MathWorks; Manuel Abraham Robles, University of Arizona

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

angle is measured between the front normal vector and the South direc-tion. (b) The zenith angle is measured between the arm of the collector and the vertical axis.with respect to the vertical and horizontal planes. ω(t) = (360/24)t (1) δ = 23.45 sin(360(284 + n)/365) (2)The solar vector is found using (3) as a function of the solar parameters and the lens normal vectoris found as a function of the solar cooker angles. ˆ s = (cos δ cos ω cos λ + sin δ sin λ, − cos δ sin ω, − cos δ cos ω sin λ + sin δ cos λ) n

Conference Session

Teams and Teamwork in Design

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yogesh Velankar, Purdue University; Sean Brophy, Purdue University; Masataka Okutsu, Purdue University; Daniel Delaurentis, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Page 15.1190.8making timesAcknowledgementsNSF Grant number # 0935153, Purdue University’s Discovery Learning Center, School ofEngineering Education, and the School of Aeronautics and Astronautics.References 1. Clough, W. (2004). The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. National Academy of Engineering: Washington, DC. 2. Seat, E., & Lord, S. M. (1999). Enabling effective engineering teams: A program for teaching interaction skills. Journal of Engineering Education. 88, 385-390. 3. Oakley, B., Felder, R. M., Brent, R., & Elhajj, I. (2004). Turning student groups into effective teams. Journal of Student Centered Learning, 2(1), 9-34. 4. Newstetter, W. C. (2005

Conference Session

Teams and Teamwork in Design

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wael Mokhtar, Grand Valley State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Program, Professor Paul Duesing, andMr. Jon Coullard for the contribution in the presented projects. Last but not least, the authorwould like to thank the students who participated in the projects for providing the samples thatwere presented in the paper.Bibliography1. Duesing, P., Baumann, D., McDonald, D., Walworth, M., and Anderson, R., “Learning and Practicing the Design Review Process in Senior Capstone Design Classes” ASEE Annual Conference proceedings, no. 2465, 2004.2. Miller, R. and Olds, B., “A Model Curriculum for a Capstone Course in Multidisciplinary Engineering Design”, Journal of Engineering Education, , pp 1-6, October 1994.3. Todd, R., Magleby, S., Sorensen, C., Swan, B., and Anthonya, D., “A Survey of Capstone

Conference Session

Assessment

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech; Benjamin David Lutz, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References1. Howe, S., "Where are we now? Statistics on Capstone Courses Nationwide." Advances in Engineering Education, 2010. 2(1): p. 1-27.2. Howe, S. and J. Wilbarger, "2005 National Survey of Engineering Capstone Design Courses," in American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. 2006: Chicago, IL. p. 21 pp.3. Wilbarger, J. and S. Howe, "Current Practices in Engineering Capstone Education: Further Results from a 2005 Nationwide Survey," in ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. 2006: San

Conference Session

Design Methodology and Evaluation 2

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

April M. Bryan, University of the West Indies

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

instruments proposed in this study in order to provide further verification andvalidation. Finally, another proposed area of future work is the inclusion of originality andcomplexity measures in the assessment of the proposed device.7. AcknowledgementsThe author wishes to thank the Department of Mechanical Engineering and especially Prof. Edwin Ekwue andMs. Nimba Whatuse for their support of this research project. Page 23.1212.128. References [1] Dutson, A. J. Todd, R. H. Magleby, S. P. Sorensen, C. D., 1997, A Review of Literature on TeachingEngineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses, ASEE Journal of Engineering Education

Conference Session

Design Across the Curriculum 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Johnathon Garcia, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology; Ryan E. Harlow, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology; Estevan Andres Nunez, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology; lorena Isabel Velasquez, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology ; Curtis John O'Malley, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

with and study energetic systems and high velocity,dynamic impacts. This field often excites many of our students, and drives many of them topursue education at NMT for the availability of these classes. As a result, the course is able tosmoothly implement a project requiring students to design a space vehicle shield capable ofprotecting critical components behind it from simulated meteorites. Teams of 6-10 design ashield capable of withstanding shrapnel, approximately 0.375in and spherical in diameter,traveling at ~3000 ft/s. Like the other projects in this course the solution is open-ended yet hassome guiding parameters, namely the shrapnel characteristics. A limiting factor of size, weight,and cost are also used. In figure 3 below is an

Conference Session

Capstone Design

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Andrew L. Gillen, University College London; Michael L. Woodrow, University College London; Jose Luis Torero, University College London

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Engineers, ‘Joint Board of Moderators 2017 Guidelines for Developing Degree Programmes’. [Online]. Available: https://www.jbm.org.uk/Files/JBMSite/fe/fec419ee-8adf-4451-9d10-afae9751b467.pdf.[3] J. J. Pembridge and M. C. Paretti, ‘Characterizing capstone design teaching: A functional taxonomy’, J. Eng. Educ., vol. 108, no. 2, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20259.[4] Y.-S. Shin, K.-W. Lee, J.-S. Ahn, and J.-W. Jung, ‘Development of internship & capstone design integrated program for university-industry collaboration’, Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 102, pp. 386–391, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.753.[5] B. Jones, C. Epler, P. Mokri, L. Bryant, and M. Paretti, ‘The Effects of a Collaborative Problem-based

Conference Session

DEED Postcard Session 2 and Presentation of Student Essay Competition Winners

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Austin Talley P.E., Texas State University, San Marcos; Kimberly Grau Talley P.E., Texas State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

those with anonline component”, Digital Culture & Education, 2(2), 2010, 128-143.[2] Strayer, J.F., “How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovationand task orientation”, Learning Environments Research, 15, 2012, 171-193.[3] Swartz, Brian., “Building a Classroom Culture that Paves the Way to Learning”,Proceedings of the 119th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. San Antonio, 2012.[4] Davies, R., Dean, D., & Ball, N., “Flipping the classroom and instructional technologyintegration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course”, Educational TechnologyResearch & Development, 61(4), 2013, 563-580.[5] Wilson, S. G., “The Flipped Class A Method to Address the Challenges of

Conference Session

Teams and Teamwork in Design I

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lifford McLauchlan, Texas A&M University-Kingsville

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

.6Smith et. al. also discuss PBL as well as cooperative learning.4 They state that in PBL teachersare there to aid, as a guide, students in the learning process. They further relate that positiveinterdependence is important to cooperative learning. In positive interdependence students mustrely on each other to succeed at the given task(s). 4Pucher et. al. describe two student motivations for learning.2 These include intrinsic andextrinsic motivations. Student intrinsic motivation means that the students are of their own willinterested in the material and problems while extrinsic means that the students receive outsidedriven rewards such as money, grades, etc. Thus student intrinsic motivation is the one of choice.For this reason PBL should use

Conference Session

Design in Freshman and Sophomore Courses

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Abbott, University of Missouri; Katie Lough, University of Missouri

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Background2.1 Approach in Design CurriculumThe functional modeling method has been or is currently used in several design relatedcourses at the Missouri University of Science & Technology (Missouri S&T and formerlyknown as the University of Missouri-Rolla) such as IDE 20 Introduction to EngineeringDesign with Computer Applications, IDE 105 Design Representations, IDE 106 DesignPerceptions, IDE 220 Engineering Design Methodology, IDE 315 InterdisciplinaryDesign Project, IDE 420 Modern Product Design, IDE 427 Function-Based RiskAnalysis, and ME 161 Introduction to Design. Other universities also apply functionalmodeling techniques such as Penn State, Carnegie Melon University, University of Texasat Austin, Virginia Tech, and Bucknell University

Conference Session

Teams and Teamwork in Design II

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gregory Watkins, California State University, Chico

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

ProcessIn order to develop an improved method of student team formation, various best practices werestudied. This is clearly a thorny issue that has been widely discussed in the literature in botheducational and industrial settings. Many methods are based in some way on assessing thestudent’s personality traits such as Myers Briggs indicators1 or The Big Five personality factors2.Papers specifically related to student team formation by Wesner3, Wilde4, and Adams5 report ona number of differing strategies that may be instructive for the interested reader.A source not widely reported on is research into team roles by R Meredith Belbin. His 1981book, Management Teams – Why they Succeed or Fail1, and a follow-up work, 1998’s TeamRoles at Work2, studied

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kanti Prasad, University of Massachusetts-Lowell

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

VLSI Design however are only beingtaught for the last 20 years, with additions in MMIC system design and VHDL/Verilog basedsystem design. In VLSI, design constraints such as minimization of dissipated power,maximization of the speed, and optimization of device density onto the chip, are dealt with quiteextensively. In MMIC system design, the issues predominant at microwaves such as, s-parameters, distributed parameters pertinent to device, as well as packaging, are dealt with detail.For example, during low noise, or power amplifier at microwaves, characterization ofpseudomorphic high electron mobility (pHEMT) or metal semiconductor field effect transistor(MESFET), along with their doping profiles in layered-material-structure are explained

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Capstone Design Projects

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yupeng Luo, California State University, Fresno; Silvana Polgar, California State University, Fresno; Wei Wu, California State University, Fresno

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

shelter design for future improvements of the prototype.Recommended new studies include modular design for future shelters and design of prototypedfurniture featuring flexibility, safety, and sustainability.References[1] L. J. McKenzie, M. S. Trevisan, D. C. Davis, and S. W. Beyerlein, "Capstone design coursesand assessment: A national study," in Proceedings of the 2004 American Society of EngineeringEducation Annual Conference & Exposition, 2004, pp. 1-14.[2] J. A. Marin, J. E. Armstrong, and J. L. Kays, "Elements of an Optimal Capstone DesignExperience," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 19-22, 1999.[3] R. H. Todd, S. P. Magleby, C. D. Sorensen, B. R. Swan, and D. K. Anthony, "A Survey ofCapstone Engineering Courses in

Conference Session

Maker Spaces within the University

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jenifer Blacklock, Colorado School of Mines; Stephanie Ann Claussen, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

for EE. To stay consistent with EE, ME will also be employed as a form ofpre-/post-assessment as well. Additionally, as students prepare to graduate we willperform semi-structured interviews, to understand how they used the labs and any gainsthey showed in learning outcomes. This will be new for both ME as well as EE.ConclusionsFrom the efforts at Colorado School of Mines, a number of conclusions can be drawn: § Makerspaces can successfully be established through both student and faculty led efforts. § Implementing hands-on projects throughout the curriculum will increase the number of students who start using the space/s and continue to use the space/s. § Establishing safety throughout several different

Conference Session

Capstone Design Practices

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Zhinan Zhang, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; Houzhi Liu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; Lu Chen, Shanghai JiaoTong University; Yaxin Huang, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; Jiabin Zhu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

-operate framework in a mechanical engineering capstone project.” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 32-54, 2020.[7] M. Beshoy, J. Shraddha, J. D. Summers, “Investigating the impact of requirements 11 elicitation and evolution on course performance in a pre-capstone design course,” J. Eng. Design, vol. ED-30, pp. 155-179, Apr. 2019.[8] E. B. Walker , D. M. Boyer, “Using Studio Culture to Foster Epistemic Change in an Engineering Senior Design Course,” IEEE Trans.Educ, vol. ED-62, pp. 209-215, Aug. 2019.[9] S. Howe, L. Rosenbauer, S. Poulos, The 2015 Capstone Design Survey Results: Current Practices and Changes over Time. Northampton, MA

Conference Session

Design for Community and Environment

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Mehalik, University of Pittsburgh; Yaron Doppelt, University of Pittsburgh; Christian Schunn, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting a Learning-by-Designcurriculum into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495-548.7. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Smith, T. A., & Kelly, D. L. (1997). Scienceachievement in the primary school years: IEA’s third international mathematics and science study. Chestnut Hill,MA: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston College.8. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Gonzalez, E. J., Gregory, K. D., Smith, T. A., Chrostowski, S. J., et al. (2000).TIMSS 1999 international science report: Findings from IEA’s repeat of the third international mathematics andscience study at the eighth grade. Chestnut

Conference Session

Teams and Teamwork in Design

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen Ekwaro-Osire, Texas Tech University; Peter Orono, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

questionnaires have to be applied in further iterations.Additional, a separate questionnaire pertaining to the pan-mentor’s effectiveness will also beconstructed.7. Acknowledgements The second author acknowledges support from IUPUI: Office for Professional Developmentgrant for Special focus Gateway Development and Purdue School of Engineering andTechnology.8. Bibliography1. Ekwaro-Osire S. 'Pan-Mentoring' as an effective element of capstone design courses. The International Journal of Engineering Education 2003;19(5):721-4.2. Orono P, Ekwaro-Osire S, "Evolutionary design paradigm as a retention tool," in Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon, 2005.3. Ekwaro-Osire S, Orono P, "Pan-mentoring in creative

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education (DEED) Engineering Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gerald Sullivan, Virginia Military Institute; Jon-michael Hardin P.E., Virginia Military Institute

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

conventional labs in the course. In addition, the survey asked students whether they wereplanning to stay in Mechanical Engineering or were considering a change of major. The survey isshown below.ME-105 Student SurveyAs part of the ME departments ongoing effort to improve our Intro to Mechanical Engineeringcourse, it is important for us to know what‟s working and what‟s not! Please take a few minutesto rate your enjoyment of the lab exercises listed below: 1. Lego Clock design lab: a. I really enjoyed this lab and wished that there were more like it in the ME-105 curriculum. b. I generally enjoyed this lab exercise c. This lab was OK; not great, not bad. d. I didn‟t enjoy this lab e. I strongly

Conference Session

Teams and Teamwork in Design

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Natasha Perova, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Sean P. Brophy, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Ruth A. Streveler, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

for writing the paper, their activity was less frequent incomparison to teams 3 and 5. Team 1’s wiki history contributions revealed that only halfof the team members were writers of the paper for the most part. Their activitiesprimarily were content contributions and formatting. With only 17 percent of activityattributed to edits. In contrast, teams 3 and 5 had higher percentages attributed to edits,emphasizing more dialog between team members rather then individual contributions.Contributions history for teams 3 and 5 also showed that there were contributions fromeach of the team members, making their work experience more of a collaborativeprocess.The meaning of collaborative process for each of the team members is an importantconsideration

Conference Session

Capstone Design Pedagogy II

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rui (Celia) Pan, Purdue University; Shih-Ping Kuo, Purdue University; Johannes Strobel, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

ideas.Bibliography1. Adams, R. (2001). Cognitive processes in iterative design behavior. Dissertation: University ofWashington.2. Adams, R., & C. J. Atman. (1999). Cognitive processes in iterative design behavior. Proceedings ofthe Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, November, San Juan.3. Adams, R. S., & C. J. Atman. (2000). Characterizing Engineering Student Design Processes: AnIllustration of Iteration. Proceedings of the Annual Conference for the American Society ofEngineering Education, June, Charlotte, NC.4. Adams, R. S. (2002). Understanding design iteration: Representations from an empirical study. In D.Durling & J. Shackleton (Eds), Common Ground: Proceedings of the Design Research SocietyInternational Conference at Brunel

Conference Session

Assessment and Evaluation in Design

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mysore Narayanan, Miami University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

critical years. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Barrows, Howard S. (2000). Problem-Based Learning Applied to Medical Education. Springfield, IL: SouthernIllinois University School of Medicine.Boud, D., Feletti, G. (1991). The Challenge of Problem-based Learning. United Kingdom. London: Kogan PagePublishers.Boylan, H. (1988). The historical roots of developmental education. Part III. Review of Research inDevelopmental Education, 5 (3).Boylan, H., Bonham, B., & Bliss, L. (1992). The impact of developmental programs. Research in DevelopmentalEducation, 9 (5).Boylan, Hunter R. (2001). Making the Case for Developmental Education. Research in Developmental Education,12 (2).http://www.umkc.edu/cad/nade/nadedocs/hbcase95.htmBrier, E. (1984

Conference Session

Design Projects across the Curriculum

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ibibia Dabipi, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore; Christopher Hartman, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore; James B. Burrows-Mcelwain, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

needed to solve a single problem while keeping in mind the manydiffering objectives of the overall project [1]. A multidisciplinary approach to engineering designis valuable in that it asks that students make certain that, “…advances in performance,…technology, or discipline(s), must be much more highly integrated than in the past” [2]. TheFreshman Engineering course at the University of Maryland Eastern Shore is designed to exposestudents to challenging problems that require them to gain experience and increase theirknowledge outside of their normal field of expertise while practicing decision making skillsnecessary to stay on time and on budget.Engaging students within the engineering design principlesStudents in the Spring 2009 Engineering

Conference Session

Design in Freshman and Sophomore Courses

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gail Hohner, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Jennifer Wegner, University of Michigan; Moses K. Lee, University of Michigan; Amy Frances Goldstein, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

also compare 35 incoming students who did not participate in the program. Thisprogram is the initial activity in an undergraduate multidisciplinary design program whichincludes many co-curricular enrichment activities as well as an academic minor. We intend tostudy this group of students through their engineering education and evaluate them periodically.We use both the self-efficacy survey from Carberry, Lee and Ohland (Measuring EngineeringDesign Self-Efficacy) as well as the concepts in design survey from Oehlberg and Agogino(Undergraduate Conceptions of the Engineering Design Process: assessing the Impact of aHuman-Centered Desgin Course – which is an extension of Mosborg S., et.al., Conceptions ofthe Engineering Design Process: An Expert

Conference Session

Design Cognition II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joseph C. Musto, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Alicia Domack, Milwaukee School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

manipulated to mitigate those effects.References: 1. Ariely, Dan, Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces that Shape Our Decisions, Harper Perennial, 2010. 2. Slaughter, J.E., E.F. Sinar, and S. Highhouse, “Decoy Effects and Attribute-Level Inferences”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5), 1999, pp. 823-828. 3. Heath, T.B. and S. Chatterjee, “Asymmetric decoy effects on lower-quality versus higher quality brands:: Meta-analytic and experimental evidence”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 22, January 1995, pp. 268- 284. 4. Wedell, D.H., “Distinguishing among models of contextually-induced preference reversals”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol. 17