Conference Session

Design Tools and Methodology I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan Delson, University of California, San Diego

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

of the UCSD Peer Review tool. This screen shot for 3 person team, but most of ourteams have 4-6 members. Page 25.1096.3 Fig. 1: Initial Rating ScreenshotSingle Parameter Assessment with a Fixed Pie ApproachA key difference between the UCSD Peer Review tool and CATME tool is that the UCSD toolhas a single parameter that the each student applies to their teammate to indicate overall teamcontribution. Moreover, this single parameter is applied in a fixed-pie fashion, meaning that ifone teammate is rated above average then other teammates(s) must be rated below average. Thenumber of points that can be allocated is

Conference Session

Design Cognition I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hamid Rad, Washington State University, Vancouver

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Education”, Section 2546, 2006 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 18-21, Chicago, Illinois.[4] O’Brien, S; Abulencia, J.P, “Learning Through Reverse Engineering”, Section 505, 2010 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 20 - 23, Louisville, Kentucky.[5] Kellogg, R.S; Jenison, R., “Utilizing Reverse Engineering to Explore the Design Process”, Section 2438, 1997 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 15-18, Milwaukie, Wisconsin.[6] McCracken, W.M; Newstetter, W., “Reverse Engineering or Design Recovery: Two Approaches to Uncovering Designing”, Section 2225, 2000 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 18-21 St. Louis, Missouri.[7] Robertson, J; Wales, B.; Weihmeir, J., “Reverse Engineering as a Means

Conference Session

DEED Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Harry B. Santoso, Utah State University; Raymond E. Boyles, Utah State University; Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University; Wade H. Goodridge, Utah State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

that used interview as asingle or complementary method. Table 1. Example of Interviews in Engineering Education Research Paper title Year Method(s) involvedWhy Do Students Choose Engineering? A Qualitative, 2010 semi-structured interview and 6 informal conversationLongitudinal Investigation of Students’ Motivational ValuesStudents’ Conceptions of Tutor and Automated Feedback in 2010 in-depth interview (semi-structured 7 interview)Professional Writing

Conference Session

Creativity and Innovation in Engineering Design

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Micah Lande, Stanford University; Larry Leifer, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Program.Bibliography 1. Lande, M and Leifer, L, “Introducing a “Ways of Thinking” Framework for Student Engineers Learning to Do Design,” June 14-17, 2009. Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. Austin, Texas. 2. Dym, C, Sheppard, S, Agogino, A, Leifer, L, Frey, D, Eris, O, “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning,” Journal of Engineering Education, 2005. 3. Robinson, JA, “Engineering Thinking and Rhetoric”, Journal of Engineering Education, 1998. 4. Cardella, ME, Engineering Mathematics: an Investigation of Students' Mathematical Thinking from a Cognitive Engineering Perspective, Thesis (Ph. D.) University of Washington, 2006. 5. Ishii, K

Conference Session

Capstone Design III

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Darling, Ph.D., Syracuse University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

acknowledge the organizers of the abroad course which the engineeringstudents joined: Rebecca Bollin, Kevin Lair, Yutaka Sho, and the staff of SUAbroad. Theundergraduate participants in the IV saline design project were Francesca Coppola, Loai Allam,Jenna Priola, Rachel Ogundiran, Patricia Wardwell, and Catherine Wilcox. The undergraduateparticipants in the sterilization design project were Thomas Law, Razan Fashho, Alanna Abel,Yushek Pun, and Joo Won Lee. Funding for the project was generously donated by Brian andEmily Beals through the L.C. Smith Faculty Excellence Award.Bibliography 1. King, PH; Fries, RC. Design of Biomedical Devices and Systems. 2nd Edition, Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2009. 2. Zenios, S; Makower, E; Yock, P.Biodesign

Conference Session

The Best of Design in Engineering

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zeshan Hyder, Virginia Tech & UET Lahore; Zulfiqar Ali, Virginia Polytechnic State University; Janis P. Terpenny, Virginia Tech; Richard M. Goff, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

engineering education]. in Mudd Design Workshop II, `Designing Design Education for the 21st Century', 19-21 May 1999. 2001. Ireland: Tempus House of Publishers.5. Fink, L.D. A Self-Directed Guide to Designing Courses for Significant Learning. 2003; Available from: http://www.deefinkandassociates.com/GuidetoCourseDesignAug05.pdf.6. Ghazinoory, S., A. Esmail Zadeh, and A. Memariani, Fuzzy SWOT analysis. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2007. 18(Compendex): p. 99-108.7. Ullman, D.G., The Mechanical Design Process. 4th ed. 2009: McGraw Hill. 448.8. Nair, K.G.K. and P.N. Prasad, Offshore outsourcing: a swot analysis of a state in India. Information Systems Management, 2004. 21(Copyright 2004, IEE): p

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ana Elisa E. Goulart, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

24.1322.13them to be open to new development approaches and bring innovation to their futureemployers.5 - References 1. McConnell, S., “Code Complete,” 2nd edition, Microsoft Press, 2004. 2. Williams, L., Maximilien, E. M., Vouk, M., “Test-Driven Development as a Defect-Reduction Practice,” in the Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE’ 03), pp. 34, 2003. 3. Solís, C. and Wang, X., “A Study of the Characteristics of Behaviour Driven Development,” in the Proceedings of the 37th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, 2011. 4. Wynne, M and Hellesoy, A., “The Cucumber Book – Behaviour-Driven Development for Testers and Developers,” Pragmatic

Conference Session

DEED Melange

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sara A. Atwood, Elizabethtown College; Matthew T. Siniawski, Loyola Marymount University; Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

standards work: how to implement standards-based assessments in the classroom, school, and district, 3rd ed. Advanced Learning Press, Englewood, CO. 5. Siniawski, M.T., Carberry, A.R., & Dionisio, J.D. (2012). Standards-based grading: An alternative to score- based assessment. Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE PSW Section Conference, San Luis Obispo, California. 6. Carberry, A.R., Siniawski, M.T., & Dionisio, J.D. (2012). Standards-based grading: Preliminary studies to quantify changes in student affective and cognitive behaviors. Proceedings of the 42nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Seattle, Washington. 7. Carberry, A.R., Lee, H-S., & Ohland, M.W. (2010). Measuring engineering

Conference Session

Design Pedagogy 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sonia Travaglini, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; Helen L. Chen, Stanford University; Swetha Nittala, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. USA: SAGE Publications, pp. 69-103, 2013.[7] S. J. Tracy, Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis,Communicating Impact. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, 2019.[8] M. Vaismoradi, H. Turunen, and T. Bondas, “Content analysis and thematic analysis:Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study,” Nursing & Health Sciences, vol. 15ED-3, pp. 398-405, 2013.[9] N. A. Mamaril, E. L. Usher, C. R. Li, D. R. Economy, and M. S. Kennedy, “Measuringundergraduate students' engineering self‐efficacy: A validation study,” Journal of EngineeringEducation, vol. 105 ED-2, pp. 366-395, 2016.Appendix 1List of questions for students participating

Conference Session

Early Engineering Design Experiences

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

M. Reza Emami, University of Toronto

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

other twotypes be brought up only when they are directly relevant to the core type. In a design course,procedure is the primary organizing content, thus the course should centre on a procedural task,i.e., developing a prototype from concept generation to analysis, to synthesis, to fabrication,integration, and testing. During this procedure, relevant concepts and theories should bepresented directly related to what the procedure requires. For example, the Reverse EngineeringAssignment, which will be discussed in the next section, is of conceptual type, but choosing thesubject related to the design project ensures the relevance of the developed concept(s) to theprimary procedural content. The same strategy can be applied to the design and

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Potpourri

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dominic Halsmer, Oral Roberts University; Nate Roman, Oral Roberts University; Tyler Todd, Oral Roberts University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

original engineer(s). Consider the following quote from page55, “He [reverse engineer] also noted that the letters were so precise they must have beenengraved not by a labourer but by a highly trained craftsman.” Key to the design recoveryprocess was the incorporation of historical and cultural information from that time period.Consider this quote from page 61, “archeologists also studied the rest of the salvaged cargo.Their discoveries help to paint a vivid picture of when the ship sailed, where her load was beingtaken and the sort of world from which she came. From there, we can guess at the origins of theAntikythera mechanism itself, and how it ended up on its final journey.” Thus when relatedhistorical information was combined with direct

Conference Session

Capstone Design I

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John K. Estell, Ohio Northern University; Juliet Hurtig, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

-nology.com 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.teach- nology.com/tutorials/teaching/rubrics3. S. M. Blanchard, M. G. McCord, P. L. Mente, D. S. Lalush, C. F. Abrams, E. G. Loboa, H. T. Nagle, Rubrics Cubed: Tying Grades to Assessment to Reduce Faculty Workloads, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.4. V. L. Young, D. Ridgeway, M. E. Prudich, D. J. Goetz, B. J. Stuart, Criterion-Based Grading for Learning and Assessment in Unit Observations Laboratory, Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.5. What is a Rubric? Relearning by Design, Inc., 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.relearning.org

Conference Session

Design Tools and Skill Development

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Annie Abell, Ohio State University; Kelly DeVore, Columbus College of Art and Design

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Design Teams

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacquelyn Kay Nagel, James Madison University; Christopher Stewart Rose, James Madison University; Ramana M. Pidaparti, University of Georgia; Elizabeth Marie Tafoya, James Madison University; Peyton Leigh Pittman; Wade Knaster, James Madison University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

, engineer). This approach is coupled with the AskNature.org website,which is a public database of biological information organized by a biomimicry taxonomy [37].The cognitive process of this approach is divided into the steps of scoping, discovering, creating,and evaluating (Fig. 2), and is structured around the search for particular biological insights tosolve a given problem. Scoping involves specifying the problem to be solved with operatingconditions, the functions that must be performed, and which life’s principles the design willincorporate. Discovering involves identifying biological systems that have evolved strategies tosolve the defined function(s) followed by abstracting those strategies into possible designprinciples. This step is often

Conference Session

Capstone Design Courses I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa M. Del Torto, Northwestern University; Bruce Ankenman, Northwestern University; Stacy Benjamin, Northwestern University; Trevor Harty, Northwestern University; Penny L. Hirsch, Northwestern University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Capstone Design Courses II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nikhil Gupta, Florida State University; Matthew J Jensen, Florida Institute of Technology; Chiang Shih, Florida A&M University/Florida State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

multidisciplinary approach shows that such projects can leverage on thecomplementary skills and disciplinary expertise of individuals and institutions so that effectivepartnership can form to provide inspirational learning experience for all participants.Florida Institute of Technology program has a similar senior design model, spanning a total ofthree semesters, a single credit junior design course held in the spring semester, followed by bothsenior year semesters. Being a smaller school with 14 different engineering disciplines,multidisciplinary senior design projects are commonplace, allowing students from variousdisciplines to work collaboratively to meet the end requirement(s). Oftentimes, senior designprojects are industry-sponsored, although

Conference Session

Design Pedagogy and Curriculum 2

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Cozzens, Utah Educational Network; Jeremy Ray Farner, Weber State University; Thomas James Paskett, Weber State University; Elias V. Perez, Utah State University Eastern; Isabella Borisova, Southern Utah University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Best of DEED

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert L. Nagel, James Madison University; Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University; Jacquelyn Kay Nagel, James Madison University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Design Spine

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University; Eric C. Pappas, James Madison University; Robert L. Nagel, James Madison University; Jacquelyn Kay Nagel, James Madison University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Capstone Design I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter L Schmidt, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Daniel Hoch, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Nabila A. Bousaba, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; William F. Heybruck, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Deborah L Sharer, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Valentina Cecchi, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Gary Teng, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Elizabeth Sharer, Francis Marion University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

UNC Charlotte in 2010 as Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering and researcher in the Energy Production and Infrastructure Center (EPIC).S. Gary Teng, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte Dr. S. Gary Teng is Professor and Director of Systems Engineering & Engineering Management Program and Center for Lean Logistics & Engineered Systems at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He holds B.E., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Industrial Engineering. Dr. Teng is a Professional Engineer in the State of Wisconsin and an ASQ-certified Quality Engineer and Reliability Engineer. His research interests are in engineering system design and analysis, lean systems design & implementation, Lean

Conference Session

Design Communications & Cognition I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dirk Schaefer, Georgia Institute of Technology; Jitesh Panchal, Washington State University; Sammy Haroon, The RBR Group; Farrokh Mistree, University of Oklahoma

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Design Pedagogy 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jarod White, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Micah Lande, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE)Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington.Brandt, E, How Tangible Mock-Ups Support Design Collaboration, (2007) Knowledge,Technology, and Policy.Buxton, B, Sketching User Experiences, Morgan Kaufmann, 2007.Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybridapproach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International journal ofqualitative methods, 5(1), 80-92.Houde, S, and Hill, C, “What Do Prototypes Prototype?,” in Handbook of Human-ComputerInteraction (2nd Ed.), M. Helander, T. Landauer, and P. Prabhu (eds.): Elsevier Science B. V:Amsterdam, 1997.Lande, M., & Leifer, L. (2009). Prototyping to learn

Conference Session

Empathy and Human-centered Design 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Aaron Carpenter, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Juval V. Racelis, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Alexander Cabal, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Beth Anne Cooke-Cornell, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Gloria Guohua Ma, Wentworth Institute of Technology; James R. McCusker, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Lynette Panarelli, Wentworth Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June 24-27, 2018.11. "Charting their own Course", National Geographic, https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/article/partner-content-charting-their-own- course.12. G. D. Hoople, J. A. Meija, D. A. Chen, and S. M. Lord, "Reimagining Energy: Deconstructing Traditional Engineering Silos using Culturally Sustaining Pedagogies", ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June 24-27, 2018.

Conference Session

Design Across the Curriculum 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Lilianny Virguez, University of Florida; Pamela L. Dickrell, University of Florida; Andrea Goncher, University of Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

”.References[1] American Society for Engineering Education (2012). Going the Distance: Best Practices and Strategies for Retaining Engineering, Engineering Technology and Computing Students. Available:https://www.asee.org/retention-project[2] Jones, B. D. (2009). Motivating Students to Engage in Learning: The MUSIC Model of Academic Motivation. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(2), 272-285.[3] Eccles, J. S., (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors.[4] Jones, B. D., Tendhar, C., & Paretti, M. C. (2016). The effects of students’ course perceptions on their domain identification, motivational beliefs, and goals. Journal of Career Development, 43(5), 383-397.[5

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Eduaction - Poster Session

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan Cheville, Oklahoma State University; Christine Co, Oklahoma State University; Bear Turner, Oklahoma State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

reading the material they individually take an on-line quiz to testtheir knowledge of the material. Once the quiz is passed the team or small groups ofstudents are taught one of the skills mentioned early by an expert (teaching assistant) thengiven a small project to complete independently which is then evaluated by the expertusing a rubric. If the student passes inspection then the student becomes certified in thatarea of skill.In the second step student teams use the acquired skills to contribute to the first project.The class acts as one large team trying to create a project which is created one step at atime as described previously. Each team completes their part of the project then passesinformation or products to the team(s) that are in

Conference Session

Design in Freshman and Sophomore Courses

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan Masten, McMaster University; Robert Fleisig, McMaster University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

fuelfrom seeds of the Jatropha shrub, which grows in West Africa. The impact of this approach onstudent satisfaction and success is discussed.IntroductionA central focus of engineering education is the design process. Our goal as engineering educatorsis to ensure that graduating engineers have the ability to “design effective solutions that meetsocietal needs” 1. Traditionally, engineering education is built on a foundation of sciences andmathematics courses, with students taking engineering courses in their upper years, with fewstudents experiencing design outside of a focused course in their discipline. In the 1990’s, inresponse to accreditation criteria, most engineering schools added a “capstone” design project inthe final year. These projects

Conference Session

DEED Postcard Session 2 and Presentation of Student Essay Competition Winners

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jered H. Dean, Colorado School of Mines; Kristine R. Csavina, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

://scholarworks.rit.edu/other/6477 Berkey, Rick. Call about Michigan Tech Enterprise Program Jered Dean and Kristina Csavina. November 2016. Telephone.8 Gregory, Gayle H., and Carolyn Chapman. Differentiated instructional strategies: One size doesn't fit all. Corwin press, 2012.9 Michelle Chamberlin, Robert Powers; The promise of differentiated instruction for enhancing the mathematical understandings of college students. Teaching Mathematics Applications 2010; 29 (3): 113-139. doi: 10.1093/teamat/hrq00610 G. S. Mason, T. R. Shuman and K. E. Cook, "Comparing the Effectiveness of an Inverted Classroom to a Traditional Classroom in an Upper-Division Engineering Course," in IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 430

Conference Session

Understanding Student Development in Design

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Megan Kenny Feister, California State University, Channel Islands; Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); David Torres, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

industrial and organizational psychology applied to engineering student project teams—A review. Journal of Engineering Education, 102, 472-512. doi:10.1002/-jee.20023.[5] Treem, J.W. (2012). Communicating expertise: Knowledge performances in professional-service firms. Communication Monographs, 79, 23-47. doi:10.1080/03637751.2011.646487.[6] Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.[7] Whitbred, R., Fonti, F., Steglich, C., & Contractor, N. (2011). From microactions to macro-structure and back: A structurational approach to the evolution of organizational networks. Human Communication Research 37, 404-433. doi:10.1111/j

Conference Session

Design Assessment

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Martina Margaret Moyne, University College Dublin; Maxwell Herman, Harvard University; Conor Walsh P.E., Harvard University; Donal Padraic Holland, University College Dublin

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

use to instructors inthe future with tracking progression within a design class and evaluating their classes aftercompletion, and researchers who are engaged in improving engineering design education.References[1] C.L. Dym, A.M. Agogino, O. Eris, D.D. Frey, and L.J. Leifer, "Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning", J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 103-120, Jan. 2005.[2] M. Frank, I. Lavy, D. Elata, “Implementing the project-based learning approach in an academic course,” Int. J. of Technol. Des. Educ., vol. 13, no. 3, pp.273–288, 2003.[3] J. Ball and T.C. Ormerod, “Structured opportunistic processing design: a critical discussion,”. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., vol.43 no.1, pp.131—151, Jul. 1995.[4] M.R. Yasin, S

Conference Session

Design and the Capstone Experience

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shayne Kelly McConomy, Florida A&M University/Florida State University; Ruturaj Soman; Nikhil Gupta, Florida A&M University/Florida State University; Chiang Shih, Florida A&M University/Florida State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

A FMEA When analyzing a product for B FTA potential risks due to faults and C Both A & B 1 failures, I am aware of the following D None of the above fundamental tools. My project does not need E risk analysis at all In a House of Quality (HOQ), to A Benchmarking better understand competitor’s B Reverse Engineering 2 product(s), I am aware of two C Kano Diagram standard methods that could be D Either A or B employed. E Both A & B To