university-based entrepreneurship and innovation programs. Brent’s expertise also includes the design and leadership of impactful collegiate engagement programs for universal learners.Mr. Eric Prosser, Arizona State University Eric Prosser is the Engineering and Entrepreneurship Librarian with the ASU Library. Eric is the liaison to the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering and provides research services for faculty, graduate students, and undergraduate students along with instruction in critical analysis and information literacy, including the legal and ethical use of information. Eric has a Bachelor of Science in Physics from Harvey Mudd College, a Master of Information Resources and Library Science from the University
, including the purpose andthe research question before agreeing to the interview, and participants were also ensuredcomplete confidentiality during information collection from the interview. The study securedethical approval from the Human Research Ethics Committee of Australia and participation wasvoluntary. The interviews were held in an enclosed area to ensure confidentiality amongparticipants. Interviews lasted no more than 1 hour and were audio recorded. To ensure processreliability of the study, the transcription was cleaned by using pseudonyms and identifiable datawas removed in order to maintain participant confidentiality [23]. All participants signed aconsent form.Data AnalysisThe interview data were initially analyzed using an open coding
, cultural, and safety ramifications [2], [3].Design is progressively becoming the backbone of fostering a holistic engineering education asexperts and the ABET Accreditation Criteria underline the significance of a student’s ability to“apply engineering design” (from Criterion 2), "use engineering judgment" (from Criterion 6),and “recognize ethical and professional responsibilities” (from Criterion 4) in a variety of globalcontext [4]. Modeling a genuine design experience requires overcoming multifaceted obstaclessuch as forming realistic design constraints, providing adequate stakeholder accessibility, andcreating an atmosphere that provokes empathy towards stakeholders. Additionally, both studentsand educators face many challenges balancing
and peer feedback grades, and then the result is adjusted up ordown based on qualitative factors for each student. These qualitative factors included the qualityof student contributions to team products, CATME peer comments, input from machine shopstaff, faculty advisors, industry mentors, and direct observation by the instructor. As stated in thecourse syllabus, "In rare cases, serious behavior issues, significant ethical lapses, or non-contribution to the team may result in a zero score for the instructor evaluation."Initial Launch of TimeCards in Senior Design 2 (2016-2017 Capstone Cohort)In spring 2017, team time cards and the instructor evaluation were first implemented in SeniorDesign 2. In Senior Design 2, teams work independently to
environments; Page 13.573.4 Develop viable, marketable products that address sustainable development needs; Gain knowledge and skills in product realization and project management, including the ability to transfer a work in progress to other team members of engineering/business students; Understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context and achieve insight into professional and ethical responsibilities.The overall E-teams’ assignment was to develop a sustainable product from concept to prototypeto business plan. In doing this, students learned about needs
member of the AIAA Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Technical Committee since 2003.Gregg Warnick, Brigham Young University External Relations and Intern Coordinator for the Mechanical Engineering department in the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at BYU. He works directly with industry to recruit projects for Capstone and is working to increase international project opportunities for students. Interests include global technology issues, project management, ethics, and manufacturing processes. Gregg has a Master of Technology Management degree and a BS in Manufacturing Engineering Technology, from Brigham Young University. He is completing a PhD in Educational
becamethe school’s concerted effort to supply work-ready engineers who have had the opportunity tohone their professional skills through multiple linked courses requiring: written and oralcommunications; project management; open-ended problem solving; ethical and professionalresponsibilities; public health and safety; and an understanding of global, cultural, social,environmental, and economic factors.PBL senior-level activities (Capstone) are carried out by the School of Engineering +Technology (SET) in conjunction with the Rapid Center in the College of Engineering andTechnology (CET). These PBL efforts are strongly supported by the school faculty, which serveas faculty mentors on the various projects. The Rapid Center is the engagement arm of
produced is present Reflection/ R1 Rationale for design decisions Introspection and explanation given throughout project progress Metacognition Description of expectations/ Can they predict what happens and or have intentions they plan to R2 anticipated results test? Interpretation of data/strategies/ After testing, can they interpret and iterate on available R3 results information Ethical implications of design Assigned reflective piece relating to civic implications, expectation R4
afford, which is nice. A lot was just making it up, trying it out, and seeing what worked and what did not work.” (Hayley)Richard and Hayley’s ability to engage led them to learn new ideas and perspectives on how todesign.Invested & CommittedOur framework also highlights invested and committed student designers. In the context of ourframework, this category captures personal commitment to social justice and the sustainability ofthe design and processes. At the novice sophistication level, a student approaches design as asingular task without intention to apply what has been learned to a new situation. An awarestudent has a developing sense of social responsibility and ethics. They begin to explore theimpact of the design in the social
., Rayne, K., Kemp, N. J., Hart, J., & Diller, K. R. (2005). Teaching for adaptive expertise in biomedicalengineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(2), 257-276.[14] Martin, T.; Benton, T.; Ko, P.(2010). "Transfer of Adaptive Expertise to Transform EngineeringEducation", 09/01/2009-08/31/2010, "Conference Proceedings of the 2010 Annual Meeting of the American Society forEngineering Education 2010".[15] Walker, J. M.T., Cordray, D. S., King, P. H. & Brophy, S. P. (2006). Design scenarios for assessment of adaptiveexpertise. International Journal of Engaging Education, 22, 645-651.[16] McKenna, A.F., Colgate, J.E., Olson, G.B. & Carr, S.H. (2006). Exploring adaptive expertise as a target forengineering design education. ASME
N MeanApply knowledge of mathematics, 0 0 2 35 9 46 4.15science, and engineeringDesign and conduct experiments, as 0 2 4 30 10 46 4.04well as to analyze and interpret dataDesign a system, component, orprocess to meet desired needs withinrealistic constraints such as economic, 0 0 2 25 19 46 4.37environmental, social, political,ethical, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainabilityFunction on multidisciplinary team(s) 1 1 6 26 12 46
globalization, project management, leadership, ethics, and manufacturing processes. Prior to joining BYU, Gregg worked for Becton Dickinson, a Global Medi- cal Technology Company (1995-2006). In this capacity he worked as a product development engineer, quality engineer, technical lead, business leader and program/project manager managing many differ- ent global projects. Gregg received his PhD in Educational Leadership and Higher Education from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln with a Master of Technology Management degree and a BS in Manufac- turing Engineering Technology, from Brigham Young University. Gregg also is a Professional Associate Instructor for IPS Learning and Stanford University where he teaches the IPS
study suggests that students who are exposed to enquiry - based learningdevelop early confidence that results in better performance in subsequent years of study [13].Surveys of industry and university alumni consistently point to the importance of design,communication and teamwork skills, but more importantly, students’ ability to make soundjudgments in conditions of technical, commercial and sometimes ethical uncertainty. Industryvalues student learning in rich contexts, and they acknowledge the value of supportingextracurricular student teams.The incorporation of rich, contextual components is desired, but not at the expense ofengineering science fundamentals. This presents a conflict between retaining this essential
, safety, reliability, aesthetics, ethics, and socialimpact. Courses that contain engineering design normally are taught at the upper-division level of theengineering program. Some portion of this requirement must be satisfied by at least one course which isprimarily design, preferably at the senior level, and draws upon previous coursework in the relevantdiscipline”(14).A proliferation of capstone design experiences, over the last decade, has taken place at manycolleges of engineering – all seem to meet some of the requirements noted above. The ABETrequirements is the common thread that links all such experiences for all engineering disciplinesthroughout the US, and also in some other countries that have chosen to use ABET’srequirements.Another
gateway andcornerstone engineering design course that will introduce human-centered design concepts inapplied scenarios. Modeled after the successful Engineering Service Learning course at UCMerced, the students in the HCRD course will be open to all majors at the university, bothengineering and non-engineering. Design concepts such as problem identification, stakeholderand context development, specification development and market analysis, iterative prototypingand evaluation, collaborative writing, client interactions, ethics, and other topics will be covered.Online videos with accompanying quizzes will assess the subject matter understanding of thestudents. In-class discussions will be conducted with students with real-world examples of
. • Identify and acquire new knowledge and understanding required for design, and subsequently apply it to a civil engineering project.Evidence for these outcomes will include student data as part of regular formative andsummative course assessment. We will also explore future questions related to studentoutcomes that may involve interviewing or observations as sources of evidence.Current Status and Future WorkWe have recently processed ethics approval and are limited in the results we can report at thistime. Although the focus of this initial stage is on the organizational shift, future work willencompass additional research questions to help us meet our goals and contribute to the bodyof knowledge around capstone design
the rubrics to give to students, as a means of communicating to them more clearly how design reports can be assessed, and therefore what they should emphasize. Page 12.343.3ABET CriteriaABET Criterion 3, Program Outcomes and Assessment requires that all engineeringprograms demonstrate that their students possess “(c) an ability to design a system,component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability,and sustainability.” Consistent with this requirement, the authors’ ME Departmentdeveloped Performance Criteria which are
://www.asee.org.) 2. Collura, M. A., Aliane, B., Daniels, S., Nocito-Gobel, J. “Learning the Methods of Engineering Analysis Using Case Studies, Excel and VBA – Course Design”. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. (On-line at http://www.asee.org.) 3. Richards, L. G., Gorman, M. E. “Using Case Studies to Teach Engineering Design and Ethics”. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. (On-line at http://www.asee.org.) 4. Jensen, J. N. “A Case Study Approach to Freshman Engineering Courses”. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. (On
. In fact the engineering profession is constantly making a series of decisions. Theprocess of decision making is far more complex than the process of problem solving.Complicating factors such as culture, ethnicity, globalization, and ethics should play a prominentrole. Design, the cross-fertilization of science and art, is a basic function of all species thatoccupy a masterfully orchestrated and designed ecosystem in which man is but one. On the otherhand, culture with its complex mix is the expression of what a group of people creates - arts,beliefs customs, institutions, products and thought - at a particular time within the context of thenatural environment. Design and culture therefore are intimately linked and undoubtedlyinfluence each
. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Review.[6] Meyers, C. (1986). Teaching Students to Think Critically: A Guide for Faculty in all Disciplines. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.[7] Perry, T. S. (2006, September). Can One Man Make Engineering Cool through Rap Music? IEEE Spectrum, Vol. 43, No. 9, pp.57-59.[8] Richard, L. G., (2004). Using Case Studies to Teach Engineering Design and Ethics. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.[9] Sandhu, J.A., Bamberg, E., Hong, J., & Boyce, M. C. (2002). Active Engagement Pedagogy for an Introductory Solid Mechanics Course. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Annual Conference & Exposition.[10
agencies, non-profits, or university units. Pastprojects have been provided by such diverse sponsors as Eaton Cutler Hammer, Medrad, MineSafety Appliances, Westinghouse Electric, the American Respiratory Alliance, the U.S. FederalAviation Administration, the Carnegie Mellon Entertainment Technology Center, the CarnegieMellon Architecture Dept., and an individual alumnus who wanted to create a restaurant offeringthe “perfect Southern Barbecue”. The design tasks have ranged from devising a means for moreeasily giving injections to medical patients to simplifying the design of a unique computer gameconsole.As they work on their projects, student team members learn and then put into practice Teaming,Project Management, Product Realization, Ethics, and
. Page 14.86.4EGNR 491-495Senior design project courses at LSSU (EGNR 491-495) are aimed at providing students with theskills for successful completion of their senior project, future projects in industry, and futureprojects in graduate school. The students will also develop effective design/project teams.Specific objectives for the course are the following:Upon successful completion of this course, students will be able to: 1. Deliver an effective professional oral presentation. 2. Write memos, letters, and project plans in a clear, concise and professional manner. 3. Explain the principles and issues of ethical behavior in engineering and professional fields. 4. Explain the use of responsibility charts and timelines in project
risks, uncertainties, and implications of their solutionsThese ideas are not new to the ABET criterion; they were housed in Criterion 3, Outcome (c) [2].Fortunately, they were given positions that are more prominent and established as overarchinggoals. In this way ABET is formally making a push to include sustainability into all engineeringcurricula. They further this point by the inclusion of the revised Criterion 3, Outcome 5, whichstates [1]: An ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contextsThere are multiple valid definitions of
understanding, success skills development and the project itself”, and “G. Motivating further development of the project to go beyond classroom but into real products for public”. Meanwhile, everyone rated either “quite a bit” or “very much” regarding the level of the capstone experience contributed to their development in the following areas: “C. Thinking critically and analytically”, “E. Acquiring job- or work-related knowledge and skills”, “F. Working effectively with others”, “G. Developing or clarifying a personal code of values and ethics”, “H. Understanding people of other backgrounds (economic, racial/ethnic, political, religious, nationality, etc.)”, “I. Solving complex real-world problems”, and “J. Being an
identify, formulate and solve problems in thermal or mechanical systems. 1.2 will be able to design a system, component, 4 4 process or experiment and analyze and interpret data 1.3 will be able to use modern tools, hardware 3 3 and software in problem solving process 2.1 recognize the need for professional and 3.5 3 ethical responsibility 2.2 recognize and consider the consequences of 2.5 2.5 engineering solutions on society 2.3 will be knowledgeable of contemporary 3 3 issues 3.1 will be effective communicators 4 4 3.2 will work
reason that reason for considered factor (as opposed to schedule, living to contribute: skill set, person was selection proximity) work ethic Individual requested 1 = hang out 5. PAL: Friendship Level 0 = were not 0.1-0.9 = degree to which students spend social time together ‘nearly
. Cambridge Univ. Press: Cambridge, UK, 1997; p 3-65.14. Hattie, J.; Timperley, H., The power of feedback. Review of educational research 2007, 77 (1), 81-112.15. Shute, V. J., Focus on formative feedback. Review of educational research 2008, 78 (1), 153-189.16. IEEE Code of Ethics. http://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/governance/p7-8.html.17. Muller, L., The importance of peer review. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 2001, 56 (3), 191.18. ABET - Accreditation Criteria and Supporting Documents. http://www.abet.org/accreditation-criteria-policies- documents/; (NAE)., N. A. o. E., The engineering of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. The National Academic Press: Washington, DC, 2004.19. McCarthy, A. M
curriculumand program development enables continuous improvement activities. The complete list ofCEAB GrAtts is provided here:1 Page 26.242.2 1. A knowledge base for engineering 2. Problem analysis 3. Investigation 4. Design 5. Use of engineering tools 6. Individual and teamwork 7. Communication skills 8. Professionalism 9. Impact of engineering on society and the environment 10. Ethics and equity 11. Economics and project management 12. Life-long learningAlthough students will develop all GrAtts throughout their undergraduate engineering programs,assessment of the attributes in the final year of the students’ programs provides
courseprepares students for a profession,” Educational Technology Research andDevelopment, vol. 53, no.1, pp.65-85. Mar. 2005.[15] B. A. King and S. Magun-Jackson, “Epistemological beliefs of engineeringstudents,” Journal of Technology Studies, vol.35, no.2, pp.56-64, Win. 2009.[16] B. A. King and S. Magun-Jackson, “Differences in engineering students' beliefsabout knowledge across educational levels,” Conference paper for the EducationDivision's 2011 ASQ.[17] W. G. Perry, Forms of ethical and intellectual development in the college years:A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1970.[18] M. F. Belenky, B. M. Clinchy, N. R. Goldberger and J. M. Tarule, Women's waysof knowing: the development of self, voice and mind. New York: Basic Books, 1986
], engineering project management skills, abilityto work in a multidisciplinary team [5, 6], higher-stage cognitive development [6, 7], andthe like. For example, Liu’s qualitative research towards industry and communityorganization professional staff identified lots of expected employable skills should betrained through capstone design to help students transform from school to workplacesmoothly, such as interpersonal skill, project management skills, feedback and presentationskills. What’s more, professional ethics, global awareness, and civic responsibility werealso emphasized [4]. Walker et al. introduced Studio Culture into engineering capstonedesign courses and the pilot case reported a significant boost in students’ cognitivedevelopment [8]. To be