Laboratory and Professor of Practice of in the Electrical, Computer, and Sys- tems Engineering Department. His responsibilities include managing the operation of the design lab and optimizing the experience for students working on engineering design projects.Dr. R. Keith Stanfill, University of Florida R. Keith Stanfill holds the academic rank of Engineer and serves as the Director of the Integrated Prod- uct and Process Design (IPPD) Program for the Industrial and Systems Engineering Department at the University of Florida (UF). He received his B.S., M.E., and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical engineering from UF in 1985, 1991, and 1995, respectively. He joined the UF faculty in 1999 as the IPPD Asso- ciate Director and
methodological framework for investigating how, when, andwhy educational innovations work in practice11. It allows researchers to “simultaneously pursuethe goals of developing effective learning environments and using such environments asnaturalistic laboratories to study learning and teaching”12. Within this framework, 4 models of aRube Goldbergineering curriculum were iteratively designed and implemented. Fundamentally,all models shared the same learning objectives, content material and pedagogical approaches, butvaried in terms of the implementation setting and structure. Some of the specific variations were:number, demographic distribution, and cultural and educational background of the students;methods of recruitment; mechanisms for financially
AC 2012-5299: PRODUCT REALIZATION EXPERIENCES IN CAPSTONEDESIGN COURSESDr. Mohamed E. El-Sayed, Kettering University Mohamed El-Sayed is a pioneer and technical leader in vehicle durability, vehicle integration, vehicle development process, and design optimization. Through his research, teaching, and practice, he made numerous original contributions to advance the state of the art in virtual simulation, lean, and integrated design and manufacturing in the vehicle development process. Currently, El-Sayed is a professor of mechanical engineering and Director of the Vehicle Durability and Integration Laboratory at Kettering University. He is the SAE International Journals Committee Chair. El-Sayed has more than 30
to Design Complex Tool Design” Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 20-23, Salt Lake City, Utah.[8] Sinha, A., “Integrating a Reverse Engineering Project in a Laboratory-Based Introductory Engineering Course” Section 514, 2009 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 14- 17, Austin, Texas.[9] Otto, K.N.; Wood, K.L., “ A reverse Engineering and Redesign Methodology for Product Evolution”, Proceedings of the 1996 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Design Theory and Methodology Conference, August 18-22, 1996.[10] Student Design Project, “Reverse Engineering of a Lighted Ball-Point Pen” Junior Class of 2008-2009.[11] Student Design Project, “Reverse Engineering of a
., Yarbrough, D., Rothmyer, A., Rajagopalan, G., Otta, S., Caughey, D., Bhaskaran, R., Smith, S., Hutching B., and Moeykens, S., “Development of Hands-On CFD Educational Interface for Undergraduate Engineering Courses and Laboratories”, ASEE, AC 2004-1526, 2004.11. Blekhman, D., “Lessons Learned in Adopting a CFD Package”, ASEE, AC 2007-830, 2007.12. LaRoche, R., Hutchings, B., and Muralikrishnan, R., “FlowLab: Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Framework for Undergraduate Education” , ASEE, AC 2002-1520, 2002.13. Ormiston, S., “Incorporating CFD into the Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Programm at the University of Manitoba”, Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference of the CFD Society of Canada: CFD2001, pp. 333
consisted of onedesign course in each of the two semesters, with an emphasis on laboratory experiences.Through these courses, the students were given 245 minutes of lab time each week (divided intotwo weekly lab periods of 170 minutes and 75 minutes, respectively) to work on various open-ended design challenges, as well as 50 minutes each week for lectures, which taught primarilywritten and graphical communication skills. The initial design course utilized the projects toexperientially develop important skillsets, such as the design process, project management,verbal communication, teamwork, social considerations, and the application of scientific andmathematic principles. These skills were expected to be developed by the students, with
, students enter the design courses in their junior yearhaving taken two core classes – Introduction to Mineral Processing and Properties of Materials.Both of these are three hour lecture and one hour laboratory courses. During their junior year,MME students primarily take discipline specific classes, usually 7-11 credit hours per semester.The courses and hours taken are variable as the MME department is relatively small, ~20students per year, and the upper division classes are offered on an every other year basis toensure that the number of students in each course is of sufficient size to meet minimum sizerequirements1.Design StreamBeginning in the 2008-09 academic year, the Department of Materials and MetallurgicalEngineering (MME) at the South
investigating teenage girls’ participation in engineering and technology activities from multiple disciplinary frames, the impact of four-year hands-on design curriculum, and the effects of service learning in engineering education.Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder DANIEL W. KNIGHT is the engineering assessment specialist at the Integrated Teaching and Learning Laboratory (ITLL) and Program. He holds a BA in psychology from Louisiana State University, and an MS degree in industrial/organizational psychology and a PhD degree in counseling psychology, both from the University of Tennessee. Dr. Knight’s research interests are in the areas of retention, program evaluation and
a shift in the cognitive research where affect, context, culture andhistory were taken into account. This showed a move from the laboratory to the classroom.Next, perspectives on learning in context are explored and also Clancy’s view of situatedcognition will be examined.Learning: legitimate peripheral participation.Legitimate peripheral participation is described as an analytical viewpoint on learning, a wayof understanding learning. Lave and Wenger7 outline that learning through legitimateperipheral participation takes place no matter which educational form provides a context forlearning or whether there is any intentional educational distinction form at all. Brown et al.11believed that learning is a process of enculturation. This is
cognitive considerations.Dr. Cameron J. Turner, Clemson University Cameron J. Turner, Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering, is the founder of the DICE (Design Innovation and Computational Engineering) Laboratory, a part of the CEDAR Group (Clemson Engi- neering Design Applications and Research) at Clemson University. Dr. Turner earned his doctorate (Engineering Design) and masters (Robotics and Automation) at The University of Texas at Austin, and his BSME (Thermal-Fluids and Solid Mechanics) at The University of Wyoming. Dr. Turner previously was an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines and a Research and Development Engineer and Subject Matter Expert at Los Alamos
of Health Science and Technology, and holds an S.M. in Aeronautics & As- tronautics from MIT and a B.S. in Materials Engineering from the University of Kentucky. She co-directs the UM Center for Socially Engaged Design and directs the Sensory Augmentation and Rehabilitation Laboratory, Laboratory for Innovation in Global Health Technology, and Global Health Design Initiative.Madeline A. Gilleran, University of Michigan Madeline Gilleran is an senior undergraduate student at the University of Michigan, majoring in Mechan- ical Engineering and completing International Minor for Engineers. She is involved in the Engineering Global Leadership Honors Program, a specialization within the Honors Program that integrates
abstractrepresentation of reality. Thus, the goal of learning, behaviourism submits, is to understand thereality and modify behaviour accordingly, and the purpose of teaching is to transfer theknowledge from expert to learner18. The behaviourist model is still widely adopted forinstructional design of teaching factual or procedural knowledge of engineering. Instructorsconvert the reality into abstract or generalized representations, and transfer them to studentsthrough a well-planned, linear and gradual procedure in a “tamed” environment, be it aclassroom or laboratory. The students’ performance is assessed by measuring the proximity oftheir behaviour (answering questions, writing reports and essays, performing laboratoryexperiments, etc.) to the expected
Engineering (1982), and a Master degree in Electrical Engineering (1986) from North Carolina A&T State University. Prior to her current position at UNC-Charlotte, Nan worked for IBM (15 years) and Solectron (8 years) in the area of test development and management. She teaches the senior design course and manages the standalone computers in the Electrical Engineering department.William Heybruck, University of North Carolina, Charlotte William Heybruck received his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte in 2001. Prior to becoming the Director of the UNC Charlotte College of Engineering Industrial Solutions Laboratory he was a Senior Engineer for
-nology.com 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.teach- nology.com/tutorials/teaching/rubrics3. S. M. Blanchard, M. G. McCord, P. L. Mente, D. S. Lalush, C. F. Abrams, E. G. Loboa, H. T. Nagle, Rubrics Cubed: Tying Grades to Assessment to Reduce Faculty Workloads, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.4. V. L. Young, D. Ridgeway, M. E. Prudich, D. J. Goetz, B. J. Stuart, Criterion-Based Grading for Learning and Assessment in Unit Observations Laboratory, Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.5. What is a Rubric? Relearning by Design, Inc., 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.relearning.org
manual assembly operations within a laboratory setting, there was a PFRthat specified that the components had to be appropriately configured and sized to be easilymanipulated by robots. There was a PFR that specified the component swapping, rather thanscaling product family differentiation would be used for the product family. This PFR wasnecessary to ensure that the developed product family would have a significant impact on theperformance of the WeRMST. The remaining PFRs specified that the product family needed tobe cost effective and aesthetically pleasing.Following the specification of the PFRs, the next step involved the search for candidate PFs thatmet the PFRs. This search was performed in four (4) sub-steps. First the team identified
running was manageable and could be completed by one or two trained technicians who spent about two to five hours each week maintaining or servicing the laboratory equipment. The most common problem is for the extruder to jam in some way, which could either be a blockage in the drive gear or a blockage in the nozzle. The first can usually be fixed quickly by disassembling the extruder, removing the blockage, and reassembling. In order to fix a nozzle jam, the nozzle has to be cleared out with a 0.4 millimeter drill bit, removed and cleaned with a propane torch, or replaced entirely. The next most common failure is that the filament cooling fan duct hits a part that has warped and breaks off. In this case, the duct can easily be replaced by one
language such as MATLAB, and a few on full-semester, client-baseddesign projects, all seek to increase retention and improve understanding of engineering conceptsat an early stage. Below, a few of many quality program are described; these were selected becausethey highlight and assess topics of interest to our program, including creativity, real-world designchallenges, and development of technical skills and self-confidence. With the intention of exhibiting that engineering is a creative process and increasinginterest in electrical and computer engineering (ECE), The University of Alabama developed adesign laboratory freshmen course for ECE students [12]. In this course, the creative process forthe students’ designs included brainstorming
Laboratory in the School of Engineering at Rens- selaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) and Professor of Practice in the Mechanical, Aerospace and Nuclear Engineering department from 1999 to 2015. He also worked at GE Corporate from 1987 to 1991, con- sulting and introducing world-class productivity practices throughout GE operations. In 1991 he joined GE Appliances and led product line structuring efforts resulting in $18 million annual cost savings to the refrigeration business. Later as a design team leader he led product development efforts and the initial 1995 market introduction of the Built-In Style line of GE Profile refrigerators. His last assignment at GE Appliances was in the Office of Chief Engineer in support of
. Specific activities guide learners through a platform planning process. In addition toproduct platforming, the cases promote learning concepts of function-based family design,component sharing, modularity, customer needs-driven approach, market analysis, decision-making, etc.Five senior engineering students have studied these three case activities during their summerresearch experience at SMART (Systems Modeling and Realization Technologies) laboratory atVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State University4. The students were sponsored by theNational Science Foundation’s Research Experience for Undergraduate (REU) Program forproduct platform planning5. This study involved the students’ learning experiences with the casestudies. First, the students
Paper ID #7464An Innovative Two-Year Engineering Design Capstone Experience at JamesMadison UniversityDr. Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University OLGA PIERRAKOS is an associate professor and founding faculty member of the James Madison Uni- versity Department of Engineering, which graduated its inaugural class in May 2012. At JMU, Dr. Pier- rakos is the Director of the Center for Innovation in Engineering Education (CIEE) and Director of the Advanced Thermal Fluids Laboratory. Her interests in engineering education research center around recruitment and retention, engineer identity, engineering design instruction and
oral communication to describe the data, calculations, analysis, and experimental results used to substantiate design decisions. (b, g, k) Course Outcome 5 – An ability to recognize ethical dilemmas and make appropriate decisions. (f)Several methods have been used to assess student work in Capstone Design to assign grades andimplement the outcomes assessment process. For week-to-week evaluation, students haveprovided self progress reports and maintained a laboratory-style engineering notebook wherethey have recorded all design work and meeting notes. The course instructor grades these selfreports and notebooks weekly. Students have written individual learning goals based upon the
AC 2011-2181: RE-DESIGNING CAPSTONE DESIGN: TWO YEARS OFEXPERIENCECameron J Turner, Colorado School of Mines Dr. Cameron Turner is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines where he runs the Design Innovation and Computational Engineering Laboratory. At CSM he teaches undergradu- ate and graduate courses in engineering design and is a member of the Senior Design Leadership group. Dr. Turner is currently the course coordinator for the Engineering Capstone Design program and is active in the Computers and Information in Engineering Division of ASME. Page 22.1213.1
university education. Perhaps this is most clearly evident in the type ofengineers certain companies employ and perhaps the statistics on employment may show a biastowards employing graduates from particular institutions in specific industry sectors. Educators have reported on the benefits of experiential, hands-on, student-directed learning[1-4] and the effects of design courses in engineering [5]. Engineering educators have used field Page 24.1198.2trips, laboratory investigations, and interdisciplinary activities that enrich and extend thecurriculum [6, 7]. Such designing of authentic experiences into courses and curricula are
Paper ID #34035Team Formation and Function Decisions and Student Roles on DiverseEngineering Design TeamsDr. David A. Copp, University of California, Irvine David A. Copp received the B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Arizona and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical engineering from the University of California, Santa Barbara. He is currently an Assistant Professor of Teaching at the University of California, Irvine in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. Prior to joining UCI, he was a Senior Member of the Technical Staff at Sandia National Laboratories and an adjunct
as a resource to students [2] [3]. With larger research institutions oftenhaving more laboratory equipment available for student use, students benefit from the combinedresources of both institutions and collaboration between unique student cultures and perspectives[4].To foster such collaboration, MOOCIBL (Massively Open Online Course for Innovation-BasedLearning) was used as the central learning management system for a multi-institutionalCardiovascular Engineering course across four universities around the United States [5]. Thecourse introduces students to a non-traditional Innovation-Based Learning environment. In thislearning model, students define and track their learning goals by creating tokens representingtheir completed learning
from Loyola Marymount University, her MS Electrical Engineering and MS Biomedical Engineering degrees from Drexel University, and her PhD Bioengineering degree from the University of Washington. Between her graduate degrees, she worked as a loop transmission systems engineer at AT&T Bell Laboratories. She then spent 13 years in the medical device industry conducting medical de- vice research and managing research and product development at several companies. In her last industry position, Dr. Baura was Vice President, Research and Chief Scientist at CardioDynamics. She is a Fellow of the American Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering (AIMBE).Ms. Francisca Fils-Aime, Loyola University Chicago Francisca
Laboratories and an adjunct faculty member in Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at the University of New Mexico. His broad research interests include engineering education, as well as control and optimization of nonlinear and hybrid systems with applications to power and energy systems, multi-agent systems, robotics, and biomedicine. He is a recipient of UCSB’s Center for Control, Dynamical Systems, and Computation Best PhD Thesis award.Ms. Alejandra Hormaza Mejia, University of California, Irvine Alejandra Hormaza Mejia is a PhD student in the department of mechanical and aerospace engineering at the University of California, Irvine. She received her B.S. in chemical engineering and M.S. in mechan- ical and aerospace
havecollaborated with the Media Laboratories at Caltech and Universidad Rafael Landivar to resolvethe critical technical and course scheduling problems. Through the use of streaming video andoff-line teleconferencing we were able to lecture during the 2006 fall quarter even though theacademic calendars at both institutions differ by a few weeks in their start date. The full coursewas made available on line for later viewing by the students in Guatemala with just a few daysdelay after the lecture was taught at Caltech.2.2 Introducing e-Teams (Fall 2006)From our 2005 experience with “proxy engineering”, it was clear we had to consider variousissues: • Cultural and Language barriers • Differing University cultures driven by different
AC 2007-1354: TEACHING CAPSTONE DESIGN IN A SERVICE-LEARNINGSETTINGMary Kasarda, Virginia Tech Mary Kasarda is an associate professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech. She specializes in magnetic bearing, rotor dynamic, and health monitoring research topics. She has six years of professional engineering experience and her background is in various aspects of turbomachinery engineering. She is a member of the VT Rotor Dynamics Laboratory and the VT Center for Intelligent Materials and Smart Structures. In 2003-2004, she acted as an education consultant through Virginia Tech to Sweet Briar College to help facilitate a new engineering program at this all-women liberal
Charlotte College of Engineering Industrial Solutions Laboratory he was a Senior Engineer for Hitachi Global Storage Technologies specializing in the Microdrive and automotive hard disk drives. Prior to Hitachi, he was Product Development Manager for the Wireless products at IBM. He has three patents in the field of test technology.Daniel Hoch, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Dan Hoch is a faculty associate in the Engineering Technology Department at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He teaches courses in the Mechanical Engineering Technology department such as machining practices, senior design, and thermodynamics. Dan’s areas of interest are related to thermal