Bioengineering from the University of Pennsylvania.Dr. Dustyn Roberts P.E., University of Delaware Dustyn Roberts received her B.S. in Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering from Carnegie Mellon Uni- versity (2003), her M.S. in Biomechanics & Movement Science (2004) from the University of Delaware, and her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering (2014) from New York University. She has six years of pro- fessional experience in the robotics and medical fields, and is passionate about translational research and engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016STUDENT BENEFITS OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY VERSUS SINGLE-DISCIPLINARYDESIGN EXPERIENCES: A COHORT STUDY OF A CAPSTONE DESIGN
in industry in senior level engineering and management positions with both the General Motors Corporation and the Michelin Tire Corporation in both the U.S. and Europe. His research and teaching interests include manufacturing process machine design and development and the development and improvement of engineering education in a global setting. Since coming to BYU in 1989, he has been the Sr. author of two manufacturing processes books, one a best seller used thought out the world, and numerous technical articles. He has served as a department chair and undergraduate coordinator, a member of the Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) of ABET (the Accreditation Board for Engineering
learning studies. Retrieved from: http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf3. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.4. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.5. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (1994). Joining together: Group theory and group skills. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.6. Erika Powell, E. D. (2014). A Performance Approach to Designing and Measuring Career Development Interventions for Online Engineering Students. Dissertation. The University of Virginia.7. West, R. E. (2010). A
Paper ID #21542Tracking Skills Development and Self-efficacy in a New First-year Engineer-ing Design CourseJessica DanielsDr. Sophia T. Santillan, Duke University Sophia Santillan joined Duke as an assistant professor of the practice in summer 2017 and will work with the First Year Design experience for first-year engineering majors. As a STEM teacher and professor, she is interested in the effect of emerging technology and research on student learning and classroom practice. After earning her bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral degrees from Duke, Santillan taught at the United States Naval Academy as an assistant professor
capstone engineering courses.The long-term motivation for this research is to identify and develop pedagogical methods toimprove the proficiency of engineering students completing a capstone engineering designprogram, specifically, to make them more innovative, entrepreneurial, and able to meet the needs Page 14.364.2of their future careers. Additionally, the essential objective is to determine the best practicesover the long term that improve the design proficiency of engineering students so that institutionscan graduate students who are productive, highly skilled, and exceed performance expectations.The philosophy in conducting this research was
of 2 students, we found that: (1) the structure of the course doessupport healthy team practices; (2) students may benefit from a team assessment tool, inaddition to CATME, that requires structured, written feedback from everyone to be shared; (3)the student design teams were more healthy than not.INTRODUCTIONBeing a member of a team is a common experience for many people, e.g., during athleticendeavors, as students in school, or as colleagues in the workplace. The idea, however, thatany team will function at a high level (i.e., productively and constructively) without purposefuland well-informed effort is not true. The literature on forming teams supports the notion thatteams thrive when team members feel psychologically safe, are engaged
course functions to make a smooth transition from students’undergraduate education in engineering components design (i.e., bottom-up and analysis-based)to graduate-level advanced issues in engineering design (i.e., top-down and synthesis-based).The course instructor, Prof. Stephen Lu, has been teaching this course for over 10 years, and theinstructor’s own research focused on collaborative engineering, design thinking, and engineeringeducation.Participants of this course were all graduate engineering students majoring in mechanicalengineering, aerospace engineering, and industrial engineering at USC. The final classenrollment was 36, 37, 36, and 31 for the four consecutive semesters during 2010-2012,respectively. Roughly one fourth of the class
design reviews prepares students for professional practice, enhances achievement ofboth professional development and solution development, and provides valuable exhibits for students’professional portfolios. The authors of this work-in-progress paper seek collaborators for implementingand testing the proposed assessment structure in capstone design courses.IntroductionConsider this scenario: An engineering graduate walks into a job interview and hands the interviewerachievement scores for his or her teamwork, communication, problem solving, project management,ethics and professional responsibility, willingness to take risks, motivation to continue learning, and otherknowledge, skills and abilities important to the employer. The interviewer
importantpart of practicing responsible engineering. After implementing and assessing a health and safetytraining program at the Université de Sherbrooke, the following was noted: “Whether for thedesign of new machines or for the modification of existing machines, the engineer has to makedecisions that will have a major impact on the health and safety of workers. It is thus essentialthat the engineer be able to adequately assess risks” 9. For these reasons, providing safety trainingfor students will not only reduce the likelihood of accidents, but will give students an opportunityto learn about the importance of safety considerations in the design process
Engineering Education Excellence Award He is a past-chair of the ASEE IL/IN Section, and board member of Freshman Programs and Educational Research Methods Divisions.Barrett Myers, Purdue University Barrett Myeters is a masters student in Computer Programming Technology. He received his B.S in Computer Science from the University of Kentucky in 2004. He is currently a graduate assistant with the EPICS Program at Purdue University. Page 11.941.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Multi-Campus Collaborations among Undergraduate Design Teams: Opportunities and
. James A. Coller, University of Michigan James Coller is an engineering PhD Candidate at the University of Michigan focusing on the development of a novel multi-layer network approach to understanding design complexity in unmanned maritime vehi- cles. James also completed his BSE and MSE in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering in 2017 and 2018 respectively and a MS in Robotics in 2019 at Michigan. He spent three years during his undergrad- uate education as an Instructional Assistant for a first year design-build-test-communicate engineering course. His research interests include autonomous robotics for both land and marine environments, ship design for the U.S. Navy, and improving equity and inclusion in
philosophy is supported by studies which havelooked cross-culturally at the contexts in which literacy is practiced. These include Akinnaso[30],Besnier[31, 32], Hornberger[33], McLaughlin[34, 35], and Reder and Green[36].Perhaps the most important aspect of a social perspective on literacy is that it requires one tolook not only at the set of skills associated with literacy, but more importantly the enactment ofthe literary event, that is, the larger social and cultural events and relationships that result from it.In terms of engineering education, this means, for example, being cognizant of who is writing ajournal paper, who has funded the research, and what the purpose of the research is. Suchaspects are especially vital when looking at the impact
. 0.23 0.89 Articulate design goals of sub-problems and frame them in terms impact on overall design goals. 1.44 1.66 Value and leverage the skills of a members of a team to achieve a design goal. 1.11 1.33 Use information from inside and outside of a team to make design decisions. 1 1.33 Generate multiple alternatives for a given design goal with real world constraints and limited information. 1.33 1.44 Systematically evaluate and select the best solution based real world constraints and limited information. 1.12
prepares Engineering/Technology candidates for teacher licensure. Dr. Mentzer’s educational efforts in pedagogical content knowledge are guided by a research theme centered in student learning of engineer- ing design thinking on the secondary level. Nathan was a former middle and high school technology educator in Montana prior to pursuing a doctoral degree. He was a National Center for Engineering and Technology Education (NCETE) Fellow at Utah State University while pursuing a Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction. After graduation he completed a one year appointment with the Center as a postdoctoral researcher.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of
the centrality of design in undergraduateengineering programs [1], teaching design courses and embedding design problems in corecourses carries many practical issues for instructors. Researchers suggest that expert designersframe problems more broadly than novices, but authentic context may make a design problemtoo difficult. Further, authentic problems are not instructional designs; they may contain manydetails unrelated to course learning outcomes, and students may focus on aspects of a designproblem that are familiar to them, missing key opportunities to learn both content and designpractices. While highly technical problems seem promising as a way to focus students’ attentionon the content, decontextualized problems provide little
at New York University.Dr. Bruce Ankenman, Northwestern University Bruce Ankenman is a Professor in the Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences at Northwestern’s McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Sciences. He received a BS in Electrical Engineering from Case Western Reserve University and after working in the automotive industry for five years, returned to graduate school for an MS and PhD in Industrial Engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. His research interests primarily deal with the design and analysis of experiments that are used to build models for physical systems or metamodels for simulated systems. Professor Anken- man is the co-director of the Segal Design
between teamsin different sessions. After the class presentation and the reflection lecture (i.e., the week-15),two additional weeks (i.e., the week 16 and 17) were offered for each team to compose a finalreport (which had no page limitation) to summarize their complete learning process andoutcome. As a result, the 4-page report for evaluation is made different from the final report inthe sense that, the former is accomplished strictly using one approach, whereas the latter mightbe impacted by both approaches. By doing so, we intended to reach a subtle balance betweenteaching two approaches separately for the comparison purpose and combining them together inthe interest of student’s learning.3.3 Design evaluation:A total of 36 graduate
graduate skills highlight a number of deficiencies in the preparation ofstudents for professional careers. Among the most commonly noted gaps between expectations andactual skills are • the ability to understand software systems as different than single-user programs; 6,51 • the ability to visualize different perspectives or views on a software system; 10,11 • the ability to think critically and reflectively; 31,38 • systems analysis and design skills; 6,31,51 and • problem-solving and investigative skills. 6,10,11,31 As more and more of our world becomes dependent upon computer-based systems, futuresoftware developers and designers must develop effective decision-making skills and strategies inaddition to the technical knowledge they
ethical responsibility; (g) An ability to communicate effectively; (h) The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context; Page 22.1213.2 (i) A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning; (j) A knowledge of contemporary issues; and (k) An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.1Senior design is a significant ABET consideration as most if not all of these outcomes are relatedto a senior design experience. The senior design experience is about the
University. Recent research has focused on 1) using writing and communication assignments to improve the teaching of engineering design and 2) developing a flexible mobile studio pedagogy using the Mobile Studio Instrumentation Board.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette Matthew W. Ohland is Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students, team assignment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative teaching methods has been supported by the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received Best Paper
material is based upon work supported by the National Science FoundationGraduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. DGE-1650044. Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.REFERENCES[1] B. Hartmann et al., "Reflective Physical Prototyping through Integrated Design, Test, and Analysis," in Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Montreux, Switzerland, 2006: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 299-308.[2] J. Marks and C. C. Chase, "Impact of a Prototyping Intervention on Middle School Students' Iterative Practices and Reactions
strategies for addressing environmental impact while still meeting design and economic requirements. 3. Conduct a material selection with a goal of reducing the environmental impact of a product and/or process while simultaneously reducing material costs. 4. Use appropriate tools to evaluate the environmental impact of a manufacturing process and recommend actions for reducing this impact and minimize production costs. 5. Propose design changes to a product to enhance recycling, reuse and/or remanufacturing capability with consideration of the economics of these activities. 6. Identify and apply best practices in promoting the environment in a corporate setting.”The six topical modules were introduced and integrated with
Learning. She completed her Ph.D. in 2014 in Aerospace Engineering at Georgia Tech. Alexandra received her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering from MIT and her M.S. in Systems Engineering from the University of Virginia. Her research interests include engineering design education (especially in regards to the design of complex systems), student preparation for post-graduation careers, approaches for supporting education research-to-practice. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Iterating on Students’ Perceptions of Iteration in the Design Process: An Exploratory StudyAbstractExplorations of experienced designers demonstrate how these designers employ
Engineering’s Bernard M. Gordon Prize and the 2004 NSPE Engineering Education Excellence Award. He is a past-chair of the ASEE IL/IN Section, and board member of Freshman Programs and Educational Research Methods Divisions. Page 12.488.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Developing an Understanding of Instructors’ Design Learning Philosophies in a Service-Learning ContextIntroductionEngineering design involves the creation of an artifact which impacts and becomes a part of theworld. Although design is generally considered an essential activity
current research includes examining the nature of constraints in engineering design and providing service learning opportunities for first-year programming students through various K-12 educational activities. Dr. Estell is a Member-at-Large of the Executive Committee for the Computing Accreditation Commission of ABET, and also serves as a program evaluator for the Engineering Accreditation Commission. He is also a founding member and serves as Vice President of The Pledge of the Computing Professional, an organization dedicated to the promotion of ethics in the computing professions through a standardized rite-of-passage ceremony.Dr. Todd France, Ohio Northern University Todd France is the director of Ohio Northern
behind integrated product development. 2. Strategy for Community Project: Determined the best way to apply IPD concept to the community, given the strategy above, and developed a high-level schedule. The high- level schedule below also included constant communication with the advisory team, who provided essential support for research of identified needs. o Week 1: Identified community needs, chose competition topic, provided design workshop o Week 2: Worked with teams to begin design process, provided team workshop o Week 3: Helped teams with prototyping and technical issues, provided safety workshop o Week 4: Wrapped up project and voted for winning team
. Page 15.643.8Specific HSE Team Activities and Design Work from 2008-2009During the 2008/09 academic year, five HSE teams were active, all of them in Michigan: ArthurHill High School in Saginaw, Davis Aerospace High School in Detroit, Utica High School,Traverse City Central High School, and Hancock High School. A total of 65 studentsparticipated and their projects are summarized below: • Our Mission to be Green: Arthur Hill H.S. students are researching, designing, and constructing a Michigan Natural Green Spot, consisting of a variety of flowering plants, vegetables, and shrubs along with a pathway in an 80 x 130 foot area on the school’s campus. It will provide an educational space for the students and a place for the
guide’ theme from the axial coding. These themesare mapped out to design an instructional scaffolding strategy model.More effective pedagogical practices to improve engineering students’ knowledge constructionin online learning have been the subject of much argument from researchers and deserve furtherinvestigation. It is important to understand the design process of an instructional scaffoldingstrategy. Designing instructional scaffolding strategies as a platform for metacognitivescaffolding approaches can help instructors to improve engineering graduates’ knowledgeconstruction in terms of higher order thinking.Keywords: Instructional scaffolding, knowledge construction, online learning1.0 INTRODUCTIONThere have been numerous technological
discipline to vote for the “Industry Choice Award,”and each discipline’s faculty determines the “Best Project Award.” Recipients of the awards hadpreviously received $25 gift certificate to the school book store, which was of little value toseniors only days away from graduation. Our Senior Design Day Committee has now changedthe “Best Project Award” to a laser-engraved freestanding plaque suitable for display on a desk.The students have commented that they would like to earn the plaque, as it is a lasting memento.Table 3 shows the detailed pro and con list for senior design awards. Table 3: Awards Pros/Cons Aspect Pro Con Faculty chooses Choice not subject to
University. The competition, as it exists today, consists of an autonomous navigation challenge, a design competition, and an interoperability challenge. The IGVC offers a design experience that is at the very cutting edge of engineering education. It is multidisciplinary, theory-based, hands-on, team implemented, outcome assessed, and based on product realization. It encompasses the very latest technologies impacting industrial development and taps subjects of high interest to students. The competition practice team organization and leadership skill development, and there are even roles for team members from business and engineering management, language and graphic arts, and public relations. Students solicit and interact with