Asee peer logo
advanced search
Displaying all 19 results

Designing for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Systems Engineering Education

Conference Session
Design Across Curriculum 1
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Courtney C. Rogers, University of Virginia; Rupa S. Valdez, University of Virginia
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
, 2018.[2] V. Eubanks, Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press, 2018.[3] C. C. Perez, Invisible women: Exposing data bias in a world designed for men. Random House, 2019.[4] D. Norman, The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic books, 2013.[5] D. E. Forsythe, “New Bottles, Old Wine: Hidden Cultural Assumptions in a Computerized Explanation System for Migraine Sufferers,” Med. Anthropol. Q., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 551– 574, 1996.[6] National Science Foundation, “Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering,” 2017. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2017/nsf17310/digest/occupation/overall.cfm (accessed Jun. 23
Relevance Score: 0.028557876

An Analysis of Factors Impacting Design Self-Efficacy of Senior Design Students

Conference Session
Design in Engineering Education Division: Design Mental Frameworks
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joanna Tsenn, Texas A&M University; Heather S. Lewis, Texas A&M University; Astrid Layton, Texas A&M University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
hours (gray), 4-8 hours (diagonals), 8-12 hours (dotted), or more than 12 hours per week (white). Table 6. Summary of Tukey HSD results for weekly effort groups with statistically significant differences. Self-Concept Group 1 Group 2 Q statistic p-value Confidence < 4 hours 12+ hours 3.833 0.035 Motivation < 4 hours 4-8 hours 5.479 0.001 Motivation < 4 hours 8-12 hours 6.072 0.001 Motivation < 4 hours 12+ hours 5.892 0.001
Relevance Score: 0.026232086

A Hybrid Approach to Team-forming for Capstone Design Projects

Conference Session
Design Teams 2
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Peter Schuster, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Eltahry Elghandour, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Lauren Anne Cooper, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
, an adaptation of student-formed teams that leaves the final team- forming decision in the hands of the instructorsAll of these team-forming approaches start before the first term begins by providing studentswith project proposal descriptions, sponsor contact information, and guidelines on what toconsider when looking at potential projects (e.g. personal interest, career goals, prior experience,special skills, anticipated workload). This material allows students to start thinking about thetype of the project before classes begin. At the first class meeting, after discussing courselogistics, explaining the team-forming process, and answering questions, students attend a‘Sponsor Q&A Expo’ where they meet with sponsors of projects
Relevance Score: 0.02498814

Learning Outcomes of a Junior-Level Project-Based Learning (PBL) Course: Preparation for Capstone

Conference Session
Design Pedagogy
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sudhir Kaul, Western Carolina University; Wesley L. Stone, Western Carolina University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
), ordisagreeing (4), or strongly disagreeing (5) to specific questions (1, 2, 3, 4) in the surveydiscussed in Section 3. Table A.1. Data Collection – Sections 1 & 2. Section 1 Section 2 Q 1 2 3 4 5 Q 1 2 3 4 5 Overall 1 15 3 1 0 0 1.26 1 20 11 1 1 0 1.48 1.37 2 14 4 1 0 0 1.32 2 22 8 2 1 0 1.45 1.39 3 14 4 1 0 0 1.32 3 21 11 0 1 0 1.42 1.37 4 12 5 2 0 0 1.47 4 19 11 0 3 0 1.61
Relevance Score: 0.02498814

Student Designers’ Interactions with Users in Capstone Design Projects: A Comparison Across Teams

Conference Session
Best In DEED
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Robert P. Loweth, University of Michigan; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Kathleen H. Sienko, University of Michigan; Amy Hortop, University of Michigan; Elizabeth Ann Strehl, University of Michigan
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
Relevance Score: 0.02186007

Asset-based Approaches to Engineering Design Education: A Scoping Review of Theory and Practice

Conference Session
Design Methodologies 2
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Hannah D. Budinoff, The University of Arizona; Vignesh Subbian, The University of Arizona
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
Proceedings, 2018, doi: 10.18260/1-2--30204.[56] J. A. Mejia, D. Ruiz, V. Popov, A. Esquinca, and D. Gadbois, “Board 104: Asset-based Practices in Engineering Design (APRENDE): Development of a Funds-of-Knowledge Approach for the Formation of Engineers,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[57] S. L. Dika, M. A. Pando, B. Q. Tempest, and M. E. Allen, “Examining the Cultural Wealth of Underrepresented Minority Engineering Persisters,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 144, no. 2, pp. 1–9, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000358.[58] S. L. Dika, M. A. Pando, B. Q. Tempest, K. A. Foxx, and M. E. Allen, “Engineering self- efficacy, interactions with faculty
Relevance Score: 0.021418408

Considering People: An Exploratory Investigation of Engineering Student Ideation

Conference Session
Design Mental Frameworks
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Laura R. Murphy, University of Michigan; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Colleen M. Seifert, University of Michigan; Eytan Adar, University of Michigan; Sophia Brueckner, University of Michigan
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
Research in 2006,” Des. Res. Q., Sep. 2006.[2] E. Sanders, “An Evolving Map of Design Practice and Design Research,” Interactions, pp. 13–17, Dec. 2008.[3] IDEO, The Field Guide to Human-Centered Design. 2015.[4] C. B. Zoltowski, W. C. Oakes, and M. E. Cardella, “Students’ ways of experiencing human-centered design,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 28–59, 2012.[5] I. Mohedas, S. Daly, and K. Sienko, “Design Ethnography in Capstone Design: Investigating Student Use and Perceptions,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 888–900, 2014.[6] R. P. Loweth, S. R. Daly, J. Liu, and K. H. Sienko, “Assessing Needs in a Cross-Cultural Design Project: Student Perspectives and Challenges,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 36, no. 2, pp
Relevance Score: 0.021418408

Augmented Reality Computer-aided Design Education (ARCADE) Tool to Improve Student Motivation, Engagement, and Spatial Cognition

Conference Session
Design Methodologies 1
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Ulan Dakeev, Sam Houston State University; Reg Recayi Pecen, Sam Houston State University; Faruk Yildiz, Sam Houston State University; Y. Luong, Sam Houston State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
Cardoso, L. F., Mariano, F. C. M. Q., & Zorzal, E. R. (2019). A survey of industrial augmented reality. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 139, 106159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106159Ha, I., Yoon, Y., & Choi, M. (2007). Determinants of adoption of mobile games under mobile broadband wireless access environment. Information & Management, 44(3), 276–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.01.001Hsi, S., Linn, M. C., & Bell, J. E. (1997). The Role of Spatial Reasoning in Engineering and the Design of Spatial Instruction. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(2), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00278.xIbáñez, M. B., Uriarte Portillo, A., Zatarain Cabada, R., & Barrón, M
Relevance Score: 0.020193469

Whom Are We Serving? An Exploration of Student Demographics in a Large Engineering Design Projects Ecosystem

Conference Session
Best In DEED
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
David A. Copp, University of California, Irvine; Alejandra Hormaza Mejia, University of California, Irvine; Mark E. Walter, University of California, Irvine; Natascha Trellinger Buswell, University of California, Irvine
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
-20 Best Colleges Ranking,” https://money.com/best-colleges/profile/university-of-california-irvine/, accessed 17 Apr. 2020. [4] “College Navigator - University of California-Irvine,” https://nces.ed.gov/collegenavigator/ ?q=university+of+california+irvine&s=CA&id=110653#enrolmt, accessed 17 Apr. 2020. [5] “First-generation students make up half of UCI’s class of 2018,” https: //news.uci.edu/2018/06/04/first-generation-students-make-up-half-of-ucis-class-of-2018/, accessed 17 Apr. 2020. [6] R. Pan, R. Shehab, C. Foor, D. Trytten, and S. Walden, “Building diversity in engineering competition teams by modeling industry best-practice,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2015. [7] D. A. Trytten, R
Relevance Score: 0.017669285

Innovation, Design, and Self-Efficacy: The Impact of Makerspaces

Conference Session
Design in Engineering Education Division: Postcard and Student Essays
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Roxana Maria Carbonell, University of Texas, Austin; Madison E. Andrews, University of Texas, Austin; Audrey Boklage, University of Texas, Austin; Maura J. Borrego, University of Texas, Austin
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
presented at the American Society of Engineering Education, Salt Lake City, UT.6. Hurtado, S., & Carter, D. F. (1997). Effects of college transition and perceptions of the campus racial climate on Latino college students' sense of belonging. Sociology of Education, 324-345.7. Jin, Q., Gilmartin, S. K., Sheppard, S. D., Chen, H. L. (2014). Comparing Engineering and Business Undergraduate Students’ Entrepreneurial Interests and Characteristics. In American Society of Engineering Education Conference, Indianapolis, IN.8. Kim MJ, Maher ML. The impact of tangible user interfaces on designers' spatial cognition. Human-Computer Interaction. 2008;23(2):101-137.9. Longo, A., Yoder, B., Guerra, R. C. C., & Tsanov, R. (2017
Relevance Score: 0.017669285

Student Perspectives on Capstone Design Learning

Conference Session
Capstone Design
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ben David Lutz, Virginia Tech; Mike Ekoniak, Virginia Tech; Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech; Courtney S Smith-Orr, Virginia Tech
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
, pp. Session AC 2007-894.11 R. K. Yin, Case study research: Design and methods, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2014.12 J. J. Pembridge, "Mentoring in engineering capstone design courses: Beliefs and practices across disciplines," Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2011.13 M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research & evaluation methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2002.14 B. Lutz, C. Hixson, M. C. Paretti, A. Epstein, and J. Lesko, "Mentoring and facilitation in entrepreneurship education: Beliefs and practices," presented at the National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance, San Jose, CA, 2014.15 J. W. Creswell, Research design: Qualitative
Relevance Score: 0.017669285

Valuing and Engaging Stakeholders: The Effects of Engineering Students' Interactions During Capstone Design

Conference Session
Best of DEED
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ibrahim Mohedas, University of Michigan; Grace Louise Cravens, Sienko Research Group; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Kathleen H. Sienko, University of Michigan
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
novice software designers. J Res Comput Educ. 2001;33(3):235 – 250.20. Scott JB. The Practice of Usability: Teaching User Engagement Through Service-Learning. Tech Commun Q. 2008;17(4):381–412. doi:10.1080/10572250802324929.21. Mohedas I, Daly SR, Sienko KH. Requirements development: approaches and behaviors of novice designers. J Mech Des. 2015.22. Mohedas I, Daly SR, Sienko KH. Design Ethnography in Capstone Design: Investigating Student Use and Perceptions. Int J Eng Educ. 2014;30(4):888–900.23. Creswell JW. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2013.24. Mohedas I, Daly SR, Sienko KH. Gathering and Synthesizing Information During
Relevance Score: 0.015145102

Supporting Novice Engineers in Idea Generation using Design Heuristics

Conference Session
Design Tools and Skill Development
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Laura R. Murphy, University of Michigan; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Seda McKilligan, Iowa State University; Colleen M. Seifert, University of Michigan
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
: Strategies for Product Design, 4th ed. West Sussex, England: Wiley, 2008.[34] N. Crilly, “Fixation and creativity in concept development: The attitudes and practices of expert designers,” Univ. Camb. Dep. Eng. Trumptington Str. Camb. CB2 IPZ UK.[35] E. P. Torrance, “Encouraging Creativity in the Classroom,” Duboque Iowa William C Brown Publ., 1970.[36] B. J. Lucas and L. F. Nordgren, “People underestimate the value of persistence for creative performance.,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 232–243, 2015.[37] N. L. Leech and A. J. Onwuegbuzie, “An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation,” Sch. Psychol. Q., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 57–584, Dec. 2007.
Relevance Score: 0.015145102

Assessing the Culture of Engineering Student Project Teams

Conference Session
Design Teams 2
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Laura J. Hirshfield, University of Michigan; James A. Coller, University of Michigan; Emily A. Madden, University of Michigan; Robin Fowler, University of Michigan
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
. Chapell, D. Casey, C. De la Cruz, and J. Ferrell, “Bullying in college by students and teachers,” Adolescence, vol. 39, no. 153, p. 53, 2004.[13] C. Rayner, “The incidence of workplace bullying,” J. Community Appl. Soc. Psychol., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 199–208, 1997.[14] J. Klein, D. Cornell, and T. Konold, “Relationships between bullying, school climate, and student risk behaviors.,” Sch. Psychol. Q., vol. 27, no. 3, p. 154, 2012.[15] T. Diefenbach and J. A. A. Sillince, “Formal and informal hierarchy in different types of organization,” Organ. Stud., vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1515–1537, 2011.[16] A. G. L. Romme, “A note on the hierarchy–team debate,” Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 411–417, 1996.[17] J
Relevance Score: 0.015145102

Collaboration Patterns and Design Practices in First-Year Project-Based Engineering

Conference Session
Design Across Curriculum 1
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Ha Nguyen, University of California, Irvine; Liang Li Wu, University of California, Irvine; Gregory N. Washington, University of California, Irvine; Kyu Yon Lim, Ewha Womans University; Christian Fischer, University of Tübingen, Germany
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
. Washington, “Evaluation of online learning in afirst-year engineering design course,” in Proceedings of the 2018 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference, June 24-27, 2018, Salt Lake City, UT. ASEE[25] K. Q. Fisher, L. Hirshfield, A. Siebert-Evenstone, G. Arastoopour, and M. Koretsky,“Network analysis of interactions between students and an instructor during design meetings,”in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, June 26-29, 2016, NewOrleans, LA, USA. ASEE.[26] G. N. Svarovsky, “Exploring complex engineering learning over time with epistemicnetwork analysis,” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), vol 1-2,4, Oct. 2011.[27] C. L. Marquart, C. Hinojosa, Z. Swiecki, B. Eagan, B
Relevance Score: 0.015145102

Senior Capstone Team Formation Based on Project Interest: Team Selection by Students Compared with Team Selection by Instructors

Conference Session
Design Teams 2
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Peter Schuster, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Lauren Anne Cooper, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Eltahry Elghandour, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Eileen W. Rossman P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Sarah Harding, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
contrast to the traditional faculty-formed teaming method, in September 2018, the seniorproject faculty decided to allow students to create their own teams (student-formed teaming). Aswith the traditional teaming method, the students were given detailed information about theprojects prior to team forming, including project Q&A sessions with sponsors. The actual teamforming took place during the scheduled class time, using the Mingling process as described inAller, et al. In preparation, faculty created an 11”x17” poster (Figure 3) for each project andtaped them to the walls. The posters included the proposal number, name, and sponsor at the topand a box for any special skills required near the bottom. The stage was set by writing out
Relevance Score: 0.015145102

Contextual Social Awareness in Design: Engineering Education as a Catalyst for Change

Conference Session
Empathy and Human-centered Design 2
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Greses Pérez, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; Swetha Nittala, Stanford University; Carol B. Muller, Stanford University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
Relevance Score: 0.012620918

Modifications to a Senior Capstone Program to Improve Project Management and Design-Cycle Pedagogies and Enhance Student Learning

Conference Session
DEED Postcard Session 2 and Presentation of Student Essay Competition Winners
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cory Mettler, South Dakota State University; Robert Fourney, South Dakota State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
any preliminary prototype data to a review panel. This panel consists offaculty with appropriate backgrounds who are not part of the project team. The instructor aloneassesses the quality of the presentation. The panel is instructed to focus solely on the quality ofdesign; they are NOT involved in the assessment process. The purpose is to allow students theopportunity to honestly present their ideas and get feedback on their designs before entering theExecuting Processes. The students provide a copy of their presentation slides to the panel a fewdays before the review, present during the review for 20 minutes, and spend 40 minutes in a Q/Asession.Prototype Demonstrations - Teams are required to include prototype demonstrations in theirproject
Relevance Score: 0.012620918

Tracking Skills Development and Self-efficacy in a New First-year Engineering Design Course

Conference Session
FPD and DEEDs Joint Postcard Sessions
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jessica Daniels; Sophia T. Santillan, Duke University; Ann Saterbak, Duke University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education, First-Year Programs
a larger change from Survey 1 to Survey 2 than from Survey 2 to Survey 3. Thethree highest changes were seen in developing a prototype for a design challenge (Q8), settingdesign criteria (Q5), and using an iterative process to complete the design challenge (Q10).Table 3. Engineering design process results. Survey 1 Survey 2 Survey 3 Difference Q Step P value Average Average Average btw 1 & 3 Identifying a design problem from 1 3.40 4.30 4.20 0.80 <0.005 the community Incorporating
Relevance Score: 0.012620918