Paper ID #33001Engineering Ethics in Engineering Design Courses: A PreliminaryInvestigationDr. Andrew Katz, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Andrew Katz is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He leads the Improving Decisions in Engineering Education Agents and Systems (IDEEAS) Lab, which uses multi-modal data to characterize and improve decision-making processes throughout engineering education ecosystems.Ms. Isil Anakok, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Ms.Anakok is Ph.D. student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia
Paper ID #19587Development of Perceptions of Technical and Ethical Expertise In TeamsOver TimeDr. Megan Kenny Feister, California State University, Channel Islands Megan Kenny Feister is an Assistant Professor of Organizational Communication at California State Uni- versity Channel Islands. She is a recipient of the Purdue Research Foundation dissertation grant and co-wrote a National Science Foundation grant for her dissertation and postdoctoral work in Organiza- tional Communication at Purdue. Her primary research interests include collaboration and innovation; negotiations of expertise in team-based organizational
Paper ID #18124Incorporation of Ethics and Societal Impact Issues into Senior Capstone De-sign Courses: Results of a National SurveyDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Environ- mental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She has served as the the ABET assessment coordinator for her department since 2008. Professor Bielefeldt is the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice
ability assessment technique waspiloted in the Winter of 2013 at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia. The design abilityconstruct was defined as an ability to define the problem, evaluate alternatives, and communicatethe design. This was derived from a literature review and accreditation materials. Four-pointLikert-scale items were also included concerning ethical awareness, which was defined asknowledge of equal treatment of all persons, ethical conduct in all situations, appreciatingcultural diversity for all ethnicities, and possessing a keen awareness of engineers’ responsibilityto society.The quantitative instrument was piloted to 240 students with a 10% response rate. While someitems displayed a statistically significant result
); and Professionalism (ethics). Atthe freshmen and sophomore levels, students experience their initial team design project and thena second project with more technical expectations. They are learning and practicing all of theProfessional Plan components, with the goal that juniors/seniors will be independently capable ofimplementing more rigorous team projects, and will be prepared to implement design and buildprojects subject to ever more realistic constraints and external customer needs.This paper will provide specific details of our adjustments to the freshman and sophomore designsequence in the 2020-21 academic year, based on the original implementation of these classes,the rapid changes required in spring 2020, and the ongoing current
engineering design course that aims to enhance theengineering design and engineering disciplines for first-year students in liberal arts universities.Specifically, we examined what learning objectives in this course motivated students. Moreimportantly, the study explored whether these motivations aligned with teacher’s perceptions ofmotivation, and how these motivations varied based on student demographics. The course isdesigned as a highly interactive seminar-style course that explores all aspects of the engineeringprofession, including engineering disciplines, education, creativity and design process, andengineers’ professional and ethical responsibilities. Students here implement the engineeringdesign process to develop prototypes that solve
implementing morecompletely the ABET criteria, focusing on the six outcomes which comprise the Professional or‘soft’ skills.Capstone Course Goals We present the following set of themes (developed over the years) as lecture topics andincorporate into the design environment; we also give brief arguments for their importance, aswe justify them to the students:1) Intellectual, Professional, and Ethical Stance: Students must understand the characteristics of Page 11.1184.2their profession and their role in it, the tools and characteristics of a qualified, working engineer.Understand the professional standards and the ethics.2) Resource Skills: The
Human Needs: Expanding the Scope of Engineering Senior DesignAbstractThe culminating design experience in engineering curricula is usually intended to provide aframework within which the emerging engineer can draw upon an acquired base of knowledge inhis or her discipline to solve an open ended problem in that discipline or in a multidisciplinarycontext requiring contributions from that discipline. In this paper, we show how the culminatingdesign experience can be framed so as to expand the scope of its contribution in the education ofengineering students. We describe a pedagogical framework within which educational outcomesassociated with multidisciplinary activity, legal, ethical, and professional responsibilities, and
assessment,and maintainability (which, for geological engineering, often focuses on “design for lowmaintenance”). Design management skills include ethics exercises specific to geologicalengineering and project management exercises aimed at students who will enter the consultingengineering and construction industries.Design in Specialty Engineering Disciplines In any engineering discipline, a contrast may be made between “engineering science” and“engineering design” problems. Engineering science problems typically share the followingcharacteristics: • “the problem statement is compact and well-posed • the problem has readily identifiable closure • the solution is unique and compact • the problem uses
capstone discussed in refernce5 was implemented in an educational programhaving following five Program Educational Objectives (PEO’s):PEO 1: Showing leadership in contributing to the success of their teamsPEO 2: Work collaboratively to synthesize information and formulate, analyze and solve problems with creative thinking and effective communication.PEO 3: Make professional decisions with an understanding of their global, economic, environmental, political and societal implications.PEO 4: Apply modern tools and methodologies for problem solving, decision making and design.PEO 5: Commit to professional and ethical practices, continuous improvement and life-long learning.In addition to meeting its own discipline specific
to compare the content of Capstone Design courses atdifferent colleges, or used by the instructor to develop and improve an existing course.Other Activities and Lectures:This listing is slightly different from the first one because some of these are student activities,while others are course lectures that are given to introduce the student to new topics or toreinforce and expand on topics. Other Activities: 1. Ethics 2. 3-D CAD Program: Pro-Engineer, Solidworks, or Catia 3. Teamwork Skills Lectures: 4. Resumes and Interviewing 5. Entrepreneurship 6. Patents and Licensing 7. Professionalism 8. Tolerances and Dimensions 9. Design for Safety 10
, successfuldesigners require proficiency in an auxiliary set of skills related to the design process. We havecreated professional development training materials on topics associated with auxiliary designskills for students within this design course series. Topics include working in teams, interactingwith clients, presentation skills, design ethics and regulations, and global design. The trainingmaterials consist of an online video archive of experts speaking on such topics and associatedactive learning exercises. Using online, pre-recorded expert lectures makes class time availablefor conducting the active learning exercises, including working on design projects. The trainingcontent is modular, allowing small or large portions to be incorporated in a range of
year-long Capstone design experience. With a fo- cus on providing students with a broader experience base, the multidisciplinary program applies teams of engineers, business, design, and other students to work with Ohio companies to help them be more competitive and with local non-profits to help them become self-sustaining. Using a formal design pro- cess, teams develop new products to meet industries’ competitive needs and others to meet the needs of people with disabilities. Students learn to solve open-ended problems and gain skills in critical thinking, professional communication, ethics, and teamwork. Rogers recently expanded this one-year program to a four-year Integrated Engineering and Business (IBE) honors
that sustainability be built into the curriculum and taught congruent with theengineering fundamentals. The last level is a complete overhaul of the engineering curriculum tobe based upon sustainability principles.The last program offered under the SFM umbrella (e) is both an undergrad and grad certificateprogram. The undergrad program includes topics such as ethics, resource equity,technological/societal interactions, environmental engineering and engineering materials at theglobal level. The undergrad certificate concludes with the aforementioned international seniordesign program. The graduate level certificate includes those topics covered at the undergradlevel but additionally includes policy, societal, economic, environmental and
, students beginusing typical software packages such as MATLAB and HTML. Also, the issue of ethics ispresented for the first time to the EE students. The culmination of this course is the completionof a robotic bug and competing against fellow students for best design and performance3.The second design course, EE 200, further builds on the project-based mission. During thiscourse, students learn to construct circuits using the departmental print circuit board prototypefacilities. Circuit simulation with PSPICE software is also presented for this first time. Thetopics of ethics, MATLAB, and technical writing are continued from the previous course. Thisdesign course has been designed as a co-requisite for the first circuits and networks
, hereby, require development of their personal and professionalskills, both short term skills (e.g. resume writing, job searching, and interviewing skills) as wellas long term skills (e.g. graduate study, intellectual property, entrepreneurship, and professionalskills) for life after graduation. For example, as part of the short term goal, we invite aprofessional from the campus career center to introduce students to the job market, job huntingskills and the corresponding services the university offers. For the long term goal, classdiscussion plays a key role since it not only improves students’ communication skills, but alsohelps them understand their professional and ethical responsibilities as engineers.The connections of this senior seminar
. First-year projects differ across universities, but typical projects can include a focus ondesigning and building prototypes, working in teams, full- and small-scale projects, case-studyanalysis, reverse engineering, and the integration of engineering, math, and science courses 2.The course described in this paper builds on the effective components of project-based, hands-onfirst-year design projects, and uses the human centered design process to frame an approachwhere students are encouraged to incorporate the user, environment, and ethical considerationsthroughout the process. The course has capacity for over 1,600 students annually at theUniversity of Florida providing meaningful individual hands-on makerspace skills to eachstudent, and
, management skills, gender issues, and professional ethics. Since 1975, Dr. Pappas has consulted on a wide variety of topics including management skills, technical and scientific writing, public speaking, interpersonal communications, sexual harassment prevention, employee relations, creative thinking, diversity, and conflict negotiation. Address: Department of Integrated Science and Technology ISAT 117 / MSC 4102 James Madison University Harrisonburg, VA 22807 PappasEC@jmu.edu 540-568-1694Ronald Kander, James Madison University Professor Kander is Director of the School of Engineering at James Madison University (JMU) where he teaches and does research in the area of polymer
must be approved by the supervisor. Then each team chooses their own advisor(which cannot be the supervisor). Through lectures and class discussion from the supervisor,students gain knowledge of the product development process, project management, professionalengineering practice, and the regulatory, legal, ethical, and economic aspects of design4,5,6.The students adhere to an engineering design process that includes early stages of design projectdevelopment including three design proposals. They must conduct customer surveys to selectone best design proposal. The advisor for each project must technically evaluate and approve theselected best design proposal.The design process provides the students with an important experience in defining and
Paper ID #9949The Discourse of Design: Examining students’ perceptions of design in mul-tidisciplinary project teamsMegan Kenny Feister, Purdue University, West Lafayette Megan K. Feister is a doctoral candidate in the Brian Lamb School of Communication at Purdue Uni- versity. Her research focuses on organizational identity and socialization, team communication, ethical reasoning development and assessment, and innovation and design. Megan holds a B.A. in communica- tion from Saint Louis University and a M.A. in Organizational Communication from the University of Cincinnati.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West
liaison biweekly. Each student within a team servesas a Project Manager for part of the academic year. The Project Manager is incharge of running the project meetings, assigning tasks to team members at themeetings and following up with action items, and communicating with the liaisonand the faculty advisor.The year-long capstone experience provides the students ample opportunity tointegrate their knowledge of science, engineering, ethics and humanities withcreative problem solving, to work effectively in a team setting, to improvecommunication skills, to understand and respond to client needs, and to developproject management and human relations’ skills. Because the senior designproject covers many of the topics in ABET criterion 3 (a-k) program
literature) that aredifficult to achieve in the rest of the engineering curriculum. These learning outcomes includestudent ability to function effectively as a member of a diverse and interdisciplinary team,student understanding of professional and ethical responsibilities, student ability to understandthe impact of technology in a societal context, and student ability to grasp engineering projects ina holistic sense. The course is designed to be a part of the project-based learning sequence and isexpected to prepare students for the challenging senior year projects where students are requiredto demonstrate a strong ability to synthesize and integrate the skills learnt from the previousyears. This course serves as a scaffolding2 to assist the junior
results highlight national and gender differences in students’ perception of theirdevelopment in ABET-related skills. The American students rated themselves higher increativity, teamwork, ethics, facility with tools of engineering practice, and in recognizing globalimpact. The Korean students assessed their skills higher in design, problem solving, andcommunication skills. There was no statistically significant difference in leadership or analyticalskills. However, in spite of apparent national differences, the students follow similar genderpatterns. The men were more confident in technical and analytical skills, while the women weremore confident in communication and teamwork skills. As such, both cultures could benefit frominterventions that
: An occupational science perspective” by Cail Carin-Levy & Derek Jones, Queen Margaret University College“Ethics”8. Ethics Case 1: The Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster (Texas A&M)9. Ethics Case 2: Choose different ethical dilemmas from the website: http://ethics.tamu.edu/pritchar/an-intro.htm“Teamwork”10. Team Performance Evaluation (Varney3)11. Team Performance Evaluation (Parker4)12. Final Team Performance“Presentation”13. Presentation Critique (View the DVD, and write a one-page critique.)Pro-Engineer:During the semester, the students have nine weeks of instruction in Pro-Engineer. They have nothad any instruction in a CAD program except AutoCad when they were freshmen, so it is helpfulwhen they interview for a job to
between qualitative and quantitative reasoning, (4) developmental instruction in systemsthinking and sustainability, (5) integrating cross-disciplinarity perspectives, (6) process and notjust content (e.g. cognitive processes), and (7) bridging engineering skills with professional skillssuch as communication, project management, team and collaborative work, ethics, etcetera. Inthis paper, we present how each course in the six-course sequence builds off the prior providingmoderate instruction over a long period of time and building developmentally on prior learningoutcomes, all while in the context of authentic and meaningful PBL experiences. It is such skillsand attitudes that students learn and practice over a long period of time (with regular
Property, Technical Communications, WritingSpecifications, Engineering Ethics, Engineering Economics, Codes and Standards, theDesign Process, and Sustainability) which results in nine individual homeworkassignments (about one sixth of the grade) and two exams (about one third of the grade).Detailed descriptions of the projects and assignments for the sophomore design courseand their assessment in Fall 2007 will now be presented along with results from studentsurveys in the course.Assignments for the Sophomore Design CourseIn the fall 2007, 70 students enrolled in the sophomore design course, MECE 2361. Bythe time teams were self-selected for the team project during the fourth week, twostudents had dropped. The remaining 68 students completed the
is integrated with a course on Ethics in theProfession; (iii) Creation of a new junior year design course integrated with courses inbiomedical, civil, computer, electrical, and mechanical engineering; and (iv) Partnership withindustry in the creation of real-life engineering projects for senior capstone design course.This paper presents how the sophomore design course has evolved and the changes that werebrought about based on faculty and informal student feedback.Design Throughout the Engineering CurriculumConsistent with most engineering programs, the curriculum at the University of Hartfordincludes a freshman engineering and senior capstone design course. Because of the relativelysmall size of the engineering program with about 100
research interests center around interdisciplinary collaboration in engineering and engineering education, including studies of the collaborative relationships between engineers and education researchers. She was recently awarded a CAREER grant from NSF to study interdisciplinarity in engineering graduate programs nationwide.Jenny Lo, Virginia Tech Jenny Lo, assistant professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, is interested in understanding and improving engineering curriculum related to introductory engineering courses, engineering design, engineering ethics, and undergraduate research
engineers, diversity and inclusion in engineering, human-centered design, engineering ethics, leadership, service-learning, and accessibility and assistive-technology.Dr. Andrew O. Brightman, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Andrew O. Brightman serves as Assistant Head for Academic Affairs and Associate Professor of Engi- neering Practice in the Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering. His research background is in cellular biochemistry, tissue engineering, and engineering ethics. He is committed to developing effective ped- agogies for ethical reasoning and engineering design and for increasing the diversity and inclusion of engineering education.Mr. Sean Eddington, Purdue University
by engineering students in their fields. Page 14.489.2 1HistoryThe concept behind PtD and its linkages to engineers is not new. Beginning in the 1800s,demand for safer designs for machine guards, controls for elevators, and boilers became thenorm, followed by a procession of other devices and processes created by engineers to makework environments safer. The important role of engineers was highlighted as early as 1947, bythe Canons of Ethics for Engineers, which stated that: He will regard it his duty to guard against dangerous elements in apparatus, structures, or plants, or