- Conference Session
- Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 3
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Leah M Wiitablake, Clemson University; Amber Taylor; Landry Samuels; Jalani Ziad Eanochs; Caleb Jovan Hardin; Shi'ron Williams-Mattison; Samuel Cole Fambrough; D. Matthew Boyer, Clemson University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)
Paper ID #37679Elevating Student Voices in Collaborative Textbook DevelopmentLeah M Wiitablake, Clemson University Leah M. Wiitablake is a current doctoral student in the Engineering and Science Education department at Clemson University. Her dissertation research focuses on undergraduate student interest and perceptions, in particular, the perceptions of and interest in the geosciences from students from traditionally minori- tized groups. As a graduate research assistant, Leah has worked on designing and assessing virtual reality field experiences for introductory geology courses and is currently involved with
- Conference Session
- Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - Research Investigations in the Context of Design Education
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Mark J. Povinelli, Syracuse University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)
diverse spectrum of knowledge,including fostering flexible modes of thinking, qualitatively demonstrated enhanced creativityand collaboration within design teams. Additionally, they reported developing a deeperunderstanding of themselves and cultivating more profound purposes.Building on this trajectory, this paper explores the implications of the HE pedagogy onengineering design education, examining its role in preparing students for engagement in designpractices, and considering what may motivate their deeper understanding of design. It provideshistorical context underscoring the pivotal role of design in engineering education and advocatesfor a more holistic approach to design methodologies. The research also investigates whetherexpanding
- Conference Session
- Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - Evolving Pedagogies in Capstone Design Education
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Alexander R. Murphy, Florida Polytechnic University; Elisabeth Kames, Florida Polytechnic University; Jim Dewey, Florida Polytechnic University; Karim Elish, Florida Polytechnic University; ONUR TOKER, Florida Polytechnic University; Matt Robert Bohm, Florida Polytechnic University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)
, multidisciplinaryprojects can be challenging for many reasons. Design education is often relegated to the end ofan undergraduate program, which does not allow students to learn from their mistakes becausethey are given tight deadlines and linear deliverables. In response, Fazelpour et al. argue for aholistic approach to design education throughout an undergraduate curriculum [6]. Students withdesign experiences throughout their undergraduate program will learn to work in teams earlier,better preparing them for peer collaboration and meaningful engagement with industry sponsors.That said, those who have implemented multidisciplinary capstone programs warn of potentialissues. Behdinan et al. note the potential for exacerbation of student performance issues such as
- Conference Session
- Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 12
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Kris Jaeger-Helton, Northeastern University; Constantine Mukasa, Northeastern University; Richard Whalen, Northeastern University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)
concept of failing, iterating, and retrying is near the top ofthe first-year list yet is virtually absent on the Capstone list. This research provides a usefulinvestigative approach for other engineering educators to examine their programs and informs morefocused planning through the curriculum for students’ future success.KeywordsCornerstone, Capstone, Engineering Design, Technical Skills, Professional Competencies, Co-op,Cooperative Education, Work ExperienceIntroductionFor the past few decades, several initiatives have been designed to improve and strengthen students’outcomes in the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields at all levels ofthe educational system. For example, the Department of Education published a letter
- Conference Session
- Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - Teamwork in Design Education
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Sydney Kropp, University of Oklahoma; Doyle Dodd, The University of Oklahoma
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)
likelihood of last-minute, hurriedteamwork. Additionally, the entire class exhibited a perfect 100% on-time submission rate forgroup-written assignments. Finally, students found teamwork more enjoyable with this method ofsubmission. When surveyed, students' opinions of teamwork improved by an average of 1 point(on a 5-point scale). This mixed methods, IRB approved study, highlights the potential benefits ofincorporating individual portions in team assignments, paving the way for improved opinions onteamwork, promotion of accountability, and time management skills among students. Introduction This study explores a fresh approach to promote accountability and encourage individualparticipation in the
- Conference Session
- Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Poster Session
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Yuwei Deng, King's College London; Wei Liu, King's College London
- Tagged Divisions
-
Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)
think and work [6].Design thinking is a problem-solving approach that emphasizes transdisciplinary and holisticskills to develop an innovative and comprehensive skill set among students [7]. In today's rapidlyevolving and technologically advanced world, integrating design thinking into engineeringeducation has become a valuable strategy to prepare students for success [8][9]. However,despite the growing interest in design thinking, there is a need for a systematic review of theliterature to explore its current state and identify future research trends. A review of the literaturecan provide a comprehensive overview of the research on design thinking in higher engineeringeducation, identify the strengths and limitations of the current literature
- Conference Session
- Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - Engineering Design and First-Year Education
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
MD B. Sarder, Bowling Green State University; Mohammad Mayyas, Bowling Green State University; Mohammed Abouheaf, Bowling Green State University; Gül E. Kremer, University of Dayton
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)
practical ideas and classroom units for the upcoming school year. 2. Conducting research and expanding knowledge in robotics courses. 3. Spending significant time in a lab environment to solve problems and inform curriculum development. 4. Creating engaging content for students. 5. Learning from experts on specific topics and collaboratively creating materials for their classes. 6. To experience 3-D design and delving deeper into the process and implementation. 7. Exploring logistics and supply chain automation.Among the potential avenues to improve classroom instruction, educators included the following: 1. Identifying learning objectives, planning specific learning activities, and starting with a broader perspective
- Conference Session
- Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 6
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Damon Kirkpatrick, U.S. Air Force Academy; Michael Anderson, U.S. Air Force Academy; Phillip Cornwell, U.S. Airforce Academy
- Tagged Divisions
-
Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)
identified asfundamental courses for officer development [4]. Among the core courses are five engineeringcourses. Mechanical Engineering 220 – Fundamentals of Mechanics (ME 220) is most often thesecond core engineering course, the first being an introductory computer science course, that everystudent will take before graduating, usually during their sophomore year [4]. It is also thefoundational course for students who are pursuing a degree in Mechanical Engineering or Civiland Environmental Engineering. As one of the core engineering courses, ME 220 is expected tohelp satisfy certain institutional learning outcomes, primarily teaching students how to applyengineering problem-solving methods with an emphasis on design methodology [4]. Aninstitution
- Conference Session
- Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 2
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Gregory Litster, University of Toronto; Patricia K. Sheridan, University of Toronto; Emily Moore P.Eng., University of Toronto
- Tagged Divisions
-
Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)
Paper ID #38817A comparison of shared mental model measurement techniques used inundergraduate engineering contexts: A systematic reviewMr. Gregory Litster, University of Toronto Greg Litster is a PhD student in Engineering Education at the University of Toronto in the Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education and Practice. He received his MASc degree in Man- agement Sciences (2022) and a Bachelor of Knowledge Integration degree (2020), both from the Univer- sity of Waterloo. His research interests are focused on mental models for engineering design teams, group dynamics and how collaboration