development community about the model-basedenterprise (MBE). The MBE could provide significant opportunities for efficiency andeffectiveness in product development 1. At the core of the MBE are computer-aided design(CAD) models that allow for the more efficient completion of tasks associated with productdevelopment. These include computer-aided engineering simulations, computer-aidedmanufacturing processes and other manipulations of the digital artifacts. CAD models combinedwith product lifecycle management (PLM) systems have long been proposed as providing greatbenefits 2. However, these benefits are predicated on the ability of CAD models to be easilyreused and understood by the various actors across the commercialization process. This requiresa
, thus making those notebooks unavailable to other graders and to thestudents themselves.1 BackgroundThose familiar with fluid flow in pipes may recall Nikuradse’s harp (Figure 1), which presentsexperimental data for friction factor as a function of wall roughness (sand glued to the pipewalls) and Reynolds number. Nikuradse’s experimental data fit his expected curves astoundingly Page 24.164.2well, with little scatter. Regarding Nikuradse’s experimental technique, Hager and Liiv 1 stated,“Nikuradse had a practice in which he determined the rough path of a curve with preliminaryobservations and then discarded final measurements that fell too far
, andinternational field. There is a clear need for a standardized terminology and organizational system – a setof keywords – to map the field and communicate research initiatives. Such a taxonomy could providemultiple benefits, including: better connections between research and researchers; more accessible research results, recognition for and identification of emerging research areas, a way to describe the diversity of engineering education research areas, and a common terminology with which researchers could frame their efforts.The goals of our NSF-funded project, then, are two fold: (1) to develop a comprehensive taxonomy ofkeywords that could be used to describe engineering education research projects, publications, authors,and
. Page 24.171.2This lack of emphasis (accounting for approximately 10% of the course) is not a reflection of thesignificance of connections in design, instead, it is due to time constraints and the commonlymis-held belief that connections are standardized details that could and should be left tofabricators and detailers. However, connections, are the glue that holds a structure together, andas such deserve special emphasis to ensure sound structural integrity. Historically, connectionfailures have contributed to many structural failures. Examples include: the Hartford CivicCenter in 1977 [1], the Hyatt Regency Hotel in Kansas City in 1980 [2], and, more recently, the I-35 W Bridge in Minneapolis [3]. Since the Hyatt Regency failure, many state
adaptivequestioning to learn the extent of a student’s knowledge of a subject, and then designs itsinstruction to address the topics for which the student is ready. ALEKS does not rely onmultiple choice questions, but rather has the students enter answers using math symbolsfor each problem. Further details on the usage of ALEKS in this program can be found inReisel, et al.11Table 1 provides a summary of the number of students in each cohort, the number ofstudents who improved their math placement through the bridge program, and thenumber of students who participated in the bridge program who then enrolled in Math116 and Math 231 in the Fall semester. Note that all the students who enrolled in Math231 had placed up into Calculus I through the bridge program
24.195.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Are Multiple-Choice Questions Suitable for a Final Examination in a STEM Course?1 IntroductionAs the discourse on educational strategy has shifted in recent decades from a focus on teachingto student-centered learning objectives, the role of student assessments has shifted frommeasurement of topic mastery to the "constructive alignment" of assessments with the learningprocess1. In this context, examinations and other assessments undertaken during the progressionof a course both measure student achievement and guide the learning process through structuredformative feedback2.Comprehensive final examinations, in
macroethical and practical conceptualization of engineering work.As early as 1999, the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Board of Directorsrecognized this need and declared, in an official statement, “ASEE believes that engineeringgraduates must be prepared by their education to use sustainable engineering techniques in thepractice of their profession.”1 Engineering professional disciplinary societies have responded byincluding sustainability as part of Engineers’ Codes of Ethics: the first “fundamental canon” ofthe American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Code of Ethics includes that engineers “shallstrive to comply with the principles of sustainable development;”2 the American Institute ofChemical Engineers (AIChE) includes
1 Introduction As educators advance engineering education, active learning tools are becoming preferredchoices for addressing how students struggle with complex topics in engineering, especially as afunction of their backgrounds, demographics, and personality type. In order to move beyond thetypical road bumps encountered when teaching difficult concepts, contemporary methods arebeing developed that seek to engage students actively, inside and outside the classroom, as wellas kinesthetically through the various human senses. Such approaches have the potential toimprove student comprehension and knowledge retention, and most importantly, to increasestudents' interest in the material. [1]Assisting students in the learning of imperative
led to its development and has been used as an educationalframework for promoting students’ consideration of the broader impacts of engineering onpeople, economics, and the environment. As a result, product archaeology offers students anopportunity to reconstruct and understand the customer requirements, design specifications, andmanufacturing processes that led to the development and production of a product. This paperdescribes: 1) the identification and development of assessment tools for evaluating the impact ofproduct archaeology, 2) the implementation of the product archaeology framework during tworecent academic year semesters in undergraduate engineering courses at all levels across sixuniversities, and 3) assessment results with
institutions thatseeks to evaluate the effect of video generation and viewing on studentunderstanding of several thermodynamics concepts: 1) Entropy and the SecondLaw, 2) Reversibility, 3) Steady State vs Equilibrium, 4) Internal Energy vsEnthalpy, and 5) Reaction Rate vs Reaction Equilibrium (Abulencia – 2012).The focus of this paper is to examine the effect of students viewing peer-generatedvideos (21 total) of the aforementioned topics. The viewing assignment coincidedwith the time that particular topic was being taught in lecture. TheThermodynamics Concept Inventory developed by Vigeant and colleagues wasused to assess conceptual learning and was administered at the beginning andend of the semester (Prince – 2009, Vigeant 2009, Vigeant 2011). The
LandscapeInstitutions across the nation seek to produce highly skilled and qualified graduates fromnationally accredited engineering education programs. As a result, engineering educationprofessionals require resources for evaluating student progress, assessing student learningoutcomes, and understanding impact of educational projects and programs. Several websites,many of which are supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF), address the growingneed for easily accessible assessment and evaluation instruments. For example, the AssessingWomen and Men in Engineering Project (AWE)1 is a multi-institutional project offeringassessment instruments for K-16 engineering education outreach activities. Purdue’s INSPIRE2focuses on engineering education instruments
need for furtherimprovement of K-12 science education to develop a more integrated science, technology,engineering, and mathematics [STEM] curriculum to meet the workforce demand and to, moreimportantly, advance citizens’ scientific and technological literacy.While the impetus has been and continues to be on inquiry-based teaching and learning inmathematics and science, the new NRC framework embeds and integrates engineering andtechnology. Engineering provides a logical platform for applying and integrating scientific andmathematical concepts. This framework, as outlined in A Framework for K-12 ScienceEducation, will influence change in the national standards that will now include four core ideas:(1) physical sciences, (2) life sciences, (3
project aims to characterize how engineering students view and approach innovation. Aspects of the research that are accomplished so far include: 1) a multi-phase protocol that includes interviews, process mapping tasks, and think-aloud protocols, 2) a content analysis to determine typical innovation and discovery behaviors used in innovation in technical areas, and 3) a meta-synthesis of assessment methods used in engineering entrepreneurship. Based on the findings from these studies, we made recommendations that inform activities associated with the educational plan including classroom activities and assessment tools. Introduction While innovativeness is a
engineering knowledge and thinking skills. This paper focuses on the use ofvideo data to uncover and document students’ thinking and development and presents lessonsour team has learned as we use video data to support our investigation. Video data allows theresearcher to review and re-immerse him or herself back in to the original context and explorepoints of interest that could not be captured fully in the field notes, observations and existingartifacts [1].In this study we explore the cognitive discord, which can occur when engineering students, whohave been previously taught convergent mathematical thinking strategies, are exposed to thedivergent manner in which design problems are solved in educational engineering environmentsand in the real
drive to master technical concepts, the desire to apply them,innovate, create, solve, and synthesize.1-3 In other words, motivation is a major factor in thedevelopment of metacognitive and solving problem skills. A key factor in student motivation istheir perceptions of their future possible selves, which are also linked to cognition andperceptions of themselves in the present.4-5 This research seeks to help educators understandfactors that contribute to students’ motivation, such as expectations, values, and goals, as well astheir cognition and academic performance. Understanding these relationships will address thechallenges facing engineering educators: increasing interest in engineering, creating a morediverse engineering workforce, and
transfer process. Completed 3 papers based on the qualitative research. Created and presented a research poster on the qualitative research, which was awarded second place in the symposium. Attended training session on qualitative coding and memo-writing and generating theory for qualitative research. Made 4 conference presentations and contributed to 1 workshop. Three of the conference presentations were on the above papers.Quantitative analysis of MIDFIELD databaseOur analysis used records for 94,732 undergraduate students from the Multiple-InstitutionDatabase for Investigating Engineering Longitudinal Development (MIDFIELD). MIDFIELDcomprises a census of undergraduate students who attended 11 public institutions between
second, to help teachers developcurriculum units based on Cloud Computing technologies that can be integrated into differenthigh-school subjects.The program was structured into two workshop sessions. The first session, during the summer of2012, consisted of three days of hands-on instruction. At the end of the first session, the teacherswere given an assignment to complete during the fall semester. The second workshop sessionconsisted of a 1-day meeting in December 2012, during which the teachers presented completedassignments and participated in a group discussion. Sixteen high-school teachers participated inthe program. Participants received 20 hours of professional development credit. Meals wereprovided along with a $100 daily
practicemethods of dissemination of the MHOS pedagogy to the entire STEM community have not yetbeen identified.Mobile hands-on pedagogy in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) is arelatively recent innovation in the teaching of electrical engineering. Three of the universitiesthat have been involved in the development of this pedagogical approach for the past decade areRensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), Virginia Tech (VT), and Georgia Institute of Technology(Georgia Tech) [1-18]. Colleagues at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology (RHIT), HowardUniversity (HU), Morgan State University (MSU), and Virginia Western Community College(VWCC) were early adopters and have contributed significantly to the refinement of theapproach [19-24
largerpopulation. The steps for the research method are depicted in Figure 1. Qual. Data Quant. Data Qual. & Qualitative Survey Collection Collection Quant. Claims Hypotheses (Phases 1&2) (Phases 1&2) Findings Figure 1: General research methods strategyFirst, two phases of qualitative research methods were employed. The first phase, a collection ofopen-ended questionnaire responses, assessed (a) the educational gains of EWB-USA membersand (b) descriptions
in-depth literature synthesis to understand different ways in which theseinnovative engineer characteristics were currently identified, and we have begun to assess existingneeds for new engineering innovativeness assessment instruments. Page 24.284.5 3The key findings of our studies co-constructed with engineering innovators are:1. A definition of engineering innovation: Engineering innovators described innovation similarly stating an improvement in a product or process that has value to users and is implemented sustainably and profitably in a
Education Division of the American Institute ofChemical Engineers (AIChE), the discipline’s major professional society. The overall objectiveis to lower the activation barrier for using conceptual instruction and assessment so that manymore chemical engineering faculty will incorporate concept-based learning into their classes.The specific objectives of this project are to:1. Develop the AIChE Concept Warehouse, a flexible database-driven website for conceptual questions in the core chemical engineering sciences. Features of the AIChE Concept Warehouse include: a. Making concept questions available in different formats to facilitate widespread use. b. Allowing integration of questions within a course and from different courses so students
Education, 2014 Conceptual Change Across Engineering DisciplinesIntroductionExisting research on conceptual change (i.e. the effortful process of revising or changing one’sfundamental understanding of something) has drawn from various disciplines including physics,biology, mathematics and history. Little research has been done, however, investigating howdifferences in content may affect conceptual change in the various disciplines [1].MethodsThe research described here investigates this question by analyzing data on studentunderstanding of engineering concepts from multiple content areas within the broad discipline ofengineering: mechanics of materials, Boolean logic, fluid mechanics, and transportationengineering. In total, this
the simplicity to be built bystudents over the course of five semesters. The work is designed to test two hypotheses: 1. A long-term design project that integrates knowledge from multiple courses strengthens student knowledge retention. 2. A large-scale design project requiring tools from many courses improves student problem-solving and design skills.By integrating five semesters of the mechanical engineering curriculum into a cohesive whole,this project has the potential to transform the way undergraduate education is delivered. Beforeand after testing is being conducted to assess: a) Change in retention between courses and b)Change in student problem-solving and design skills.Students at Rowan University have built almost all
, on-line students' survey results, and on-line students'direct assessment results. Through this study, we are able to verify that there is no deficiency foron-line students to understand course content with the help of the computer lab exercises; and inseveral scenarios, on-campus students and on-line students behave differently while taking thecomputer lab exercises. The development and assessment of this software is partially supportedby an NSF CCLI grant. 1. Introduction“Medical Imaging” is an important subject in most bio-medical and bio-engineering curricula1,2.To effectively offer this as an introductory undergraduate course, we designed a series ofcomputer lab exercises3,4 for students to observe the computational and physical
members will continuously improve the content and delivery of the course by sharing updates and improvements to each lecture topic. Regular interactions will take place via a workshop in the summer of 2014, regular pre- workshop internet meetings, regular post-workshop internet meetings, and visits to the collaborating institutions by the PIs.Thus, the CoP will provide two-way conversation between the creators of the material and theinitial adopters at the partner universities, with the intent that eventually the line between thesetwo groups is blurred.This paper and its companion poster are the result of a very recent (September 1, 2013) fundingaward from NSF (TUES Type 2; “Collaborative Research: Training Next Generation
the activities themselves? To address these questions, we have gathered a faculty advisory group from diverse institutions who are willing to use modified versions of our existing activities in their courses. They have also assessed our current activities and given Page 24.366.2us feedback upon which aspects are most challenging to implement. Ultimately, 1 once we have assessed the effectiveness of the modified
the problem. Based on existing research, we expect threekey factors to influence ideation flexibility: 1) problem framing (the way a problem and itsconstraints are “set”); 2) the use of ideation tools; and 3) ideation teaming (interactions withothers during ideation). Our research investigates the impacts of these key factors on engineeringideation flexibility and correlates them with students’ cognitive styles. Our aim is to createguidelines and methods that will help engineers increase that flexibility by learning how todeliberately engage in ideation using different approaches. The project uses experimental studieswith pre-engineering and engineering students, at various stages in their educational programs,testing each factor’s impact on
directs the KSU Medical Component Design Laboratory, a facility partially funded by the National Science Foundation that provides resources for the research and development of distributed medical monitoring technologies and learning tools that support biomedical contexts. His research focuses on (1) plug-and-play, point-of- care medical monitoring systems that utilize interoperability standards, (2) wearable sensors and signal processing techniques for the determination of human and animal physiological status, and (3) educational tools and techniques that maximize learning and student interest. Dr. Warren is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics
Laboratory for education and training; c) train faculty to teach core courses in theAAS PLT program; d) perform outreach activities to local high schools to promote the newprogram; e) educate 30 or more students or workers by the end of the project.The period for the NSF grant is July 1, 2013 - December 31, 2015. To support achievement ofthe project objectives the PI developed a set of activities and a time table for each activitytogether with responsible personnel. The activities that have taken place since the beginning ofthe grant are described below.a) Formation and Meetings of the Program Advisory BoardOne of the first activities was to form an Advisory Board to guide the new program throughoutits development phase and continue with future
chemistry are guiding the development of the nextgeneration of materials, products, and processes. Natural and bio-based materials are emergingas a viable alternative to petroleum-based plastics, especially in both automobile and packagingapplications. For example, a major problem in maintaining a healthy environment is wastedisposal. Petroleum-based plastics were developed to provide durability and resistance to variousforms of degradations due to fungi and microbial agents.1-4 They are a part of our everyday lives.According to the Society of Plastics Engineers (SPE), over 200 million tons of plastics aremanufactured annually around the world. Of that, 26 million tons are manufactured in the UnitedStates. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA