Paper ID #19492Design of Classlab and Supporting Spaces to Enable a Multidisciplinary Hands-on First-Year Engineering Design CurriculumDr. Jenna P. Carpenter, Campbell University Dr. Carpenter is Founding Dean of Engineering at Campbell University. She is Chair of the ASEE Long-Rangge Planning Committee and the ASEE Strategic Doing Governance Team. She is a past Vice President of Professional Interest Councils for ASEE and past President of WEPAN. Currently Chair of the National Academy of Engineering Grand Challenge Scholars Program Steering Committee and an ASEE PEV for General Engineering, Dr. Carpenter regularly speaks
objectives and an assignment for participants. There were also 5 sessionsduring Fall 2013. Breakout groups within each session promoted interactions among subsets ofthe participants; these were critical for encouraging broad participation, with each breakoutgroup reporting back to the full VCP afterward. Pre-planned topics included (1) Introduction tothe Circuits VCP, (2) Overview of Research-based Instructional Approaches, (3) LearningObjectives and Bloom’s Taxonomy, (4) Student Motivation, (5) Teams, and (6) & (7) Makingthe Classroom More Interactive. The topics for sessions (8) and (9) were developed by our VCPcommunity during preceding weeks: (8) Simulation and Hands-On Learning, Assessing Impact;(9) Great Ideas that Flopped. In addition to
academic advisor toenroll. Through the class assignments, the students are asked to do items that are helpful for theirsuccess as an engineering student. The purposes of the class are to: Graduate the student in engineering, Develop the student professionally with subjects not taught in the classroom, and Send the graduated student directly to graduate school full-time.The class is built on the “Guaranteed 4.0 Plan” by Donna O. Johnson.5 This system has anexcellent time management plan and teaches the students “how to learn” and how to earn andmaintain a straight “A” average. Other topics include: resumes, elevator speeches, how to work acareer fair, portfolios, the 4+1 plan, graduate school, research, career plans for 10 years
4 2 2 0 3.25environments, and an ability to identify and useappropriate technical literature can be rated as,Instructor Comments:The composite score exceeds the target scorethat is set at 3.00 on the scale of 4. Hence the Number of Responses: 8course met the specified criteria and no action isneeded at this time. Table 4: Continuous Improvement Plan for NSF-ATE PLC Module 1-10, 2-10, 3-3, and 3-4Semester Impetus for Change Action and Impact By WhomSpring 1. Modularization of 1. PLC Course was divided in to four modules Faculty2012
-relatedexperiments and course materials into the engineering curriculum, with a focus on artificial organs. Sev-eral modules are being developed and integrated throughout Rowan’s engineering curriculum, into themultidisciplinary freshman engineering course, core engineering courses, and senior electives. The mod-ules will be highly transferrable to other traditional engineering programs such as chemical, mechanicaland electrical as well as biomedical engineering programs. Our evaluation plan will examine specificlearning outcomes in core engineering areas as well as effect on retention, student attitudes, and careerchoices. This paper presents descriptions of the proposed and completed modules, and results of our as-sessment of learning outcomes to
- F2F person help or instruction is sometimes necessary or better Plan to use progress reports or build-as-you-go in PLAN TO the futureResultsSince the students were not required to write the progress reports and did not (per se) have toapply the build-as-you-go strategy to their writing, one of our overarching questions centered onwhether the students in fact viewed the progress reports as stepping-stones and/or used the build-as-you-go strategy. Based on the student interviews, to our great satisfaction, they did. In fact,the very great majority of students (96%) indicated they used the progress reports as a stepping-stone and/or applied
and tested, and are waiting forprocedures to be written followed by classroom trial. The others are in the concept and hardwaredesign stages. The plan is to have all eight ready for fall of 2016.This paper addresses several aspects of the project. First, the guided inquiry approach in generalis discussed. Then, our plan of how to apply this approach in a classroom setting is laid out withsome discussion of lessons learned from using similar but longer exercises in a lab setting.Finally, we give examples of the type of hardware that will be used and the type of worksheetsthat could be used in concert with the hardware.Introduction:This paper reports on the status of work being done to develop classroom exercises to helpstudents better
: Page 13.422.2 1. Acquisition of customer’s requirements, 2. Problem formulation, 3. Cost estimation, 4. Product conceptual design, 5. Product representation (Solid Modeling), 6. Product conceptual prototyping, 7. Make/buy decision, 8. Manufacturing process capabilities, 9. Manufacturing process identification, 10. Process planning, 11. Fabrication and Assembly.In this course, interdisciplinary teams with students from various engineering andtechnology disciplines worked together to design, manufacture, and assemble real-lifeproducts. Senior students in manufacturing options participated in this course. Studentsin the MS program actively participated in the project as part of their practice-orientedcredit requirement. The
engineering proposal consisting of a problem statement, project objectives, preliminary B.O.M and a plan of action. This is due one week after the project is assigned. 2. Project Progress Updates: The students provide a weekly update to the instructor and their team either via email or through pre-scheduled meetings. Altogether 9 updates are required. In these updates the teams are required to communicate the following: a. What happened the past week? b. What will happen this week? c. What are the major issues the team is facing? 3. Project Report: At the end of the term the teams submit a comprehensive project report. This report provides the details of how the project is executed. It
bedeveloped during the grant period. The first one of these, Geometrical Optics, is being createdand is planned to be offered in winter 2014 to a small group of students for the first time. Thecourse includes three hours of lecture and three hours of laboratory. The development of theremaining core courses is scheduled to be completed by fall 2014.c) Development of the Optics and Photonics LaboratoryIn fall 2012 the College was able to assign a dedicated room to house the Optics and PhotonicsLaboratory, which was previously located in the same room as the Electronics Laboratory. Thishas been extremely helpful in preparation for adding the new AAS PLT program which requiresmore equipment and more space. Currently the equipment in the photonics lab
Nanotechnology Fundamentals Lab for Engineering StudentsAbstractNanotechnology findings and products have exponentially increased in the last decade withoutany parallel development in workforce to support this increase. The gap between supply ofskilled workforce and demand in nanotechnology is expected to continue in growth for a while.This paper describes efforts to help in bridging this void of workforce through the developmentand implementation of a comprehensive lab component for educating an interdisciplinary classof engineering and science students at the junior level. The course is introduced as part of alarger plan to bring nanotechnology into undergraduate education. The approach followed in thislab development is unique since it aims at
allotted cost and space constrains of the program.Laboratory ExperimentsCopies of all of the laboratory experiments performed in each laboratory course in the ElectricalEngineering program at Missouri S&T have been obtained. Students in the collaborativeElectrical Engineering program at MSU will run the same set of laboratory exercises in thefacility at MSU as is done at Missouri S&T. These experiments have been developed over timeby the faculty in the Electrical Engineering Department at Missouri S&T. Faculty in theprogram at Missouri S&T and MSU will regularly communicate to ensure that any changes,deletions, or additions to the laboratory experiments planned for a particular electricalEngineering lab class are noted at both
. Page 11.52.1L. Fink, University of Oklahoma Dr. L. Dee Fink, an off-campus evaluator, is the person responsible for developing and implementing the evaluation plan, and he has an extensive background in pedagogy and assessment. Because of this expertise, Dr. Fink will be responsible for: 1.) developing and© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 monitoring the pedagogical models being used, 2.) leading the orientation programs for both undergraduate peer teachers and the faculty members involved, to make sure they fully understand the pedagogy procedures being used, 3.) developing the evaluation plan and materials, 4.) collecting and analyzing the evaluation
thesetests, the water flow was maintained at a constant, low rate. In the case of the HWB, head lossdue to the flow path (pipe friction, fitting losses etc. from the source to the first manometer) wasnegligible. We measured a 0.5 cm. difference (or loss) between these two points. It is importantto note that the flow rate had to be adjusted in order for the bridge to work properly. This wasdone by trial and error and once set, the remainder of the tests worked properly. While we didnot have a flowmeter sensitive enough to measure it, we plan to incorporate a rotameter tomonitor the flow in the next model. Page 11.56.7 Table 2. Results of
process plan and process knowledge in machining and robotics operations. (3) A comprehensive assessment and evaluation plan will be presented, contemplating several quantitative and qualitative measurements used as feeders for necessary Page 24.421.3 calibration and adjustment of the different components of the project. Evaluation of this 1 project is guided by five foundational evaluation questions, designed to focus data collection and analysis on a) the project’s stated objectives and outcomes, b) broader
and 2007, respectively. From 1993 to 1997, he worked for Telefnica of Argentina for four years designing and planning telephony outside plant net- works. Then he worked for five years for Lucent Technologies Power Systems (later Tyco Electronics Power Systems) as a Technical Support Engineer and Sales Technical Consultant in Latin America. For three years, he was also a part-time instructor in charge of ITBA’s telecommunications laboratory. He is currently and Assistant Professor at the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin and his research interests include power electronics, distributed generation, renewable and alternative energy, and analysis of the impact of
, andimmediately modified to include the expandable side, HVAC, insulation, and aesthetictreatments on the floors, walls, and ceiling by Kentucky Trailer Technologies, a division ofKentucky Trailer. The basic specifications of the facility are shown in Table 1 and the overallfloor plan of this part of the facility is shown in Figure 3.Because of the expandable wall, the classroom space is approximately 48.5 m2. The expandingwall contains two 1.5 m flat panel plasma screens for display of lecture slides or other mediafrom the lab’s desktop PC’s or any laptop. The expanding wall also has a 2.4 m white board tofacilitate traditional lecture methods and open discussions. A small podium on wheels can bepositioned in a convenient location for the speaker.Table
. Page 23.1142.7The importance of planning was learned through a bitter way. Without enough back-up parts,one team wasted a week after the original ones were broken. Another team spent too much timeon building the hardware and had not enough time to tune the integrated system for the projectgoals. Furthermore, almost all the teams had to work late in the last week to catch up the projectdeadline.At the end of the semester, each team presented the design with a demonstration to the class. Afinal group report was also required to conclude their team project. The project accounted for15% of the final grade in the second control course, which included the demonstration, thepresentation and the report.Observations and DiscussionsThe assessment of
students of several TCNcourses to set up, configure and troubleshoot computer networks and related services (e.g.,routing, switching, networking services configuration such as DHCP, DNS, WWW, FTP, SMTP Page 14.690.5in both Windows and Linux operating systems).Currently, this networking lab is managed under a lab domain by a dedicated server withMicrosoft Windows Server 2003. This laboratory will be integrated to the backbone laboratorynetwork through a DS1/DS3 link. In the near future, we plan to add a Gigabit Ethernetconnection between Room 218 and Room 210 when supporting hardware equipments areavailable on both sides.2.7 Administration and
), and schedule policy (production scheduling).Their efforts were assessed in terms of the key business results (cash and investments),management information gathering, data analysis, decision making and team work. A secondexample that relates to this simulation is Analysis and Design of Manufacturing Systems wherestudents use Microsoft Dynamics – Great Planes system. It is a full-scale ERP (EnterpriseResources Planning) system and students have an opportunity to learn how to implement andsetup data in real industrial environment. A third example encompasses use of software tools NILabView and Circuit Design Suite in designing, troubleshooting, and controlling electrical,electronic and mechatronic systems in various courses. Students design and
Paper ID #13323Development of a Low-Cost, Low-Voltage Three-Phase Power Synthesizer forUse in Motor and Systems ExperimentsMs. Kathleen Teresa McGuire Kathleen T. McGuire is a senior electrical engineering major at the University of San Diego. She is graduating in May and has plans to work for Freescale Semiconductor in Austin, Texas starting this summer. She is part of several engineering honors societies such as Tau Beta Pi and Tau Eta Nu, as well as several other clubs on campus. She is interested in semiconductors and embedded systems.Ms. Jessica Urbano Jessica L. Urbano is a Spring 2015 graduate of the University of
emergency exits and fire extinguishers. ) - Safety measures based on Heinrich's law ( Refer to 4.3.1 (2) for details. ) - Accident forecasting ( Refer to 4.3.1 (3) for details. )(2) Safety Measures Based on Heinrich's LawHeinrich's Law suggests that eliminating minor accidents, which are potential risk factorsfor further accidents, might help in preventing major accidents. Based on this law, thestudents submit a report of minor accidents they have experienced and share thisinformation in class. (3) Accident ForecastingAt the experiment planning stage, the students are instructed to forecast any accidents that Page 11.719.11may occur during their
. Simple inductors7. The 555-band (a team project to present a tune to the rest of the class)8. An R-C transient and op-amp9. Investigation of a NAND gate10. Use of a transistor11. Building a thermometer using a transistorWithin this context, the Hydro-circuits lab was introduced this year.A typical laboratory session is illustrated in Figure 1. Page 12.51.3 Figure 1: Typical “fun lab” in sessionThis year the plan was to introduce the hydro-circuits lab at the third session. Delays in theacquisition of parts delayed it to the sixth session. Two sections of Circuits I were taught thissemester, so that there were
(Mathematica, MATLAB, Maple, and LabVIEW). This willprovide an opportunity for all CSET-STEM participants to learn technical skills improve theirperformance in their classes, in their jobs, and in their future careers. These activities are estimated torequire an average of about 1 hour per week.Professional Development ActivitiesIn order to enhance the educational performance and retention of CSET-STEM Scholars, the followingactivities are planned. These activities are estimated to require an average of about 2 hours per month:(a)Monthly Seminars -- All Scholars will be encouraged to attend a monthly seminar. Talks will begiven by faculty and industry guest speakers. In addition, students will share their experiences. Thisinteraction will aid the
previously described version,3 though it uses much of the same code. A screen shot ofthe VB6-based circuit editor is shown in Fig. 3.The program no longer requires that students have a copy of PowerPoint to use it, but is currentlystill limited to Windows PC’s, or other platforms running Windows emulators. Students caneasily access such machines on campus computing sites if they do not own one. A future web-based version is planned, but will require considerable additional development to implement.2.3. Web-Based Waveform Sketching Input ModuleA number of typical problem types in textbooks involve showing the student a waveform for thecurrent or voltage of a capacitor or inductor as a function of time, and asking them to sketch theother quantity (by
is more likelythat the work will be done in different Master’s Research Project classes, taught by differentinstructors at different times.At the writing of this paper there are five different cohorts of students currently working on theMaster of Science in Wireless Communications (MSWC) degree, and four of the five cohortswill work on their research projects at different times. Students have proven to be reasonablyadept at identifying interesting projects. But they have proved to be less adept at assessing howmuch time will be required to complete the research for their project despite the fact that they arerequired to develop a detailed project plan using Microsoft Project. Overestimating how muchwork they can complete in three months is
, but do not necessarily teachstudents how to decide when to use a thermocouple, as opposed to another temperaturemeasurement device, or how to properly install a measurement device to avoid experimentalerrors.The idea of redesigning laboratory courses to benefit capstone design has been attemptedpreviously by Folz et. al. In their case, a junior-level materials engineering laboratory coursewas altered to include more engineering design concepts as well as problem solving,collaboration, and communication skills. The teams in this course were assessed during thecourse and showed gains in applying theory to practice. Folz et. al. had planned, but notfinished, assessment of the students after capstone design to determine if the skills learned in
- plementing undergraduate laboratory and lecture courses that address the evolving needs of biomedical engineers, and managing the ABET assessment program for the Weldon School of Biomedical Engineer- ing.Dr. Marcia Pool, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Marcia A. Pool is an Instructional Laboratory Coordinator in the Weldon School of Biomedical En- gineering at Purdue University. She is responsible for overseeing and assessing junior level laboratories, bioinstrumentation and biotransport, and is involved with teaching and mentoring students in the Senior Design Capstone course. Recently, she has worked with colleagues to plan and implement a problem- based learning approach to the biotransport laboratory to improve
fieldof metrology. The essence of the Navy Metrology and Calibration Program including its vastlaboratory structure are provided as a foundation to illustrate skill sets and disciplines involvedgenerally with metrology. Then, MEC’s partnerships and other activities to educate peopleabout metrology and to inspire students to consider metrology as a career field are presented.Also, specific examples of projects with professional societies and other organizations involvedwith metrology are highlighted and discussed. Included are MEC’s various STEM outreachefforts highlighting metrology that align with DoD’s STEM Outreach Strategic Plan as well aspartnerships developed with local colleges and universities. The intent of the paper will be toprovide a
A.S.E.T/B.S.E.T Plan of Study (Supply[5]. This issue is further complicated by the fact that food and Chain Source: ISO 22006)foodstuff production and manufacturing is becoming increasingly complex and is requiring moretechnically skilled employees [6]. The U.S. Department of Labor’s Career Guide to Industries, 2008-09Edition, Food Manufacturing, stated: “Fierce competition has led food manufacturing plants to invest in technologically advanced machinery to become more productive. The new machines have been applied to tasks as varied as packaging, inspection, and inventory control, but the processing of animal products remains a labor-intensive activity that is resistant to automation efforts. As a result