University Systems Engineer - Eafit UniversityProf. Genisson Silva Coutinho, Instituto Federal de Educac¸a˜ o, Ciˆencia e Tecnologia da Bahia Genisson Silva Coutinho is a Ph.D. student at the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He is a CAPES grantee and also professor in the Department of Mechanical and Materials Technology at the Instituto Federal de Educac¸a˜ o, Ciˆencia e Tecnologia da Bahia. He is a mechanical engineer and holds a Bachelor’s degree in law and a Master’s degree in mechanical engineering. He has been teaching at different levels, from the first year of technical high school to the final year of mechatronic engineering course, since 1995. He also has considerable experience in
AC 2011-505: IMPROVING STUDENT ATTAINMENT OF ABET OUT-COMES USING MODEL-ELICITING ACTIVITIES (MEAS)Karen M. Bursic, University of Pittsburgh Karen M. Bursic is an Assistant Professor and the Undergraduate Program Director for Industrial En- gineering at the University of Pittsburgh. She received her B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh. Prior to joining the department she worked as a Senior Consultant for Ernst and Young and as an Industrial Engineer for General Motors Corporation. She teaches undergraduate courses in engineering economics, engineering management, and probability and statistics in Industrial Engineering as well as engineering computing in the
. Douglas, University of Florida Dr. Elliot P. Douglas is Associate Chair, Associate Professor, and Distinguished Teaching Scholar in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Florida. His research activities are in the areas of active learning, problem solving, critical thinking, and use of qualitative methodolo- gies in engineering education. Specifically, he has published and presented work on the use of guided inquiry as an active learning technique for engineering; how critical thinking is used in practice by stu- dents; and how different epistemological stances are enacted in engineering education research. He has been involved in faculty development activities since 1998
interested in the role of liberal education in developing engineering leaders.Dr. Brian P. Helmke, University of Virginia Brian Helmke is currently Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Virginia. He received the B.S.E. in bioengineering from the University of Pennsylvania, the B.S.Econ. from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, and the Ph.D. in bioengineering from the University of California, San Diego. Brian’s research interests include cardiovascular physiology, cellular mechanobi- ology, and nanotechnology-based biomaterials. He is also interested in technology-enhanced teaching, experiential learning for undergraduates in science and engineering, and inclusive teaching
and equipping faculty with the knowledge and skills necessary to create such opportunities. One of the founding faculty at Olin College, Dr. Zastavker has been engaged in development and implementation of project-based experiences in fields ranging from sci- ence to engineering and design to social sciences (e.g., Critical Reflective Writing; Teaching and Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering, etc.) All of these activities share a common goal of creating curricular and pedagogical structures as well as academic cultures that facilitate students’ interests, moti- vation, and desire to persist in engineering. Through this work, outreach, and involvement in the commu- nity, Dr. Zastavker continues to focus
research that confirms this belief. Indeed somework suggests that engineering graduates are ill-prepared to solve the complex problems theyencounter in the workplace [4]. Substantial work has been devoted to characterizing student andexpert problem-solving in physics [5-11] and engineering [12-14], but there are almost noagreed-upon measures of problem solving [8]. If we are to teach undergraduate students to solvecomplex, real-world problems we must be able to measure how well they are learning thenecessary skills. In this work, we describe the testing of a new assessment to measuredimensions of problem-solving in undergraduate chemical engineering courses.Much of the empirical work in problem-solving has focused on differences between experts
Paper ID #33213Writing-enriched Engineering CoursesProf. Abolfazl Amin, Utah Valley University Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering, Brigham Young University M.S. in Mechanical Engineering, Brigham Young University B.S. in Mechanical Engineering, Brigham Young University Engineering Professor at Utah Valley University since 1990. Instructed Mathematics and Physics as an adjunct at University of Utah and Westminster College.Dr. Abdennour C. Seibi, Utah Valley University Dr. Abdennour Seibi, is an Associate Professor at Utah Valley University teaching in Mechanical Engi- neering Programs. He has an extensive academic and
, College of Engineering, Michigan State University. Dr. Sticklen also serves as the College Coordinator for engineering education research, and is an Associate Professor in the Computer Science and Engineering Department, MSU. Dr. Sticklen has lead a laboratory in knowledge-based systems focused on task specific approaches to problem solving. More recently, Dr. Sticklen has pursued engineering education research focused on early engineering; his current research is supported by NSF/DUE and NSF/ CISE.Daina Briedis, Michigan State University Daina Briedis is an Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science at Michigan State University. Dr
Paper ID #11911Achieving High Functioning Teams Using Team Based Learning in FlippedClassroomsDr. Jennifer Mott, California Polytechnic State University Jennifer Mott is faculty in Mechanical Engineering at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. Her research interests include using Team Based Learning in engineering courses and first year engineering programs.Dr. Steffen Peuker, California Polytechnic State University Dr. Steffen Peuker holds the James L. Bartlett, Jr. Assistant Professor position in the Mechanical Engi- neering Department at the California State University in San Luis Obispo. He is teaching courses, includ- ing
variable modeling. She also focuses on individual differences (e.g., in well-being, cognitive functioning) from a process modeling perspective.Dr. Conrad Tucker, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Tucker holds a joint appointment as Assistant Professor in Engineering Design and Industrial En- gineering at The Pennsylvania State University. He is also affiliate faculty in Computer Science and Engineering. He teaches Introduction to Engineering Design (EDSGN 100) at the undergraduate level and developed and taught a graduate-level course titled Data Mining–Driven Design (EDSGN 561). As part of the Engineering Design Program’s ”Summers by Design” (SBD) program, Dr. Tucker supervises students from Penn State
AC 2011-1489: EARLY ENGINEERING INTERESTS AND ATTITUDES:CAN WE IDENTIFY THEM?Karen A High, Oklahoma State University KAREN HIGH earned her B.S. from the University of Michigan in 1985 and her M.S. in 1988 and Ph.D. in 1991 from the Pennsylvania State University. Dr. High is an Associate Professor in the School of Chemical Engineering at Oklahoma State University where she has been since 1991. Her main technical research interests are Sustainable Process Design, Industrial Catalysis, and Multicriteria Decision Mak- ing. Her engineering education activities include enhancing mathematics, communication skills, critical thinking and creativity in engineering students and teaching science and engineering to education
AC 2010-2137: OPEN-BOOK VS. CLOSED-BOOK TESTING: ANEXPERIMENTAL COMPARISONLeticia Anaya, University of North Texas Leticia Anaya, M.S. is a Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Technology at the University of North Texas College of Engineering. She is currently working in her PhD in Management Science at the University of North Texas. She received her M.S. in Industrial Engineering from Texas A&M University. Her research and teaching interests include Thermal Sciences, Statistics, Quality Assurance, Machine Design, Simulation and Educational Teaching Methods. She has published previously in ASEE Conferences and has developed three laboratory manuals in the following areas
students. Martin et al.19 alsoemphasize the need for improving parental education regarding the processes for universityadmission, financial aid, expected engineering course load, and long-term benefits of earning anengineering degree. They specifically suggest considering language barriers while designingparents’ events.Transition The transition solutions focused on 1) making curricular changes and 2) developingsocial capital in community colleges for engineering. Hoit and Ohland showed, with statistically-significant evidence, that presenting the realengineering content, in the first-year itself, helps retain women students14. They introduced theintroduction to engineering course in a laboratory format, where they employed active
. 2017.[3] S. Jaikaran-Doe, A. Henderson, E. Franklin, and P. Doe, Strategies for promoting cultural diversity within student laboratory groups in an engineering degree course at an Australian uni ersit , Australasian Association for Engineering Education Annual Conference 2018, Hamilton, New Zealand.[4] M. V. Jamieson and J. M. Sha , Appl ing Metacogniti e Strategies to Teaching Engineering Innovation, Design, and Leadership, Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association, 2017.[5] S. Beecham, T. Clear, J. Barr, M. Daniels, M. Oudshoorn, and J. Noll, Preparing Tomorro s Soft are Engineers for Work in a Global En ironment, IEEE Software, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 9 12, Jan. 2017.[6
organizations and individuals engage in technological innovation.Dr. Micah Lande, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Micah Lande, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering and Manufacturing Engineering pro- grams at the Polytechnic School in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches human-centered engineering design thinking, making and design innovation project courses. Dr. Lande researches how technical and non-technical people learn and apply design thinking and mak- ing processes to their work. He is interested in the intersection of designerly epistemic identities and vocational pathways. Dr. Lande received his B.S in Engineering (Product Design), M.A. in
students to take a course in fluid mechanics (CEE 1402) with and accompanying lab. This course teaches principles that prepare engineers to basic design fluid mechanic design, such pumping systems, pipe systems, open channel flow, etc. The project was to help in the development of laboratory experiments designed to improve student learning of basic fluids concepts. Project will involve design and construction of various experiments requiring the use of the machine shop.J) Freshman Engineering Program, University of Pittsburgh. The project was to Design & Develop an Online Interactive Scholarship Information WebsiteBased on the experiences and the modifications the students had with these projects and our newgoals, we found
Engineering Undergraduate Laboratory,” IEEE Frontiers in Education, 1997, pp. 350-354.[7] Armarego, J., “Advanced Software Design: A Case in Problem-Based Learning,” IEEE Computer Society: Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, 2002, pp. 44-54.[8] Denayer, I., K. Thaels, J. Vander Sloten, and R. Gobin, “Teaching a Structured Approach to Design Process for Undergraduate Engineering Students by Problem-Based Education,” European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2003, pp. 203-214.[9] Brodeur, D., P. W. Young, and K. B. Blair, “Problem-Based Learning in Aerospace Engineering Education,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering
Heidi Diefes-Dux is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education (ENE) at Purdue University with a joint appointment in the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering (ABE). She is the chair of the ENE Graduate Committee and she is a member of the Teaching Academy at Purdue. She received her B.S. and M.S. in Food Science from Cornell University and her Ph.D. from ABE in 1997. Her research interests include open-ended problem solving, evaluation of education technology, and first-year and graduate curriculum development.P.K. Imbrie, Purdue University P.K. Imbrie is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He
Paper ID #9650Towards Improving Computational Competencies for Undergraduate Engi-neering StudentsDr. Claudia Elena Vergara, Michigan State University Claudia Elena Vergara is a Research Scientist in The Center for Engineering Education Research (CEER). She received her Ph.D. in Plant Biology from Purdue University. Her scholarly interests include: improve- ment of STEM teaching and learning processes in higher education, and institutional change strategies to address the problems and solutions of educational reforms considering the situational context of the par- ticipants involved in the reforms. She is involved in
AC 2012-4652: IS THE ENGINEERING EDUCATION COMMUNITY BE-COMING MORE INTERDISCIPLINARY?Dr. Johannes Strobel, Purdue University, West Lafayette Johannes Strobel is Director of INSPIRE, Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning, and Assistant Professor of engineering education and learning design and technology at Purdue University. NSF and several private foundations fund his research. His research and teaching focuses on policy of P-12 engineering, how to support teachers and students’ academic achievements through engineering learning, the measurement and support of change of habits of mind, particularly in regards to sustainability and the use of cyber-infrastructure to sensitively and resourcefully
coursemodel traverses from one location in time and space to another.Background: Replication vs. Mutation of the Wright State Model for EngineeringMathematics EducationThe Wright State Model (WSM) is a semester-long math course that teaches fundamentalconcepts of Calculus 1, 2, 3, and Differential Equations in an engineering context through hands-on laboratory experiences and application-rich problems. The WSM is designed to disrupt thetraditional rigid sequencing of undergraduate engineering curricula by decoupling mathematicsprerequisites from engineering coursework—introducing undergraduates to sufficientmathematical tools in the one-semester course to enable them to get started and make progress intechnical engineering coursework, regardless of
. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation (pp. 99-117; 288-291). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.19. Wickman, P.–O. (2004). The practical epistemologies of the classroom: a study of laboratory work, Science Education, 88, 325-244. Page 25.44.1220. Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications. Sage Publications, London.21. DeVellis, R.F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.22. National Academy of Engineering http://www.nae.edu23. Hofer, B.K., & Pintrich, P.R. (Eds.). (2002). Personal
yield both explicit ex-pectations (competencies identified by the participants), and implicit expectations that resultedfrom inductive qualitative analysis from the interviews. Other methods for yielding competencylists are more prescribed, such as those from document analysis, but yield more limited results.Additionally, there were prior works that have alluded to KSAs about postdoc career but have notbeen directly applied to postdoc recruitment. Davis’ work [38] outlined teaching skills, proposalwriting, and project management as skills associated with positive outcomes for postdocs experi-ences through an empirical approach. Nowell et al. [39] identified required skill sets for postdocsto pursue career development opportunities. Those skill
convinced to focus on implementing a superior CQI system, then both programimprovement and accreditation could be achieved simultaneously.What are some of the barriers to implementing a superior CQI program? Numerous reasons canbe supplied, some legitimate, others less so1. Since faculty cooperation is essential to the successof any CQI implementation, the factors contributing to their reluctance to embrace CQI must beovercome in order to succeed. What, then, are some of the reasons given by faculty for their lackof enthusiasm for CQI?A key factor is limited time and available resources. Faculty are called upon to accomplishmultiple tasks involving scholarly activity, teaching and service. At major research universities,the emphasis for tenure and
engineering education supervised by Dr.Cynthia Atman at University of Washington, Seattle.Dr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University Brian Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. During the 2011-2012 academic year he participated in a professor exchange, teaching at the Munich University of Applied Sciences. His engineering education interests include collaborating on the Dynamics Concept
Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech.Abdulrahman M. Alsharif, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Abdulrahman M. Alsharif is a Ph.D. student and a research assistant in the Engineering Education de- partment at Virginia Tech. He has received the Saudi Arabia Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research scholarship to pursue his Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in Industrial and Systems Engineer- ing. His research interests are teaching and learning, policy and guidelines, and assessments. He hopes to work as a social scientist in engineering in higher education.Dr. Michelle D. Klopfer, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityDr. David B. Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute
workshop, we chose to pursue the analysis reported in this paper.The participants were a team of second-year undergraduate engineering students at a large publicuniversity composed of three men and three women. The video was collected in the seventhweek of the 10-week required Material Balances course. Studios in this course are not graded ontask completion, but instead on participation and engagement of group members. Twofacilitators, a graduate teaching assistant (GTA) and an undergraduate learning assistant (LA),both of whom attended pedagogical training workshops, were present. This research wasapproved by the Institutional Review Board and all participants provided written consent.Studio TaskAs part of the curricular reform project, studio
technicalengineering content knowledge. The case study draws upon interviews with human resourcepersonnel and managers, and focus groups of early-career engineers at five companies ofregional and national status operating in Southwest Ohio. In addition, the study makes use ofobservational data and textual analysis of documents collected from faculty teaching inmechanical and civil engineering programs at the university. Interview and focus group datawere coded thematically to identify organizational values for effective professionalcommunication, engineers’ knowledge about effective communication, and genres and texttypes. Instructor-supplied documents, including syllabi and assignments descriptions, wereanalyzed to determine the presence of class activities
AC 2012-5094: EXPLORING THE EFFECT OF DESIGN EDUCATIONON THE DESIGN COGNITION OF SOPHOMORE ENGINEERING STU-DENTSDr. Christopher B. Williams, Virginia TechDr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of engineering education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communica- tion in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, and design education. She was awarded a CAREER grant from NSF to study expert teaching practices in capstone design courses nationwide, and is Co-PI on several NSF grants to explore identity and interdisciplinary collaboration in engineering design.Mr
AC 2012-4029: INSTITUTIONAL DISCOURSES IN ENGINEERING ED-UCATION AND PRACTICENathan McNeill, University of Florida Nathan McNeill is a Postdoctoral Associate in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Florida, where he is studying the factors that contribute to success in open-ended problem-solving. He has a Ph.D. in engineering education from Purdue University, an M.S. in mechan- ical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology, and a B.S. in engineering from Walla Walla University.Dr. Elliot P. Douglas, University of Florida Elliot P. Douglas is Associate Chair, Associate Professor, and Distinguished Teaching Scholar in the De- partment of Materials Science and