her research with the Collaborative Learning Lab, exploring ways to to promote collaborative problem solving in engineering education and provide students with team design experiences that mimic authentic work in industry.Dr. Emma Mercier Emma Mercier is an associate professor in Curriculum and Instruction at the University of Illinois Urbana- Champaign. Her work focuses on collaborative learning in classrooms, and in particular, the use of technology for teachers and students during collaborative learning. Most recently Mercier’s projects have focused on collaborative learning in required undergraduate engineering courses.Dr. Saadeddine Shehab, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign A Postdoc Research
their careers, which can affect an individual’s perception of theirexpertise. A study of project managers showed that having technical skills are the bare minimumfor the job [6]. Having exceptional professional skills is what leads to success in roles withgreater responsibilities in management [6]. This emphasis on professional skills could allude to ashift in expertise from technical to professional skills when switching to a managerial role inlater career stages. The transition away from technical expertise may be difficult for engineers tonavigate, as professional skills align less with the technical skills associated with early career.We present our examination of practicing engineers’ definition of their expertise by genderidentity and
Paper ID #33840Predicting Interest in Engineering Majors: The Role of Critical Agencyand Career GoalsHeather Perkins, Purdue University, West Lafayette Heather entered the Applied Social and Community Psychology program in the fall of 2014, after com- pleting her Bachelor of Science in Psychology from the University of Cincinnati. In Spring 2021, she defended her dissertation and began a post-doctoral research position at Purdue University. She has par- ticipated in various research projects examining the interaction between stereotypes and science interest and confidence, their influence upon womens’ performance in
the Educational Research and Methods Division of ASEE. She founded the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching in Engineering at U-M in 2003 and served as its Director for 12 years. Prior to joining U-M, Dr. Finelli was the Richard L. Terrell Professor of Excellence in Teaching, founding director of the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning, and Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at Kettering University. Dr. Finelli’s current research interests include student resistance to active learning, faculty adoption of evidence-based teaching practices, and the use of technology and innovative pedagogies on student learn- ing and success. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of
courses. Dr. Anwar is the recipient of the 2020 outstanding researcher award by the School of Engineering Education, Purdue University. Also, she was the recipient of the ”President of Pakistan Merit and Talent Scholarship” for her undergraduate studies.Mr. Ahmed Ashraf Butt, Purdue University, West Lafayette Ahmed Ashraf Butt is a doctoral student at the School of Engineering Education, Purdue University. He is currently working as a research assistant on the CourseMIRROR project funded by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES). He is interested in designing educational tools and exploring their impact on enhancing students’ learning experiences. Before Purdue University, Ahmed has worked as a lecturer for two
mechanical engineering design course these distinct ideal models of thedesign process as steps in a student’s Design Thinking learning trajectory are shown in Figure 2.Using this taxonomy, students’ maps can be classified as one of the ideal models of the designprocess shown.Neeley (2007) developed a framework for adaptive expertise that represents the way that theindustry expert designers behave where the design process evaporates and the expert uses thenormative design steps as an interwoven number of possible tools to apply strategically.This research effort is part of a larger research project to explore and understand the learningtrajectories of students and their learning gains in the product-based learning, undergraduateengineering classroom
strategies that two graduate teaching assistants and threeundergraduate course assistants used to intervene in the groups’ work during four collaborativeproblem solving undergraduate engineering discussion sections. It also investigates how thesestrategies influenced the quality of students’ interactions in the groups. This study set out toanswer the following research questions:1) What were the strategies that the TAs and CAs used to intervene with the groups’ work?2) What was impact of these strategies on the quality of students’ interactions in the groups?MethodsDesign A qualitative exploratory design is used in this study [14], which is a part of a multi-yeardesign-based implementation project [15] that aims to develop tools to support
thatdeveloping a student’s intuition is an important aspect in engineering education, but the constructitself remains vague. As part of a larger project on defining engineering intuition, this paperfocuses on how first-year engineers perceive the construct of intuition. With less than a year ofexperience in engineering, these students currently lack the experience and knowledge requiredto develop robust intuition, but they have interesting insights into what they, as novice engineers,consider intuition and how it is developed. In future work, we will compare first-year studentperceptions of the construct with those of practicing engineering (representing experts) to capturesimilarities and differences across novice and expert perceptions on
-dimensionalvectors focused on geometric and algebraic vector addition (subtraction), scaling of vectors,slope and the length (magnitude) of a vector. Lesson 2 focused on the operations of dot productand vector projection. Lesson 1 included the target material for this study; Lesson 2 was given ina traditional instruction format. For Lesson 1, an activity was developed in Geogebra™ thatprovided students some key definitions and visualizations for 2-dimensional vectors, and thenfacilitated an exploration with geometric vector addition and subtraction using the paralleldisplacement and scaling. Some elements of the activity are shown in Figure 1. In Panel 1,students are given the definition of a vector and use the interactive figure to explore the changein
companies such as SIEMENS and for USAID projects.Dr. Natalie L. Shaheen, Illinois State University Dr. Natalie Shaheen is an assistant professor of special education at Illinois State University. Dr. Sha- heen’s research and teaching focus on equity and access for disabled students in technology-mediated K-12 learning environments.Dr. Anne Therese Hunt, I received my masters’ and doctoral degrees from Harvard University’s T. H. Chan School of Public Health, where I served on the faculty for twelve years before starting a research consulting company. There, I have been involved with research design and analysis on diverse projects at the Harvard School of Public Health, the Harvard Institute for International
paired F/T-LEARN cohort (FTIC students only for F-LEARN comparisongroup, transfer students only for T-LEARN comparison group); 2) first academic term ofenrollment is similar to the paired F/T-LEARN cohort; 3) declared as STEM in their first term(see Appendix A for a list of CIP codes that map to STEM majors for this project); 4) have notparticipated in another Living-Learning Community or other Enriching Learning Experience(e.g. honors in the major, National Merit Scholars, mentoring programs, etc.); and 5) have acumulative GPA similar to the F/T-LEARN cohort (high school GPA for FTIC; previousinstitution GPA for transfer students), which was done by computing the minimum andmaximum high school GPA or previous institution GPA for the F/T-LEARN
measurement schema. We set out to use the validated linkbetween overt behaviors and cognitive states to develop a tool that allowed students to report ontheir own cognitive engagement. As the ICAP theory suggests, cognitive engagement is influencedby the environment in which student learning takes place. Despite educators developingcurriculum (i.e. homework, projects, writing assignments, etc.) to influence student’s out-of-classenvironment, cognitive engagement outside the classroom is rarely addressed in the literature onSTEM students. One of the unique contributions of our instrument is the measurement of cognitiveengagement in two distinct environments: inside the classroom and outside the classroom. Wedeveloped a measurement schema that prompted
AC 2008-1851: APPLES AND ORANGES? A PROPOSED RESEARCH DESIGN TOEXAMINE THE CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN TWO MEASURES OFENGINEERING LEARNINGPatrick Terenzini, The Pennsylvania State University Distinguished Professor of Education and Senior Scientist in the Center for the Study of Higher Education.Lisa Lattuca, Pennsylvania State University Associate Professor of Education and Senior Research Associate in the Center for the Study of Higher EducationMatthew Ohland, Purdue Engineering Education Associate Professor and Director of First-Year Engineering in the Department of Engineering EducationRussell Long, Purdue University Director of Project Assessment
credit to the originality of others and acknowledge indebtedness whenever: 1. Directly quoting another person's actual words, whether oral or written; 2. Using another person's ideas, opinions, or theories; 3. Paraphrasing the words, ideas, opinions, or theories of others, whether oral or written; 4. Borrowing facts, statistics, or illustrative material; or 5. Offering materials assembled or collected by others in the form of projects or collections without acknowledgment.8 Page 14.1056.3Causes of the problem: ignorance or competing demands?Some learners fail to follow academic integrity standards because
students were recruitedbased on their high likelihood of completing an engineering major, roughly a quarter of theinitial sample was lost during the four years of the study due to students switching out ofengineering.11 With some data collection methods (e.g., individual interview, the design tasksdiscussed in this paper) being very resource-intensive, project limitations also resulted in a lowersample size for some methods in some years.In its original form, data analyzed for this paper were drawn from a set of handwritten responsesto an engineering design task. In the task, participants were asked to design a method to allowpedestrians to cross a street at a busy intersection. Specifically, they were given 15 minutes torespond to a sequence of
attributes relate to becoming: 1) Aware of theWorld, 2) Solidly Grounded, 3) Technically Broad, 4) Innovative, 5) Effective in TeamOperations, and 6) Effective in Leadership Positions.Our project team has collected data from engineering student subjects who were enrolledin two different courses, and at various stages of their education. These portfolios werecreated by students intending to major in a wide range of engineering disciplines. One-way ANOVAs and post-hoc tests were utilized to examine differences between theengineering discipline and students’ class standing (i.e., first-year students, sophomores,juniors, and seniors). Overall, our analysis indicates that our rubrics based onAlexander’s Model of Domain Learning (MDL) 2-4 are effective in
Paper ID #18315Longitudinal Study of Changes in Student Motivation and Attitudes in Engi-neeringDr. Lisa Benson, Clemson University Lisa Benson is a Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University, with a joint appointment in Bioengineering. Her research focuses on the interactions between student motivation and their learning experiences. Her projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their problem solving processes. Other projects in the Benson group include effects of student-centered active learning, self-regulated
practice and reflection doing normal activities such as eating, moving, and journaling.MethodsOur participants in this study were undergraduate engineering students—mostly first- and second-year and from various demographic backgrounds—who took the course on engineering thrivingduring 2018. We examined changes in students’ scores on gratitude, meaning, and mindfulness atthree time-intervals: a pretest the first day of class (n = 12), a post-test the last day of class (n =12), and a follow-up six months later (n = 5). Part of a larger project (NSF #1626287), we measuredthese competencies using a previously validated survey [26] that examined the impact of variousnon-cognitive and affective factors on engineering student success. For gratitude
Goni, Juli´an is an educational psychologist from the Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile, with academic certification in Economy. He is an instructor and researcher at DILAB UC (School of Engineering UC). He has collaborated in diverse innovation projects with the National Innovation Council (CNID), the Center for Studies of Argumentation and Reasoning (CEAR UDP) and ChileCreativo. In DILAB UC he researches on tipics such as Engineering Education, Public Innovation and Teamwork. He is interested in research, theory and application of interdisciplinary social sciences, with emphasis on the intersection of psychology, innovation, education, philosophy and engineering. c American
collection of all of these instantiations, along with the secondary quantitativeanalyses mentioned previously, will allow for the final step of the FRAM: identification ofpossible control mechanisms. Through this process, common trends will be explored to identifywhich functions lead to the most variability in the system and the outcome. This analysis shouldgive indications of design decisions that can be made to reduce the corresponding variability.For instance, if variability originating in an assignment function leads to large variability ofoutcome, that can inform aspects of assignment design. While many of the specific aspects ofthis project are rooted in the context of the study, the final recommendations will be stated asgenerally as the
Paper ID #28882Assessment of Learning Effectiveness in Online and Face-to-Face LearningEnvironment for Engineering EducationDr. Prabodh Panindre, New York University Prabodh’s scholarly focus includes fire science and firefighter safety research, online learning, heat trans- fer, nanotechnology, and microfluidics. His research group has received several grants (more than $6 million) from U.S. Department of Homeland Security for fire prevention and safety research. He led a team of NYU researchers on the ”Wind-Driven High-Rise Fires” project with Fire Department of New York (FDNY) and National Institute of Standards
design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 10 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty teaching practices and intersections of motivation and learning strategies. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 All Games Are Not Created Equally: Differences in How Games Contribute to Learning in EngineeringAbstractReviews of game-based learning literature treat games as a unified
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Emma Mercier is an associate professor in Curriculum and Instruction at the University of Illinois Urbana- Champaign. Her work focuses on collaborative learning in classrooms, and in particular, the use of technology for teachers and students during collaborative learning. Most recently Mercier’s projects have focused on collaborative learning in required undergraduate engineering courses.Prof. Mariana Silva, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Mariana Silva is a Teaching Assistant Professor at the Computer Science Department at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She received her BSME and MSME from the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil and earned her Ph.D. in
Paper ID #14471Automated Grading of Excel Workbooks Using MatlabDr. Curtis Cohenour Ph.D., P. E., Ohio University Dr. Cohenour is an Assistant Professor in the Ohio University Engineering Technology and Management Department, in Athens, Ohio. He received a Bachelor of Science degree from West Virginia Institute of Technology in 1980, a Master of Science degree from Ohio University in 1988, and a Ph. D. in Electrical Engineering from Ohio University in 2009. He is a registered professional engineer in West Virginia, and Ohio. Dr. Cohenour has worked in Industry as an electrical engineer and project manager. He joined Ohio
approaches. This paper describes a long-term project which has developed aninnovative curricular model that provides students with hands-on skills highly sought byindustry; as well as an accompanying standardized test to measure student achievement on thecompetencies spanned by the curricular innovation. It gives a formal summative evaluation ofthe curricular model; and describes a comparative study being undertaken to compare thelearning gains achieved under the new curricular model with those attained by comparisongroups studying the same content but without participating in the particular curricularinnovation.Introduction Lack of practical, hands-on experience in manufacturing is one of the major competencygaps in manufacturing engineering
Paper ID #12177Exploring Contemporary Issues in Sustainable EnergyDr. Paul Gannon, Montana State University Associate Professor, Chemical EngineeringDr. Ryan Anderson, Montana State UniversityMr. Justin W Spengler, Montana State UniversityDr. Carolyn Plumb, Montana State University Carolyn Plumb is the Director of Educational Innovation and Strategic Projects in the College of En- gineering at Montana State University (MSU). Plumb has been involved in engineering education and program evaluation for over 25 years. At MSU, she works on various curriculum and instruction projects including instructional development for faculty
to material ownership raised byindividual faculty, departments, or even institutions.Because of these issues, the first step in flipping a classroom isn’t using someone else’s videosbut making instructor-specific videos to seamlessly merge with current curriculum25,26. Largecourse redesign, especially as championed by the National Center for Academic Transformation(NCAT), is very focused on helping faculty develop their courses for their own universities27.Collaborations between one university and another, even for courses which are very similar, areless common. The American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Virtual Communities ofPractice was formed in part to assist in such collaborations and was where this project began28.Section 3
like to help people (this is a separate research project that is currently under development).We posit even though engineering involves substantial application of math and science theprimary goal is to identify and work on authentic problems and develop meaningful solutionswhich overshadows that necessity to apply math and science. Further, we speculate that successin engineering requires the application of multiple other skills such as communication,collaboration, creativity, computing, etc. which are likely to dilute the thought of engineering asa career in which people focus on the application of mathematics and science. Finally, wepredicted that there would be shifts in the answers based on experience, with first yearengineering students
research, and investigation of instructional princi- ples and assessments in STEM.Mr. Nathaniel HUNSU, Washington State University Nathaniel Hunsu is currently a PhD candidate of Educational Psychology at the Washington State Univer- sity. He received a B.Sc. in Electronics and Computer Engineering from the Lagos State University, Nige- ria and a M.Sc. in Project Management from University of Sunderland. He is interested in the conceptual change research in science learning. His research emphasis at the time is about how students process textual information for conceptual change in STEM education. He can be reached at nat.hunsu@wsu.edu.Prof. Bernard J. Van Wie, Washington State University Prof. Bernard J. Van Wie did
the journals Advances in Engineering Education and International Journal of Service Learning in Engineering. He serves as program chair for the Community Engagement Division of ASEE. Dr. Harding was invited to deliver a workshop on Ethics in the Engineering Curricula at the 2009 NSF Engineering Awardees Conference and to participate in the NSF Project Based Service Learning c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Paper ID #12382 Summit. He received the 2008 President’s Service Learning Award for innovations in the use of service learning at Cal Poly. In 2004 he was named a Templeton Research