helpincrease the reliability and the validity of the study’s instrumentation.We welcomed the administrative differences among the professors in different campuses. Ourlearning scientists did not restrict the professors’ teaching style or their questionnaireadministration techniques. Other than the IRB requirements, we let the professors practice theirown style in their classrooms. Fortunately, we have planned collecting both control andexperimental student data from each participating institution that will allow us to identify thecampus differences (using the institutions as co-variance) and control if marginal differences areobserved.Mutual Engagement and Evolved GoalsEach professor sustained participation in this study through weekly meetings in the
. Page 23.510.7Table 2. Survey Factors and Statements Survey Factors and Statements Factor Survey Statement Engineering I intend to major in an engineering field. Identity I plan to remain enrolled in an engineering major over the next semester. I think that earning a bachelor’s degree in engineering is a realistic goal for me. I am fully committed to getting my college degree in engineering.Interactions Since coming to the College of Engineering I have developed close personalwith Faculty relationships with other students.and Peers The student friendships I have developed at the College of Engineering have
Learningdelimiter at 3.0 or a grade of B-. Rating descriptors that are now available were developedthrough intense interaction between field expert professors that continued until all were satisfiedwith the definitions.The rubric scores were designed and corroborated to be more descriptive of learner cognitionthan a single grade or score and hence more useful in future formative interventions. We aim totake these results into consideration when designing learning experience and assessment forfuture classes. Also we plan to modify this rubric using the same dimensions for other coursesfor which the dimensions adequately describe cognition. Page 25.441.15
background literature in Section 2, this paper presents a summaryof our investigation in Sections 3 and 4, including the experimental design, research methods,and scoring metrics to determine the impact of cognitive style on concept mapping. We close (inSections 5 and 6) with a discussion of the implications of our results, limitations of the study,and planned future work based on our findings.2. Background and Literature ReviewWith the increasing complexity of engineering problems, there are very few problems we cansolve alone. As a result, understanding cognitive diversity and how it affects particularengineering artifacts is important within the context of engineering education.7 Concept mappingis a tool used in many fields, including engineering
themeasurements throughout the longitudinal period because deviations or inconsistencies mayyield unsubstantiated conclusions.The response variable, also referred to as achievement in MBT studies, will vary widelydepending on the learning objectives of the exercise. Of course, the learning objectives must bemeasureable actions that students are able to perform as a result of the educational module. Forexample, in the author’s recent research the learning objective was for participants to be able toidentify the safety hazards in planned construction environments. Throughout the longitudinalexperiment, the assessment variable remained constant and standard; however, the context of theassignment or the problem to be solved must change. For example during
cognitive, interpersonalstudent? How do you feel when the educator evaluates you or your work?13. Did the portfolio studio align with this view? If yes, please explain how? If no, cognitivehow could it better align?14. People have said that working on the portfolio influences how they view the cognitivecourses they have taken or plan to take. Is this true for you?15. How useful was working on portfolio in regard to current coursework, future intrapersonal, cognitiveplans?16. How
Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, IL.[3] MacAlpine, B., & Uddin, M. (2009). Integrating information literacy across the engineering design curriculum.Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, TX.[4] Williams, B., Blowers, P., Goldberg, J. (2004). Integrating information literacy skills into engineering courses toproduce lifelong learners. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT.[5] Starkey, A., Kissick, B., Collins, J., & Oh, J. (2006). Faculty librarian partnerships for information fluencyinstruction: Planning and preliminary assessment. Proceedings of the American Society for
., and Felder, R. (2007). A psychometric study of the index of learning styles. Journal of Engineering Education, 96: 309-319.21) Martin, G.P. (2000). Maximizing multiple intelligences through multimedia: A real application of Gardner’s theories. Multimedia Schools, 7: 28-33.22) McCoog, I.J. (2007). Integrated instruction: Multiple intelligences and technology. The Clearing House, 81: 25-28.23) National Science Board (2007). Moving Forward to Improve Engineering Education. NSB-07-122 (November 19, 2007).24) Noble, T. (2004). Integrating the revised Bloom’s taxonomy with multiple intelligences: A planning tool for curriculum differentiation. Teachers College Record, 106: 193-211.25) Raven, M., Cano, J., Carton, B. and Shelhamer, V
parts of the solution)to the problem. Applies to initial Fitting a solution element in thesolution concepts as well as to the larger designfinal design(FEAS) FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS Verifying workability in general “Yeah, that’s good because it’s strongAssessing and passing judgment Determining whether a solution or enough to hold anon a possible or planned solution solution element meets the adult.”to the problem (or parts of the Problem Definitions criteria or Page 15.869.8problem) constraints(EVAL
. L. Waight, K. S. Zerda, and T. Sha. 2008. The relations of ethnicity to female engineering students’ educational experiences and college and career plans in an ethnically diverse learning environment. Journal of Engineering Education 97 (4): 449-465.14. Hoh, Y. K. 2008. Presenting female role models in civil engineering: An outreach activity to help teachers overcome their misperceptions of engineers. International Journal of Engineering Education 24 (4): 817- 824.15. Jain, R., B. Shanahan, and C. Roe. 2009. Broadening the appeal of engineering - Addressing factors contributing to low appeal and high attrition. International Journal of Engineering Education 25 (3): 405- 418.16. Bronzini, M. S., J. M
C26. Make sure teammatesO7. Help to plan, set goals, R17. Show respect for other understand importantand organize work teammates information and instructionsO8. Track team progress vs. R18. Demonstrate C27. Help the team buildyour timeline accountability consensusO9. Encourage progress to R19. Collaborate effectivelymeet goals and deadlinesO10. Display dedication anddetermination4.2. Study DesignAt the beginning of the course, teaching assistants participated in a 1.5 hour training session onteamwork and
, visualization and use of toolsMaking Connections: this category, like skills and tools, was organized into a subset of types,but overall, this group refers to making connections between the course material and other entity:themselves, another course, career or graduate school plans or the “real world”. Morespecifically: 1. Application to real world engineering/real problems (n=29): “I want my students to see that physics has direct connections to real world problems.” 2. Future career/graduate studies (n=18): “contribute meaningfully to the work of a structural engineering group, whether in industry or academia” 3. Integration with self/identity (n=18): “I want the students to gain confidence in their knowledge” 4
Univer- sity. She has been involved in engineering education for over 20 years.Hyun Kyoung Ro, Penn State University Hyun has been working as a graduate assistant on the Engineer of 2020 research grants that the Center for the Study of Higher Education received from the National Science Foundation.Dr. Alexander Yin, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Alexander Yin is the Senior Planning Research Associate in the Office of Planning and Institutional As- sessment. Prior to his current appointment, Alex was on the staff of Penn State’s Center for the Study of Higher Education. In that position he worked for Drs. Lisa R. Lattuca and Patrick T. Terenzini as a Senior Project Associate for two NSF-funded studies
designed” andthus, perhaps overcoming the design fixation.3. Deep Structure: Approach to DesignBuilding on the relationship between breadth, depth and design, instructors mentioned thatdesign prepares students “for some of the practical realities of being an engineer” and providesan opportunity to “use a knowledge of math and science technical knowledge to create some newproduct” while experiencing “open-ended questions”. Design was also mentioned to be a vehicleto enhance other skills such as teamwork, communication skills, persistence and planning a largeproject in stages. Instructors who teach design were explicitly asked to comment on the role ofdesign in engineering science vs. in other, more traditional engineering programs. No
strategies. It is questionable, too, whether or not the adaption of such proactive strategies wouldcontinue to be effective under the conditions of the global COVID-19 pandemic, as they had notpreviously been assessed on students undergoing the unprecedented conditions of collectivetrauma. The relatively small subfield of trauma-informed pedagogy has risen to the fore over thepast year, and research in this area suggests that students who have experienced (or who may becurrently experiencing) trauma(s) will likely struggle not only with time management, but morebroadly with related executive-functions such as planning and problem-solving [10], [11]. It iscertainly possible that we are only learning about the long-term effects of the
successful (or unsuccessful) students. This paper presents a rubric-buildingmethod incorporating a novel use of personas, adding to the literature in both domains andproviding an example case study to help bridge the theory-to-practice gap.References[1] C. J. Finelli, S. R. Daly and K. M. Richardson, "Bridging the Research-to-Practice Gap: Designing an Institutional Change Plan Using Local Evidence," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 331-361, 2014.[2] R. M. Felder and R. G. Hadgraft, "Educational Practice and Educational Research in Engineering: Partners, Antagonists, or Ships Passing in the Night?," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 339-345, 2013.[3] M. Borrego, S. Cutler, M. Prince, C
contextualizedwithin larger projects or challenges, such as engineering design, so that students may have practiceon the communication aspects of drawing which may improve self-efficacy.Continuing research on this DSEI will include modifying individual items based on further expertfeedback. We also plan to survey wider, more diverse populations of learners beyond engineeringand art classes, to look for differences in self-efficacy. Expanding the target educational level topostsecondary and professional learners would provide additional validity evidence for the use ofthis DSEI across many learning settings. Future directions may expand the DSEI more generally toany researchers interested in measuring drawing self-efficacy, whether using digital drawing
a variety of definitions and dimensions within the literature [10]. For example,Fruchter defines teamwork, in the context of (building) design, as a process - rather than acompetency - of reaching a shared understanding of relevant knowledge domains, the object beingdesigned and built, the design process itself, and the commitments it engenders [26]. Hirsch andMcKenna consider a variety of elements as part of teamwork, like conflict management,communication, leadership, and project management [21]. Teamwork is among the ABET learningoutcomes for engineering programs and is defined as “an ability to function effectively on a teamwhose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment,establish goals, plan
they firstenroll. Students who switch programs within the university and eventually graduate from anon-engineering program are still considered a graduate of this cohort. Students who arecurrently enrolled and still working toward a degree are only included in Phases 2 and 3 of ouranalysis.This research received approval from the Institutional Review Board at the university. Theresults in this article comply with the data management plan for the research including that aminimum number of entries is needed in published results.MethodologyThis framework for systematically classifying students involves a three-phase approach: (i)statistical test for comparisons, (ii) cluster analysis, and (iii) logistic regression predictions ofeventual dropout
recommendations in the curriculum and overall planning with minor focus onresearch activities. The accessibility of these experts for all the faculty members is limited. Toovercome these issues, IUCEE was established with a vision to improve the quality and globalrelevance of engineering education in India [1].Research performance is a significant factor that is commonly used in comparing universities. Theconcept of research performance is defined in two parts: one is research (all faculty are expectedto engage in research) and the other is performance (which is evaluated based on the quality of thepublished work) The different parameters considered under research component are research skillsand techniques, research funding, research management
from animaginative, creative mind-space, done outside the confines of established engineering educationcurricular activities.4-6 Making has a do-it-yourself ethos and is historically rooted in efforts likePopular Mechanics magazine who demystified everyday stuff for hobbyists and the Whole EarthCatalog: Access to Tools7 who surveyed everyday tools for the counterculture movement of the1960s. Additional real-world touchstones are the growth of Radio Shack stores and the 1980stelevision program MacGyver where the lead character would resolve each episode’spredicament by fashioning an escape plan out of found objects.8 Technology and sharing ofinformation via the Internet has greatly increased the ability for smaller communities with
discusses this in thecontext of how she plans to marry an engineer, so she can “stay with the kids until they go toschool” and then “work part-time until they get out of school.” For Maggie engineering allows aperson, in this case her imagined husband, to earn enough money to allow her, projected as anequally qualified professional engineer, to stay at home with children or work part-time. Theengineering-as-lifestyle perspective is differently shaded here, when compared to the unalloyedversions from Max and Jake, but our interpretation is that it is the same basic belief about theleading value of engineering—that it provides for a high salary and a comfortable lifestyle. Maggie: If I was married with children= Int: =You knew—You knew I was
goal is tointroduce students to the Engineering Method, this is accomplished by focusing on six courseobjectives: self-regulation, communication, working cooperatively and collaboratively, problemsolving, modeling, and quality. The “Modeling” section initiates students in the process ofengineering modeling, using several software including spreadsheets. “Concepts” introducestudents to the engineering design process, problem-solving techniques, working in teams,engineering as a profession, and planning for success that students then apply in “Laboratory” ontwo actual design projects. The “Concepts” section uses quizzes given in nearly every session toascertain whether students have understood the material in their pre-class reading