Conference Session

Research on Engineering Design Education

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ryan C. Campbell, University of Washington; Ken Yasuhara, University of Washington; Cynthia J. Atman, University of Washington; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

,engineering educators seek ways to emphasize and develop broad thinking. The work presentedin this paper provides insight into how engineering education might broaden its coverage tobetter address such modern challenges as globalization, climate change, and issues of socialjustice. In this paper, we present new findings from a recent analysis of semi-structuredinterviews that were conducted during the spring of 2006 as part of the Center for theAdvancement of Engineering Education’s (CAEE) Academic Pathways Study (APS). Theseinterviews of third-year engineering students at a large, public research university in the westernU.S. took place immediately following a short design-scoping task (the analysis of which isreported elsewhere [1, 2]) that asked

Conference Session

Research on Engineering Design Education

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christopher B. Williams, Virginia Tech; Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech; Yoon Suk Lee, Virginia Tech; John S Gero, George Mason University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

study, which includedstudents at the beginning and the end of their sophomore year. Students in the experimentalgroup completed an introductory mechanical design course, while students in the control grouphad no formal design component in their curriculum. We analyze and compare the percentoccurrences of design issues and syntactic design processes from the protocol analysis of bothcohorts. These results provide an opportunity to investigate and understand how sophomorestudents’ design ability is affected by a design course.1. IntroductionDesign has long been considered a central component of engineering education, and a number ofrecent publications have called for an increase focus on design education not only in capstone orcornerstone

Conference Session

Thinking About the Engineering Curriculum

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University; Anna Zilberberg; Christopher W. Swan, Tufts University; Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder; Kurt Paterson P.E., Michigan Technological University; John J. Duffy, University of Massachusetts, Lowell; Sean Mcvay, James Madison Univeristy

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

gap, this study aims to gain adeeper understanding of the faculty‟s experience with LTS. Herein, we present the thoroughdevelopment of the LTS Faculty Survey, designed with content and construct validationprocesses in mind and included quantitative and qualitative items, as well as key findings fromsurveyed LTS faculty experts (N=25). The survey enabled us to measure characteristics of LTScurricular and extracurricular efforts, perceived barriers faced by faculty, motivations forimplementing LTS efforts, attitudes about LTS, etc. all from a faculty perspective. Key findingssuggest that major barriers for LTS implementation are (1) faculty time/workload, (2) problemscoordinating with the community, and (3) the lack of policy on the role of LTS

Conference Session

ERM Potpourri

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janet Y. Tsai, University of Colorado, Boulder; Daria A. Kotys-Schwartz, University of Colorado, Boulder; Beverly Louie, University of Colorado, Boulder; Virginia Lea Ferguson, University of Colorado; Alyssa Nicole Berg, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

-based mentoring program at the University of Colorado atBoulder provides an opportunity to conduct engineering education research to understand andquantify the effect of mentoring on student interests and retention in engineering. Targeted at the Page 25.678.2diverse population of underrepresented minorities and women engineers at the university, thisprogram aims to improve retention rates since the college’s graduation trends lag well behind thenational average for these nontraditional groups [1] [2]. This study examines the efficacy of theYour Own Undergraduate Research Experience at CU-Boulder (YOU’RE@CU) mentoringprogram during its pilot

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Poster Session

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julie P. Martin, Clemson University; Matthew K. Miller, Clemson University; Marian S. Kennedy, Clemson University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Foundation’s Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU)initiative aims to recruit students to careers in research and has funded over 1,700 sites totalingover $435 million (of which over 600 sites receiving $171 million in funding are presentlyactive)1. Research by the STEM education community concurs that these research experienceshave a positive influence on undergraduates in a variety of ways. Yet, many of the specificaspects of the nature benefits to participants and how they accrue to participants are not knownor well understood.Prior work by the first author used Lent’s Social Cognitive Career Theory to study the impact ofREU programs on undergraduate students’ self efficacy for graduate school and researchcareers2. In this prior work, we

Conference Session

Research Informing Teaching Practice II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Flora P. McMartin, Broad-based Knowledge, LLC; Joseph G. Tront, Virginia Tech; Sarah Giersch, Broad-based Knowledge, LLC

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

graduate students and young faculty members. Analysis of the awardees’dossiers revealed the challenges associated with evaluating the impact of innovations on teachingand learning as well as issues surrounding the dissemination of innovations in engineeringeducation.1. IntroductionIn this paper we report on preliminary results of a study undertaken to determine the impact ofthe Premier Award for Excellence in Engineering Education Courseware on the culture ofengineering education. NEEDS, the precursor to the Engineering Pathway(http://www.engineeringpathway.com/ep/about/index.jhtml) developed the Premier Award “torecognize high-quality, non-commercialcourseware designed to enhance Figure 1: Courseware Defined

Conference Session

Problem-based and Challenge-based Learning

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech; Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech; Brett D. Jones, Virginia Tech; Philip R. Brown, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

perceived the usefulness of their course towards anengineering degree. Even though there were differences between the two sites that extendedbeyond the pedagogies used in first-year courses that could influence student motivation, thedifferences in instructional methods appears to have played a key part in how studentsexperienced their first-year coursework and developed ideas about engineering work.Introduction and Purpose of the ResearchProblem-based learning (PBL) is a pedagogical practice that has been shown to be effective inscience and engineering courses for promoting student learning 1-11. This approach is alsogaining traction as a possible way to promote student motivation and retention in engineeringprograms 12-14, although research

Conference Session

Contextual Competencies

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David B. Knight, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

teamwork or design skillsor fundamentals rather than understanding these skills in relation to one another. This paperexamines the E2020 suite of knowledge and skills to 1) determine whether there are engineeringseniors who score highly on all outcomes, and 2) develop and compare profiles of studentswithin an outcomes-based typology for two engineering disciplines.E2020 Learning OutcomesThe E2020 outcomes include a variety of learning goals for graduates, including areas such asbasic engineering and design, professional skills, contextual competence, and interdisciplinaryskills1. Assessment of many of these outcomes poses a challenge, as there are no standardizedtests available for evaluating student knowledge in many areas, and for some skills

Conference Session

Research in Engineering Education II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan McNeill, University of Florida; Elliot P. Douglas, University of Florida; Mirka Koro-Ljungberg, University of Florida; David J Therriault, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

programs.Ten companies that hire materials engineering graduates of the universities included in this studywere also selected as content sources. Companies were selected to represent a variety of sizes,industry sectors, and types (e.g. service-oriented, production-oriented, or both). Page 25.786.5  Table 1. Universities included in content analysis. U.S. News U.S. News Undergraduate Undergraduate University

Conference Session

ERM Potpourri

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Russ Pimmel, University of Alabama; Roger K. Seals, Louisiana State University; Stephanie M. Beard, Louisiana State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, and skills on a scalethat will meet the need. Although some traditional engineering faculty workshops havehad positive results as reported by Felder and his colleagues, 2, 7, 8 several investigatorshave identified some important issues with the short-term, face-to-face model. 6, 9, 13Specifically, such workshops do not allow time for faculty members to go through thetransitions from awareness to action, 9 can cause an adversarial relationship between thepresenter and the participants, 6 and do not encourage participants’ motivation andcommitment.13 The inadequacy of existing faculty development models is reflected in: 1)the slow adoption of engaging, active-learning methods that have been systematicallytested and shown to improve student

Conference Session

Contextual Competencies

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joshua David Schwartz, Trinity University; Ashley Ater Kranov, ABET

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

example of which is providedhere.The authors present data from the first implementation of this module in an engineeringdepartment with an identified deficiency in outcome 3j and demonstrate how the deficiency wasresolved through this practice. The department in question had established (prior to this effort)two criteria for assessing outcome 3j and these are indicated in Table 1. The first (J1) can bebroadly described as an awareness of goings-on in engineering both in the public-arena (e.g.high-profile successes or failures) and in the sense of being aware of some of the current researchefforts in engineering sub-disciplines. The second (J2) is concerned with assessing whether thestudent is aware of the impacts and consequences (realized or

Conference Session

Research Informing Teaching Practice II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Arnold Neville Pears, Uppsala University; Judy Sheard, Monash University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

separated intention Page 25.855.3and strategy into two major scales, comprising four intention sub-scales and three strategy 2sub-scales respectively. After statistical analysis in several stages 1 they arrived at a finalversion consisting of nineteen items ranked on a positive scale (1-5), where 1 representshardly ever true, and 5 nearly always true. All items are positively scored.The factor analysis conducted on aggregated data from a number of studies was unable todemonstrate the viability of the originally proposed scales. The final version consists oftwo major scales Conceptual Change/Student Focused

Conference Session

Identity and Culture

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tamara Floyd Smith, Tuskegee University; Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Diane Carlson Jones Ph.D., University of Washington; Melani Plett, Seattle Pacific University; Rebecca A. Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Nanette M Veilleux, Simmons College

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

concentrated onmethods of teaching and learning such as student research experiences.1 However, it isimportant to realize that STEM educational objectives and outcomes which, over the course ofthe undergraduate degree, represent all levels of Bloom’s taxonomy2 are overlaid with thestudent life experience represented by Maslow’s hierarchy of needs.3 Thus, if a student has notexperienced a sense of belonging, the third level of Maslow’s hierarchy, it may become thebottleneck in the goal to improve learning outcomes and achieve educational objectives.Maslow’s hierarchy of needs presents a theory of human motivation.3 The hierarchy includesfive levels of needs. The lowest level is physiological needs (food and water), and the next levelof needs is

Conference Session

Research in Engineering Education II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Johannes Strobel, Purdue University, West Lafayette; David F. Radcliffe, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Ji Hyun Yu, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Sadia Nawaz, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Yi Luo, Purdue University; Jea Hong Choi, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

researchoutcomes that reflect knowledge integration12 13 Accordingly, numerous studies in thebibliometric community have focused on research publications to measure intellectual diversityencoded in publication records, by analyzing the association of the journals that they cite tocorresponding Subject Categories (SCs) provided by Thomson Scientific’s Institute for ScientificInformation (ISI) 14 15 16. The present study was designed to investigate how interdisciplinary a body ofengineering education research is in the wider sense of knowledge integration. The projectemployed two complementary bibliometric approaches in terms of the issue of interdisciplinarity,including (1) a top-down approach using pre-defined categories (typically ISI Subject

Conference Session

Research in Engineering Education I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mallory Lancaster, Purdue University; Yi Luo; Johannes Strobel, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

EngER in that, it allows for a systematic, organizedoverview of K-12 EngER and allows for analysis of this relatively new field. This study could also guideK-12 EngER researchers to choose their research topics, to look for research collaborators, and toexplore niche research areas. The major findings resulted as follows: (1) K-12 EngER has just began totake shape and grow in the last 10 years, (2) the most popular keywords such as STEM, stud*, teac*and curricul* reveal the topics that have been most researched in the past, (3) Engineering Education(EngE) epistemologies have been the most researched area, (4) high school is the most researched for aK-12 EngE curriculum, (5) elementary education compared to other grade levels is underrepresented

Conference Session

Research Informing Teaching Practice II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sensen Li, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Sean P. Brophy, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

assessmentin their classrooms. The results will illustrate a method for quickly classifying students’ errorsassociated with evaluating engineering systems and recommendations for how to designformative feedback for classroom and individual learning system.BackgroundBlack & Wiliam conducted an extensive research review of more than 250 journal articles andbook chapters on the effectiveness of formative assessment [1]. They proposed that efforts tostrengthen formative assessment produce significant learning gains, and eventually raiseacademic standards in classrooms. Specifically, they pointed out that effective formativeassessment involves collecting evidence about how students make progress during learning andmaking necessary instructional

Conference Session

Understanding Our Students II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michele L. Strutz, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

to provide a growing economy, strong health and human services, anda secure and safe nation depends upon a vibrant, creative, and diverse engineering and scienceworkforce”. 1 To contribute to technological advancements, engage in global collaboration,solve complex problems, encourage a more socially just profession, and respond to the predictedshortage of American engineers, it is necessary for this nation’s engineering workforce anduniversity student bodies to be more diverse in its racial, gender, and socioeconomic (SES)representation. The lack of representation in SES is the focus of this research.The purpose of this qualitative study was to give low-SES students an opportunity to share theirstories about the influences that prompted them

Conference Session

Contextual Competencies

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hyun Kyoung Ro, Carnegie Mellon University; Lisa R. Lattuca, University of Michigan; Dan Merson, Pennsylvania State University; Patrick T. Terenzini, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, and parsimonious measure of the contextualcompetence of undergraduate engineering students.Introduction The practice of engineering requires more than solving for x. Engineers must be able tosolve real-world engineering problems while also understanding the range of their relevantcontexts. Projects such as the One Laptop per Child program, China’s Three Gorges Dam, andnew ultra skyscrapers illustrate the social, economic, environmental, political, and culturalchallenges of today’s engineering problems. The ABET program accreditation Criteria 3.c, 3.f,3.h, and 3.j promote contextualization of engineering practice [1]. The ABET criteria mandateoutcomes to ensure that engineering graduates cultivate the non-technical skills

Conference Session

Understanding Our Students I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wade H. Goodridge, Utah State University; Scott David Greenhalgh, University of Northern Iowa; Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University; Gary A. Stewardson, Utah State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, respectively. The test administered was the Modified Purdue SpatialVisualization Test of Rotations with fifteen weeks passing between the pre- and post-tests. Bothtests had the same form to avoid issues pertaining to reliability. In addition, both tests had abalanced design between the experimental and control groups to equally distribute the impact Page 25.922.6effects of testing validity. Students were given 40 minutes to complete the 30 question test.Non-circular and demographic questions were inclusive to the post-test questions. 65 studentswere from the face-to-face sample while 57 students were from the distance education sample.Table 1

Conference Session

Model Eliciting Activities

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University; Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh; John Anthony Christ, U.S. Air Force Academy; Ronald L. Miller, Colorado School of Mines; Tamara J. Moore, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

,students were forced to confront and repair certain misconceptions acquired at earlier stages oftheir education, to utilize laboratory experiments to gather additional data, and to recognize andthen resolve ethical issues.Here we introduce several issues when implementing MEAs in upper division level classes byproviding two case studies. These issues are circulated around the theme of engineering learningsystems, and in particular to the professional or “soft” skills. Specifically, the following insightsare provided across two MEAs from two different disciplines and engineering schools: 1. The instructional culture challenges involving MEAs implementation in the classroom; 2. How faculty’s personal epistemology for teaching

Conference Session

Research on Engineering Design Education

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Leema Kuhn Berland, University of Texas, Austin; Kirstin Collette Busch, University of Texas, Austin

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

work within each of them. Table 1 summarizes this agreement.Table 1: Comparison of epistemic commitments and practices in mathematics, science andengineering Science Engineering Design MathematicsGoal Explain natural Solve a problem Identify patterns and phenomenon by through design, structures on which to building general changing the world base conjectures principles, regarding future understanding the patterns and world structures.Common • Ask and refine

Conference Session

Epistemic Research

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Golnaz Arastoopour, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Naomi C. Chesler, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Cynthia M. D'Angelo, University of Wisconsin, Madison; David Williamson Shaffer, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Jamon W. Opgenorth; Carrie Beth Reardan, Epistemic Games; Nathan Patrick Haggerty, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Clayton Guy Lepak

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

thinking in a virtual internshipIntroductionEducational institutions at all levels have historically struggled with motivating and retainingwomen in science and engineering. Blickenstaff [1] and others have referred to this as theproblem of a “leaky pipeline,” in the sense that women opt out of the path from elementaryschool through university and on to STEM careers at various points along the way. Onesignificant “leak” occurs when declaring an undergraduate major in the first year [2, 3]. Researchsuggests that women with an interest in engineering enter undergraduate programs with highlevels of self-confidence, but these levels decline significantly during the first year [4]. Thesingle biggest drop in

Conference Session

ERM Potpourri

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anthony Gregerson, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Sean Franey, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, as U.S. employersin high tech industries struggle to find qualified employees amidst a shortage of STEM degreesin the workforce. In August of 2011, President Obama’s Jobs and Competitiveness Councilcalled for an additional 10,000 engineering graduates each year to meet these shortages [1]. Ifthese goals are to be met, educators in engineering disciplines must strive to improve theirgraduation rates, as only 40% of students that begin their education in STEM fields go on tocomplete their degree in that field [2]. Such low graduation rates may be discouraging, but foreducational researchers they highlight the opportunity for significant gains to be made. However,realizing these gains may require a systematic reevaluation of all parts of the

Conference Session

Engineering Design: Implementation and Evaluation

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Cole, Northwestern University; Robert Linsenmeier, Northwestern University; Ann McKenna, Northwestern University; Matthew Glucksberg, Northwestern University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

literacy.” Sinceour focus is on mathematical modeling in the context of engineering design, we usedGainsburg’s2 framework to structure our activities and data collection. (Other authors3-5 havepresented additional, similar frameworks for the creation of mathematical models.) Specifically,Gainsburg identified six steps for what mathematical modeling should include: 1. Identify the real-world phenomenon 2. Simplify or idealize the phenomenon 3. Express the idealized phenomenon mathematically (i.e., “mathematize”) 4. Perform the mathematical manipulations (i.e., “solve” the model) 5. Interpret the mathematical solution in real-world terms 6. Test the interpretation against realityShe studied the use of mathematical models in

Conference Session

Engineering Design: Implementation and Evaluation

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shanna Daly, University of Michigan; Seda Yilmaz, University of Michigan; Colleen Seifert, University of Michigan; Richard Gonzalez, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

to a design problem totake the designer to a different part of this space of potential design solutions.Evidence for Design HeuristicsIn a previous study, the application of heuristics that transformed previous concepts wasobserved within an expert designer’s ideation process18. For example, in one design concept, theexpert combined three structural heuristics: (1) changing the configuration of the identical designelements utilized in the previous concept in order to repeatedly use a swiveling motion around acommon base, while (2) changing the physical interaction of the user with the system, and (3)adding multiple functionalities to the same component. In a set of designs that were quite varied,several specific heuristics were observed

Conference Session

Educational Research & Methods Poster Session

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ming-Chien Hsu, Purdue University; Monica Cardella, Purdue University; Senay Purzer, Purdue University; Noemi Mendoza Diaz, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

educate engineering literate citizens, who can make informeddecisions about technology use 1. From an individual standpoint, engineering literateindividuals can get benefits at home and work, such as operating systems correctly andchoosing the best consumer products. “Engineering literacy” relates to understanding issuesinvolving conceiving, building, maintaining and designing objects or processes in theman-made world. It is synonymous with “technology literacy” used in the national sciencestandards 2. In this paper, we will use the term design, engineering, and technology (DET) tocapture the broader meaning of engineering education. In comparison to science andmathematics education, engineering education at the K-12 level is underdeveloped 3

Conference Session

New Learning Paradigms II

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ming-Chien Hsu, Purdue University; Monica Cardella, Purdue University; Senay Purzer, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

design task that prompts students tocritique someone else’s design process, as it is documented in a Gantt chart with a brief verbaldescription7. In addition to administering the task to many different populations of engineeringstudents, Bailey has also administered the task to practicing engineers in order to further validatethe instrument8.We have changed the task description to ask the teachers to examine a students’ design processas depicted in Figure 1. The task description asked the teachers to “Imagine that you asked yourstudents to design a container to keep an egg safe during an egg drop contest. Now imagine thatwe were able to capture one of the students’ design process and create the following tableshowing the different activities

Conference Session

New Learning Paradigms II

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Juyeon Yun, Purdue University; Monica Cardella, Purdue University; Senay Purzer, Purdue University; Ming-Chien Hsu, Purdue University; Yoojung Chae, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

classrooms, and, finally, behavior pertains to parents’engineering-related activities with their children in their daily life. The following are thedefinitions of the three domains used in the study: ≠ Definitions 1. Parents’ engineering knowledge: comprehension of the basic principles and concepts of engineering 2. Parents’ engineering attitudes: feelings and beliefs about engineering Page 15.423.4 3. Parents’ engineering behavior: the frequencies of activities parents do with their childrenMethodologyPrior to beginning the process of developing this instrument, the Parents’ EngineeringAwareness

Conference Session

Knowing our Students, Faculty, and Profession

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katherine Winters, Virginia Tech; Holly Matusovich, Virginia Tech; Ruth Streveler, Purdue Universtiy

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

faculty members.1 Aspart of the undergraduate education process, faculty guide students through thousands of hours inclassrooms and laboratories. To design better educational experiences for engineering students,faculty must understand how students perceive these interactions and how such interactionscontribute to engagement in learning. Using self-determination theory 2 and analyzinglongitudinal interview data, we explored students‟ perceptions of interactions with faculty andhow these interactions changed during their four undergraduate years.Literature ReviewSelf-determination theory (SDT) posits the importance of socio-contextual factors in humanmotivation.3, 4 In learning environments, socio-contextual factors include social aspects such

Conference Session

ERM Potpourri

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mitchell Nathan, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Amy Atwood, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Amy Prevost, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Allen Phelps, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

significantly lessinclined to use students’ interests and backgrounds to shape classroom instruction. The primarychange attributable specifically to the intervention was the increased belief among newly mintedPLTW teachers that they were providing engineering instruction that effectively integratedscience and math concepts. While this is seen as desirable and in keeping with current educationefforts, the final section examines some of the challenges of implementing effective STEMintegration in high school classrooms.The Importance of Studying Teacher Beliefs about Engineering EducationAs U.S. high schools respond to calls for improving student learning in math, science and pre-college engineering 1 and the availability of increased funding