-maze for this project.References[1] J. W. Grice, P. T. Barrett, L. A. Schlimgen, and C. I. Abramson, "Toward a brighter future for psychology as an observation oriented science," Behavioral Sciences, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1- 22, 2012.[2] O. S. Collaboration, "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science," Science, vol. 349, no. 6251, p. aac4716, 2015.[3] J. B. Sidowski, "Experimental methods and instrumentation in psychology," 1966.[4] R. Scheiner et al., "Standard methods for behavioural studies of Apis mellifera," Journal of Apicultural Research, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 1-58, 2013.[5] C. Varnon, H. Lang, and C. I. Abramson, "Automated research in comparative psychology: Limitations and new directions," Ярославский
., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 131–140, 2011.[8] L. H. Jamieson and J. R. Lohmann, “Innovation with Impact: Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education,” American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, D. C., 2012.[9] M. Borrego, J. E. Froyd, and S. Hall, “Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: A Survey of Awareness and Adoption Rates in U.S. Engineering Departments,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, pp. 185–207, 2010.[10] C. Henderson and M. Dancy, “Increasing the Impact and Diffusion of STEM Education Innovations,” Characterizing the Impact and Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations Forum. New Orleans, 2011.[11] C. Henderson, A. Beach, and N. Finkelstein, “Facilitating
use on examperformance. Teaching of Psychology, 33, 39–40.8. Fish, S. (1990). How to recognize a poem when you see one. Ways of Reading: AnAnthology for Writers 2nd ed, eds D. Bartholomae & A. Petrosky, Bedford Books of St. Martin’s Press, Boston, pp.178–191. Page 12.955.10 9
5 4 3 2 1 • Support staff in engineering, such as, director of a teaching center, or an assessment specialist 5 4 3 2 1 • K-12 outreach director 5 4 3 2 1 • Other _________________________________________________________________________ 5 4 3 2 110. What type of educational background and experience should the person(s) identified as very critical in question #9 have?11. Which of the following degree programs are needed to meet current engineering education challenges? (5=very critical; 4=critical; 3=neutral; 2=less critical; 1=not critical) • K-12 teaching
Page 13.633.11Education Conference, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 2007.6. Donaldson, et al. (2007).7. Donaldson, K. and S. Sheppard. (2008). A Snapshot of American Undergraduate Engineering Institutions:National Sampling for the Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey (APPLES) (AcademicPathways Study). Technical Report CAEE-TR-08-058. Lichtenstein, G. (2007). APS — APPLES Exposure to Engineering and Persistence: Analysis of Cohort 3Confirm/Doubt Data. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.9. Guay, F., Vallerand, R.J., & Blanchard, C. (2000). On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsicmotivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion, 24(3), 175-213
through problem-based learning an application of the course material and show acorrelation between design and system application. The assignment required a short reportdocumenting the case with examples and illustrations of the structural system(s) or members,computer analysis, and any other supporting evidence showing the application of the subjectmatter in the qualitative and quantitative analysis. The teams also presented brief slide show Page 13.1331.2presentations to the class. The graphic design of the presentations were of high quality, but thereport writing was often painful to read, lacked clear organization, and was of much lowerquality
us?” In Proceedings of the Special Interest Groupon Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) Technical Symposium3 R. Uhlig, A. Farahani, A. Cruz, S. Viswanathan, H. Evans, and M. Sotelo, “AchievingCompelling Student Comprehension of Complex Information Structures for both On-Site and On-Line Courses”, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education 2008 AnnualConference, Pittsburgh, PA Page 14.1305.12
student(s) in order that students have a vested interest in the project and obtain asense of difference-making in completing the project. This paper evaluates student learning andmotivation and provides a status report on the ongoing research at the University of Evansvilleconcerning the enhancement of student learning and motivation by virtue of international andhumanitarian attributes associated with international capstone design projects.Eleven University of Evansville students traveled to the Dominican Republic for a six-day datacollection activity that resulted in three capstone design projects for these students plus fouradditional students. A structural equation modeling analysis is presented that developsindependent latent variables for
Engineering Education & Practice. 1995;121(2).3. Berthouex P.M. Honing the writing skills of engineers. Journal of Professional Issues inEngineering Education & Practice. 1996; 122(3).4. Bransford J. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press;2000.5. Yalvac B, Smith H.D., Troy J.B. Promoting advanced writing skills in an upper-levelengineering class. Journal of Engineering Education (Washington, D.C.). 2007; 96(2).6. Carvill C, Smith S, Watt A, Williams J. Integrating writing into technical courses: Stepstoward incorporating communication into the engineering classroom. Proceedings of the 2002American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition
). On location. Logan, UT. Utah State University Press. 8. Mullin, J, Schorn, S., Turner, T. , Hertz, R., Davidson, D. & Baca, A. (2008). Challenging our practices, supporting our theories: Writing mentors as change agents across discourse communities. Across the Disciplines5Special Issue: Rewriting Across the Curriculum: Writing Fellows as Agents of Change in WAC.. 9. Definition of Critical Thinking. Foundation for Critical Thinking. http://www.criticalthinking.org/aboutCT/define_critical_thinking.cfm 10. Paul, R., R. Niewoehner, L. Elder, 2006, The Thinker’s Guide to Engineering Reasoning, The Foundation for Critical Thinking, Dillon Beach, CA. 11. Soven, Margot Iris (2006) What the writing
Environments)Center, which is funded by NSF grant SBE-0354453. Any opinions, findings and conclusionsor recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation. We would also like to thank TracieRickert and Aki Sakamoto for their assistance with the coding of the data. We would like tothank the engineering educator who partnered with us by allowing us to interview his students,and we would especially like to thank all of the engineering students who participated in thestudy.Bibliography1. Underwood, D., Is Mathematics Necessary. The College Mathematics Journal 1997, 28, (5), 360-364.2. Jonassen, D.; Strobel, J.; Lee, C. B., Everyday Problem Solving in
, Employer Satisfaction with Graduate Skills. 2000, ACNielsen Research Services.2. National Survey of Student Engagement 2006 results summary. 2006, IUPUI Information Management and Institutional Research.3. Cooney, E, Alfrey, K and Owens, S. Critical Thinking in Engineering and Technology Education: A Review. in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exhibition. 2008, American Society for Engineering Education.4. Cloete, A. Solving problems or problem solving: What are we teaching our students? in ASEE Annual Conference. 2001. Albuquerque, NM, United States: American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC 20036, United States.5. Dewey, J., How We Think. 1910, Lexington
Social Cognitive Construct validation: Determining Women andMen’s Success in Engineering Programs,” Journal of Higher Education, 78 (3), 336-364, 2007.[7] Vogt, C., “An Account of Women’s progress in engineering: A Social Cognitive Perspective,” Journal ofWomen and Minorities in Sciences and Engineering, 9 (3/4), 217-238, 2003.[8] Crockett, D. S., “Academic advising: A cornerstone of student retention,” New Directions for Student Services,1978 (3), 29 – 35, 2006. Page 14.1290.7
. Page 11.877.11[14] Leonard, D. and S. Strauss, “Putting Your Company’s Whole Brain to Work,” Harvard Business Review.Reprint Number 97407. July 1, 1997.
introductions to different areas ofengineering that allow students to shape their programs to reflect interests in one of the usualbranches of engineering. A particular concern for our program was the student success rate inone of our engineering gateway Computer Sciences (Cpt S 121 - Program Design andDevelopment) courses. Over a four year period from 2000-2004, only 57% of the students wereable to complete the course with a grade of C or better, resulting in 43% of graded students“failing” this class (not including students who withdrew before receiving a grade). Because thiscourse is crucial to retaining students in the engineering program, it was identified to pilot aninstrument that could inform faculty, and more generally, engineering educators
2006-638: EXAMINING THE UNDERLYING MOTIVATIONS OF ENGINEERINGUNDERGRADUATES TO BEHAVE UNETHICALLYTrevor Harding, Kettering University Dr. Trevor S. Harding is Associate Professor of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering at Kettering University where he teaches courses in engineering materials and manufacturing. Dr. Harding's research interests include wear phenomenon in orthopeadic implants, ethical development in engineering undergraduates, and pedagogical innovations in environmental education. Currently, Trevor serves on the ERM Division Board of Directors and on the Kettering University Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning Advisory Board.Cynthia Finelli, University of Michigan
-408.15. Fenske, R.H., Porter, J.D., & DuBrock, C.P. (2000). Tracking financial aid and persistence of women, minority, and needy students in engineering, and mathematics. Research in Higher Education, 41(1), 67- 94.16. Schensul, S., Schensul, J. & LeCompte, M. (1999). Essential ethnographic methods: Observations, interviews and questionnaires. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.17. Keels, C. (2004). Keeping students afloat. Black Issues in Higher Education, 21(18), 32-36, 38-39. Page 11.1451.7 6
the Future, Draft 6”. Body of Knowledge Committee. American Society of Civil Engineers. Reston, VA.4. Grigg, Neil S., Marvin E. Criswell, Darrell G. Fontane, Laurel Saito, Thomas J. Siller, and Daniel K. Sunada (2004) “Integrated Civil Engineering Curriculum: Five-Year Review”. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. 130:3, 160-165.5. Friesen, Marcia, K. Lynn Taylor, and M.G. Britton (2005) “A Qualitative Study of a Course Trilogy in Biosystems Engineering Design”. Journal of Engineering Education. 94:3, 287-296.6. Estes, Allen C., Ronald W. Welch, and Stephen J. Ressler (2004) “Questioning: Bring Your Students Along on the Journey”. Journal of Professional Issues in
lectures,” presented at the 11th IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering and Application (SEA 2007), Cambridge, MA, 2007.[5] S. Deterding, D. Dixon, R. Khaled, and L. Nacke, “From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining ‘Gamification,’” in Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, New York, NY, USA, 2011, pp. 9–15.[6] J. Hamari, J. Koivisto, and H. Sarsa, “Does gamification work? — A literature review of empirical studies on gamification,” in System Sciences (HICSS), 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on, 2014.[7] C. Cheong, F. Cheong, and J. Filippou, “Quick Quiz: A gamified approach for enhancing learning,” in PACIS 2013
. Technol., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 97–110, 1959.[4] F. R. Curcio, “Comprehension of Mathematical Relationships Expressed in Graphs,” 1987.[5] A. Yolcu, “Middle school students’ statistical literacy: Role of grade level and gender,” Stat. Educ. Res. J., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 118–131, 2014.[6] J. Watson, “Assessing statistical thinking using media,” in The Assessment Challenge in Statistics Education, Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1997, pp. 107–122.[7] N. Daun-Barnett and E. P. St. John, “Constrained Curriculum in High Schools: The Changing Math Standards and Student Achievement, High School Graduation and College Continuation,” Educ. Policy Anal. Arch., vol. 20, p. 5, 2015.[8] J. N. Lovett and H. S. Lee, “New Standards
Computing Sciences in Colleges, 18(6), 151-164. 5. Kovačić, Z. J., & Green, J. S. (2012). Automatic grading of spreadsheet and database skills. Journal of Information Technology Education, 11. 6. Kline, D. M., & Janicki, T. N. (2003). Enhancing economic and finance learning through automated grading of spreadsheet exercises. Journal of Economics and Financial Education, 2(2), 23-29.
Engineering Technology Program. Technology Interface International Journal, 13(2), pp. 31-38. [6] Ahmed, M. S. (2012). Value of Formal Project Management to Automotive Employees. International Journal of Modern Engineering, 13(1), pp. 27-35. [7] Dieter, G. E., & Schmidt, L. C. (2012). Engineering Design (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
-24.2 IEEE, Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge. ed. by James W. Moore Alain Abran, Pierre Bourque, Robert Dupuis (Los Alamitos, California: IEEE Computer Society, 2004).3 Bourque Pierre 'The Maturation of Software Engineering as a Discipline and Recognized Profession'2009) .4 Mary Shaw, 'Software Engineering Education: A Roadmap', in Proceedings of the conference on The future of Software Engineering (ACM, 2000), pp. 371-80.5 Coimbatore Krishna Prahalad, and Mayuram S Krishnan, The New Age of Innovation: Driving Cocreated Value through Global Networks. Vol. 1 (McGraw-Hill New York, 2008).6 Jesűs Favela, and Feniosky Peńa-Mora, 'An Experience in Collaborative Software Engineering Education
featuring their classroom professor and students who wereinstead exposed to a non-local professor. Additionally, an end of course survey revealed that ingeneral students had no preference for who was featured in the videos. Further refinement of theclass materials management system and the inclusion of additional course modules areopportunities to improve and further validate this study.Section 1: IntroductionOver the last several decades, more and more U. S. students are enrolling in college, with nearlyforty percent of Americans obtaining at least a two-year college degree1,2. The United States haslong been the leader in higher education, boasting a majority of the top universities and collegesin the world3. As the economy moves away from an
science teachers. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 5(1), 85–103.[10] Mazumder, Q. H., & Karim, R. M. (2012). Comparative Analysis of Learning Styles of Students of USA and Bangladesh, Paper no: AC2012-5075, 119th ASEE Annual Conference, June 10-13, 2012, San Antonio, TX, USA[11] Oxford, R. L., and Chien-Yu L. (2011) "Autonomous learners in digital realms: Exploring strategies for effective digital language learning." Independent language learning: Building on experience, seeking new perspectives 1 (2011): 157.[12] Zimmerman, B. J., and Dale H. S. (2011) eds. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. Taylor & Francis, 2011
engineeringprogram a year later than those that begin in a calculus course or those that made a C or better intheir first mathematics course.Additionally, our results showed that fewer than 12% of graduating engineers during a singlesemester at our institution started in a non-college level mathematics course. In contrast, nearly40% of graduating engineering students entered the university with AP or dual enrollment creditfor single variable calculus.This quantitative study of trajectories of students who start out in non-college level mathematicswas conducted to identify the subject(s) for a future qualitative study of the factors thatcontribute to students’ persistence in engineering when they encounter difficulties in theircollege mathematics
engineering design course. Research in Engineering Design 10, 118-128 (1998).11. Cross, N., Christiaans, H. & Dorst, K. Analysing design activity, xi, 463 p. (Wiley, Chichester ; New York, 1996).12. Atman, C.J. et al. Engineering Design Processes: A Comparison of Students and Expert Practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education 96, 321-334 (2007).13. Atman, C.J., Chimka, J.R., Bursic, K.M. & Nachtmann, H.L. A comparison of freshman and senior engineering design processes Design Studies 20, 131-152 (1999).14. Mosborg, S. et al. Conceptions of the engineering design process: an expert study of advance practicing professionals. in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (Portland, Oregon
. A. Embed social awareness in science curricula. Nature 505, 477–478 (2014).5. Seshadri, P., Reid, T. N. & Booth, J. W. A framework for fostering compassionate design thinking during the design process. in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings (2014).6. Hynes, M. & Swenson, J. The Humanistic Side of Engineering : Considering Social Science and Humanities Dimensions of Engineering in Education and Research. J. Pre-College Eng. Educ. Res. 3, 31–42 (2013).7. Fila, N. D. et al. The people part of engineering: Engineering for, with, and as people. in Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 727–735 (2014).8. Scheier, M. F. & Carver, C. S. The Self
paymentfrom the board two weeks later. Purchase orders (PO) post-it notes are placed on the suppliergame board, a post-it note payment is placed over top of the PO the following week as thematerials manager receives the sheet(s) of paper purchased. Accounting writes all invoices andsupplier payments, and must track cash-on-hand.At the midway point in the simulation, the game takes a time-out as teams are asked to analyzeinformation they (should) have been collecting. Requested analysis includes averages on salesprice per case, weekly demand, and average raw material cost. Teams are also asked to identifytheir current finished goods inventory, accounts payable, accounts receivable, and profit.Averages are to be calculated, with teams encouraged to
,” Planet, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 4–5, Dec. 2006.[5] J. H. F. Meyer, R. Land, and C. Baillie, Threshold concepts and transformational learning. Rotterdam: Sense, 2010.[6] B. Thomassen, “The uses and meanings of liminality,” International Political Anthropology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 5–27, 2009.[7] M. Flanagan, “Threshold Concepts: Undergraduate Teaching, Postgraduate Training, Professional Development and School Education; A Short Introduction and a Bibliography,” 30-Jan-2018. .[8] S. K. Srivastava, “Threshold concepts framework: An effective approach to address future spatial sciences pedagogical challenges,” in The Proceedings of The Queensland surveying and spatial conference 2012: The future of surveying and spatial science is