design.UGTA’s reaped many benefits ranging from an increased sense of ownership and belonging asengineering students to developing the often-overlooked “soft” skills needed to thrive asprofessionals. This model is now being explored for use in the companion course, Introduction toEngineering, which students take in the alternate freshmen semester (the sequence can be takenin either order).Perhaps the most important result can be found a year later in our student study spaces, dorms,and off-campus housing: the teams formed in this course can be found living and workingtogether as friends and colleagues after having forged meaningful connections during their timein Introduction to Engineering Problem Solving.References[1] S. Godin, Stop Stealing Dreams
Estadístico sobre la educación de Puerto Rico 2016-2017 (Databook): Tabla 9. Tasas de graduación (IPEDS Graduation Rate) en las instituciones de educación superior en Puerto Rico (año académico 2016-17)” [Online] Available: CEPR webpage, http://www2.pr.gov/agencias/cepr/inicio/estadisticas_e_investigacion/Pages/default.aspx [Accessed Mar. 21, 2018][17] Q. Jin, S. Purzer, and P.K. Imbrie, “Measuring first year engineering students' knowledge and interest in materials science and engineering”, In Proceedings of 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, TX, June 10-13, 2012[18] P.O. Garriott, L.Y. Flores, and M.P. Martens, “Predicting the math/science career goals of low-income prospective first
web-enhanced college courses. Internet and Higher Education 9 (2006) 175–190.[4] Kerr, Marcel S., Kimberly Rynearson, Marcus C. Kerr Student characteristics for online learningsuccess. Internet and Higher Education 9 (2006) 91–105[5] Lightfoot, Jay M. . A comparative analysis of e-mail and face-to-face communication in an educationalenvironment. Internet and Higher Education 9 (2006) 217–227.[6] Brenton, Harry, Juan Hernandez, Fernando Bello, Paul Strutton, Sanjay Purkayastha, Tony Firth, AraDarzi. Using multimedia and Web3D to enhance anatomy teaching.Computers & Education, In Press,Corrected Proof, Available online 19 September 2005.[7] Khalifa, Yousuf M. ,David Bogorad, Vincent Gibson, John Peifer and Julian Nussbaum Virtual Realityin
, R.J., et al., Scientific research in education. 2002, Washington, DC: National Academy Press. xiii, 188.3. Hutchins, E., Learning to Navigate, in Understanding Practice: perspectives on activity and context, S. Chaiklin and J. Lave, Editors. 1996, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. p. 35-63.4. Carnegie Scholar Program. [cited 16 January 2006]; Available from: http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/programs/sub.asp?key=21&subkey=62&topkey=21.5. Rigorous Research in Engineering Education. [cited 16 January 2006]; Available from: http://www.mines.edu/research/cee/ND.htm.6. Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education. [cited 16 January 2006]; Available from: http
emphasis of data analysis to identify students’ stances on the use of PPDs.Judgments about students reasoning with PPDs were derived from examining interviewtranscripts. To start with, responses that shed light on interpreting, evaluating, criticizing,and comparing with PPDs were identified. Themes emerged from the data and werecategorized with further explanation and quotations from the transcripts as examples.Validity and ReliabilityIt is challenging to ensure the validity of qualitative research [38], [39]. Validity was definedas “how accurately the account represents participants’ realities of the social phenomenaand is credible to them” [38], [40] Creswell and Miller suggest two perspective s to governthe validity in qualitative inquiry: the
,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(3): 05-525. 11. "Premier Award Winners." K-Gray Engineering Pathway Digital Library. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Feb. 2014. 12. Baker, D.F. (2008), "Peer assessment in small groups: a comparison of methods," Journal of Management Education, 32(2):183-209. 13. Wang, E., Velasquez-Bryant, N., Adams, J., Batchman, T., Cantrell, P., Jacobson, E., Johnson, W., Kleppe, J., LaCombe, J., LaTourrette, N., Norris, G., Sparkman, W., and Varol, Y. (2004), "First Year Engineering Experience Initiative," Proceedings of the ASEE Annual conference and exhibition, Salt Lake City. 14. Freeman, S. A., & Dyrenfurth, M. J. (2003), “Using peer assessments in team
., Brophy S., “Effectiveness of challenge-based instruction in biomechanics,” J. Eng. Educ. 96(4) 311(2006)3 Steif P., Lobue J.M., Kara L.B., Fay A.L., “Improving problem solving performance by inducing talk about salientproblem features,” J. Eng. Educ. 99(2) 135 (2010) Page 23.134.74 Romney C., “Work in Progress: Tablet PCs in Interactive Undergraduate Mathematics.” Proceedings of the 39thFrontiers in Education Conference. San Antonio, TX (2009)5 Crouch, CH, Mazur E, “Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results,” Am J Phys, 69: 970-977 (2001)6 Hersham M.C., Luna M., Light G., “Implementation of interdisciplinary group
. Lumsdaine, Thinking preferences of engineering students: Implications for curriculum restructuring. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION-WASHINGTON-, 1995. 84: p. 193-204.12. Johnson, D.W., R.T. Johnson, and K.A. Smith, Active learning1991: Interaction Book Co.13. Schön, D.A., Educating the reflective practitioner1987: Jossey-Bass San Francisco.14. Collins, A., J. Brown, and S. Newman, Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading. writing and mathematics (Technical Report No. 403). Cambridge, MA: Bolt, University of Illinois at Urbana, Champaign. Center for the Study of Reading.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 284 181), 1987.15. Collins, A., J.S. Brown, and A. Holum, Cognitive apprenticeship: Making
environments, and complex reasoning.Barbara Olds, Colorado School of Mines Barbara M. Olds is Associate Provost for Educational Innovation and Professor of Liberal Arts and International Studies at the Colorado School of Mines. She returned to CSM in 2006 after spending three years at the U. S. National Science Foundation where she served as the Division Director for the Division of Research, Evaluation and Communication (REC) in the Education and Human Resources Directorate. She remains a consultant to the EHR Directorate. During the 2006-2007 academic year Barbara was a visiting professor in Purdue University’s Engineering Education Department. Her research interests are primarily in understanding and
- shots instead of desktop video captures of this navigation because they allowed the instructor to better focus students¶ attention to each of the major tools in these toolbars. In addition, this strategy significantly reduced the demand on the instructor¶s time to produce these materials. Once the
fall semester. Employed inthe current study, was a pragmatic approach, where the researchers utilize both qualitative andquantitative research methods to address the research problem, research question(s), and researchcircumstance. Surveys were used to gather quantitative data, while semi-structured interviewswere used to obtain qualitative data. Both the survey and semi-structured interview data werecollected and analyzed separately.ResultsQuantitative Analysis: SurveyThe survey provided the quantitative data to examine students’ perceptions of the classroomculture and social transactions. Means and standard deviations were calculated for level ofsatisfaction for faculty advising, availability and instruction. The higher the score the
postsecondary reward and opportunity, in Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, J.C. Smart, Editor. 2005, Kluwer Academic Publishers: The Netherlands. p. p. 43-84.7. Carnevale, A.P. and S.J. Rose, Socioeconomic Status, Race/Ethnicity and Selective College Admissions, in America's Untapped Resource: Low-Income Students in Higher Education, R.D. Kahlenberg, Editor. 2004, Century Foundation Press: New York. p. 106, Table 3.1.8. (2010) Socioeconomic Diversity: Advantage for Wealthy Students. The Chronicle of Higher Education.9. Fischer, K. (2008) Top Colleges Admit Fewer Low-Income Students: Pell Grant Data Show a Drop since 2004. Chronicle of Higher Education.10. Alon, S., The influence of financial aid in
research in engineering education and assists other faculty in their scholarly projects. She is past Chair of the Educational Research and Methods Division of ASEE and guest co-editor for a spe- cial issue of the International Journal of Engineering Education on applications of engineering education research.Brian A. Burt, University of MichiganEunjong Ra, University of MichiganTrevor Scott Harding, California Polytechnic State University Dr. Trevor S. Harding is Chair and Professor of Materials Engineering at California Polytechnic State UniversitySan Luis Obispo where he teaches courses in biomaterials, solidification metallurgy, tribology and life cycle design. Dr. Harding has published numerous manuscripts in the area
, and the conceptual changes students go through after graduation. Research onstudents will reveal students’ misconceptions. Longitudinal studies of conceptual changefrom higher education to practice will reveal conceptual difficulties in this transition.Together this data will be the building blocks of theories of engineering learning andconceptual change. This information can also be used to inform classroom approaches tocreate more innovative and capable engineers.References1. Trowbridge, David E., and Lillian C. McDermott. 1980. Investigation of student understanding of the concept of velocity in one dimension. American Journal of Physics 48(12) 1020-28.2. Shaffer, Peter S. and Lillian C. McDermott. 2005. A researched-based approach
). Art and artifact of children's designing: A situated cognition perspective. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(2), 129-166.5. Penner, D., Giles, N. D., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1997). Building functional models: Designing an elbow. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 125-143.6. Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2006). Project-based learning. In K. L. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317-333). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.7. Crismond, D. (2001). Learning and using science ideas when doing investigate-and-redesign tasks: A study of naive, novice, and expert designers doing constrained and scaffolded design work. Journal of Research in
their modeling expertise. Page 22.688.6AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation Engineering Education Program(EEC) Grant No. 0648316. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.Bibliography1. Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. M. (2003). Foundations of a models and modeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning, and problem solving. In R. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving
American Colleges.; 1984.9. Hanson SL. Lost talent: Women in the sciences. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press; 1997.10. National Council for Research on Women. Balancing the equation: Where are women and girls in science, engineering, and technology? New York, NY: National Council for Research on Women; 2001.11. Seymour E, Hewitt NC. Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1997.12. Berryman S. Who will do science? Minority and female attainment of science and mathematics degrees: Trends and causes. . New York: Rockefeller Foundation; 1983.13. Pieronek C, McWilliams LH, Silliman SE, Uhran JJ, Gunty M, C. G. Monolith or mosaic: Using demographics and detailed
Style Index: A Replication and Extension”. British Journal of Management.13 Entwistle, N.J. and Tait, H. (1996). Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students. Centre for Research on Learning and Instruction, University of Edinburgh.14 Amabile, T., Hill, K.G., Hennessey, B.A., and Tighe, E.M. (1994). “The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivational Orientations”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. American Psychological Association, 66 (5).15 Khatena, J. and Torrance, E.P. (1998) Khatena Torrance Creative Perception Inventory: Instruction Manual, Scholastic Testing Service, Inc. Bensenville, IL.16 Dasgupta, S. (1994). Creativity in invention and
CTC and engagement in undergraduate STEMeducation. With the completion of the conceptual model, the second phase of the study, surveytool development, becomes the focus.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the National Science Foundation for theirsupport of this work under the REESE program (grant numbers DRL-0909817, 0910143,0909659, 0909900, and 0909850). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.References 1. Goodenow, Carol (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence
” inengineering education that could risk derailing my main research questions? These arechallenges I will work through as I move forward in my research.NotesIn the mid 1990’s science, technology, society and environment (STSE) replaced science,technology and society (STS) education.Bibliography1. Pedretti, E. (1999). Decision Making and STS Education: Exploring Scientific Knowledge and SocialResponsibility in Schools and Science Centers Through an Issues-Based Approach. School Science andMathematics, 99, 174-181.2. Zeidler, D.L. (2003). The Role of Moral Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues and Discourse in ScienceEducation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.3. Wiesenmayer, R.L. and Rubba, P.A. (1999). The Effects of STS Issue Investigation and
Number of Target Time period Event Event description participant Participants s Training of in-service teachers from Lauderdale Lakes Middle Teachers’ August, 2019 STEM Teachers and Lake Worth Community 12 training High school for NASA-STEM content
discipline in some and multidisciplinary in others.Project sources varied across instructor-initiated, government or industry-sponsored, professionalorganization-sponsored, and student-initiated. Project focuses included research-driven,community service, design competition, and entrepreneurial product development. Table 12summarizes characteristics of classes participating in pilot testing of MTP assessments.Table 12. Description of Capstone Project Classes Included in Pilot Test of Prototype MTPClass Semesters Discipline(s) Students A 2 Multidisciplinary (beyond engineering) 66 B 1 Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering 135 C 2 Biomedical
: Cambridge University Press. 5. Hirshfield, L. Whinnery, J. L., Gilbuena, D. M. and Koretsky, M. 2014. A study of feedback provided to student teams engaged in open-ended projects. In 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: 360 Degrees of Engineering Education. Indianapolis, IN. June 15-18. http://www.asee.org/search/proceedings (2015/01/15). 6. Litzinger, J.A., L. R. Lattuca, R. G. Hadgraft and W. C. Newstetter. 2011. Engineering education and the development of expertise. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1): 123-150. 7. Smith, K. A., S. D. Sheppard, D. W. Johnson, and R. T. Johnson. 2005. Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. Journal of
of Science Resource Statistics (2007). S&E degrees, by race/ethnicityof participants: 1995-2004. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.3. National Science Foundation (2008). Statistical report on women, minorities and persons with disabilities inscience and engineering. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/start.htm4. Seymour, E. and Hewitt, N. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. BoulderCO: Westview Press.5. Fennema, E. (1998). What affirmative action has contributed to educational research. Educational Researcher,27(9):5-7.6. Hurtado, S., Cabrera, N.L., Lin, M.H., Arellano, L., and Espinosa, L.L. (2009). Diversifying science:Underrepresented student experiences in structured research