Asee peer logo

Assessing Student Knowledge Of The Learning Objectives

Download Paper |

Conference

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Chicago, Illinois

Publication Date

June 18, 2006

Start Date

June 18, 2006

End Date

June 21, 2006

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Assessment

Tagged Division

Educational Research and Methods

Page Count

28

Page Numbers

11.240.1 - 11.240.28

DOI

10.18260/1-2--863

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/863

Download Count

358

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Joanne Mathews Illinois Institute of Technology

biography

Daniel Ferguson Illinois Institute of Technology

visit author page

Senior Lecturer, Interprofessional Studies Program (IPRO), Il Institute of Technology

visit author page

author page

Margaret Huyck Illinois Institute of Technology

biography

Abhinav Pamulaparthy Illinois Institute of Technology

visit author page

IPRO Team Project Manager; major in MMAE

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Assessing Student Acquisition of Knowledge of Learning Objectives for an Interprofessional Projects Program

Abstract

The Interprofessional Projects Program (IPRO®) at our university provides a six credit multi- disciplinary, project team based course required of all undergraduates which helps develop in these students various knowledge and skills deemed essential by ABET and future employers. This knowledge and skill, defined from our course Learning Objectives [LO], are competency in teamwork, communications, project management and ethical behavior, developed in the context of addressing a real world problem. Through this research, we are assessing whether or not students that participate in an IPRO course gain a more thorough understanding of the declarative knowledge supporting comprehension of the Learning Objectives by administering a knowledge test to each IPRO student both at the beginning and at the end of each semester. There are several reasons for giving these tests, one, faculty have asserted the hypothesis that the subject LO knowledge is gained through student work in other [non IPRO] courses and that the IPRO courses are unnecessary as general education requirements and two, faculty maintain that exposure to two IPRO courses is unnecessary as whatever needs to be learned about the LOs is/can be absorbed in one 3 credit course rather than two 3 credit courses.

Our first goal for the research is to measure what students actually comprehend about the Learning Objectives. Our second goal is to evaluate how much LO knowledge the non IPRO departments provide students before/outside the IPRO courses. Next we want to learn if IPRO students beginning and ending LO knowledge varies by background and other demographic factors. Our final research goals are to isolate the gains made in declarative LO knowledge or other values received in a second IPRO course as opposed to a first IPRO course and to evaluate various techniques for improving the declarative knowledge [test scores] of our students.

Many engineering programs have project based courses with similar learning objectives and the implications for engineering educators supporting these curriculum are related to measuring the acquisition of knowledge obtained directly from a course versus other courses or, for example, prerequisites. It is also beneficial to evaluate methods to measure the knowledge acquisition related to specific skills and behavior as described by learning objectives and defined competencies related to those Learning Objectives.

Introduction

The IPRO Program is a unique undergraduate experience offered at our university that enables students to cultivate a multitude of skills needed in today’s workplace. The IPRO experience provides students with practical applications in the areas of teamwork, problem solving, innovation, leadership, communication, and other valuable professional skills. The multidisciplinary teams offer students the opportunity to communicate and collaborate with students from other majors (such as engineering, computer science, architecture, science and business), drawing from their knowledge, in order to complete the objectives of the project. The 30 to 35 IPRO teams that are formed each semester (involving about 24 instructors and

Mathews, J., & Ferguson, D., & Huyck, M., & Pamulaparthy, A. (2006, June), Assessing Student Knowledge Of The Learning Objectives Paper presented at 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois. 10.18260/1-2--863

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2006 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015