Conference Session

Research in Engineering Education II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dana Denick, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Aidsa I. Santiago-Román, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Ruth A. Streveler, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Natalie Barrett, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

: Equivalence (C.A. 1), Couples & Equilibrium (C.A. 21)1 Common Errors: 6, 7, 10, 1117. A 200 N-mm couple acting counter- clockwise keeps the member in equilibrium while it is subjected to other forces acting in the plane (shown schematically at the left). The four dots denote equally spaced points along the members. Assuming the other forces stay the same, what load(s) could replace the 200 N-mm couple and maintain equilibrium?Analysis of Student Responses: Two of the five students responded with the correct answer E.These two students were able to identify that both the force and moment of the selected responseare equivalent to the given situation.Student A: “...it’s a couple moment because it has equal forces in opposite

Conference Session

Assessment Instruments

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Syed Helmi Syed Hassan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; Khairiyah Mohd-Yusof, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; Mohd Salleh Abu, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; Shahrin Mohammad, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

own words I will immediately attempt to find the I will underline the important solution to the problem words, list down facts and knowledge that I know, and identify concept/s that I need to learn. When a conflict arise I will accept my friends’ point of view I will keep thinking about the during problem to avoid prolong the discussion matter

Conference Session

Cognitive Skills Development

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Vetria Byrd Ph.D., Purdue University, West Lafayette; Kendall Roark, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Brent T. Ladd, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Association for Interdisciplinary Studies 41st Annual Conference, Oct. 23-26, 2019, University van Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019.[4] J. C. Roberts, C. Headleand, and P. D Ritsos, "Sketching Designs Using the Five Design- Sheet Methodology." IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 419-28, 2016.[5] S. McKenna, L. Alexander, and M. Meyer. "Worksheets for Guiding Novices through the Visualization Design Process." ArXiv.org, p. 17+, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1709.05723.pdf. [Accessed January 30, 2020].[6] J. Brooke, “SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale,” Usability Evaluation in Industry, 189(194), 4-7, 1996.[7] A. Cairo, “Ethical Infographics,” IRE Journal, vol. 37

Conference Session

Qualitative Research Methods

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elliot P. Douglas, University of Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Crotty, M. (2003). The foundations of social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Douglas, E. P. (2015). Engineering as a space of white privilege. Understanding & Dismantling Privilege, V(1), 36-44.Douglas, E. P., Koro-Ljungberg, M., & Borrego, M. (2010). Challenges and promises of overcoming epistemological partiality: Advancing engineering education through diverse ways of knowing. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(3), 247- 257.Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research. New York: Routledge.Jordan, S

Conference Session

ERM Potpourri II

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mieke Schuurman, Pennsylvania State University; Dennis Gouran, Pennsylvania State University; Laura L. Pauley, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, S.K., Hanneman, L. F., Guardiola, R. & Brumm, T.J. (2001). Development of Workplace Competencies Sufficient to Measure ABET Outcomes. Conference Proceedings of Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition. Albuquerque, New Mexico.17. Bloom, B. S. (1984) Taxonomy of educational objectives. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.18. Besterfield-Sacre, M. E., Shuman, L., Wolfe, L. & McGourty, J. (2000). Triangulating Assessments: Multi-Source Feedback Systems and Closed Form Surveys. Conference Proceedings of Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition. St. Louis, Missouri.19. NSF DUE Award Abstract #0206630 (PI McGourty): http://nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward.do?AwardNumber=0206630

Conference Session

STEM Pipeline: Pre-College to Post-Baccalaureate

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nancy Healy, Georgia Institute of Technology; Lynn Rathbun, Cornell University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

or project director, then themanagement team steps in to have the issue(s) addressed.The results presented in Table 3 indicate that the NNIN is meeting its primary objectives: • Providing advanced research project – 4.14 • Learning to use advanced equipment and processes – 4.16 • Exciting participants about graduate school – 4.48 • Providing information on nano careers – 4.08 • Enhancing presentation and writing skills – 4.25 • Exposing participants to the breadth of nano – 4.22We use the information gained from these post-surveys and external evaluations to makechanges to our program. For example, in 2006 many students indicated that the NNIN REU didnot provide them with enough information about careers in nanotechnology with

Conference Session

ERM Poster Session

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

TK Beam, James Madison University; Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University; Jamie Constantz, James Madison University; Aditya Johri, Virginia Tech; Robin Anderson, James Madison University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

to the most recent Science and Engineering Indicators report of the NationalScience Foundation (NSF), the percentages of all freshmen intending to major in engineeringor computer sciences dropped in recent years 4. Despite an increase in the numerous efforts to Page 14.968.2recruit and retain more engineering students, such as learning communities, mentoring, pre-college programs, the declines in engineering enrollment continues. Specifically, althoughwomen have outnumbered men in undergraduate education since 1982, they have earned onlyabout half of all S&E bachelor’s degrees since 2000 and less than one-fifth of engineeringdegrees 4

Conference Session

ERM Potpourri

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jill Nelson, George Mason University; Margret Hjalmarson, George Mason University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

). Reconceptualizing procedural knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36,404-411.4. Oppenheim, A., Willsky, A. & Hamid, S. (1997). Signals and systems (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: PrenticeHall.5. Lobato, J. (2003). How design experiments can inform a rethinking of transfer and vice versa. EducationalResearcher, 32(1), 17-20.6. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & William, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it intopractice. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.7. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SagePublications. Page

Conference Session

Building Communities for Engineering Education Research

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maura Borrego, Virginia Tech; Ruth Streveler, Colorado School of Mines; Nancy Chism, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis; Karl Smith, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities; Ronald Miller, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

this project.The authors also thank the RREE Executive Committee members who participated in therevisions of the 2005 RREE: Robin Adams, George B. Forsythe, Frank Huband, MarciaMentkowksi, and Marilla Svinicki. Additional thanks go to Robin Adams forconversations that led to the development of the participant poster activities.References[1] S. Fincher and R. Adams, presented at the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Savannah, GA, 2004.[2] O. H. Griffin Jr., A. Aning, V. K. Lohani et al., presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, 2004.[3] R. Streveler, K. Smith, and R. Miller, presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Portland, OR

Conference Session

Experiences of Diverse Students

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacqueline Ann Rohde, Clemson University; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno; Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

. Quinn. "Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale (GRIT– S)." Journal of personality assessment 91.2 (2009): 166-174.24. Digman, John M. "Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model." Annual review of psychology 41.1 (1990): 417-440.25. Sexual Minority Research Team. "Best practices for asking questions about sexual orientation on surveys." (2008).26. R Core Team. (2016). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org/27. Ruxton, Graeme D. "The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to Student's t-test and the Mann– Whitney U test." Behavioral Ecology 17.4 (2006): 688-690.28. Cohen, Jacob. "A power primer

Conference Session

Motivation and Engagement

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John T. Solomon, Tuskegee University; Vimal Kumar Viswanathan, San Jose State University; Eric Hamilton, Pepperdine University; Chitra R. Nayak, Tuskegee University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

studied using the implementation in a variety ofengineering schools.Acknowledgements: Support for this work is provided by the National Science Foundation Award No. DUE 1504692 and1504696. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are thoseof the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References:[1] Crawley, E.F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D.R., and Edström, K., "Historical accounts of engineering education", Rethinking engineering education: Springer, 2014, pp. 231-255.[2] Froyd, J.E., Wankat, P.C., and Smith, K.A.," Five major shifts in 100 years of engineering education", Proceedings of the IEEE Vol. 100, No. Special

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 19: Thinking about the Engineering Curriculum

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Greg L. Heileman, University of Kentucky; William G. Thompson-Arjona, University of Kentucky ; Orhan Abar, University of Kentucky; Hayden W. Free, University of Kentucky

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

instance, in Figure 2 we showthe electrical and computer engineering degree plan at a university located in the northeast of theUnited States, a program with a low curricular complexity score.What is remarkable about the two programs shown in Figures 1 and 2 is that they have nearly iden-tical student learning outcomes. In particular, both programs list the eleven ABET student learningoutcomes, and they both include the additional program requirements ABET stipulates shouldaccompany electrical, computer, communications, telecommunication(s) and similarly named pro-grams.4 Furthermore, both programs have ABET accreditation. Thus, experts in the discipline haveindependently certified the quality of these programs and have determined that both

Conference Session

Student Motivation and Faculty Development

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Huettel, Duke University; Michael R. Gustafson II, Duke University; Joseph C. Nadeau P.E., Duke University; David Schaad, Duke University; Michael M Barger, Duke University; Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia, Michigan State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Rigorous, Integrated Introduction to Electrical and Computer Engineering. IEEE Trans. Education, 50(3), 174-181.14. Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Durik, A. M., Conley, A. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Karabenick, S. A., and Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Measuring situational interest in academic domains. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 647-671.15. Shuman, L.J., et al. (2002). “The future of engineering education,” in Proc. 32nd Annu. Frontiers in Education Conf., Boston, MA, Nov. 2002, vol. 1, pp. T4A-1–T4A-15.16. Olds, B., and Miller, R. (2004). The effect of a first-year integrated engineering curriculum on graduation rates and student satisfaction: A longitudinal study. J. Eng. Educ., 93(1), 23–36.17. McLellan, J. H

Conference Session

Working in Teams: ERM Roundtable

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Mott, California Polytechnic State University; Steffen Peuker, California Polytechnic State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

correct answer. Teams receive points based on thenumber of scratches it takes to determine the correct answer. Using the IF-AT form during thetRAT is key to help students correct misconceptions in real time, and the points-scale gives thestudents motivation to learn to work together effectively as a team without direct instructor input.After all teams have completed the tRAT, the instructor can give a short—typically 5 to 10minute—lecture clearing up any remaining confusion about the topic. Students are given anopportunity to submit a written appeal, as a team, of any RAT question they believe to beambiguous.The applications–on which the most time is spent in class–are problems that the students mustsolve as a team. The applications follow a 4-S

Conference Session

Diffusion and Adoption of Teaching Practices

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew West, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Geoffrey L Herman, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

by programs in the College of Engineering.Future work will need to explore the changes in faculty’s belief about teaching and learning moredeeply.Acknowledgments. This work was supported by the College of Engineering and theDepartment of Mechanical Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois atUrbana-Champaign as part of the Strategic Instructional Initiatives Program (SIIP), as well as bythe National Science Foundation (NSF) award DUE-1347722.References [1] M. Borrego and C. Henderson. Increasing the use of evidence-based teaching in STEM higher education: A comparison of eight change strategies. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2): 220–252, 2014. [2] S. Brownell and K. Tanner. Barriers to faculty pedagogical change

Conference Session

Measurement and Instrumentation

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian M Frank, Queen's University; James A. Kaupp, Queen's University; Natalie Simper, Queen's University; Jill Scott, Queen's University, Kingston (Canada)

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Multi-State Collaborative to Advance LearningOutcomes Assessment. [accessed 2015 Mar 11]. http://www.sheeo.org/projects/msc-multi-state-collaborative-advance-learning-outcomes-assessment17. Zahner D. Reliability & Validity - CLA+. Council for Aid to Education; 2013.http://cae.org/images/uploads/pdf/Reliability_and_Validity_of_CLA_Plus.pdf18. Klein S, Liu O, Sconing J. Test Validity Study (TVS) Report. Council for Aid to Education; 2009.19. Pintrich PR, Smith DAF, Garcia T, Mckeachie WJ. Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategiesfor Learning Questionnaire (Mslq). Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1993 [accessed 2013 Jan15];53(3):801–813.20. Council for Aid to Education (CAE). CLA+ Sample Report. http://cae.org

Conference Session

Teaching and Learning Strategies II

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cyrus Habibi P.E., University of Wisconsin-Platteville; Annelise Shirley Roti Roti, University of Wisconsin - Platteville; Motahareh Alaei, Minnesota State University, Mankato

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

solution manuals in the teaching of higher mathematics,” Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics at the Undergraduate Level, Crete, Greece, July 2002.8. Ginsberg E., Panasuk R., George S., “ Survey of Physics Instructor Attitudes on Student Access to Problem Solutions,” Electronic Journal of Science Education, v2 n3 Mar 1998AppendixStudent comments“Solution manuals are not helpful at all if students just copy the answers. I have used solutions manuals and it has helped me outa lot. I use them to double check my answers as well as the way that I get to my answer. It helps to reinforce ideas as well asdouble check for simple mistakes. It is also helpful if you are stuck on a problem and just need

Conference Session

Student Approaches to Problem Solving: ERM Roundtable

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Catherine D. McGough, Clemson University; Adam Kirn, Univeristy of Nevada, Reno; Courtney June Faber, Clemson University; Lisa Benson, Clemson University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

. Individual Differences in Solving Physics Problems. 1978:325–348 3. Eccles JS, Wigfield A. Motivational Beliefs , Values , and Goals. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002. 4. National Academy of Engineering. Advance Personalized Learning. NAE Gd Challenges Eng. 2012. 5. McGough C, Benson L, Kirn A. Relationships between Engineering Students’ Future Time Perspectives and Their Problem Solving Processes. In: NARST Conference.; 2015. 6. Kirn AN. The Influences of Engineering Student Motivations on Short-Term Tasks and Long-Term Goals. Dissertation. 2014. 7. Nickerson RS. Thinking and Problem Solving. 2nd ed. (Carterette E, Friedman M, Sternberg R, eds.). Academic Press; 1994:425–430. 8. Grigg S, Benson LC. A coding scheme

Conference Session

Teaching and Learning Strategies I

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Hagge, Iowa State University; Mostafa Amin-Naseri, Iowa State University; Stephen B Gilbert, Iowa State University; John Jackman, Iowa State University; Enruo Guo; Gloria Starns, Iowa State University; LeAnn E Faidley, Wartburg College

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, 1968.20- Guo, E., Gilbert, S., Jackman, J., Starns, G., Hagge, M., Faidley, L., & Amin-Naseri, M. (2014). Statics Tutor: Free Body Diagram Tutor for Problem Framing. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 448-455). Springer International Publishing.21- Corbett, A. T. and Anderson, J. R.: Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4(4), 253-278. (1995) Page 26.440.17

Conference Session

Engineering Identity

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Walter C. Lee, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

environment. Eur J Eng Educ. 2006;31(1):35-42. doi:10.1080/03043790500430185.7. Meyers KL, Ohland MW, Pawley AL, Silliman SE, Smith KA. Factors relating to engineering identity. Glob J Eng Educ. 2012;14(1):119-131.8. Chachra D, Kilgore D, Loshbaugh H, McCain J, Chen H. Being and becoming: gender and identity formation of engineering students. In: American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.; 2008.9. Varelas M (Ed. . Identity Construction and Science Education Research: Learning, Teaching, and Being in Multiple Contexts. (Varelas M, ed.). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers; 2012.10. Johnston S, Lee A, McGregor H. Engineering as captive discourse. Techn{é} Res Philos Technol

Conference Session

Project-Based Learning

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul M. Yanik, Western Carolina University; Chip W. Ferguson, Western Carolina University; Sudhir Kaul, Western Carolina University; Yanjun Yan, Western Carolina University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, Vancouver, BC, Canada.12. Ferguson, C.W., Yanik, P.M., Chang, A. and Kaul, S. (2015). “Scholarship Program Initiative via Recruitment, Innovation, and Transformation.” Proc. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA.

Conference Session

Active Learning Methods in Action

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tom McCormick, Virginia Military Institute; James C. Squire, Virginia Military Institute; Gerald Sullivan P.E., Virginia Military Institute

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

needed forunderstanding the demonstration and the learning points for successfully completing thequestionnaire which the students filled out immediately following the lecture. The primaryteaching points are summarized in condensed form below. The lecture began by discussing the industrial revolution and the need for power sources to drive the machines which transformed our modern society. o Water wheels were replaced by generators and the electric motor, which is essentially a generator operated in reverse, began to drive the machines. o Wide-scale use of DC electric motors began in the late 1800’s. These motors take advantage of the properties of electric and magnetic fields. o Electric current flowing in a wire will

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 2: The Study of Identity in Engineering Education

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas, El Paso; Luis Miguel Procter, University of Texas, El Paso; Anita Patrick, University of Texas, Austin

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, 2002.22. P. C. Blumenfeld, E. Soloway, R. W. Marx, J. S. Krajcik, M. Guzdial, A. Palincsar, “Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning,” in Educational Psychologist, vol. 26, no. 3-4, pp. 369-398, 1991.23. M. Borrego, A. Patrick, L. Martins, M. Kendall, “A New Scale for Measuring Engineering Identity in Undergraduates,” Proceedings of the ASEE Gulf Southwest Annual Conference, Austin, TX, 2018.

Conference Session

Engineering Design: Implementation and Evaluation

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Cole, Northwestern University; Robert Linsenmeier, Northwestern University; Ann McKenna, Northwestern University; Matthew Glucksberg, Northwestern University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

problem into the basic elementsof one (or more) LED(s) shining on a surface during the early stages of model development.Those who succeeded better in developing the mathematical relationships saw this as important.We do not yet know whether the sketching contributed to their ability to generate a model, butour initial analysis suggests exploring this in more detail.It is possible that the phototherapy problem was too difficult as a first attempt at modeling. Wechose phototherapy because students all had some background in previous coursework related tolight, and because it was unlikely to give an advantage to any students as a problem inmechanical or electrical modeling might have. We would have given students credit for amathematical approach

Conference Session

Measurement Tools

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adam Carberry, Tufts University; Matthew Ohland, Purdue University; Chris Swan, Tufts University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

physics. American Journal of Physics, 1998. 66(3): p. 212-224.27. Stathopoulou, C. and S. Vosniadou, Exploring the relationship between physics-related epistemological beliefs and physics understanding. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2007. 32(3): p. 255-281.28. White, B., et al., The epistemological beliefs assessment for physical science, in American Education Research Association. 1999: Montreal.29. Vincenti, W.G., What engineers know and how they know it: Analytical studies from aeronautical history. 1990, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.30. Loverde, L., Science & engineering, philosophy and common sense. Ingenierias, 1998. 1(2): p. 24-31.31. Pajares, F., J. Hartley, and G. Valiante, Response format in

Conference Session

Understanding Our Students I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kyle B. Reed, University of South Florida

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Education 99(1), 71--79.6. Davies, T. (2000), 'Confidence! Its role in the creative teaching and learning of design and technology', .7. Fantz, T.; Siller, T. & Demiranda, M. (2011), 'Pre-Collegiate Factors Influencing the Self-Efficacy of Engineering Students', Journal of Engineering Education 100(3), 604--623.8. Gecas, V. (1989), 'The social psychology of self-efficacy', Annual review of sociology, 291--316.9. Gibbons, R. (1992), A primer in game theory, FT Prentice Hall.10. Hutchison, M.; Follman, D.; Sumpter, M. & Bodner, G. (2006), 'Factors influencing the self-efficacy beliefs of first-year engineering students', Journal of Engineering Education - Washington 95(1), 39.11. Parsons, S.; Croft, T. & Harrison, M. (2009), 'Does

Conference Session

Teaching with Technology

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Michael L Falk, Johns Hopkins University; Mike Reese, Johns Hopkins University; Camilo Vieira, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

engineering and science. Baltimore, Maryland: World Technology Evaluation Center, Inc. 7. Emmott, S. (2008). Towards 2020 Science. Science in Parliament, 65(4), 31-33. 8. Zachary, J. L., Johnson, C. R., Eide, E. N., & Parker, K. W. (1995). An entry-level course in computational engineering and science. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 27(1), 209-213. 9. [PITAC]. (2005). Computational science: ensuring America’s competitiveness. President's Information Technology Advisory Committee (PITAC), 27. 10. Hu, C. (2007). Integrating modern research into numerical computation education. Computing in Science & Engineering, 9(5), 78-81. 11. Devens, P. E. (1999). MATLAB & freshman engineering. Paper presented

Conference Session

Research in Assessment

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter M. Ostafichuk, University of British Columbia; Jim Sibley, University of British Columbia, Vancouver; H.F. Machiel Van der Loos, University of British Columbia

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

at UNL (University ofNebraska–Lincoln), 15 (4).16 Feichtner, S. and Davis, E., 1991, “Why Some Groups Fail: A Survey of Students’ Experiences with LearningGroups,” The Organizational Behaviour Teaching Review, 9 (4).17 ABET, 2009, “Criteria for Accrediting Applied Science Programs,” retrieved January 10, 2011, fromAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology website: http://www.abet.org/forms.shtml18 CEAB, 2009, “Accreditation Criteria and Procedures,” retrieved January 10, 2011, from Canadian EngineeringAccreditation Board website: http://www.engineerscanada.ca/e/files/Accreditation_Criteria_Procedures_2009.pdf19 University of Pittsburgh, “EC2000 Outcome Attributes,” retrieved January 11, 2011, from University ofPittsburgh website

Conference Session

Thinking About the Engineering Curriculum

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jason Feser, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Science & Technology Policy ; Maura J. Borrego, National Science Foundation; Russ Pimmel, University of Alabama; Connie Kubo DUPE Della-Piana, National Science Foundation

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

and adoption rates in U.S. engineering departments Journal of Engineering Education, 2010. 99(3): p. 185-207.12. Prince, M. and R.M. Felder, Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 2006. 95(2).13. Wieman, C., K. Perkins, and S. Gilbert, Transforming science education at large research universities: A case study in progress. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 2010. March- April.14. University System of Maryland, Change and sustainability in higher education: Final report. 2010.15. Borrego, M. and B. Olds, Analysis of trends in United States National Science Foundation funding of engineering education: 1990-2010, in

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Potpourri II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chirag Variawa, University of Toronto; Susan McCahan, University of Toronto

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

UIDapproach, we can create more inclusive learning environments that are more flexible and canaccommodate different learner characteristics. Our future work will investigate ways ofimproving the process of finding and mitigating inaccessible language used in all levels ofengineering education, in addition to making the environment more accessible and inclusive forstudents.References1 Synergies (2008 Annual Report). Rep. National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering. Web. .2 Vision, the NACME Continuum (2010 Annual Report). Rep. National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering. Web. .3 Variawa, C., and S. McCahan. 2010. Design of the learning environment for inclusivity. Proceedings of the 2010 American Society for