communicatingeffectively and efficiently. Much work has been done to investigate the effect of interventions inupperclassmen capstone courses (see bibliography). Additionally, courses which integratewriting and project design instruction are becoming increasingly common6,8 . Thisinterdisciplinary combination has the potential to give students an experience in technical writingand engineering design closer to that practiced outside of an academic setting8 .For this paper, the researchers examined the effect of instructional interventions on earlyengineering students, primarily freshmen and sophomores. The course in question is ENGR 14:Introduction to Solid Mechanics. This is a prerequisite course for many higher level engineeringclasses which combines
resources, like Scratch, PhET, and theMobile Studio, hint at the promise cyberlearning holds for facilitating the development of 21stcentury skills. While National Science Foundation (NSF) Program Officers (POs) are interestedin continuing to support cyberlearning research and developments that promote excellence inundergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education, there is aneed to understand elements of existing resources that have already achieved positive outcomes.An exploratory sequential mixed methods research design1 was used to explore this topic. Of the1,000 NSF-funded projects POs have highlighted in the NSF Highlights over the past 10 years,nearly100 were cyberlearning awards. After applying selection
Engineering Education at Penn State. She holds a doctoral degree in educational psychology emphasizing applied measurement and testing. In her position, Sarah is responsible for developing instructional support programs for faculty, providing evaluation support for educational proposals and projects, and working with faculty to publish educational research. Her research interests primarily involve creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship education.Dr. Esther W Gomez, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Esther Gomez is an assistant professor in the Departments of Chemical Engineering and Biomedical Engineering at the Pennsylvania State University. Dr. Gomez’s research program focuses on how me- chanical
adults12,13,14. Therefore, there is a need to develop educational activities to improveenergy literacy. These activities have included high school energy competitions, development ofinterdisciplinary curricula, and field experiences and internships. As many of these educationalendeavors culminate in some type of deliverable or other artifact, an opportunity exists tosupplement measurement of energy literacy via tests of knowledge with measurement throughobservation of project artifacts. This type of approach could then be used to examine whatfactors might be contributing to higher levels of energy literacy, allowing refinement of theeducational activities. The development of a rubric for the evaluation of energy literacy is inprogress to capture the
tosupport education practitioners in Computer Science in undertaking high quality educationalresearch. The Bootstrapping model comprises a set of integrated activities focused on specificacts of collaborative research called experiment kits. An experiment kit is embedded in a one-week workshop, in which particpants learn and practice appropriate research methods.Participants gather data over the course of a year and twelve months later, join a second one-week workshop where they share results, analyze data, plan for reporting and dissemination, anddesign additional studies. We have run two of these projects in the United State, funded by theNational Science Foundation. We also discuss measures by which we might gauge the success ofthese capacity
design teams shape whetherand how students’ contributions to the design project are recognized.4 Given this, groupcomposition in design teams becomes an important instructional decision since access todisciplinary knowledge and identity can influence students’ future trajectories. However,mechanisms by which roles affect broader relationships to design are underexplored. Our aim isto understand students’ emergent roles in design teams, and how this may or may not interactwith their complex relationships (epistemological and affective) to computer programming anddesign. We unpack how pairing students of different levels of expertise influences students’access, their sense of whether or not they can participate in a discipline. We suggest that
engineers but is notaddressed in studies focusing on math and science identity. This gap in the literaturepresents a unique opportunity to make an important contribution to the literature byexplicitly examining how students’ affect towards key elements of engineering practicepredict their engineering identities. The first step towards narrowing this gap isestablishing a measure of affect towards key elements of engineering practice. In abroader project, we seek to understand how an individual’s affect toward elements ofengineering practice, i.e., the extent to which one likes these elements, predicts theirattraction to and retention within engineering education and the engineering profession,via its effects on identification with the engineering
particular design solutions. Specifically, they struggle with creating,manipulating, and critiquing mathematical models to assist in the design of a product or process.The ultimate aim of our work is to improve students’ ability to use models in capstone designafter being exposed to instruction on mathematical modeling.This study was a continuation of an earlier project in which we explored how studentsdeveloped, used, and interpreted mathematical models. In the previous study, students weregiven instruction in the steps of mathematical modeling and a scenario in which they were askedto assist a hypothetical design team by creating a mathematical model that could be used inmaking decisions about the design. The instruction and the scenario broke
advanceddegrees and clarifying career goals. In spite of such widespread support and belief in the value ofundergraduate research to improve education, the bodies-of-knowledge and learning outcomescomprising of the countless ways in which students benefit and learn from being involved inresearch projects have been insufficient and understudied. Most of the existing literature revealthe predominance of program descriptions and evaluation efforts, rather than studies groundedon research. Moreover, most of these studies on undergraduate research have focused on thesciences, whereas undergraduate research experiences in engineering are limited.One of the most prominent studies on undergraduate research has been the work of ElaineSeymour and her research
on projects and activities inmakerspaces.Growth MindsetGrowth mindset has been defined as, the extent to which learners keep an open mind to considertheir ability to learn or perform [27], [28]. People who consider their current limitations predictstheir limitations in the future (e.g., “I am bad at math”), hold a fixed mindset. In contrast, peoplewho consider their current limitations can be overcome with effort or opportunity, hold a growthmindset. We posit that work in makerspaces increases the potential for students to develop agrowth mindset due to the ability to experiment with solutions and engagement in multipleattempts with no real single and correct solution. In addition, the ability to modify and createnew prototypes is relatively
course and the students that are working within the boundaries of thecourse [4]. Therefore, work is being done to design assessment that allows for student freedomwith strategies like project-based learning and learning portfolios [5]. These forms of assessmentderive from work on open-ended learning environments and self-regulated learning. Open-endedlearning is a pedagogical approach that harnesses students’ intrinsic motivation to learn [6], andself-regulated learning is when students make goals and evaluate their learning in order topractice metacognition [7]. Many researchers have found benefits when implementing moreopportunities for student-directed learning both in higher education [8–11] and the K-12system [12]. Giving students ownership
AC 2010-1953: REPRESENTATIONS OF STUDENT MODEL DEVELOPMENT INVIRTUAL LABORATORIES BASED ON A COGNITIVE APPRENTICESHIPINSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNKendra Seniow, Oregon State University Kendra Seniow is an undergraduate student in Chemical Engineering, the University Honors College, and the International Studies Programs at Oregon State University. In pursuit of her University Honors College and International degrees, she is investigating student teams’ use of models during completion of the BioReactor Virtual Laboratory project, how similar educational principles can be applied to international development projects and how participation in both these authentic activities helps develop stronger
silliness that many organizations get enamored with and get to the core of what people need to do to be productive professionals. Richard is a recipient of a 2012 Academy Award (Oscar) for technical development of the Phantom High Speed Camera in additional to other awards for professional achievement and volunteer leadership roles. Richard has also written papers titled ”Project Management with Technical Professionals”, ”Real Men Downsize”, and ”Ivan Boesky got it Wrong” and is sporadically working on a book based on his experiences. Richard believes that the engineering profession, with its many disciplines, provides intelligence and structure which is desperately needed in our increasingly complex world. Most recently
advising, career guidance,and faculty support are frequently reported by students who leave an engineering program(Seymour et al., 1997, Meyer et al., 2014). Regardless of these challenges it is important forengineering programs to be aware of these realities when developing and implementing retentioninitiatives.Temple University’s Project SOARTraditionally, Temple University has responded to the issue of low rates of success and retentionin its engineering courses and programs by providing support interventions for strugglingstudents. In fact, at Temple we have robust student support services, including tutoring, examreview sessions for select courses, peer assisted study sessions, coaching on academic skillsdevelopment, a writing center, and
AC 2012-5229: FACULTY SURVEY ON LEARNING THROUGH SERVICE:DEVELOPMENT AND INITIAL FINDINGSDr. Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University Olga Pierrakos is an Associate Professor and founding faculty member in the School of Engineering, which is graduating its inaugural class May 2012, at James Madison University. Pierrakos holds a B.S. in engineering science and mechanics, an M.S. in engineering mechanics, and a Ph.D. in biomedical en- gineering from Virginia Tech. Her interests in engineering education research center around recruitment and retention, engineering design instruction and methodology, learning through service (NSF EFELTS project), understanding engineering students through the lens of identity theory
game design mechanicswere also taught via weekly board game sessions conducted inside and outside of class wherestudents both played and deconstructed the mechanics of the games experienced. In the latterpart of the course, a major course project was assigned in which four teams of students inconjunction with graphic design students developed unique games meant to teach others aboutclimate change and civilization collapse. Specific game mechanics were not prescribed; instead,student teams were encouraged to explore a variety of mechanics and design elements that bestsuited their chosen audience and game theme. In addition to this final board game product,students wrote a reflective paper to (a) explain how the board game accomplished the goal
Engineering Taxonomy for Assessing Problem Based Learning in Underrepresented GroupsABSTRACTProblem based active learning is an effective way to engage undergraduate STEM students andenhance their critical thinking skills, especially in minority learners. Using a three-tieredengineering taxonomy for cognitive learning, a semester long multidisciplinary project wasassessed as part of an upper level Instrumental Analysis course at Central State University(CSU), an 1890 Land Grant Institution located in Wilberforce, Ohio. The Problem BasedLearning (PBL) experience focused on materials degradation and was designed to give STEMmajors an open ended opportunity for hands-on, student driven discovery by experimenting withvarious analytical techniques
Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Evaluating the impacts of project-based service learning on students through the EPICS programAbstractProject-based service learning (PBSL) is an innovative approach to education that is beingincreasingly adopted by many engineering programs. Yet while PBSL itself is becoming moreprevalent, the body of research behind service learning is lacking in some areas. Previousresearch has identified a wide range of positive outcomes that have been attributed to servicelearning including increased social responsibility, teamwork skills, communication skills, criticalthinking skills, understanding of societal context, and many more. However, this research iscomposed primarily of self
opportunity to develop different research projects with various themes such as seismic vulnerability and risk; structural behavior of building subjected to seismic, wind and water loads and seismic isolation devices for buildings. I am currently working in some research projects related to engineering education with professors from the department in order to develop this area in the university.Arturo Ponce P.E., University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Arturo Ponce has a BS in Computer Engineering and a MS in Electrical Engineering from UPR Mayaguez. He has a PhD in Computer Information Systems from Nova Southeastern University. He is an associate professor at the at the UPR Mayaguez Engineering Sciences and Materials
at the Colorado School of Mines and Research Associate Professor in Academic Affairs. Dr. Streveler holds a Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from the University of Hawaii at Manoa, Master of Science in Zoology from the Ohio State University, and a Bachelor of Arts in Biology from Indiana University at Bloomington. She is co-principle investigator of three NSF-sponsored projects: Developing an Outcomes Assessment Instrument for Identifying Engineering Student Misconceptions in Thermal and Transport Sciences (DUE - 0127806), Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (ESI-0227558), and Rigorous Research in Engineering Education: Creating a Community of Practice (DUE
by emphasing the need for Synergetic Configuration across the curriculumKey words: Synergy: Variety: Synergetic Configuration: Foundation students:Graduate Students 1. Introduction & BackgroundBased upon the pedagogically focused aspects of the RVS model of Engineering Education [1]and following an Action Research approach [2] the Great Expectations Project set out toidentify and find solutions to the issues around the ‘academic transition’ into university fortwo very different cohorts of students; those who enter university without the required pre-requisite qualifications and are therefore required to enrol upon a pre-undergraduate level‘conversion’ programme in general engineering; and students who, having graduated with aBachelor’s
disciplines. This limited literature may be attributed to multiple reasons such as asignificant emphasis on mathematics and science in the first two years of engineeringcurriculum, a strictly sequential degree path, and a lack of flexibility in the programrequirements. Engineering students often report difficulty in relating the theoretical content ofthe first few semesters to actual engineering applications. This study investigates theeffectiveness of undergraduate research as a possible means of overcoming these studentperceptions. Students are introduced to well-defined research projects at an early stage of theirundergraduate degree program by adopting a scaffolding approach. The primary focus of thisstudy is to understand student perceptions
Scientist with the Legislative Office of Research Liaison of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives. He has been Principal Investigator of a number of bioengineering research projects involving implantable transmitters and sensors and their use in physiologic measurements. He was the Principal Investigator of the Drexel E4 educational reform project, the Gateway Engineering Education Coalition and is currently PI of an NSF funded GK-12 project. He is member of the NAE and a fellow of the ASEE, the IEEE, and the AIMBE. He is the recipient of a number of other awards and honors including the Bernard M. Gordon Prize of the National Academy of Engineering
and communication with technical and non-technical peers. Students worked in teamsof three and four to solve ill-defined problems presented by the instructor. Topics coveredConstruction Waste, Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Recycling Education, PublicTransportation, and Campus Transit. Deliverables, including a technical report, an oralpresentation, and an analytical reflection, were used as data for this project. Students weresurveyed to assess their perceptions of problem-based learning. There were seventy-twoparticipants over three semesters. One preliminary result from both the survey and qualitativedata is that students felt confident about working with others from different disciplines. Studentsmostly commented positively about their
of the first year engineering experience, authentic projects and assessments, and P-12 engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Work In Progress: Developing Single Point Rubrics for Formative AssessmentIntroduction This Work in Progress describes initial efforts at Ohio Northern University to develop rubrics forassessing student work on a client-based term project in an introductory programming coursesequence. Initially, traditional analytic rubrics – where each criterion contains a descriptor foreach level in the performance rating scale – were used in a summative fashion to providefeedback. At face value, rubrics of this variety are convenient
mathematics is considered to be a fundamental element of engineering education, littleempirical research has been conducted to understand how engineering students actually usemathematics. This project takes a research- informed approach towards understanding the role ofmathematics in engineering design by combining two studies of engineering students’ use ofmathematical thinking: a study of engineering students’ use of mathematics during an industry-based senior design project and a study of engineering students’ use of mathematics during alaboratory based design problem.The capstone study used a combination of qualitative methodologies to investigate engineeringstudents’ use of mathematics during one of their first real- world design projects. For
for assessing ethical decision-making in individuals and teams in engineering-centered project teams. These instruments are being developed as part of a larger grant seekingto understand the relationship between individual and team ethical climate in multidisciplinaryproject teams. This paper describes the development of the qualitative methods being used inthis project, a discussion of the analysis we have conducted, and presents preliminary results.Finally, we discuss limitations of this method and offer future directions for this line of researchin enriching our understanding of team ethical climate on multidisciplinary project teams in anengineering education context.Team Climate and Small Group CommunicationHow individuals relate to one
Bioengineering and graduate degrees in Industrial Engineering, all from Arizona State University.Mr. Aisosa Ayela-Uwangue, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Aisosa Ayela-Uwangue is a doctoral student in the Engineering Education and Systems Design program at Arizona State University. He received his Bachelor of Science and Masters of Science degrees in Electrical Engineering from Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester New York. Aisosa is a research assistant for an NSF funded project titled IUSE/RED: Additive Innovation: An Educational Ecosystem of Making and Risk Taking.Dr. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University Samantha Brunhaver is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Ira A. Fulton
student and faculty perceptions of productive conflict. Themain conflicts that were reported in our study included conflicts of commitment, differentideas about the project direction as well as different working styles.Results from this research will enable us to rethink common models of team conflict anddevelop direct and indirect intervention strategies that can help students to better integrateemotion and intellect in engineering design and innovation.IntroductionAlthough design projects and course structures may vary, there has been a consistentattempt to integrate team experiences into the engineering design curriculum 1-5. Whilethere has been significant work that describes instructional approaches for integrating andassessing teamwork
AC 2010-2028: SPECIAL SESSION: DEVELOPING INTERCULTURALENGINEERS THROUGH SERVICEKurt Paterson, Michigan Technological University Page 15.1083.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Developing Intercultural Engineers Through ServiceAbstractThis paper reports on recent efforts to understand the cultural awareness among engineeringstudents. A standard assessment program has been instituted across the various programs atMichigan Technological University with pre-, during-, and post-project phases. The mixed-methods assessment plan consists of surveys, reflection statements, journaling, a wellnessindicator, the Intercultural Development Inventory, and project