Tise, J. C., & Zappe, S. E., & Gomez, E. W., & Kumar, M., & Croninger, R. M. V., & Cutler, S. (2019, June), Board 49: Work in Progress:  An Exploration of Students’ Conceptualization of Research after Participating in an Undergraduate Research Experience  Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--32361

\bibitem{asee_peer_32361}
  Tise, J. C., \& Zappe, S. E., \& Gomez, E. W., \& Kumar, M., \& Croninger, R. M. V., \& Cutler, S. (2019, June), \emph{Board 49: Work in Progress:  An Exploration of Students’ Conceptualization of Research after Participating in an Undergraduate Research Experience}
  Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition , Tampa, Florida.
  10.18260/1-2--32361

Joseph C. Tise, Sarah E. Zappe, Esther W. Gomez, Manish Kumar, Rachel Miriam Vriend Croninger, and Stephanie Cutler.  "Board 49: Work in Progress:  An Exploration of Students’ Conceptualization of Research after Participating in an Undergraduate Research Experience".  2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida, 2019, June.  ASEE Conferences, 2019.  https://peer.asee.org/32361 Internet.  24 Jan, 2025

\bibitem{asee_peer_32361}
  Joseph C. Tise, Sarah E. Zappe, Esther W. Gomez, Manish Kumar, Rachel Miriam Vriend Croninger, and Stephanie Cutler.
  "Board 49: Work in Progress:  An Exploration of Students’ Conceptualization of Research after Participating in an Undergraduate Research Experience".
  \emph{2019 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition , Tampa, Florida, 2019, June}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2019.
  https://peer.asee.org/32361 Internet.  24 Jan, 2025

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_32361
author = "Joseph C. Tise, Sarah E. Zappe, Esther W. Gomez, Manish Kumar, Rachel Miriam Vriend Croninger, and Stephanie Cutler"
title = "Board 49: Work in Progress:  An Exploration of Students’ Conceptualization of Research after Participating in an Undergraduate Research Experience"
booktitle = "2019 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition "
year = "2019"
month = "June"
address = "Tampa, Florida"
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://peer.asee.org/32361}
number = {10.18260/1-2--32361}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - This Work-in-Progress paper investigates how students participating in a chemical engineering (ChE) Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) program conceptualize and make plans for research projects.  The National Science Foundation has invested substantial financial resources in REU programs, which allow undergraduate students the opportunity to work with faculty in their labs and to conduct hands-on experiments.  Prior research has shown that REU programs have an impact on students’ perceptions of their research skills, often measured through the Undergraduate Research Student Self-Assessment (URSSA) survey.  However, few evaluation and research studies have gone beyond perception data to include direct measures of students’ gains from program participation.  This work-in-progress describes efforts to evaluate the impact of an REU on students’ conceptualization and planning of research studies using a pre-post semi-structured interview process.  

The construct being investigated for this study is planning, which has been espoused as a critical step in the self-regulated learning (SRL) process (Winne & Perry, 2000; Zimmerman, 2008). Students who effectively self-regulate demonstrate higher levels of achievement and comprehension (Dignath & Büttner, 2008), and (arguably)  work efficiency. Planning is also a critical step in large projects, such as research (Dvir & Lechler, 2004). Those who effectively plan their projects make consistent progress and are more likely to achieve project success (Dvir, Raz, & Shenhar, 2003).   

Prior REU research has been important in demonstrating some positive impacts of REU programs, but it is time to dig deeper into the potential benefits to REU participation. Many REU students are included in weekly lab meetings, and thus potentially take part in the planning process for research projects. Thus, the research question explored here is: How do REU participants conceptualize and make plans for research projects?

The study was conducted in the ChE REU program at a large, mid-Atlantic research-oriented university during the summer of 2018.  Sixteen students in the program participated in the study, which entailed them completing a planning task followed by a semi-structured interview at the start and the end of the REU program.  During each session, participants read a case statement that asked them to outline a plan in writing for a research project from beginning to end. Using semi-structured interview procedures, their written outlines were then verbally described.  The verbalizations were recorded and transcribed.  Two members of the research team are currently analyzing the responses using an open coding process to gain familiarity with the transcripts.  The data will be recoded based on the initial open coding and in line with a self-regulatory and project-management framework. 
 
Results: Coding is underway, preliminary results will be ready by the draft submission deadline.

The methods employed in this study might prove fruitful in understanding the direct impact on students’ knowledge, rather than relying on their perceptions of gains.  Future research could investigate differences in students’ research plans based on prior research experience, research intensity of students’ home institutions, and how their plans may be impacted by training.  

AU  - Joseph C. Tise
AU  - Sarah E. Zappe
AU  - Esther W. Gomez
AU  - Manish Kumar
AU  - Rachel Miriam Vriend Croninger
AU  - Stephanie Cutler
CY  - Tampa, Florida
DA  - 2019/06/15
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Board 49: Work in Progress:  An Exploration of Students’ Conceptualization of Research after Participating in an Undergraduate Research Experience
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/32361
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--32361
ER  -