students [1]. Students worktogether as a team to apply their engineering skills and gain field experience before embarkingon their eventual careers [2]. The open-ended nature of the experience allows numerous learningopportunities for practicing both technical and non-technical skills. While the primary emphasisof capstone design experience is justifiably technical competency, the non-technical aspects areequally important within engineering careers [2]. A structured training within the broad area ofprofessionalism is required to leverage the capstone design experience and better align with thecareer needs.Besides the application of technical knowledge, every capstone project relies on multipleprofessional skills to be successful. While
c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Toward an Understanding of the Relationship between Race/Ethnicity, Gender, First-Generation Student Status and Engineering Identity at Hispanic-Serving InstitutionsAbstractUnderstanding how students of different demographic backgrounds differ in their earlyengineering identities can help inform educators’ efforts to facilitate engineering identitydevelopment. This work contributes to this understanding with a quantitative exploration of theways that race/ethnicity, gender, and first-generation status work together to impact engineeringidentity among 656 early-career engineering students at a public Hispanic-Serving Institution(HSIs) in the Southwestern
the basic concepts taught in thecore STEM courses is a strong contributing factor to student attrition. Strategies to improvelearning experiences in STEM courses by all students at colleges and universities are thereforeneeded so that they persist in the STEM career pipeline. A group of STEM faculty members at aHistorically Black University is committed to this important need through the far-reaching use ofVirtual Reality (VR) in its STEM courses and investigating its impact on learning outcomes,engagement and persistence in STEM.The two big questions that continue to be examined by STEM education experts are: (a) Why dostudents change their majors from a STEM to a non-STEM major? and, (b) Why do studentsstruggle with STEM concepts leading
noteworthy that limited studiestook the detailed approach of understanding students' perspective of their learning needs, e.g.[15], expectations in the courses, e.g. [16] and academic challenges [17] that may hinder theirprogress in STEM courses, or future decision of a STEM career. Furthermore, most of thesestudies used a survey approach to understand students’ perspectives and experiences and lackeddirect interaction with students. The purpose of this work in progress study is to understand detailed students'perspectives about their challenges in post-secondary STEM classrooms. More specifically, wefocused on understanding which challenges or factors hindered students' progress in changingtheir perception about future STEM career options
understandhow students who enter the university with different levels of preparation navigate through theircollege careers through a social capital lens, focusing on their networks, and sense of identityand belonging within engineering. As part of the program, students are expected to meet withfaculty and peer mentors, broadening the pool of potential contacts they might turn to whenfaced with an engineering decision. After the first two years of the program, this paper exploresthe experiences of nine students to understand how their social networks have changed via theName and Resource Generator instrument, an instrument that is designed to understand studentnetworks and access to engineering-related social capital via self-reported networks. This
applied this advice throughout his life. William stated that “becausefrom a socioeconomic status and…I want to provide for my family, these are people that are likeme, but they don’t necessarily look like me.”William graduated college and worked at a large company where he previously interned. Twelveyears ago, he left that company in order to begin his time at his current place of employment.During the time of the interview, William was in a leadership role and recognized that thecompany gave him opportunities to define a career path that did not exist before he beganworking there, but he questioned the rate of his advancement. He “has not been shy” to haveconversations about his “desire to advance”, but when the time came “it was always this
reflects the ability to bounce back from adversity and unfavorable conditions.Previous studies have shown the importance of resilience to succeed in the workplace, as well asacademic career. Being resilient is particularly significant in engineering programs; encouragingstudents to develop resilience may be a key catalyst for academic improvement and subsequentcareer success.While the literature pertaining to academic resilience is well-developed, there are not manyinstruments that measure the construct. With a focus on engineering students. The current studyexamines the structure validity of the Academic Resilience Scale (ARS -30). Participantsincluded 113 engineering students enrolled in an engineering class who completed an onlinesurvey of the
the Department of Cognitive and Learning Sciences. Dr. Dare’s research interests are focused on K-12 STEM education. In particular, she is interested in supporting science teachers’ reform- based instruction while simultaneously understanding their beliefs. As science classrooms shift to more integrated STEM approaches, this is especially critical. Additionally, Dr. Dare has a passion for working with K-12 students to understand how changes in classroom instruction impacts their attitudes towards and beliefs about STEM fields. In particular, she is looking at methods that positively impact girls, which may increase the number of women pursuing careers in STEM-related fields where they are currently
understanding by exploring engineering students’ researchexperiences through an interweaving of quantitative survey data and connected qualitativeinterviews. By integrating quantitative and qualitative data, we can better understand students’researcher identities and ultimately better support their research academic and career choices.Introduction and BackgroundUndergraduate research experiences (UREs) give students the opportunity to understand what itis like to be a researcher while enhancing their metacognitive and problem-solving skills [1].Exposure to UREs can help prepare students for a thesis-based graduate program and, morebroadly, can help them clarify their career plans and goals. UREs have been shown to increasestudents’ confidence in their
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Her research focuses on the development of achievement motivation in educational settings and the interplay among motivation, emotions, and learning, especially in STEM fields.Dr. S. Patrick Walton, Michigan State University S. Patrick Walton received his B.ChE. from Georgia Tech, where he began his biomedical research career in the Cardiovascular Fluid Dynamics Laboratory. He then attended MIT where he earned his M.S. and Sc.D. while working jointly with researchers at the Shriners Burns Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital. While at MIT, he was awarded a Shell Foundation Fellowship and was an NIH biotechnology Predoctoral Trainee. Upon completion of his doctoral studies, he
spatial visualization. He teaches courses at the University of Illinois where he serves as the Director of Undergraduate Programs for the Department of Aerospace Engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Towards Understanding Interrelated Growth Mindset and Spatial Visualization Skill Training Abstract Spatial Visualization skills is a key predictor of students’ academic performance in STEMclasses, retention rate in STEM majors, and future career choice. Previous research focusing onstudents’ spatial visualizations skills has impacted educational practice, including the formation oftargeted training to help
]found that in the STEM majors only 58% of students remain in those fields at the end of theirfreshman year. While there are numerous reasons for this attrition, it is likely that a part of theproblem is that first–year engineering students may not have an accurate understanding of theskills necessary for a successful career in engineering. Similarly, these first year students come tothe career with different motivations. The purpose of this research was to better understand theperceptions of first-year engineering students as they entered a program that was developed witha hands-on, practical focus in order to prepare students for industry after graduation. Because ofthe program’s foundational idea being that the BS in Engineering is an
Texas A&M University, post- graduate training in evaluation at The Evaluators Institute (TEI) at George Washington University and the AEA/CDC Summer Evaluation Institute. Besides teaching, she has worked as an evaluator in grants awarded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), National Institutes of Health (NIH), US Department of Agriculture (USDA), and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Currently she is the internal evaluator for the projects Recruiting, Retaining and Engaging Academically Talented Students from Economically Disadvantaged Groups into a Pathway to Successful Engineering Careers (PEARLS) and for Building Capacity at Collaborative Undergraduate STEM Program in Resilient and
on several NSF-funded projects related to design, including an NSF Early CAREER Award entitled ”CAREER: Engineering Design Across Navajo Culture, Community, and Society” and ”Might Young Makers be the Engineers of the Future?,” and is a Co-PI on the NSF Revolutionizing Engineering Departments grant ”Additive Innovation: An Educational Ecosystem of Making and Risk Taking.” He was named one of ASEE PRISM’s ”20 Faculty Under 40” in 2014, and received a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers from President Obama in 2017.Dr. Micah Lande, Arizona State University Micah Lande, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering and Manufacturing Engineering pro- grams and Tooker Professor at the
Paper ID #16387Uncovering Forms of Wealth and Capital Using Asset Frameworks in Engi-neering EducationDr. Julie P. Martin, Clemson University Julie P. Martin is an assistant professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. Her research interests focus on social factors affecting the recruitment, retention, and career development of underrepresented students in engineering. Dr. Martin is a 2009 NSF CAREER awardee for her research entitled, ”Influence of Social Capital on Under-Represented Engineering Students Academic and Career Decisions.” She held an American Association for the Advancement of Science
Paper ID #25276Using Topological Data Analysis in Social Science Research: Unpacking De-cisions and Opportunities for a New MethodDr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering fos- ter or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and
factor in their lives. It seemsclear that the college experience has done nothing to close the confidence gap, and perhapscontributed to its persistence. We now turn to students’ own reflections on their engineeringeducation for an explanation.Results from student interviews:In their senior year, 15 of the APS students participated in an in-depth, semi-structuredqualitative interview. Some questions in the interview were designed to elicit students’reflections on their experiences as engineering undergraduates. Others were designed to elicitstudents’ conceptions of engineering and themselves as engineers now embarking on theirprofessional careers. In this section, we complement the findings from the PIE survey with a richpicture of students
, maybe instead of doing just biology in general, I will be able to generalize it to a certain thing, but I’m not sure how degrees work for that…I’ve heard about companies sending their employees to school to learn about certain things so they can apply it to their field and, to me that’s what works for me, but in either case, I still want to go into the biology thing;…genetics is another thing that I just would love to work with and go into and (.) I think I just [need] to try to find…some kind of a career application....But what I don’t like though: I couldn’t spend my life at a computer.” femaleWhy Balance MattersStudents describe the
career development is beneficial for developing competencyand professional identity5.Conceptual Model: Institutional MentoringThe proposed conceptual model of this study combines aspects of environmental models oflearning, organizational knowledge transfer, and peer mentoring to suggest the paradigm ofinstitutional mentoring within academia. From the literatures on environmental models oflearning and organizational knowledge transfer, we focus on the contextual factors that shape theway that knowledge can be shared across organizational boundaries through institutionalmentoring. We define institutional mentoring as a type of peer mentoring between teams atdifferent institutions working towards similar goals in which knowledge exchange is
ofuniversities; teaching focused universities, liberal arts colleges and major research universities.In recent years, more undergraduate students have been involved in research irrespective of theirdiscipline; science, engineering, social science or arts. It is already a proven concept that UR canenhance the intellectual merit of students by engaging them in inquiry-based learning, preparesthem for their graduate education and helps them in their professional development to enter intoa career of their choice. As a result, most universities, currently are focusing on engaging moreundergraduate students in research by developing innovative strategies. This study aims todiscuss the experiences of both authors in engaging undergraduate students in field
measure their confidence of learning engineering basic subjects andacademic skills necessary to complete their engineering programs. Page 24.1356.3Table 1. Noncognitive constructs measured by the SASIID Construct Origin Ns Nt Subconstruct Ni 1 Intrinsic Academic Intrinsic 4 25 Career 5 Motivation Motivation Scale (AIMS) Challenge 6 (French & Oakes, 2003)11 Control 7
/Co-PI on 10 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty teaching practices and intersections of motivation and learning strategies.Dr. Stephanie G. Adams, Old Dominion University Dr. Stephanie G. Adams is the Department Head and Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She previously served as Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies in the School of Engineering at Virginia Commonwealth University and was a faculty member
National Science Foun- dation, on the board of the American Society for Engineering Education, and as an associate dean and director of interdisciplinary graduate programs. Her research awards include U.S. Presidential Early Ca- reer Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE), a National Science Foundation CAREER award, and two outstanding publication awards from the American Educational Research Association for her journal articles. All of Dr. Borrego’s degrees are in Materials Science and Engineering. Her M.S. and Ph.D. are from Stanford University, and her B.S. is from University of Wisconsin-Madison.Dr. David B Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University David B. Knight is an Associate Professor and
institutions to enhance their experience indesign and/or leadership roles, and thus attract employers of interest [6], [10].Other students engage in undergraduate research opportunities as an alternative venue given itsimmediate and long-term benefits [5], [6], [12], [17], [25], [27], [32]. Research efforts indicatethat undergraduate students participating in research obtain greater confidence in research andprofessional abilities, attest awareness of a graduate school environment, gain significant growthin structuring and conducting research project, and pursue STEM careers and Ph.D. studies post-graduation [3], [25], [26], [27].Nonetheless, procuring internship positions, joining research groups, or being accepted intograduate school, highly depends
. National Science Foundation-sponsored SUCCEED Coalition. He has also been active in promoting qualitative research methods in engineering education through workshops presented as part of an NSF project. He has received several awards for his work, including the Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers, the Ralph Teetor Education Award from the Society of Automotive Engineers, being named a University of Florida Distinguished Teaching Scholar, and being named the University of Florida Teacher of the Year for 2003-04. He is a member of the American Society for Engi- neering Education and the American Educational Research Association and is currently Editor-in-Chief of Polymer Reviews.Dr. Mirka
identification of theskills needed by early career engineers as they enter the workplace.The Academic Pathways Study was originally designed to investigate these research questionsusing data from four cohorts of participantsa. In 2005, a fifth group was added (referred to as theCross-sectional Cohortb) that included students not in the original design and provided cross-sectional data from all four undergraduate years.APS Longitudinal data were collected at four pseudonymous institutions: Technical PublicInstitution, Urban Private University, Suburban Private University, and Large Public University.The Cross-sectional Cohort data were collected at a fifth institution (another large publicuniversity). The Broader Sampling Cohorts expanded the number of
directly out of high school to work in engineering-relatedfunctions such as assembly. In the recent past, it was common to have a career path that led toengineering positions within the same company or industry for these individuals. Today, themajority of entry-level engineering positions require a BS degree, and technical experience aloneis not enough to be competitive for such jobs.4Additionally, adult student and graduate student enrollment traditionally increases during periodsof financial recession, with some programs seeing adult education applications double over thelast few years (Master’s programs in Education at Texas State University). These studentsrepresent a growing segment of the population. They are often unable to attend classes
academy where there are successful practices for helping students develop anidentity, more specifically a military identity, to settings where such intentional practices do not Page 22.69.2exist. While a military identity is not the same as an engineering identity, it is a professionalidentity and is related to future career work. The military academy in this study is located in thenortheastern United States. The primary comparative university setting is a private university inthe mid-western United States where students have a strong identification with their university’sreputation. A secondary comparative setting included a public university in
program for an average of 2.8semesters. All participants were born at the end of Generation X (1961-1981)1 or at thebeginning of the Millennial Generation (1982-2002)1. Their average age was 27 years old.Because of this, they may share characteristics commonly associated with one or bothgenerations.In comparison to the population of graduate student instructors in the College of Engineering, theEGSMs in our study have taught for more semesters on average and are more likely to expressinterest in a tenure or tenure-track faculty career (Table 1). Moreover, EGSMs are as likely toexpress interest in pursuing a career in industry. Survey respondents were allowed to choosemore than one potential career path (Table 1). Table 1. Comparison of
communications courses appear to be ararity.The ever-growing need for Ph.D. communication instruction suggests several questions: ArePh.D. engineering students acquiring the skills they need to succeed in their professional careers,either on their own or through resources in their programs? How in fact have engineeringschools responded to the growth of enrollment of foreign students so that graduating students areprepared to successfully lead in their field? What kinds of communication-related offerings aremost beneficial: courses, labs, workshops, one-on-one coaching, integration of communicationinstruction into technical programs? While a number of U.S. institutions offer a range ofsupports for Ph.D. engineering students, the increasing proportion of