campusculture [9], [10]. In these studies, campus culture considered (1) classroom experiences, (2)faculty-staff relationship, (3) institutional support services, (4) peer interactions, (5) studenteffort to learn, (6) goal development and management, and (7) institutional commitment. As aresult, we integrated these components of campus culture into our understanding of institutionalclimate to ground our data collection approach and provide a helpful framework for uncoveringways in which institutional climate can impact how a Black HBCU undergraduate engineering orcomputing student navigates their post-graduate planning and decision-making.Identity and SuccessUnderstanding how an institution’s culture and climate support students’ personal identities is
fully online or return to campus for a hybrid learningenvironment in the fall 2020 semester. Approximately 10 percent of students chose the fullyonline option for the fall 2020 semester. The university released safety guidelines for in-personand hybrid events, such as approval requirements for student organized events, maximumnumber of attendees, and restrictions on outside visitors. These guidelines were updatedthroughout the course of the semester as county guidelines changed.Data Collection Our research team comprised two graduate students and one faculty member. Theresearch team members each have research and work experiences related to student support andservices. The Institutional Review Board at this institution approved our study
. SNA allows students to examine how they participate in an informalatmosphere by equal participation [4]. Bruun et al. explored how self-reported studentinteractions can be viewed as meaning-making processes and use this to understand howquantitative measures that describe the position in a network, called centrality measures, can beunderstood in terms of the interactions that occur in the context of a university physics course[5]. Applying social network analysis (SNA) to measure student experiences, Dou et al. found acorrelation between the role of the students in their social network classroom and enhancedproduction of self-efficacy [6].Social media has been an immense influencer for making decisions nowadays [7], [8]. People arenot only
from Purdue University. Her research characterizes front-end design practices across the student to practitioner continuum and studies the impact of developed front-end design tools on design success.Ms. Leah Paborsky, University of Michigan Leah is a graduate from the University of Michigan with a B.S.E. in Mechanical Engineering and minor in Space Sciences and Engineering. She served as an undergraduate research assistant in the Daly Design and Engineering Education Research Group focusing on engineers’ beliefs about social aspects of engineering work. She is currently pursuing a M.S. in Aerospace Engineering Sciences at University of Colorado- Boulder.Dr. Sara L. Hoffman, University of Michigan Sara Hoffman
three personas have been developed using the 2020 application pool. While thetarget personas used for the rubrics were developed using the process noted above, thesepersonas were developed using the student responses to the applications. For a more in-depthdiscussion of the method used, see our prior work [19].General Applicant Persona: Mark JohnsonMark is from North Carolina. He didn’t attend a community college before coming to thisuniversity. Both of his parents are college graduates. Mark is a second-year student in themechanical engineering concentration. Making the leap from an easy high school career to amuch more difficult undergraduate engineering career and learning how to effectively study isthe biggest academic challenge Mark has
Paper ID #34551Conceptualizing Faculty Adaptability in Enacting Curricular ChangeHadi Ali, Arizona State University Hadi studies the influence of the future of work on curricular innovation, with a focus on exploring the relationships between and among adaptability, risk taking and value making. In an effort to characterize engineering education as an (eco)system for creating value, Hadi’s approach integrates analytical methods of data science to address changes in systems and society. More broadly, Hadi is interested in examining how engineering innovations mobilize social and economic change. Hadi has graduate degrees
.— AthenaDemanding advisors who lacked a robust work-life balance and failed to instill a passion for theirresearch in their graduate assistants presented participants with an undesirable career model inacademia. Participants whose advisors were yet to attain tenure exhibited the most acute disdainfor a future in academia. Students in this situation began to question their desire to becomefaculty, which caused them to reevaluate why they were pursuing a doctorate at all.The relationship participants had with their advisors formed a crucial component of theirexperience. Most participants spoke about their frustrations working with faculty memberswhom they did not perceive as being held accountable for subpar mentorship and, in some cases,exploitation of
onschedule, encourages consistent communication amongst students and professors. For mostprojects, the amount of work is so large that one person alone cannot handle it [9]. That is why ateam is required. A team’s success is also strongly dependent on team culture. A strong teamculture relies on effective communication, vision, and trust [10]. While educators recognize theimportance of project management and team culture, simply relying on the capstone experiencefor students to naturally develop, practice, and master this skill set may not be prudent. Studentteams regularly fail to meet faculty members’ expectations in terms of project management andstruggle to develop a productive team culture. This deficit can be addressed in many ways butfirst
as nonevidence.In terms of direct evidence, Trent provided one example. Specifically, he used his own personalexperience as being a person of color as an analogy to what women might experience inengineering (see 3 in Table 2): “You know, leveraging lived experience, if I sit here long enough, I can identify points of discrimination inequity. Looking for another word...bias...ironically, effectively along each point of my professional journey.”Because Trent used his personal experience to draw an analogy between the experiences ofwomen and people of color, we categorized this piece of evidence as direct evidence.6.1.2. FlynnOur second participant, Flynn, is a white male engineering faculty member. In the interview
, discussing the nature of concepts beinglearned, and connecting the present with past learning. The verbal and nonverbal responses ofgroup members provide valuable feedback to a student’s performance. Promotive interaction alsofacilitates the formation of personal connections between group members. In the originalframework [20], the authors emphasized face-to-face interactions as being the catalyst drivingpromotive interaction. Therefore, this is one aspect of cooperative learning that should beseverely affected by the pandemic.Interpersonal and social skills refer to various skills that a student needs to successfullycooperate in a group. Some of these skills include leadership, decision-making, trust-building,communication, and conflict management
career fairs can facilitate connections toprofessional opportunities, communication of professional competency (e.g. during interviews) isvital to successfully landing those opportunities. In the long-term, internalizing andcommunicating professional experiences is critical to being an effective lifelong learner, which isrecognized as an important competency for engineers [7]–[9]. Developing an ability to reflect onday-to-day professional situations and recognize opportunities for self-improvement andadaptation is a first step in pursuing additional professional training (e.g. professionalcertifications, graduate course work, professional seminars).Unfortunately, student engagement with technical and professional competencies often occur
higher rates of mental health conditions in engineeringand understand factors that influence students’ decisions to seek help. Wider scale studies andcross-institutional engineering-specific studies can provide additional evidence for understandingthe mental health issues faced by our students and how engineering education plays a role inthem and their ability to address such issues timely. Aligned with that objective, this studypresents an initial exploration of the relationship between the stigma typically associated withmental health conditions and help-seeking behavior of students. It is a first step toward a morethorough examination of the engineering culture and its effect on students’ mental health.Engineering culture and mental
Chairman of the Department of Computer Science at Howard University. His primary research interest is in distributed computing. Dr. Burge is also interested in Computer Science Education and Diversity, and Tech En- trepreneurship and Innovation. His work in CS Education and Diversity has primarily been focused on informal and personalized learning, and on the use of technology to aid in the socio-technical encultur- ation of underrepresented students in CS, K-12 initiatives, and diversity, equity, and inclusion beyond compliance. Dr. Burge practices design thinking as an innovative teaching methodology and promotes immersive learning and learning by doing. He co-teaches the Bison Startup and Bison Accelerate courses
or choosing inventions to address specific concerns.From a descriptive perspective, students with low scores in academic motivation (AMO),persistence (PST), social engagement (SCE), and decision making in college major (DMA)should be referred to the academic consulting center, those who have low scores in fit withmajor/career (FIT) could lead to a consulting in the career center. Also, a low score in masterylearning goal orientation (MLG), personal achievement goal orientation (PAG), deep learningapproach (DLA), surface learning approach (SLA), and problem-solving approach (PSA) maywarrant a referral for tutoring in the major.The SASI III could be used for intervention development and research for causality-relatedconcerns from an
and alumniperceptions might differ. Although we will also be using student surveys and focus groups in thisproject, we decided to start with program alumni as we feel they are uniquely well-positioned todiscuss their learning experience in the program with a juxtaposition to their career and graduateschool experience, and speak to the relevance of the program’s teaching and learning approachesbeyond the program itself. Comparing faculty perceptions with alumni perceptions is key indistinguishing between the intended and the enacted curriculum [19], [20].To engage in this research, we sought previous research on comparing instructor and alumniperspectives. Interestingly, despite an extensive literature review, the majority of studies focuson
research in engineering education in areas of sustainability, resilience and fuel cell education.Dr. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University Samantha Brunhaver is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Fulton Schools of Engineering Poly- technic School. Dr. Brunhaver recently joined Arizona State after completing her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. She also has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Northeastern University. Dr. Brunhaver’s research examines the career decision-making and professional identity formation of engineering students, alumni, and practicing engineers. She also conducts studies of new engineering pedagogy that help to improve student engagement and
, North Carolina State University Julie Simmons Ivy is a Professor in the Edward P. Fitts Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering and Fitts Faculty Fellow in Health Systems Engineering. She previously spent several years on the faculty of the Stephen M. Ross School of Business at the University of Michigan. She received her B.S. and Ph.D. in Industrial and Operations Engineering at the University of Michigan. She also received her M.S. in Industrial and Systems Engineering with a focus on Operations Research at Georgia Tech. She is President of the Health Systems Engineering Alliance (HSEA) Board of Directors. She is an active member of the Institute of Operations Research and Management Science (INFORMS), Dr
case studies that outlines or highlights key features and ideas that relevantand should be considered when designing an engineering curriculum to meet the 21st century. Inthe case study by Garvey & Foley [30], it is emphasized that a curriculum should be more inclusive,not exclusive, because every person in this world deserves a chance to participate in developingand sustaining the future of humanity. Problems cannot be solved from one scenario or angle. Wewill always need other eyes to explore other ways of solving challenges. The most importantqualities of having an inclusive curriculum are to consider flexibility and clarity when designing ordeveloping the curriculum.Another article [31] talks about a case study of redesigning the
Elizabeth Litzler, Ph.D., is the director of the University of Washington Center for Evaluation and Re- search for STEM Equity (UW CERSE) and an affiliate assistant professor of sociology. She has been at UW working on STEM Equity issues for more than 17 years. Dr. Litzler is a member of ASEE, 2020-2021 chair of the ASEE Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and a former board member of the Women in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN). Her research interests include the educational cli- mate for students, faculty, and staff in science and engineering, assets based approaches to STEM equity, and gender and race stratification in education and the workforce. She was awarded the 2020 WEPAN Founders Award
[7]. TheCommunity of Inquiry Framework [11] uses social constructivism to outline three importantcomponents within online courses that contribute to student development and learning: socialpresence, cognitive presence, and teaching presence. Social presence can be defined by theability for group members to project themselves socially and emotionally, as “real” people (i.e.,their full personality) [11]. Cognitive presence is the act of constructing meaning throughsustained communication and is often developed through significant social presence [11]. Thethird component is teaching presence, which is how instructors design educational experiences tofacilitate social and cognitive presence [11]. These theories framed our methods and
' personal information was encrypted or removedfrom public view, without data distortion [23].Responses obtained from these instruments were compiled in electronic spreadsheets andanalyzed using Excel statistical modules. Variables such as response mode and frequency wereconsidered within the questions. The decision to work with descriptive statistics was based onthe objective of characterizing the general response of the students to the innovation proposal. Ifit is positive, as expected, incorporation is planned in an experimental study to determine theimpact on student performance.Data analysis and resultsStudent Satisfaction with Educational PodcastsAll 53 students in the course were asked to participate in the poll, 46 answering the
student learningthrough practice of freehand sketching in perspective.While many educational drawing tools have been explored with great potential to improve drawingself-efficacy, few studies have tried to measure student’s self-efficacy in their drawing ability in atruly comprehensive and quantitative manner that can be replicated in other studies.MethodsA. Instrument DevelopmentAccording to Fabrigar, the soundness of the items that are included in an instrument have an im-portant role in utilizing the results obtained from Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) [29]. TheDrawing Self Efficacy Instrument (DSEI) consists of 13 items that addresses four areas of Draw-ing efficacy. The DSEI was reviewed by an experienced designer and drawing instructor