Paper ID #42510Applying Personal Strengths: Building Well-Being and Resilience Strategiesin an Undergraduate Wellness CourseJulianne Latimer, Georgia Institute of Technology Julianne Latimer is a second-year undergraduate student pursuing a degree in Industrial and Systems Engineering at Georgia Tech in Atlanta, Georgia. Currently, she serves as a student assistant for the Effective Team Dynamics Initiative, where she conducts engineering education research and facilitates strengths-based team dynamics workshops for first-year and transfer student seminars. Julianne is deeply passionate about promoting educational
Paper ID #42659Engineering Design Process through Game-Based Learning for FreshmenEngineering StudentsMs. Laura Ngoc Nhi Nguyen, University of Oklahoma 2nd-year Computer science major at the University of Oklahoma with a passion for stimulating more progression in education with the help of technology!Dr. Javeed Kittur, University of Oklahoma Dr. Kittur is an Assistant Professor in the Gallogly College of Engineering at The University of Oklahoma. He completed his Ph.D. in Engineering Education Systems and Design program from Arizona State University, 2022. He received a bachelor’s degree in Electrical and Electronics
. The data presentedhere suggest to some extent that LGBTQ people score similarly to their peers on indicators ofscience and engineering identity, but that attention to their experiences is still warranted. AsLGBTQ issues become politicized across the nation, LGBTQ individuals need safe environmentsin STEM fields to nurture their intrinsic motivation and pursue fulfilling careers.1.0 Introduction The purpose of this research paper is to test differences in science and engineeringidentity among students based on minoritized sexual and gender identities. LGBTQ (lesbian, gay,bisexual, transgender, and queer or questioning) students are estimated to be underrepresented byabout 20% in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM
self-efficacy scales/measures). Future work will also recruit a larger (N = 3,000-4,000) sample of respondents to complete the shorter, refined survey in order to gain anunderstanding of the degree to which the basic psychological needs are satisfied or frustratedacross geographic regions, genders, races, and other individual and workplace demographicfactors.References [1] S.A. Hewlett, C.B. Luce, L.J. Servon, L. Sherbin, P. Shiller, E. Sosnovich, and K. Sumberg. "The Athena factor: Reversing the brain drain in science, engineering, and technology." Harvard Business Review Research Report, vol. 10094, pp. 1-100, 2008. [2] J S.A. Hewlett, L. Sherbin, F. Dieudonne,, C. Fargnoli, and C. Fredman, C. Athena 2.0
chair of the Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN) and a deputy editor for the Journal of Engineering Education (JEE). Prior to joining ASU he was a graduate research assistant at the Tufts’ Center for Engineering Education and Outreach.Dr. Jean S. Larson, Arizona State University Jean Larson, Ph.D., is the Educational Director for the NSF-funded Engineering Research Center for Bio- mediated and Bio-inspired Geotechnics (CBBG), and Associate Research Professor in both the School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment and the Division of Educational Leadership and Innovation at Arizona State University. She has a Ph.D. in Educational Technology, postgraduate training in Computer Systems
Paper ID #39363Exploring the relationship between key constructs of self-assessmentcomponents, motivation, and self-regulation in engineeringTaiwo Raphael Feyijimi, University of Georgia Taiwo is a current Master’s student in the College of Engineering with an emphasis in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Georgia, Athens GA. He had is Bachelors degree in Physics education from the Obafemi Awolowo University (O.A.U.), Ile-Ife, Osun, and an associate degree in Elec- trical and Electronics Technology Education from the Federal College of Education (Technical), Akoka, Lagos, Nigeria.Mr. Olanrewaju Paul
Paper ID #44108Supplemental Instruction: Shaping Future EngineersMr. Zachary Miller, University of South Alabama Zachary Miller is a graduate student pursuing a Master’s degree in Mechanical Engineering at the University of South Alabama (USA). He earned his Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering in 2023 from the same university. During his undergraduate studies, Zach served as a Supplemental Instructor (SI) for engineering courses at USA. Zach’s experience in SI started his passion for engineering education. Zach’s primary research interests revolve around engineering education and aerospace systems, where his
University at Buffalo. His research interests lie in the area of social justice and issues related to diversity, equity and Inclusion. Before University at Buffalo he worked in teaching capacity in the higher education sector of Pakistan. Additionally he has worked as a researcher in projects aimed at promoting climate change adaptation in Pakistan.Xinrui Xu, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Xinrui (Rose) Xu graduated from Purdue University School of Engineering Education. Currently, she works at Huazhong University of Science and Technology School of Education as an Assistant Professor. Coming from a humanistic and critical perspective, her research promotes understanding and practice that support
through simulations and games, on topics such as genetic modification, climate change, and public infrastructure. Marvez has also worked on the development of natural language processing models for assessment and personalized feedback in educational settings. At Tufts, Marvez works with McDonnell Family Assistant Professor Greses P´erez in the CEEO on the development of engineering board games for multilingual students in culturally relevant contexts.Greses Perez, Tufts University Greses P´erez is an engineer, learning scientist and educator. She received her Ph.D. in Science Education with a focus on Learning Sciences and Technology Design from Stanford University. Her scholarship specializes in the interdisciplinary
Paper ID #41397Lessons Learned from Generating, Consolidating, and Analyzing Large Scale,Longitudinal Social Network DataDr. Jack Elliott, Iron Range Engineering, Minnesota State University, Mankato Jack Elliott is an assistant professor in Integrated Engineering at the Iron Range Engineering Program, a part of Minnesota State University Mankato. His research areas include student social support networks in engineering education, experimental fluid dynamics, and developing low-cost technology-based tools for improving fluid dynamics education.Dr. Angela Minichiello, Utah State University Angela (Angie) Minichiello is a
Paper ID #38884Learning through PBL with Emphasis on People, Process, and ProductAcross CoursesDr. Micah Lande, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Micah Lande, PhD is an Assistant Professor and E.R. Stensaas Chair for Engineering Education in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the South Dakota School of Mines & Technology. Dr. Lande directs the Holistic Engineering Lab & Observatory. He teaches human-centered engineering design, design thinking, and design innovation courses. Dr. Lande researches how technical and non-technical people learn and apply design thinking and making processes to their work
Paper ID #41510Unpacking Critical Socializers Impacting STEM Students’ Motivation at aMinority Serving InstitutionDr. Jeffrey Stransky, Rowan University Dr. Stransky is a post-doctoral research associate in the School of Applied Engineering and Technology at the New Jersey Institute of Technology. He obtained his PhD in Engineering Education and MS in Mechanical Engineering from ¬¬Rowan university. Dr. Stransky seeks to understand the engineering ideologies that promote potential disparities between engineers’ practices and their micro- and macroethics. Dr. Stransky is passionate about developing innovative educational
ofmeritocratic ideologyIn the television series, The 100 and The Expense, audiences are given two complex andinteresting characters – both women of color and both engineers. As made clear by reportsdiscussed earlier in this paper (Gena Davis Institute on Gender in Media, 2018; The Office ofScience and Technology, 2016), media representations of women of color in engineering rolesare needed and important. Additionally, in line with the call to “change the conversation”(National Academy of Engineering, 2008) about engineering and making it more inclusive, weneed to see more positive media representations of exceptional women of color withunquestioned engineering skills. Thus, Reyes and Nagata provide much-needed positiverepresentation and can act as role
significant Research and Practice Implications for these themes.Dr. Javeed Kittur, University of Oklahoma Dr. Kittur is an Assistant Professor in the Gallogly College of Engineering at The University of Oklahoma. He completed his Ph.D. in Engineering Education Systems and Design program from Arizona State University, 2022. He received a bachelor’s degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering and a Master’s in Power Systems from India in 2011 and 2014, respectively. He has worked with Tata Consultancy Services as an Assistant Systems Engineer from 2011–2012 in India. He has worked as an Assistant Professor (2014–2018) in the department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, KLE Technological University, India
students. Matthew has been nominated for numerous teacher awards including Early Excellence in Teaching, Innovation in Teaching, and Honored Instructor. His kind nature and consideration brings connection, community, and ongoing mentorship for his students.Michael I. Swart, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Michael is an artist and musician masquerading as an academic, honored with the opportunity to research and design educational technologies that engage the body and the mind to make learning fun. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Engineering Students’ Multimodal Discourse: How Speech and Gesture Reveal Emerging Epistemologies When Reasoning About Mechanics of Materials
, and what is considered rigorous work [13], [39], [41],[42]. By restricting who can participate in engineering research or hindering feelings ofbelonging among a diverse body of researchers, we simultaneously exclude novel,transformative ways of knowing that a diverse body of researchers brings to the field throughtheir experiences and worldviews [27]. Even in our current climate where knowledge of racialand gendered discrimination is more widespread, we still see issues that could potentially beremedied by developing and maintaining a diverse body of researchers, and questioning whetherour technological advancements perpetuate inequity [43], [44].Engineering Research ParadigmsWhen needed and appropriate, engineering research work often
Technologies (ICECCT), 2021, pp. 1–7.[29] C. G. P. Berdanier, C. Whitehair, A. Kirn, and D. Satterfield, “Analysis of social media forums to elicit narratives of graduate engineering student attrition,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 125–147, Jan. 2020.[30] Z. Chen and A. Gillen, “How Do Engineering Students Characterize Their Educational Experience on a Popular Social Media Platform Before and During the Covid-19 Pandemic?,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[31] H. B. Rosqvist, N. Chown, and A. Stenning, Neurodiversity Studies: A New Critical Paradigm. Taylor & Francis Group, 2020.[32] T. Eagle, “Exploring Collective Medical Knowledge and Tensions in Online ADHD Communities,” in Companion
Mathematics, Science and Technology, 6(3), pp. 266-284, 2018.[5] P. T. Prusko, “Circling Back: A Portrait of the Lived Experiences of Nontraditional Female Students in STEM,” Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 16(2), 2021.[6] C. Brozina and A Johri, “Using Prompted Reflective Journaling to Understand Nontraditional Students in Engineering," Proc. 2022 ASEE Annual Conf. & Expo., August 2022.[7] C. Brozina, A. Chew and A. Johri, "If I had more time: A transactional perspective on supporting nontraditional students in engineering," 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), College Station, TX, USA, 2023, pp. 1-8, doi: 10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10343307.
. Ross, ‘“Be real black for me” imagining BlackCrit in education’, UrbanEducation, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 415–442, 2016.[26] S. Hartman, Lose your mother: A journey along the Atlantic slave route. Macmillan, 2008.[27] D. Roberts, Fatal invention: How science, politics, and big business re-create race in the twenty-firstcentury. New Press/ORIM, 2011.[28] S. Cedillo, ‘Beyond inquiry: Towards the specificity of anti-blackness studies in STEM education’,Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, vol. 18, pp. 242–256, 2018.[29] C. C. Samuelson, and E. Litzler, “Community cultural wealth: An assets‐based approach to thepersistence of engineering students of color.” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 05, no. 1, pp.93-117, 2016
Multidisciplinary Engineering. Her work focuses on instructional strategies in engineering, and educational technology. She is also passionate about student mental health and broadening participation in engineering.Matilde Luz Sanchez-Pena, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Dr. Matilde S´anchez-Pe˜na is an assistant professor of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo – SUNY where she leads the Diversity Assessment Research in Engineering to Catalyze the Advancement of Respect and Equity (DAREtoCARE) Lab. Her research focuses on developing cultures of care and well-being in engineering education spaces, assessing gains in institutional efforts to advance equity and inclusion, and using data science
LeBlanc is an associate professor in the Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering at The George Washington University. Her research goals are to create next-generation energy conversion technologies with advanced materials and manufacturing techniques. Previously, she was a research sci- entist at a startup company where she created research, development, and manufacturing characterization solutions for thermoelectric technologies and evaluated the potential of new power generation materials. Dr. LeBlanc also served in Teach for America and taught high school math and physics in Washington, DC. Dr. LeBlanc obtained a PhD in mechanical engineering with a minor in materials science at Stanford University
Paper ID #42007Validity Evidence for the Sophomore Engineering Experiences SurveyMiss Fanyi Zhang, Purdue University Fanyi is a third-year Ph.D. student at Purdue University. She majors in Industrial-Organizational Psychology and works as a Graduate Research Assistant for the Women in Engineering program. Her area of interest focuses on conceptualizing and promoting flourishing and understanding the dynamics of positive relationships. Her current research agenda includes developing a mentor support framework and promoting the effective design of mentor training.Dr. Beth M. Holloway, Purdue University Beth Holloway is
, Engineering, Mathematics, and Technology (STEM). A further strand of his research examines the development of interdisciplinarity in the sciences and works to define the mechanisms by which it is formed, identify the contexts conducive to its flourishing, and develop the educational experiences that accelerate its development.Carlie Laton Cooper, University of Georgia Carlie is a doctoral student in the Louise McBee Institute of Higher Education at the University of Georgia (UGA). She earned a bachelor’s degree in Psychology from UGA (2017) and a Master of Education in Higher Education Administration from Georgia Southern University (2021). She has higher education experience in business affairs and academic advising. She
July 2022, under Professor Kurt Becker’s supervision. Before getting his Ph.D. from USU, Mohammad was a student at Oklahoma State University, where he received a Master of Science (M.Sc.) degree from the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department. Mohammad also received another master’s degree in computer engineering from the Jordan University of Science and Technology (JUST) in Jordan. Besides, Mohammad also has a bachelor’s degree in computer engineering from Al- Yarmouk University in Jordan. Complemented with his educational degrees, Mohammad has more than four years of teaching experience at Najran University, Saudi Arabia. Mohammad was also working as a Graduate Teaching Assistant (GTA) for 2.5 years at
biomedical engineering drives his academic pursuits, seeking to explore how these technologies can revolutionize both fieldsDr. Javeed Kittur, University of Oklahoma Dr. Kittur is an Assistant Professor in the Gallogly College of Engineering at The University of Oklahoma. He completed his Ph.D. in Engineering Education Systems and Design program from Arizona State University, 2022. He received a bachelor’s degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering and a Master’s in Power Systems from India in 2011 and 2014, respectively. He has worked with Tata Consultancy Services as an Assistant Systems Engineer from 2011–2012 in India. He has worked as an Assistant Professor (2014–2018) in the department of Electrical and
India. He has worked as an Assistant Professor (2014–2018) in the department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, KLE Technological University, India. He is a certified IUCEE International Engineering Educator. He was awarded the ’Ing.Paed.IGIP’ title at ICTIEE, 2018. He is serving as an Associate Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education Transformations (JEET). He is interested in conducting engineering education research, and his interests include student retention in online and in-person engineering courses/programs, data mining and learning analytics in engineering education, broadening student participation in engineering, faculty preparedness in cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains of
Paper ID #44237A Scoping Review of Concept Inventories in Engineering EducationVincent Oluwaseto Fakiyesi , University of Georgia Vincent Oluwaseto Fakiyesi received the B.Tech. degree in chemical engineering from the Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomosho, Oyo State, , Nigeria in 2015, and He is presently a Doctoral Students at Engineering Education Transformative Institute at the University of Georgia College of Engineering.Deborah Gbemisola Fabiyi, Washington State UniversityIsaac Damilare Dunmoye , University of Georgia Isaac Dunmoye PhD in Engineering (in view), University of Georgia, USA, M.Sc. in
areeducation-adjacent. Two companies with strong ties to engineering education will participate inthis study: a software company whose product is widely used and taught in engineering coursesacross US universities, and an educational technology company whose product supports studentlearning and faculty classroom management. Both companies have an interest in ensuring theirproducts support engineering learning and would like to conduct research around this area. Thefindings of this study will be based on in-depth interviews with industry professionals about theirmotivations for conducting engineering education research, research goals, research processes &infrastructure, and barriers they have encountered. Thematic analysis will be as part
, sociotechnical engineering practice. Their current projects include studying and designing classroom interventions around macroethical issues in aerospace engineering and the productive beginnings of engineering judgment as students create and use mathematical models. Aaron holds a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering from U-M, and a Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Astronautics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Prior to re-joining U-M, he was an instructor in Aerospace Engineering Sciences at the University of Colorado Boulder. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Students’ Use of Engineering Judgment on Undergraduate Student Project
ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016.[15] S. A. Licorish, H. E. Owen, B. Daniel, and J. L. George, "Students’ perception of Kahoot!’s influence on teaching and learning," Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, vol. 13, p. 9, 2018/07/21 2018.[16] M. Pascu, D. C. Petculescu, and I. P. Stupariu. (2023, Investigating Students’ Perception of Online Assessment as a Result of the Interaction among the Extrinsic Assessment Factors on Students Psychological Characteristics. Education Sciences 13(2).[17] L. Parody, J. Santos, L. A. Trujillo-Cayado, and M. Ceballos. (2022, Gamification in Engineering Education: The Use of Classcraft Platform to Improve Motivation and Academic Performance