American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) has also proposed a set of coreprinciples stipulating that engineering learning may be considered three dimensional with a focuson engineering habits of mind (e.g., creativity, iteration, collaboration), engineering practices(design, optimization, constraint assessment), and engineering knowledge (principles, problemsolving, and technological outputs) [5]. This approach diverges from the way STEM hastypically been taught in U.S. middle schools, where science and engineering principles are rarelyanchored in relevant phenomena [6]. Since teachers often assume the main responsibility forimplementing engineering tasks in their classrooms to comply with the widespread focus onSTEM integration, they may
engineering at a major universitythat likely did not have many Appalachian attendees, earned their engineering degree and arenow working in the field as engineers. On the campuses of major universities, Central Appalachian students are oftenmarginalized because these educational spaces were not created with their needs and experiencesin mind. The primary research question is, “What types of cultural capital did CentralAppalachian engineers use to become career-ready engineers during their undergraduateengineering experience at a major university?” This study seeks to provide pilot data for afuture phenomenographic study, with the outcome space being stories of success to provide pathsforward for tomorrow’s engineering students from the Central
Paper ID #37488Student curiosity in engineering courses and research experiences: ”I’mkind of torn between being a decent student and a decent engineer.”Dr. Natalie Evans, University of Virginia Natalie Evans, Ph.D. is a postdoctoral research associate in the UVA school of Education and Human Development. Her research examines how educational experiences influence the development of curiosity and creativity in students from preschool through college.Jessica Scoville, University of VirginiaJamie J. Jirout, University of VirginiaDr. Caitlin Donahue Wylie, University of Virginia Caitlin D. Wylie is an associate professor of Science
associated with liberal education [12] which differs fromthe math, science, engineering science, and design focus of engineering curriculum. Educationsystems and cultural values sometimes prohibit lifelong learning ‘habits of mind’ as the value oflearning or doing responsible, informed work is de-emphasized in relation to short-term goals ofobtaining credentials and being associated with institutional prestige [12]. Broadeningconceptions beyond formal learning in educational institutions or professional developmentprogramming, “lifewide learning” recognizes the multiple overlapping spaces and contextswhere learning occurs [13], [14]. Lifewide conceptions of lifelong learning account for non-economic strands such as family life, social life, and
behavioural surveillance 2006-2011,” Sex. Health, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 81–86, 2016.[18] E. Goble, W. Austin, D. Larsen, L. Kreitzer, and S. Brintnell, “Habits of mind and the split-mind effect: When computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software is used in phenomenological research,” Forum Qual. Sozialforsch., vol. 13, no. 2, p. 4, 2012.[19] J. A. Rios, G. Ling, R. Pugh, D. Becker, and A. Bacall, “Identifying Critical 21st-Century Skills for Workplace Success: A Content Analysis of Job Advertisements,” Educ. Res., vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 80–89, Mar. 2020.[20] A. L. Pawley, C. Schimpf, and L. Nelson, “Gender in Engineering Education Research: A Content Analysis of Research in JEE, 1998-2012,” J. Eng. Educ
factors contributing to mental health issues among college students, thereis a notable gap in the literature regarding international undergraduates in engineering.International students, with their different beliefs, values, and expectations related to mentalhealth, may have different coping strategies, help-seeking preferences, and service utilizationpatterns. Among various factors, religiosity may influence their approach to coping, seekingassistance, and utilizing services. With this in mind, this study investigates the impact ofreligiosity on the mental health, help-seeking behavior, and service utilization of internationalundergraduate engineering students in the United States.Purpose/Hypothesis: This study explores the relationship between
the acknowledgement of implicit bias (Isaaac et al., 2023),understanding of microaggressions (Kim & Meister, 2023; Masta et al., 2022), and fostering asense of belonging through open communication (Sedgwick & Yonge, 2008; Campbell & Klotz,2021). Non-Cognitive development (Khine & Areepattamannil, 2016) includes factors such as aperson’s sense of belonging (Hoffman et al., 2002), their engineering identity development(Godwin et al., 2016; Rodriguez et al., 2022), their meaning and purpose, motivation (Schell &Husman, 2008; Kirn & Benson, 2015), mindset (Dweck, 2016), and social skills such as self-control (Maloney et al., 2012), patience (Schnitker, 2012), and mindfulness (Van Dam et al.,2010).What does it mean to
numerous teacher awards including Early Excellence in Teaching, Innovation in Teaching, and Honored Instructor. His kind nature and consideration brings connection, community, and ongoing mentorship for his students.Michael I. Swart, University of Wisconsin - Madison Michael is an artist and musician masquerading as an academic, honored with the opportunity to research and design educational technologies that engage the body and the mind to make learning fun and produc- tive.Arushi Renschler Pandey, University of Wisconsin-Madison Arushi is a 4th year undergraduate student in the Department of Electrical Engineering. Her research interests include how engineering students use metaphor and imagery when mechanically
,” Psychology, vol. 07, pp. 1587–1607, 2016, doi: 10.4236/psych.2016.713153.[29] L. Vygotsky and M. Cole, “Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes,” 1978.[30] R. A. Engle, J. M. Langer-Osuna, and M. McKinney de Royston, “Toward a Model of Influence in Persuasive Discussions: Negotiating Quality, Authority, Privilege, and Access Within a Student-Led Argument,” Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 245–268, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.1080/10508406.2014.883979.[31] P. Wankat and F. Oreovicz, Teaching Engineering, 2nd ed. West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue Univeristy Press, 2015.[32] E. G. Cohen, “Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups,” Rev Educ
anational-scale invention education program. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the constructvalidity and potential utility of the measure, which was found to include two subscales: Ingenuityand Solution Seeking. The scale also demonstrated adequate internal consistency reliability.Correlations between children’s perceptions of their inventive habits of mind and theiridentification with STEAM subjects were moderate and highest for science. The findings suggestthat STEAM subject identification and an inventive mindset can, but do not always, overlap.Keywords: invention education, inventive mindset, STEM identity, STEAM, K-12 education. Introduction To develop a robust engineering pipeline and
engineeringeducation, to examine the use of intuition in engineering problem solving. CTA is a class ofobservational protocols that surface tacit knowledge through engaging experts with a task(Crandall, 2006). The purpose of CTA is to capture how the mind works through three primaryaspects: knowledge elicitation, data analysis, and knowledge representation. Many methods ofCTA exist, and best practices call for a combination of CTA methods. In this study we are usingtwo methods: 1) the Critical Decision Method (CDM), which assesses individuals decisionmaking in non-routine incidents through a set of cognitive probes (Klein, 1989), and 2) theKnowledge Audit Method (KAM), which we use to guide our probing questions and identifytypes of knowledge used, or not
(WEEF-GEDC), 23-27 Oct. 2023 2023, pp. 1-9, doi: 10.1109/WEEF- GEDC59520.2023.10343627.[12] M. Whitwer, S. Wilson, and J. Hammer, "Engineering Student Mental Health and Help Seeking: Analysis of National Data from the Healthy Minds Study," in 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2023: IEEE, pp. 1-7.[13] S. K. Lipson, S. Zhou, B. Wagner, K. Beck, and D. Eisenberg, "Major Differences: Variations in Undergraduate and Graduate Student Mental Health and Treatment Utilization Across Academic Disciplines," Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 23-41, 2016/01/02 2016, doi: 10.1080/87568225.2016.1105657.[14] M. L. Sanchez-Pena and C. Otis, "Comparing wellbeing indicators
engineering students. These professionals can help students acquire copingskills. Strategies for burnout, stress, and anxiety, improving their mental health [5]. Additionally,practicing stress-reduction techniques like yoga, meditation, or mindfulness exercises can improvemental health and significantly reduce stress [6]. Maintaining mental health requires havinghealthy relationships with friends and family, and social support is crucial in this aspect [7]. Toavoid feelings of loneliness and isolation, which may have a detrimental effect on mental health,engineering students need to actively seek out chances for social contact and engagement inextracurricular activities.A SLR has been carried out to explore research on mental health in engineering
/2534971.[9] C. Vieira, A. J. Magana, R. E. García, A. Jana, and M. Krafcik, “Integrating Computational Science Tools into a Thermodynamics Course,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 322–333, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10956-017-9726-9.[10] L. S. Vygotsky and M. Cole, Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press, 1978.[11] N. Boblett, “Scaffolding: Defining the metaphor,” Studies in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, vol. 12, no. 2, 2012.[12] C. Vieira, A. J. Magana, A. Roy, and M. Falk, “Providing students with agency to self- scaffold in a computational science and engineering course,” Journal of Computing in Higher Education, vol. 33, pp. 328–366, 2021
Electronic Engineering from ITS Engineering College, India and a master’s degree in Data Science from University at Albany, New York. She worked as a Data Analyst during one of her summer internships in 2020, where she learned and gained experienced in data evaluating and validating company’s huge data using the techniques based on Excel, Python, and R. She is currently working with Dr. Marissa Tsugawa on Neurodiversity Research and Education. She believes that neurodiversity can help her better understand her younger brother’s condition (Asphyxiation) and respond to his basic needs because his mind works differently from everybody else’s due to which he unable to express his feelings and pain.Dr. Catherine McGough Spence
learning goals for pre-college engineering are stillbeing contested. One argument, which is promoted in science standards, is that engineeringdesign provides an authentic context to apply science concepts [4] [5] [6]. However, others arguethat this represents too narrow a view of engineering and promotes misconceptions [7] [8]. Inresponse to these concerns, the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) andAdvancing Excellence in P12 Engineering Education introduced a Framework for P-12Engineering Learning [9]. This framework outlines learning goals for engineering literacy thatmove beyond a narrow focus on practices, including engineering habits of mind and knowledge.In addition, the authors call for further research to scaffold learning
hopes future researchwill develop additional approaches that explicitly assess the affective and psychomotor domain[20]. A third paper was found that recognizes this lack of classes developed with affective learning,and it discusses the importance of having classes developed with affective learning in mind [26].With this as a background, our research study focuses on qualitatively investigating engineeringstudents understanding and perceptions on their learning through the affective domain of learning,as well as provide further evidence to the existing body of research on this topic.MethodThis research aims at investigating students’ responses about their affective connections towardslearning engineering concepts. To achieve this objective the
Paper ID #36982Structure versus Curiosity: Developing a model for understandingundergraduate students’ childhood pathways into engineeringCollette Patricia HigginsDr. Melissa Wood Aleman, James Madison University Dr. Melissa Aleman (Ph.D. University of Iowa) is Professor of Communication Studies at James Madison University and has published research using qualitative interviewing, ethnographic and rhetorical methods to examine communication in diverse contexts. ShDr. Robert L. Nagel, James Madison University & Carthage College Dr. Robert L. Nagel is Director of Engineering at Carthage College and Professor of Engineering at
climatedimensions in research and academic environments. Furthermore, the creative climatedimensions that were explicitly mentioned across interviews provide insight into the dimensionswith a strong influence over the creative climate in graduate-level engineering education.6.1. Creative Personal IdentitiesEach participant was asked to define creativity in their own words. These definitions were uniqueto each participant with little overlap among the responses, which ranged from generating ideas,exploring different perspectives and connections with an open mind, and expressing themselveswhile bringing their own visions to life. Participants were also asked to define what it means tobe an engineer. Unlike the creativity definitions, these responses were
participate in WIL experiences do notexpect the amount of complexity of the problems they were facing as engineers on the job [20].Further recognition of the affective domain’s importance, and in particular work self-efficacydevelopment, over the course of WIL experiences will alleviate some of those issues. There arestrong reasons to suggest that these affective ways of operating are crucial for harnessingengineering students’ cognitive skills [16]. Educators who use WIL should consider linkingexplicitly the cognitive and affective domains for greater student engagement and learning inWIL and for subsequent work readiness/employment [16]. With these ideas in mind, we nowturn to our own exploratory investigation of student experience of design in a
havingfewer resources offered by their parents to be successful in engineering [3]. However, this candrive the value they place on attaining an engineering career: “Students who pay their owncollege expenses may then be interested in having a future in engineering because they have ajob to pay their own way to attain their degree…” [3]. While these students may be moreopen-minded in the classroom, first-generation students require a higher sense of belonging tosucceed in college [3], potentially because they have no prior experience with or knowledge ofcollege. Stebleton et al. [18] also found a relationship between sense of belonging and levels ofdepression and stress for first-generation college students, reporting lower ratings ofbelongingness and
Paper ID #41854The Effects of COVID-19 on the Development of Expertise, Decision-Making,and Engineering IntuitionMadeline Roth, Bucknell University Madeline (Maddi) Roth is an undergraduate student with majors in Neuroscience and Psychology and a minor in Education.Miss Joselyn Elisabeth Busato, Bucknell University Joselyn Busato is an undergraduate student at Bucknell University, majoring in creative writing and biology.Dr. Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University Dr. Elif Miskioglu is an early-career engineering education scholar and educator. She holds a B.S. ˘ in Chemical Engineering (with Genetics minor) from Iowa
Paper ID #37885Enhancing Undergraduate Materials Science Labs for Experiential LearningMr. Mackinley Love, University of Calgary Mackinley Love is a Master of Science candidate at the University of Calgary in the Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering. He completed his Bachelor of Applied Science in the same department in 2021. His thesis topic and interests lie in the investigation of educational scholarship and its links with undergraduate engineering laboratories. He is also the president of the Engineering Education Scholarship Society (E2S2) for 2022-2023, the graduate student club that promotes
Paper ID #44329Appreciative Inquiry as an Intervention for Equity-Centered EngineeringEducation Research and PraxisAnn Shivers-McNair, University of Arizona Ann Shivers-McNair is associate professor and director of professional and technical writing in the Department of English and affiliated faculty in the School of Information at the University of Arizona, on the lands of the Tohono O’odham and Pascua Yaqui.Gimantha N. Perera, North Carolina State University Gimantha Perera is a Sri Lankan born researcher and educator from NC State University. He was inspired to be an engineer by his maternal grandfather Anil, who
Paper ID #42209REU Program Evaluation: A Valuable Tool for Studying UndergraduateSocialization in EngineeringDr. Caitlin D. Wylie, University of Virginia Caitlin D. Wylie is an associate professor of Science, Technology and Society in the University of Virginia’s School of Engineering and Applied Science.Mr. Kent A. Wayland, University of Virginia Kent earned his PhD in Anthropology at the University of Virginia and is now an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering and Society, School of Engineering and Applied Science, at the University of VirginiaMr. Andy Wang, University of Virginia Andy Wang is an
Paper ID #38410Illuminating Contexts that Influence Test Usage Beliefs and Behaviorsamong Instructors of Fundamental Engineering CoursesKai Jun Chew, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical UniversityDr. Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Holly Matusovich is the Associate Dean for Graduate and Professional Studies in the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech and a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education where she has also served in key leadership positions. Dr. Matusovich is recognized for her research and leadership related to graduate student mentoring and faculty development. She won
Paper ID #39861Exploring composite narratives as a methodology to understand and shareresearch findings in engineering educationDr. Susan Sajadi, Virginia Tech Susan Sajadi is an assistant professor at Virginia Tech in the department of engineering education. She has a BS and MS in Biomedical Engineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education Systems and Design from Arizona State University. Prior, she worked as an engineer in the medical device industry.Dr. Nadia N. Kellam, Arizona State University Nadia Kellam is Associate Professor in the Polytechnic School of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State
Paper ID #42338Designing and Conducting Research Using an Ethnographic Approach toIdentify Pedagogical Practices in Engineering EducationDr. Hye Yeon Lee, Georgia Institute of Technology Postdoctoral Fellow in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Institute of TechnologyProf. Joseph M. LeDoux, Georgia Institute of Technology Joe Le Doux is the Executive Director for Learning and Training in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech and Emory University. Dr. Le Doux’s research interests include narrative and inclusive pedagogies and practices. ©American Society for
instructions and applying what we have been taught.”- Machu PichuHe also stressed the unique importance of hands-on projects as a form of assessment. They providea platform for the development and application of data skills that align with the practical demandsof the engineering field. MAE students also appreciated the opportunity that experiential learningbrought as collaborative assessments allowed them to work and learn from others. Theyenthusiastically endorsed bouncing ideas off peers, valuing how it sparked new insights andunearthed blind spots invisible to a single mind. The camaraderie and support within learningcommunities also served as a powerful counterweight to the pressure of demanding projects.However, most students also harbored
asresearchers to understand departmental transformations and their impacts. The first author is anundergraduate researcher, the second author is an engineering education scholar and the PARmentor in this study, and the third author is the principal investigator of the larger study. Byactively experiencing what they also researched, the first author used the participation to askquestions relevant to the student community. With that in mind, this research was designed toaddress the need to assess the effectiveness of the PFE courses in achieving its goals ofequipping students with professional and problem-solving competencies. We present this work-in-progress study by qualitatively investigating the experiences of current EE students andalumni who are