in Electrical and ComputerEngineeringAbstractThis paper describes an NSF-sponsored department level curriculum reform project in theElectrical and Computer Engineering Department at the University of Utah. The project focuseson developing system-level design projects (mostly labs, but a few software-only projects) thatintegrate ideas within a class, between classes, and in some cases between disciplines. Writtenand oral communication is also stressed throughout this program. Materials are available for useby other educators via the PI (Furse) or the website1.IntroductionThis paper reports on a department level curriculum reform project to integrate system-leveldesign projects throughout an otherwise relatively traditional undergraduate
Assessing the connectivity of an Electrical and Computer Engineering Curriculum AbstractProgram level assessment is done by combining the contributions from several units within theprogram at designated time intervals. Course level assessment is one of those units and is usuallydone within a course using tests, homework, projects, presentations etc. without looking at theconnected courses and their learning outcomes. Although course level assessment uses most ofthe resources under assessment and is considered an essential feedback path in making thecurricular changes, very little effort has been devoted to reliable measures of student learning asthey go through a sequence
interests are in curriculum studies.Mansooreh Mollaghasemi, University of Central Florida MANSOOREH MOLLAGHASEMI is an Associate Professor at the Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences (IEMS) Department at the University of Central Florida. She has co-authored three books in the area of Multiple Objective Decision Making. Her research interests lie in Simulation Modeling and Analysis, Optimization, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Neural Networks and Scheduling.Annie Wu, University of Central Florida ANNIE WU is an Assistant Professor at the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Central Florida. Her research interests are in the areas of genetic
challenging strategy computer games, have become a big part of our everyday routine.Other, less obvious, applications, such as automatic target recognition, earthquake prediction,gene expression discovery, intelligent credit fraud protection and affectionate computing, tomention just a few, are examples of cutting-edge applications of ML in various technological,scientific and financial domains.This paper describes the outcomes of a prototype project titled “PROJECT EMD-MLR:Educational Materials Development through the Integration of Machine Learning Research intoSenior Design Projects“, whose intellectual focus is ML. The project is an on-going, multi-institute effort that started in May 2004. The project partners are two major universities
(VIP) Program is an engineering educationprogram that operates in a research and development context. Undergraduate students that joinVIP teams earn academic credit for their participation in design efforts that assist faculty andgraduate students with research and development issues in their areas of technical expertise. Theteams are: multidisciplinary – drawing students from across engineering; vertically-integrated –maintaining a mix of sophomores through PhD students each semester; and long-term – eachundergraduate student may participate in a project for up to seven semesters and each graduatestudent may participate for the duration of their graduate career. The continuity, technical depth,and disciplinary breadth of these teams enable
focus in the first year of the curriculum reform has been on restructuring andredefining the core curriculum, responding to assessment results, implementing several newassessment tools, and planning and executing two pedagogical workshops. In this paper, wedescribe the process by which we have modified the core curriculum and the results of theredesign. [This work was supported by NSF grant EEC- 0431812].Initial assessment activities associated with our legacy curriculum indicated several areas thatneeded to be strengthened. First, students rarely felt they understood the coherent, overarchingframework that integrates basic principles. Second, there was an unbalanced coverage offundamental areas of ECE. Finally, the laboratory and design
Conceptualization (Thinking)Figure 1: Kolb elements of learning and learning styles with overlaid learning activities and 4MAT learning cycle (arrows); adapted from3.Vision for Curriculum EnhancementBased on ideas generated by the Kolb/4MAT system, and funded by an NSF curriculum plan-ning grant8, we have redesigned our systems area curriculum. Overall, we have identified 38credit hours of courses that will be affected: a two semester sequence in circuit theory, a two se-mester sequence in electronic circuit analysis and design; a linear systems theory course, theircompanion non-integrated laboratories, senior technical electives and their companion non-integrated laboratories, and the senior seminar/senior design courses. The old core and its
2006-489: AN UNDERGRADUATE POWER ENGINEERING CURRICULUM: AUNIQUE AND PRACTICAL APPROACH TO BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEENACADEMIA AND INDUSTRYRavel Ammerman, Colorado School of Mines Ravel F. Ammerman (Member IEEE) received his BS in Engineering in 1981 at Colorado School of Mines (CSM), Golden, Colorado. He also received his MS in Electrical Engineering (Power Systems and Control) at the University of Colorado in 1987. He has over 24 years combined teaching and industrial experience. Mr. Ammerman has coauthored and published several technical articles on Engineering Education, Curriculum Development, and Computer Applications related to Power Systems Engineering. Mr. Ammerman is an accomplished teacher
2006-2119: INTEGRATION OF INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS AND VIRTUALEXPERIMENTS IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS COURSES FOR ONSITE, ONLINEAND HYBRID DELIVERYYakov Cherner, ATeL, LLC Dr. Yakov E. Cherner, a Founder and President of ATEL, LLC, combines 20+ years of research and teaching practice with extensive experience in writing curricula and developing educational software. He is the author of an innovative concept of multi-layered simulation-based conceptual teaching of science and technology. This instructional approach uses real-world objects, processes and learning situations that are familiar to students as the context for virtual science and technology investigations. To facilitate this methodology for
2006-2649: IMPROVE LEARNING EFFICIENCY WITH INTEGRATED MATHAND CIRCUIT SIMULATION TOOLS IN ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTERENGINEERING COURSESColin Campbell, TechnicalMastery.com Corp. Colin Campbell works with professors in Engineering at the University of Waterloo assisting them integrate mathematical software into their courses for the purpose of design and simulation. Colin graduated from Waterloo's "Co-op Applied Math with Engineering Electives" programme in 1982. Colin is the owner of TechnicalMastery.com Corporation which develops on-line video-based training courses, with an engineering leaning, for mathematical software such as MATLAB, Mathcad and Maple.Faycal Saffih, McMaster
cutting-edgeNASA-related research into the undergraduate curriculum. Cal Poly Pomona chose toincorporate the Jet Propulsion Laboratories (JPL) robotic technology research into theundergraduate curricula of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, theEngineering Technology Department, Mechanical Engineering Department, and the ComputerScience Department. We proposed to conduct an interdisciplinary project, "Deep SpaceExploration using Smart Robotic Rovers", and develop an autonomous robotic rover.During the last three years, students and faculty participating in this program have developed arobotic rover that has successfully accomplished the initial goals of the project: (1) semi-autonomous navigation systems for remote robots, (2
computer information systems at UTB did notpreviously have hardware lab, CNL has had a great impact on our ability to provide opportunitiesfor our students to understand the contents of wide variety of computer courses. Furthermore,CNL has proved to be a powerful tool in terms of enrollment and retention.AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to acknowledge all the students that have made CNL a successful project.We specially thank Francisco Arteaga, Mario Guajardo, Ariel Martinez, Brian W. Matthews,David Ortiz, Julie Pedraza, and Jose D. Zamora.Bibliographic Information1. Khan, F. and Quweider, M., “Beowulf based Curriculum Enrichment Integrated Laboratory,” National Science Foundation ATE Grant 2001.2. Sterling, T. et. al., “How to Build
2006-2058: INTEGRATING FEEDBACK TECHNOLOGY INTO THEELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING CLASSROOMCordelia Brown, Purdue University Cordelia M. Brown is a Visiting Assistant Professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Engineering Education. She received her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering at Vanderbilt University, her M.S. in Electrical Engineering at Vanderbilt University, and her B.S. in Electrical Engineering at Tuskegee University. Her research interests include assessment of instructional methods, laboratory design, collaborative learning, and retention and recruitment issues in engineering education.Monica Cox, Purdue University Monica Farmer Cox is an Assistant Professor
experience. This platform enables theexploration of a broad range of ECE concepts, both independently and integrated into an entiresystem, is flexible, to encourage creative solutions, is capable of being applied to real-worldchallenges, and is easily connected to the curricular theme. This paper describes the curricularobjectives and key course elements which guided the development of this course, the process bywhich the course was created, and the resulting content and structure.1. Introduction1.1 ECE Curriculum RedesignThe Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Duke University is undergoing acomprehensive curriculum redesign. Large-scale planning and development for the newcurriculum has been conducted in earnest since early 2003
) based upon provenpedagogical methods. The two course sequence is named VECTOR (Vitalizing ElectromagneticConcepts To Obtain Relevancy) and adapts existing teaching techniques and laboratories toaddress three inter-related objectives: A) Create an undergraduate curriculum in electromagnetics which is relevant to students and shows the impact of this field on emerging knowledge and technologies. B) Employ modern tools, skills, and techniques to emphasize fundamental concepts rather than teach legacy materials emphasizing rote, analytical solutions. C) Create an effective introductory EM course which will pipeline students into the electromagnetics-photonics curriculum at OSU, including graduate programs.These goals, described in
mostly cover circuits with resistive elements. A few examples of circuitsinvolving capacitors and non-resistive elements (e.g. integrators and differentiators) are alsogiven as examples of signal shaping circuits.In the laboratory, operational amplifiers are used to amplify signals in two practical applications.In the first experiment, students amplify the signals from an ultrasonic emitter/receive pair. Theobjective of the experiment is to measure the speed of sound by measuring the time delaybetween the original and reflected signals. In the second experiment, an operational amplifier isused to amplify the signal from an infrared emitter/detector pair used to measure the speed of avariable speed DC motor. Both the motor and the emitter
most successfulinnovations in engineering education [19]. It was the inspiration for the development ofthe Rowan University model and has been replicated at other institutions. Harvey Mudd Page 11.1329.8continues to rank second overall and third in EE/ECE specialties based upon theEngineering Dean’s reputation assessments reported by the US News and World Report.The curriculum at the Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering in Massachusettsis one of the newest on the scene for the BSECE degree. The goal of the curriculum is tomake sure that each student is taught their courses in integrated blocks of dual subjectareas with a strong project element. It
of freedom systems, incorporating full order and reduced orderobservers with state variable feedback, and including integral control in conjunction with statevariable feedback (with and without observers). As an example, Figure 13 shows a Simulinkmodel which includes a discrete-time model of a one degree of freedom plant. In thisimplementation state variable feedback is being utilized as well as integral control. Figure 14shows the same basic structure with the mathematical model of the plant replaced with the realplant. Finally, Figure 15 is a comparison between the predicted response of the system using themathematical model of the plant and the measured response when the actual plant is used. Againthis figure shows the real system takes
collaboration.Paper OverviewThis paper will firstly outline and review the areas or lines of activity which need to be addressedto ensure a successful ongoing engineering technology international collaboration from thedepartment head’s perspective. Each of the areas is briefly discussed in terms of variousapproaches towards making progress in the form of guidelines, protocol proposals, course andcurriculum matching, language and terminology normalisation or matching, calendarcomparisons and actions to be taken.The paper will then go on to provide an overview and then address in some detail the practicaland organizational issues which need to be addressed. These will include comparison ofdepartmental organizational structures, curriculum subject mapping
Orientation at MSUOne of the major applications of electrical circuits in the ME curriculum was found to be in theirlaboratories. When conducting an experiment, the majority of the instrumentation and datarecording relies on a knowledge of electrical circuits. The ME department at MSU offers asequence of three laboratories, which are taken starting toward the end of the ME curriculum. Itincludes: ME3701 Experimental Orientation (EO), ME4721 Experimental Technique I (ET1),and ME4731 Experimental Technique II (ET2). The laboratories are intended to provide ahands-on environment to reinforce concepts learned in other courses, including those outside theME home department. ME3701 (EO) gives the students an introduction to the use ofinstrumentation for
2006-2270: A QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION TOOL FORAN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING LEARNING COMMUNITYMani Mina, Iowa State University Mani Mina (SM’98) received the B.S. degree, the M.S. degree in physics, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from Iowa State University, Ames, in 1982, 1985, 1987, and 1989, respectively. He has research experience in applied electromagnetics, microelectronics and device physics, nondestructive evaluation, instrumentation, networking and physical layer issues. He has had industrial experience in the areas of instrumentation, system integration, and design in nondestructive evaluation and handheld computer systems. Currently
is the trustee of the Temple University Amateur Radio Club (K3TU, www.temple.edu/k3tu), which he has integrated into the undergraduate communications curriculum and capstone senior design projects. Dr. Silage is a past chair of the Middle Atlantic Section of the ASEE and now the Secretary/Treasurer of the ECE Division of ASEE. Page 11.1206.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Teaching Digital Communications in a Wireless World: Who Needs Equations?AbstractDigital communication is traditionally taught by examining the temporal and spectralresponse and the
2006-491: THE IMPORTANCE OF ELECTRICAL SAFETY TRAINING INUNDERGRADUATE POWER ENGINEERING EDUCATIONRavel Ammerman, Colorado School of Mines Ravel F. Ammerman (Member IEEE) received his BS in Engineering in 1981 at Colorado School of Mines (CSM), Golden, Colorado. He also received his MS in Electrical Engineering (Power Systems and Control) at the University of Colorado in 1987. He has over 24 years combined teaching and industrial experience. Mr. Ammerman has coauthored and published several technical articles on Engineering Education, Curriculum Development, and Computer Applications related to Power Systems Engineering. Mr. Ammerman is an accomplished teacher having received the CSM
Radio1. Introduction This paper discusses the implementation of a course in software-defined radio (SDR)technology and systems. The course contains significant computer and hands-on project work inorder to implement working SDR systems. Focusing on SDRs provides a method to tie togethermany of the classes in a typical electrical engineering undergraduate’s curriculum: core coursessuch as Circuits and Devices, Signals and Systems, Embedded Microcontrollers, andEngineering Electromagnetics; as well as many of the popular elective courses such asCommunications, Controls, and Signal Processing. Building a functioning SDR system requiressome understanding of all of these topic areas. SDR is an emerging technology that promises to have a
2006-1335: INFORMATION VISUALIZATION APPLIED IN PRESENTING SOMEFUNDAMENTAL POWER SYSTEMS TOPICSPeter Idowu, Pennsylvania State University-Harrisburg PETER IDOWU obtained his Ph.D. degree from the University of Toledo, Ohio in 1989. He is a registered professional engineer in the state of Ohio and is currently an associate professor of electrical engineering at The Pennsylvania State University - Harrisburg.Gordon Brinton, Pennsylvania State University-Harrisburg Gordon Brinton is currently a graduate student enrolled in the Master of Engineering, Electrical Engineering program at The Pennsylvania State University – Harrisburg.Harley Hartman, Pennsylvania State University-Harrisburg Harley
departments. We have offered the workshop four times to a total over 60 faculty membersfrom around the United States. This paper will describe the workshop, the intended outcomes,feedback from the faculty involved, the curriculum, and future plans. We will also discuss issuesrelated to recruiting faculty, integration of faculty with different backgrounds, and ongoingfaculty support.IntroductionThe growing need for information security professionals is well documented. Few universitiesoffer a comprehensive program in information assurance and security. The end result is a severeshortage of graduates proficient in the technology and policy issues critical to the security of theinformation infrastructure. While several universities have started programs
2006-567: VIRTUAL CONTROL WORKSTATION DESIGN USING SIMULINK,SIMMECHANICS, AND THE VIRTUAL REALITY TOOLBOXKain Osterholt, Belcan Corp. Kain Osterholt received the B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from Bradley University in May 2005. He is currently an electrical engineer with Belcan Corporation working on the Caterpillar backhoe-loader research and controls team. His work includes system integration using C++.Adam Vaccari, Caterpillar Incorporated Adam Vaccari received the B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from Bradley University in May 2005. He is currently an electrical engineer in the Electronics Department with Caterpillar Incorporated. His current work includes developing and
2006-459: SO YOU SURVIVED THE ABET VISIT… HOW TO CONTINUE ASUSTAINABLE ASSESSMENT EFFORTSandra Yost, University of Detroit Mercy Sandra A. Yost, P.E., Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Detroit Mercy, where she teaches in the areas of control systems, digital and analog circuits and electronics, and design. She is currently serving on the ASEE Board of Directors as Chair, Zone II. Page 11.1134.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 So You Survived the ABET Visit… How to Continue a Sustainable Assessment
. ObjectivesThe objectives of this phase of the research project are to: • Team with several instructors in integrating this experimental project and lessons learned into engineering curriculum. • Demonstrate this experimental project and evaluate its effectiveness as an innovative engineering design for students. • In collaboration with industrial partners, evaluate and explore the possibility of commercialization upon demonstrated success. Page 11.1185.3 • Work with industrial partners and other academic collaborators, to constantly improve on the modeling and simulation system design, based on the evaluations of this
Communications Experiments Using an Integrated Design Laboratory,” Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Portland, Oregon.3. H. Keene and M. Parten, “Advanced Communication Test System,” Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Albuquerque, New Mexico.4. J. Frolik, “A Comprehensive, Laboratory-Enhanced Communications Curriculum,” Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah. Page 11.497.105. J. Frolik, “Laboratory Enhancement of Digital and Wireless Communications Courses,” Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition