Bachelor’s degree in electromechanical engineering from the Facult´e ´ d’Ha¨ıti (FDS-UEH), Haiti, in 2012, and his M.Sc. degree in electrical des Sciences, Universit´e d’Etat engineering and his Ph.D. degree in electrical and computer engineering from Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA, in 2015 and 2020, respectively. His primary research interests encompass demand response, modeling wind power generation, and the operation and control of power systems with a high penetration of wind energy resources. He is a Senior Courseware Analyst at OPAL-RT Technologies, where he leads the development of electric real-time virtual laboratories focused on power electronics, motor drives, renewable
Paper ID #46868Exploring Minority Undergraduate Students’ Hands-on and Research Experiencesin a Summer QISE Laboratory CourseYiXiang Shawn Sun, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Shawn Sun is an Engineering Education PhD student at Virginia Tech. He is co-advised by Dr. Qin Zhu and Dr. Jenni Case. He is also the Assistant policy analyst fellow at Research Institute for Democracy, Society, and Emerging Technology (DSET, Taiwan). His research interests include Emerging technologies-informed engineering education; Engineering ethics; Engineering culture; Global engineering education; STEM policy analysis
Black University College in Maryland: Second-year student as a case studyAbstractThe integration of hands-on physics preparation in pre-engineering programs is essential forstrengthening students’ foundational knowledge, engagement, and career readiness, particularly atHistorically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs). This study investigates the impact ofexperiential learning approaches, including laboratory experiments, collaborative projects, andsimulations, on the academic performance and professional preparedness of second-year pre-engineering students at HBCU in Maryland. Using a mixed-methods research design, quantitativeand qualitative data were collected to assess students' engagement, conceptual understanding, andconfidence in
years, several systems have been developed to provide remote FPGA lab services,including web-based remote FPGA labs [5], cloud-based remote FPGA labs [6], and server-basedremote FPGA labs [7]. However, many of these systems offer only limited FPGA functionalitiesand impose restrictions on students’ access time to the hardware. Typically, these systems involvea lab station or server set up within the laboratory, enabling students to connect through a privatenetwork. For instance, researchers at the Pontifical Catholic University of Peru implemented asystem where a camera displays the FPGA’s physical output to students [8].Three main methods have emerged for implementing remote FPGA lab systems. The firstapproach connects the FPGAs to a private
. Johnson. Derrick’s research is centered on power system protection, with a specific focus on the integration of Inverter-Based Resources (IBRs) into modern power grids. His work aims to address the challenges and opportunities that arise from incorporating renewable energy sources into existing power systems, ensuring reliable and stable grid operations.Dr. Brian K. Johnson P.E., University of Idaho Brian K. Johnson received his Ph.D. in electrical engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1992. Currently, he is a Distinguished Professor and Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories Endowed Chair in Power Engineering in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Idaho. His
the Electrical and Computer Engineering programsthat most of the students did not gain strong troubleshooting skills by the time they graduated.To address this issue, several faculty members in the Electrical and Computer Engineeringprograms have developed an initiative aimed at helping students develop and/or improvetroubleshooting skills and, more importantly, build a solid foundation for successful professionalcareers in the future.In the initial phase of this project, a troubleshooting laboratory activity was designed andimplemented in Fall 2023 and Spring 2024 for Network Theory I, an introductory circuit courserequired for both Electrical and Computer Engineering students. During the troubleshootingactivity, students worked in teams to
system design. Although a number ofembedded systems learning and development tools are available [3-8], few fully meet bothacademic and industrial R&D needs. As an instructor in Electrical, Electronics, andMechatronics Engineering and Technology, my primary teaching focuses on embeddedengineering design and industrial automation. Since 2013, I have taught five embedded systemscourses at Texas A&M University (TAMU) and Northern Kentucky University (NKU). Tointegrate the latest microcontroller techniques and methodologies into the curriculum whileproviding hands-on laboratory experiences, I redesigned the curriculum and developed theModular Integrated Stackable Layer - Analog System Environment (MISL-ASE) board [9].Hands-on learning with
-based problem sets oftheory, possibly supplemented with circuit labs. Conceptual understanding of the course contentremains a challenge for many mechanical engineering students. A series of exercises wasdeveloped to help students visualize the concepts and gain a better appreciation for how theconcepts are useful in real-world situations. Some of the laboratory exercises involve applicationshaving sensors of mechanical phenomenon and data acquisition. Some of the exercises involvebuilding and testing circuits.Similar to the curriculum at many universities, our program has a basic electrical circuit course forsophomore students in mechanical engineering. The course structure has a 2-hour lecture, 2-hourlab, for a 3-credit course. The following
, and semiconductor physics from an engineering perspective.Seung Joon Paik, Georgia Institute of Technology Seung-Joon Paik is a Senior Research Engineer at the Institute for Matter and Systems at Georgia Institute of Technology. He received his BS, MS, and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from Seoul National University in Seoul, South Korea. Since 2013, he has been a research faculty member at IMS, where he has been managing and coordinating laboratory sections of integrated circuit fabrication courses within IMS cleanrooms. He has been providing hands-on instructions to students about microfabrication technologies for CMOS and MEMS devices. His research interests revolve around
and advanced vector networkanalyzers, that are typically used in the SI laboratory, which tends to be very expensive andbeyond the standard laboratory equipment in an undergraduate program. In this paper, we reporton the efforts that we have made to keep our signal integrity lab current with new laboratoryexperiences and capstone projects and undergraduate research. For example, recently, we haveobtained support from the Office Naval Research and the local administration to acquire newVector Network Analyzer to enhance undergraduate/graduate education and research in signalintegrity. We have also received a time domain reflectometer (TDR) donation from a localcompany, and submitted a new Major Research Instrumentation (MRI), National
free electives. The above- mentioned courses can count towards this requirement.The above-mentioned elective requirements provide a suitable platform to implement sequentialhands-on project-based courses for enhanced learning and skill building. While Sophomore andJunior-level courses can incorporate project-based instruction, this paper emphasizes project-based instruction implementation for elective courses for the following observed reasons: Most of the Sophomore and Junior-level courses have a laboratory course associated with the lecture course [6]. Substantial project work, if any, is implemented in the lab setting. Elective courses usually do not have a required laboratory course attached to it. Not
design. Thecourse’s target audience is undergraduates, serving students majoring in computer science,design, the liberal arts, and business, at a private R1 research institution. The class guidesstudents through a series of laboratory exercises and design experiences to develop theirconfidence and ability in the domains of soldering, breadboard prototyping, circuit fundamentals,and microcontrollers. This paper evaluates the impact 18-095 has had over three semesters (Fall2023, Spring 2024, Fall 2024), analyzing the development of student self-efficacy, identity, andsense of belonging, as measured across three surveys each semester (n = 71). Self-efficacy forcircuit prototyping and design increased by a mean of 45.7 points between the pre-measure
Teaching. The project not only succeeded in adapting to theconstraints of remote learning but also demonstrated a forward-thinking approach to embeddingpractical, real-world skills in the curriculum, serving as a model for future education strategies inembedded systems and other hands-on disciplines.1. INTRODUCTIONThe COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 fundamentally disrupted educational systems worldwide,forcing a sudden shift from in-person to remote learning. For engineering disciplines likeembedded systems, which rely heavily on hands-on laboratory work and real-time hardware-software integration, this transition posed unique and significant challenges. The inability to accessphysical tools and collaborative environments risked undermining the
curriculum unique, though, is the emphasis on creating a single,complete product. In fact, the course is centered around this tenet, with all classroom materialstemming from the necessary facets of such design. To the author’s knowledge, there is no othercomparable curriculum.In the proposed curriculum, the course focuses heavily on practice. However, theory is alsoemphasized in order to allow students to adjust to whatever tools a company or laboratory maydemand. Furthermore, the class emphasizes the theory behind “rules of thumb” in order to allowstudents to make educated decisions in the design process. This approach overall helps students tofoster creativity [6], as none of the practical aspects have “correct” answers, and the students gainthe
with knowledgeand skills on VLSI design and manufacture [9, 10]. Both undergraduate and graduate courses areinvolved.2.1 VLSI Course SequencesThe core undergraduate courses involved in the project can be found in Figure 1, whichillustrates the four-year computer engineering undergraduate courses.For undergraduate courses, “Digital Logic Circuit Laboratory,” “Introduction to Digital Design,”and “Computer Organization and Design” are three required courses for undergraduateComputer Engineering degree. Previously, those courses didn't have much VLSI design content.By introducing VLSI through lectures, laboratories, and class projects, students are able to makethe linkage between digital concepts to chip tapeout in three consecutive semesters
Paper ID #47267Increasing Student Achievement in ECE Fundamentals Through Standards-BasedGradingDr. Barbara E. Marino, Loyola Marymount University Dr. Barbara E. Marino is an Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Loyola Marymount University. Dr. Marino received the B.S.E.E. degree from Marquette University and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Notre Dame. Dr. Marino has many years of industry experience including work at the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, D.C. on projects related to military ID systems and work at the Jet Propulsion
topics. This is true across engineering, but especially true inelectrical engineering, where the applications require great amounts of background.In an introductory class that the author has developed [1], a curriculum was explored that allowed(in the author’s opinion) a good blend between the two extremes. The formal education focusedon classroom lectures and laboratory-based exploration. However, even though the lecturesallowed for decent breadth while the laboratory allowed for decent depth, there was still a need fordeep, less-structured exploration. This piece seems to be missing in most introductory curricula,and is of the utmost importance to allow students to really solidify their knowledge.This is where the idea of the Deep Dive comes
. Work on a team 7. Recognize basic ethical issuesMany topics in the class are introduced lightly with the understanding that they will be exploredmore in-depth in the years to follow. The learning outcomes are accomplished through a series ofin-class activities, formal laboratory sessions, and out-of-class projects. The lab sessions focusmore on the education surrounding common lab equipment and instrumentation. Projects areteam-based, with a prompt that allows choice for creativity and uniqueness while providingconstraints. In-class activities are aimed at providing students with a starting point to labs andprojects. The in-class activities and lab prep are where Tinkercad was mainly utilized in thecourse to help aid in their learning, as
National Laboratory. As part of the Center for the Space Environment Modeling at University of Michigan, she was a core member of the software developing team for the Space Weather Modeling Framework. She is a recent awardee of the NSF CAREER, NASA Heliophysics Early Career Investigator and Air Force Young Investigator Program awards.Nan Kang, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Nan Kang is a graduate student in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, where she also earned her B.S. degree. She is currently collaborating with Prof. Raluca Ilie to develop a self-guided virtual reality learning tool focused on enhancing the study of electromagnetism
experimentation, simulation-enhanced learning, and active andcollaborative learning techniques. Each component is specifically designed to addresschallenges in electromagnetics education by fostering deeper engagement, enhancingconceptual understanding, and preparing learners with practical engineering skills. Byincorporating these elements, the framework ensures that learners acquire both theoreticalknowledge and hands-on experience, effectively bridging the gap between abstract conceptsand real-world applications.The course implementing this framework consists of both lecture-based and lab components.The laboratory sessions provide students with hands-on experience, complementingtheoretical concepts covered during lectures. Some experiments are
students in hands-on projects and problem-solvingactivities [1], [10]. These are not simply introductory surveys; they involve active design andbuilding experiences. This early and consistent exposure to design and prototyping continuesthroughout the program. Laboratory courses, integrated with lectures, reinforce theoreticalconcepts in subsequent years. The curriculum culminates in team-based senior capstone projects.These capstone projects frequently address authentic engineering challenges, often in collaborationwith industry partners, providing students with invaluable real-world experience. This approach,embedding industry partnerships, internships, and co-op experiences throughout the studentjourney, ensures graduates possess both technical
NC State. His areas of research, in addition to digital circuit design, include systems integration for biological applications, electrical techniques for studying plant behavior and physiology, and the development of smart e-textiles. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Paper ID #47554Jay F Levine, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Dr. Levine is a professor in the Department of Marine, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at North Carolina State University. For more than two decades Dr. Levine’s laboratory has focused research efforts on understanding the basic biology of
goals are to enhance hands-on laboratory activities and strengthen students’ problem-solving skills.Dr. Heidi Jiao, Grand Valley State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Practice-Based Learning Activities: Conceptual Understanding and Motivation in a Non-Major Electric Circuits CourseABSTRACT Hands-on activities in the classroom are learning experiences where students physicallyengage with tasks, materials, and technologies to reinforce theoretical concepts introduced in lectures,instead of just passively receiving information during class time. These activities typically involvestudents manipulating objects, models, and tools while participating in
, jeopardizing the grid’s integrity,stability, and functionality. Accordingly, this study proposes intrusiondetection strategies on virtual platforms and mitigation methods for FDIattacks. By utilizing machine learning and blockchain technologies, theseapproaches aim to enhance resilience and reliability in smart gridoperations, ensuring the security and efficiency of energy distribution.2. ObjectiveThis study contributes to Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE)education by aligning with the American Society for Engineering Education(ASEE) objectives of curriculum enhancement and student collaborationthrough laboratory-based research. The findings of this study can beincorporated into the ASEE-ECE curriculum through course syllabi in areassuch as
Paper ID #48803Toward a Fair and Unbiased Debugging Evaluation InstrumentAndrew Jay Ash, Oklahoma State University Andrew J. Ash is a PhD student in Electrical Engineering in the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering at OSU and he is a research assistant in Dr. John Hu’s Analog VLSI Laboratory. He received his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Oklahoma Christian University. Andrew’s research interests include engineering education and hardware security of data converters and neural networks.Dr. John Hu, Oklahoma State University John Hu received his B.S. in Electronics and Information Engineering from Beihang
components inan electrical system. For instance, in a resistor-inductor-capacitor (RLC) circuit, differentialequations are used to arrive at the steady-state solution, and multiple drawings of different statescan only be done at coarse-grained steps to illustrate the dynamics. Hands-on laboratories can aidin illustrating theoretical concepts by working with physical components and measuring tools(e.g., building small circuits and using oscilloscopes). However, these laboratories tend to becarried out in a subsequent semester after the students have finished with the theoreticalfoundations. There is a need to provide dynamic illustrations at a fine granularity to studentswhile theoretical concepts are discussed in the classroom (challenge #2).Based
subsequent solar tracker development with an iterative engineeringprocess for fourteen months. The student’s active role in the project and their reflectionshighlight the educational and technical impact of a project-based approach to solar trackingtechnology. By designing, testing, and optimizing a dual-axis solar tracker, students engaged inan interdisciplinary engineering project that integrated automation, mathematical modeling,coding, and solar energy research. These reflections are analyzed to assess the alignment of theproject with the intended learning objectives.2. Experimental Methods2.1 Preliminary Lecture and Laboratory SessionThe School of Engineering at the University of Pennsylvania hosts highly motivated high schoolstudents to ESAP
Mentorship -3110 Circuits II ManagementECEGR Laboratory I: 24FQ Interpersonal Skills Teamwork and conflict Ignatian Pedagogy, Experiential3111 Circuits resolution Learning, and Universal DesignECEGR Semiconductor 25WQ STEM Technical Skills Design informed by rare and Sustainability and Climate Change3120 Devices and dangerous materials used in Circuits technologyECEGR Electrical 25WQ Ethical Leadership and Project Knowledge of UN sustainability Sustainability and
successful in their careers. Mastery learning is a promising approach for enablingmore students to succeed without lowering standards.References[1] B. S. Bloom, “Learning for Mastery. Instruction and Curriculum.” Regional Education Laboratory for the Carolinas and Virginia, Topical Papers and Reprints, Number 1,” Evaluation Comment Vol. 1 No. 2, May, 1968.[2] J. B. Carroll, “A Model of School Learning,” Teachers College Record, 64(8) , p. 723-733, 1963. https://doi.org/10.1177/0161468163064008[3] A. Essa, S. Mojarad, S. “Does Time Matter in Learning? A Computer Simulation of Carroll’s Model of Learning” in R.A. Sottilare, J. Schwarz, Eds. Adaptive Instructional Systems. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12214
laboratories. To address this, wepropose developing an AI-driven course recommendation tool focused on the Electrical andComputer Engineering (ECE) domain, designed to bridge this gap by empowering students withdata-driven guidance that improves career alignment.The tool leverages machine learning (ML) algorithms to analyze job postings from industrycareers pages, extracting key trends and skills currently in demand. Using keywords associatedwith various ECE subfields—such as controls, power electronics, and power systems—, thesystem will provide students with a curated list of recommended courses corresponding to thesemarket demands. Additionally, the tool will incorporate student input, allowing them to tailorrecommendations based on their interests