Asee peer logo
Displaying all 6 results
Conference Session
Design Experiences in Energy Systems
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jorge Alvarado, Texas A&M University
Tagged Divisions
Energy Conversion and Conservation
so an average soil temperature rise could be minimized. The studentperformed first-law analysis for the GSHP which was modeled as a closed system with a linesource of heat as shown in Figure 5. From the first law of thermodynamics, the energy balanceis as: E$ in / E$ out ? FE$ system ? FU$ system (1)For the GSHP shown in Figure 5, Equation 1 can be expressed as: FT Q$ in ? m © c p (2) Ft FTWhere, Q$ in , m, cp, and are the heat rate in, mass of soil, specific heat of soil, and Fttemperature rise per unit time, respectively. To
Conference Session
Experiences in Teaching Energy Courses
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Brendan Egan, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Stephen Dechant, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Christopher Damm, Milwaukee School of Engineering
Tagged Divisions
Energy Conversion and Conservation
, and to exhaust) wasdetermined. ⋅ 28.7 kW Q amb = = 0.082 = 8 percent 348.5 kW ⋅ 76.3 kW Q cooling = = 0.2189 = 22 percent 348.5 kW ⋅ 115 kW E elec = = 0.3299 = 33 percent 348.5 kW ⋅ 128 kW Q exhaust = = 0.367 = 37 percent 348.5 kWThese percentages were used in the EES model in order to calculate the heat flow to each areawhen the system electrical output was modified.Using the EES model, the following table was constructed to detail the electrical energygenerated and heat load provided by the exhaust gas boiler for different engine loads. Table 2
Conference Session
Developments in the Energy Laboratories
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
David Blekhman, California State University Los Angeles
Tagged Divisions
Energy Conversion and Conservation
operatingparameters of the engine, and complete the First Law analysis on the engine as an open system. Page 12.1001.5The heat loss from the engine to the environment which has a convective and a radiativecomponents is estimated as follows: ( ( Q& = A h (Tsurf − Tair ) + ε σ Tsurf 4 − Tair4 )) (1)where A (m2) is the engine surface area. The convective heat transfer coefficient h, the surfaceemissivity ε, and the
Conference Session
Novel Applications of Computers/Software in Energy Education
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Robert McMasters, Virginia Military Institute; Michael Sexton, Virginia Military Institute; Craig Somerton, Michigan State University; Andre Benard, Michigan State University; Norbert Mueller, Michigan State University
Tagged Divisions
Energy Conversion and Conservation
, the programwill give correct results. For example, Table 1 below shows two possible systems of units thatcould be used. Page 12.942.4 Unit of Measure SI U.S. L m ft. o T K F k W/m⋅K Btu/hr ⋅ft⋅o F α m2 /s ft2 /hr q W/m2 Btu/hr ⋅ft2
Conference Session
New Trends in Energy Curriculum
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kendrick Aung, Lamar University
Tagged Divisions
Energy Conversion and Conservation
theproject in front of the class followed by Q&A session from the class. To achieve outcomes (e)and (h), the instructor asked an alumnus who is working in a chemical plant to give a seminar onindustrial experience. In addition, discussions of engineering standards such as HydraulicInstitute Standards, and use of engineering handbooks are utilized where appropriate to providestudents exposure to professional conduct and necessity of lifelong learning.Lessons Learned There were 15 seniors taking the class in the fall semester. At the end of the course, studentswere asked to provide feedback on the course materials and their usefulness for their professionalcareer as an entry-level engineer. Most of the feedback is very positive, and 90% of the
Conference Session
Developments in the Energy Laboratories
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Andrew Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University; Philip Gerhart, University of Evansville
Tagged Divisions
Energy Conversion and Conservation
coordinating timing at high flow rates; the three most egregious outliers have beendropped from the following analysis.The data of most interest is friction-length parameter versus Reynolds number. The friction-length parameter was calculated by Leq Fpr 2 D 4 f ? / 1.5 D 8tQ 2where is water density, Q is measured volume flow rate, and the “1.5” is the sum of loss 4Qcoefficients for the entrance and the exit. Reynolds number is calculated by Re ? with p