193 175 150 132 125 112 S tu d e n ts 100 75 63 50 47 25 12 0 00 01 02 03 04 05 20
faced many challenges,not only with the rapid growth of the program, but with the large number of updates andtechnological advances in that time period. C G T C la s s O ffe rin g 70 60 50 C las s es O ffe re d 40 30 C la s s e s o ffered 20 10 Page 11.848.2 0 00 -01 01 -0 2 0
based interactive assessment and training program. The Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 64(1), 4-9. 5. Study, N. E. (2004). Assessing Visualization Abilities in Minority Engineering Students. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. 6. Miller, C. L. (1996). A historical review of applied and theoretical spatial visualization publications in engineering graphics. The Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 60(4), 12-33. Page 11.944.6 7. Sorby, S. A. (1999). Developing 3-D spatial visualization skills. The Engineering Design
. Page 11.852.2Engineers and technologists are important and vita to the profitability of the US economy. The U.S. Department ofLabor statistics reveal that 20% more engineers are needed over the next decade2 and that Engineering education hadits “peak” of student majors in the early 1980’s with over 450,000 students entering into some form of engineeringor technology program. But since that time, the nation has experienced a 25% drop in students majoring in a fieldrelated to engineering. Included in this downward trend, diversity continues to be a struggle as well. As of to date,consider the statistic that of the four million students graduating from high school each year, only two percent willearn an engineering degree, and only one percent of
. In D. R. Olson & E. Bialystok (Eds.), Spatial Cognition: The Structure and Development of Mental Representations of Spatial Relations. (pp. 233-259). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.9. Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1986). A meta-analysis of gender differences in spatial ability: Implications for mathematics and science achievement. In J. S, Hyde & M. C. Linns (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 67-101). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.10. Verderhus, L., & Krekling, S. (1996). Sex Differences in Visual Spatial Ability in 9-Year- Old Children. Intelligence, 23, 33-43.11.12. Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic
stereo method and studentswho used the polarized stereo method.Although Volbracht et al.’s study provided quantified effectiveness measures for different displaymethods, they only collected data related to their subjects’ objective performance, when using thedifferent display methods. However, Mills and deAraujo (1999) determined that students’subjective perceptions of technologies used in teaching should not be ignored when comparingthe effectiveness of different technologies used in education.The research problem of this study was to determine whether there is a significant difference inthe effectiveness of anaglyphic and HMD-based stereo display methods in design and graphicseducation. Specifically, the study intended to measure the impact of
25 20 15 10 5 0 1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 9-10 11-12 Scores catagories Student in GraphicsClass Engineering Students who did not take Graphics Fig. 5 Post-test graphics class, PSVT R and surface development testsReferences1. S. A. Sorby, and A. F. Wysocki, “Introduction to 3D Spatial Visualization an
or both) field(s) at the sametime. Serial presentation of information that needs to be integrated means that either thechunks of information need to be rehearsed and held in short term memory until the otherinformation is available or integrated and then retrieved from long term memory.However, this information may not be readily accessible from long term memory if the Page 11.1369.5learner cannot relate it back to the concept being learned. Similar to serial presentation ofinformation, if the material is spread out in the visual field, effort is needed to search outand fixate on the different pieces of information sequentially.3. Coordinate
/reports.html 4 Virginia State University admissions requirements. Retrieved September 27, 2005, from http://www.vsu.edu/docs/admission%20requirements.doc 5 National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. (2003). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2002, NSF 03-312. Arlington, VA. 6 Ahuja, S. (2005). Including math remediation in a 1st semester engineering technology course. Abstract submitted for the 2006 Southeastern Section Conference, Tuscaloosa, AL. 7 African-American college graduation rates: Intolerably low, and not catching up to whites. (2002, October 31). The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, 37(89), 89-105. 8 Guay, R.B. (1980
course: Re-examining the curriculum. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 66(1):5-10. 3. Forsha, Harry I. (1995). Show me: The complete guide to storyboarding and problem solving. Wisconsin: ASQC Press. 4. Fraioli, J. O. (2000). Storyboarding 101: A crash course in professional storyboarding. California: Michael Wiese Productions. 5. Hanks, K., Belliston, L. (1992). Draw! A visual approach to thinking, learning and communicating. California: Crisp Publications. 6. Hanks, K., Belliston, L. (1990). Rapid Viz. California: Crisp Publications. 7. Katz, S. D. (1991). Film directing shot by shot. California: Michael Wiese Productions. 8. Laseau, P. (2001). Graphic thinking for architects and
number of hours spent oneach topic and making adjustments as needed.Bibliography1. Anwar, S. and J. McClure. “Teaching Engineering Design Methodology to First YearEngineering Technology Students: A Case Study.” Proceedings of the 2006 CIEC Conference.Available CD ROM.2. Anwar, Sohail, Todd Batzel, Ed Sell, “Integration of Project Based Learning into a FreshmanEngineering Design Course” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference & Exposition.3. Bilén, Sven G., Richard F, Devon, Gül E. Okudan, “Cumulative Knowledge and the Teachingof Engineering Design Processes,” Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference & Exposition
. How many times did you scrap your engineering drawing for this assignment and start it over? a. zero b. 1-2 c. 3-4 d. 5-6 e. More than 6 10. Did you find this assignment difficult? No Yes If Yes, Why? 11. We have encouraged you to ask for help on individual homework assignments when necessary. This help can be from another student, your TA, or your instructor. How much help did you receive from another person(s) in completing this assignment? None Very little Some Quite a bit A Lot 1 2 3 4 5 12. In comparison to your team mates, how would you rate your ease of learning
a long-termsustainable institutional enterprise that can provide a much-needed service and learningenvironment to faculty, students and the institution, but all the obstacles need to be addressedwithout reservation first.VII. References [1] Segal, N. (2001). Creating quality streaming video. SMV News. Retrieved May 18, 2005 from http://smv.internet.com/video/tutor/videotips/ [2] Adobe Dynamic Media Group (2005). A Streaming Media Primer. [3] Mack, S. (2005). Successful Webcast ingredients: Ready for Webcasting? Here, a streaming media leader Page 11.1152.13 walks your through the steps; September 6, 2005