Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nandita Biswas, Washington State University; David Torick, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

conference on Learning@ scaleconference, March, 2014, pp. 41-50.[5] M. K. Ardebili and A.M. Sadegh, A New Approach to Teaching Engineering Graphics UsingActive Learning and Product Realization, American Society for Engineering Education AnnualConference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, June 20-23, pp. 9.76.1-9.76.7, 2004.[6] G. Baronio, B. Motyl, P. Diego, “Technical Drawing Learning Tool‐Level 2: An interactiveself‐learning tool for teaching manufacturing dimensioning”, Computer Application inEngineering Education, vol. 24, no. 4, March, 2016.[7] V. Sriraman, J.D. Leon, “Teaching Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing in aManufacturing Program”, Journal of Industrial Technology, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 2-6, May-July1999.[8] S. A. Durham, W. M

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Maxine Fontaine, Stevens Institute of Technology; Alexander John De Rosa, Stevens Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

program than GPA, such as grades in specificcourses.AcknowledgementsThis work was conducted under IRB 2017-011(N) and grew out of work started under the NSFEngage Project, Award #0833076, at Stevens Institute of Technology.References[1] Sorby, S., “Educational Research in Developing 3-D Spatial Skills for Engineering Students,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 31, no. 3, 2009, pp. 459-480.[2] Norman, K.L., Spatial visualization – A gateway to computer-based technology. Journal of Special Educational Technology, XII(3), 1994, pp. 195–206.[3] Smith, I.M., Spatial ability - Its educational and social significance. London: University of London, 1964.[4] Wai, J., Lubinski, D., and Benbow, C.P., “Spatial ability for STEM

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Dan G. Dimitriu, San Antonio College; Dana Corrina Dimitriu, University of Texas at San Antonio

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

received the 2015 Presidential Award for Excellence in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Mentoring.Miss Dana Corrina Dimitriu Dana Dimitriu is a third-year mechanical engineering student at the University of Texas at San Antonio. She is currently working on receiving her bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering with a minor in Psychology. She has interests in biomechatronics, prosthetics, 3D visualization, and graphic design. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Simple Method to Help Students Improve 3-D Visualization SkillsAbstractSpatial visualization skills and attention to detail can be effectively improved using variousspecialized methods. Starting in the 1990’s multiple

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Robert A. Chin, East Carolina University; Ranjeet Agarwala, East Carolina University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

score: 147.00 / 205 (71.71%) 139.00 / 195 (71.28%) Mode score: occurred 22 time(s) occurred 20 time(s) Standard deviation: 23.15 25.48 Reliability coefficient (KR21): 0.9264 0.9428 Range: 205 193 Interquartile range: 29 33Table 2. Descriptive/demographic data for the ADDA AAD certification exam.The exam is a criterion referenced exam in that the exam taker must respond correctly to 300 ofthe 400 items (75%) to be certified. Achieving the 75% threshold is not require for each of the 20competencies, however. For program assessment, the exam can be used as a

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Vimal Kumar Viswanathan, San Jose State University; Sadaqatali Hussainali Mirza, San Jose State University; Chitra R. Nayak, Tuskegee University; Maria Calhoun, Tuskegee University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

like to thank Prof. Ken Youssefi, instructor for ME 20course, for his support in conducting the study at San Jose State University.References[1] J. V. Ernst, D. Lane, and A. C. Clark, "Pictorial Visual Rotation Ability of Engineering Design Graphics Students," presented at the ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.[2] R. P. Springer, C. H. Dobrovolny, and J. S. Hoelscher, Graphics for Engineers, Visualization, Communication and Design: John Wiley & Sons, 1968.[3] S. A. Scribner and M. A. Anderson, "Novice drafters' spatial visualization development: Influence of instructional methods and individual learning styles," 2005.[4] G. R. Bertoline, E. N. Wiebe, C. L. Miller, and J. L. Mohler, Technical

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kate N. Leipold, Rochester Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

, Floriday, 2019.[3] H. K. Ault and A. D. J. Phillips, "New Directions in Solid Modeling - What Direct Modeling Means for CAD Educators," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016, June.[4] D. M. Grzybowski, T. Wild and S. J. Yang, "Board # 90 : Engineering Education for Visually Impaired Students," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[5] A. Talley and K. G. Talley, "Work in Progress: Teaching Design Theory and Mastercam in a Hybrid Flipped Classroom Environment," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017.[6] S. Streiner, D. Davis and K. Mallouk, "Creating Engaging Escape Rooms in First Year Engineering Courses: A Pilot Study," in ASEE FYEE Conference, Penn State

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Lulu Sun, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

] S. Mintz, “Are Colleges Ready for Generation Z? | Inside Higher Ed,” insidehighered, 2019. https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/higher-ed-gamma/are-colleges-ready-generation-z (accessed Feb. 01, 2020).[3] K. Moore, C. Jones, and R. S. Frazier, “Engineering Education For Generation Z,” Am. J. Eng. Educ. AJEE, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 111, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.19030/ajee.v8i2.10067.[4] D. Rothman, “A Tsunami of Learners Called Generation Z.,” 2016. http://docplayer.net/15163141-A-tsunami-of-learners-called-generation-z-by-darla-rothman- ph-d.html.[5] D. H. Bassiouni and C. Hackley, “‘Generation Z’ children’s adaptation to digital consumer culture: A critical literature review,” J. Cust. Behav., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 113–133, Aug. 2014

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Raghu Pucha, Georgia Institute of Technology; Sunni Haag Newton, Georgia Institute of Technology; Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology; Rebecca Watts Hull, Georgia Institute of Technology; Adhiraj Bhagat, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

learningand also assists the Center with its assessment needs.The Assessment Partners program entails three stages. First, faculty partners identify theSLO that most closely aligns with their course learning objectives. They agree to createan assessment for that SLO in their course through an assignment aligned closely with therubric (exam question(s), project, assignment, etc.) that they can easily share with SLSCenter. A Center staff member meets with each faculty partner to review the assignmentand ensure that it will work well with the rubric. Student work products for multiplecourses aligned with a particular SLO are then scored by a team of SLS staff and facultypartners collaboratively, using the rubric (faculty do not score the work of their

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Eric Leonhardt, Western Washington University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

Measurementtarget a 100 m/s flow rate at the valve seat opening. Asthe port transitions from a round opening to a rectangularopening at the end of the centerline arc, the port crosssection may grow to 115% of the valve seat opening area.At some point along the straight portion of the portcenterline, the port area decreases down to the 100% areavalue. At the port opening on the intake manifoldinterface, the port cross section area is dropped to 90% of Figure 16. Port Cross Sectionsthe valve seat opening area. The exact position of the Featuring Coupling Between115% area and 100% areas are to be confirmed by

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nathan Delson, UC San Diego; Lelli Van Den Einde, UC San Diego and eGrove Education Inc.; Jessica Tuazon; Daniel Yang, UC San Diego

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

visualization: A gateway to computer-based technology,” Journal Special Education Technology, Vol. 12(3), pp. 195–206. 1994.[4] S. Sorby, “Educational research in developing 3‐D spatial skills for engineering students”. International Journal of Science Education. Vol 31(3), pp 459-80, Feb. 2009.[5] S. Sorby, “Spatial Skills Training to Improve Student Success in Engineering,” 2012 Specialist Meeting—Spatial Thinking Across the College Curriculum, pp. 1– 4, 2012.[6] G. Hoople, E. Cowan, L. Van Den Einde, J. Tara, and N. Delson. “Teaching Spatial Visualization: A Controlled Trial of a Touchscreen App Implemented as Homework”, Conference proceedings for Frontiers in Education: Fostering Education through Diversity, October 3-6. San

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

David Torick, Washington State University; Nandita Biswas, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

initialimplementation in an IEG has been discussed and is shared at our course websitehttps://hub.wsu.edu/me-116/pdm/ to promote further implementation across academic institutionsand provide reasonable insight into implementation.Our university will be sharing our implementation with a club shortly, and we also plan to utilizethe data mining capabilities associated with SWPDMS in future educational research.References[1] E. Wiebe, "Impact of Product Data Management (PDM) trends on Engineering Graphics Instruction," 1998.[2] D. S. Kelley, "Product Lifecycle Management Philosophies Within a Computer-Aided Design Program of Study," 2003.[3] R. T. Frame, C. Pezeshki, and M. Grant Norton, "Integrating PLM Methods into the Undergraduate

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Oziel Rios, University of Texas at Dallas

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

, Mission, KS.[4] Bethune, J. D., 2015, Engineering Design and Graphics with Solidworks 2014, PearsonEducation, Upper Saddle River, NJ.[5] Zeid, I., 2005, Mastering CAD/CAM, McGrall-Hill, New York, NY.[6] Lieu, D. and Sorby, S., 2009, Visualization, Modeling, and Graphics for Engineering Design,Delmar Cengage Learning, Clifton Park, NY.

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Theodore J. Branoff, Illinois State University; Kevin L. Devine, Illinois State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

those on a physical part. The tactile aspect of handling the physical parts illustrated inpart drawings may help students develop a better understanding of DRF concepts.References1. Neumann, S., & Neumann, A. (2009). GeoTol Pro: A practical guide to Geometric Tolerancing. Longboat Key, FL: Technical Consultants, Inc.2. ASME (2009). Dimensioning and Tolerancing, ASME Y14.5-2009. NY: American Society of Mechanical Engineers. 2009. ISBN 0-7918-3192-2.3. Waldorf, D. J., & Georgeou, T. M. (June, 2016). Geometric dimensioning and tolerancing (GD&T) integration throughout a manufacturing engineering curriculum. Proceedings of the 123rd ASEE Annual Conference. New Orleans, Louisiana, June 26-29, 2016.4. Anderson, L

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Derek M. Yip-Hoi, Western Washington University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

-Disciplinarity, Aalborg, Denmark, 8th-9th September 2016 (pp. 178-183).4. Junk, S. and Kuen, C., 2016. Review of open source and freeware CAD systems for use with 3D-printing. Procedia CIRP, 50, pp.430-435.5. Wu, D., Terpenny, J. and Schaefer, D., 2017. Digital design and manufacturing on the cloud: A review of software and services. AI EDAM, 31(1), pp.104-118.6. Le, N., 2018. "Product Design with Cloud Based and Desktop CAD software: A comparison between SolidWorks and Onshape." Degree Thesis, Plastics Technology, Arcada University, Finland.7. Wu, D., Terpenny, J. and Schaefer, D., 2016, August. A Survey of Cloud-Based Design and Engineering Analysis Software Tools. In ASME 2016 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and