Displaying all 2 results
- Conference Session
- Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 3 - Spatial Visualization Topics
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Hannah Budinoff, University of California, Berkeley; Audrey Ford, University of California, Berkeley; Sara McMains, University of California, Berkeley
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Engineering Design Graphics
education pipeline, the scope of this paperfocuses on an undergraduate class early in the curriculum, which is an important time framewhere women are more likely than men to leave the engineering track [3], [12]. The aim of thisstudy is to analyze several variables within an engineering curriculum where gender differencesexist: spatial visualization ability, performance in introductory engineering graphics courses, andwork-ethic with respect to classroom tasks, within the context of self-efficacy and persistence inengineering. Understanding the factors related to the gender gap in engineering is an importantfirst step toward future studies of targeted interventions to better meet the pedagogical needs of amore diverse student population.It has been
- Conference Session
- Visualization Within Engineering Design Graphics Education Session 1
- Collection
- 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Norma L Veurink, Michigan Technological University; A. J. Hamlin, Michigan Technological University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Engineering Design Graphics
Technological University AJ Hamlin is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at Michigan Technolog- ical University, where she teaches first-year engineering courses. Her research interests include engineer- ing ethics, spatial visualization, and educational methods. She is an active member in the Engineering Design Graphics Division of ASEE and is currently serving as the Associate Editor of the Engineering Design Graphics Journal. Page 26.381.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Comparison of On-line versus Paper Spatial Testing