Asee peer logo
Displaying results 1 - 30 of 34 in total
Conference Session
Technology and Equipment to Improve IE Instruction
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Richard A. Pitts Jr., Morgan State University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering
AC 2012-5066: IMPACT OF AN UPDATED ROBOTICS LABORATORY INAN INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING PROGRAMDr. Richard A. Pitts Jr., Morgan State University Richard Pitts, Jr. is currently an Associate Professor in the Industrial & Systems Engineering Department at Morgan State University (MSU). He received his B.S.I.E. degree from MSU in 1991. Later, he received both his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in industrial engineering from yhe Pennsylvania State University in 1995 and 2006, respectively. Page 25.715.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Impact of an Updated
Conference Session
Technology and Equipment to Improve IE Instruction
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Douglas H. Timmer, University of Texas, Pan American; Miguel Gonzalez, University of Texas, Pan American; Connie M. Borror, Arizona State University, West; Douglas C. Montgomery, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering
control chart signals but returns to the process at a later random time. The web-basedmodule was written in Netbeans and utilizes the Glassfish application server. A MySQLdatabase maintains the Mouse Factory information and student records. A major advantage ofthis approach is that Netbeans, Glassfish and MySQL are all open-source software packages. Page 25.1244.4Figure 2. Bill of Materials Page 25.1244.5Figure 3. Critical Point - CoverSPC Lab FourThe fourth SPC laboratory allows students to design, implement and evaluate the impact ofimplementing a c control chart within the Mouse Factory. In the first SPC
Conference Session
Innovative IE Curricula
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Masud Salimian, Morgan State University; Yaseen Mahmud, Morgan State University; Avis L. Ransom, Morgan State University School of Engineering
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering
BerkleyNational Laboratory the importance of the energy efficiency services sector (EESS) to the U.S.economy is growing rapidly 3. Climate changes, issues regarding energy supply, a desire andperceived security need for energy independence, and uncertain but rising energy prices have ledto an increase in interest, funding and policies that support and promote energy efficiency inresidential, commercial and industrial buildings. The federal government and a number of stategovernments have also valued energy efficiency as an economic recovery strategy 4.As a result there has been significant growth in the energy efficiency services sector (EESS) inrecent years. According to a 2010 study the growth is projected to continue and to accelerateover the next ten
Conference Session
Innovative IE Course Content
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Douglas H Timmer, University of Texas, Pan American; Miguel Gonzalez, University of Texas, Pan American
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering
Paper ID #6283Teaching Gage Reproducibility and Repeatability using the Mouse FactoryDr. Douglas H Timmer, University of Texas, Pan AmericanDr. Miguel Gonzalez, University of Texas, Pan American Page 23.1144.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Teaching Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility using the Mouse FactoryAbstractThe Mouse Factory contains a set of web-based, active learning laboratories for teachingstatistical quality control and design of experiments. The sixth laboratory in the Mouse FactoryLearning suite is
Conference Session
Technology and Equipment to Improve IE Instruction
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Dave Yearwood, University of North Dakota; Alex Johnson, University of North Dakota
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering
current state of industrial education in institutions ofhigher learning in America. The influence of earlier apprentice programs, which provided youngpeople with an education that prepared them to become gainfully employed in a trade, seems tobe evident in the values and views of modern day industrial education programs, particularlythose in community colleges. Indeed, it may not be a stretch to suggest that many programs incolleges and universities still see value in “hands-on” or “experiential learning,” a desired featureof the modern curriculum.Current Challenges Facing Technology ProgramsGiven the high cost associated with using and maintaining industrial equipment, 8 many schoolshave begun replacing existing laboratories with newer modular
Conference Session
Assessment and Accreditation in Engineering Management
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Amy K. Zander, Clarkson University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering
sciences is required. One year is defined as 32 semester credits or one-fourth of the creditsrequired for graduation in the program. Basic sciences are defined as biological, chemical, andphysical sciences. Most of the engineering management programs meet this criterion through acombination of math, physics and chemistry courses, some with laboratory experiences.Figure 2 3,4,5,6,7,8,9 displays the most commonly required math and basic science courses and thepercentage of the engineering management programs that require these specific courses. It canbe seen that all programs require some calculus, some calculus-based physics and some statistics.Most also require some chemistry, differential equations and a second calculus-based physicscourse
Conference Session
Including Engineering Economy in All Curricula
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Leland Blank, Texas A&M University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
techniques of engineering economicsin a small number of classes or laboratory sessions, with possibly some material in therequired senior-level design course. This approach meets the accreditation requirement;however, it does little to adequately prepare graduates to be economically-minded as theyenter the engineering workforce.The purpose of the panel discussion is to develop innovative, plausible approaches toincluding the most important concepts and topics of engineering economics in allengineering curricula in such a fashion that faculty might accept them as a primaryknowledge base, even in the face of these external pressures.Following a brief stage-setting introduction and potential discussion questions/topics bythe moderator, the session will
Conference Session
Industrial Engineering Division Tech Session 1: IE-ing a Broader Perspective
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Faisal Aqlan, Pennsylvania State University, Erie (Behrend College); Yuan-Han Huang, Pennsylvania State University, Erie (Behrend College); E. George Walters III P.E., Pennsylvania State University, Erie (Behrend College); Osama T. Al Meanazel, The Hashemite University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering
, Product Design, Specification, and Measurement,which includes the course syllabus, course project, and detailed steps for the course project. Thecourse aims to provide an introduction to product design with an emphasis on the tools, standardsand methods used for product and part representation, specifications and measurements. Itinvolves hands-on learning and exercises in CAD and metrology laboratories. The class includeslectures, quizzes, laboratory assignments and reports, a CAD modeling project, exams, and in-class participation. The course content covers three main parts: product design and specification,dimensioning and tolerancing, and metrology. Product design and specification focuses on theproduct design process and basics of engineering
Conference Session
Assessment and Accreditation in Engineering Management
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Pawel Pawlewski, Poznan University of Technology; Zbigniew J. Pasek, University of Windsor
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering
Main process designPPL Process Develop practical base for process Logistics process Level 1 –Design design using simulation software design sem. V (lectures & laboratory)PPL Industrial Prepare project proposal for Models, Level 1 –project industry. Form consulting Proposal for sem. VI company (8 students). Project industry realization in industry. industrial projectPSPL Process Base for process management and Proposal for Level 2Management & optimization using specialized factory
Conference Session
Pedagogical Advancements in Engineering Management
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ralph Ocon, Purdue University, Calumet
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering
future roles engineering and technology students will undertake, instructors can use PBL to help students develop ideas for dealing with specific problems they will likely encounter in the workplace. Case Studies: Instructors can use PBL with individual students or student teams when discussing case studies on engineering/technology concerns. Laboratory Work: For courses involving laboratory work, instructors can use PBL when discussing appropriate laboratory behavior and relate that behavior to appropriate workplace behavior. The instructor can relate lab problems to similar problems encountered in the workplace. Employed Students: If there are students who are currently employed, PBL can be
Conference Session
Pedagogical Advancements in Engineering Management
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mysore Narayanan, Miami University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering
course curriculum content. The author has previously used a similar approach in other research projects to obtain meaningful results. 1. What should be counted as appropriate goals and accomplishments in an undergraduate engineering course that has a significant laboratory component? 2. Does the discovery approach practices utilized by the instructor providing reasonably acceptable paths toward accomplishing the specified learning goals in the chosen course? 3. What do students actually accomplish in the designed course and the laboratory exercises? How has discovery approach helped them in meeting their learning goals? 4. How has the instructor’s organizational techniques contributed towards students
Conference Session
Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kate D. Abel, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science)
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
showed that the students performbetter on tests if they are told why they are not allowed to use computers in the classroom.The lack of difference found between the overall course grades was attributed to the factthat the overall course grade included both the course grades (within the study) and othergrades (outside the study). The students final course grade included points for how theyperformed on tests, as well as, points for participation and student achievement in labs.In future studies, the data could be parsed to analyze performance on all the testseliminating non-academic and laboratory factors that could affect overall course grade.Reasons for the difference in academic success in final exam test scores between the twogroups could boil
Conference Session
Student Development and Assessment in IE Programs
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mahesh C. Aggarwal, Gannon University; Karinna M. Vernaza, Gannon University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering
publications.ConclusionsThis paper describes the various ways universities and industries can collaborate tostrengthen relationships between industries and universities. Gannon University hasemployed many of these collaborations for mutual benefits. As a result of thesecollaborations, faculty has obtained numerous patents, furnished laboratories withmodern equipment either through loan or purchased using industrial funding. Studentsparticipating in these programs are able to gain valuable work experience and themajority of the students receive full-time employment offers as a result of theseinteractions.References 1. Joos, G., Marceau, R.J., Scoot, G., Peloquin, D., An innovative industry- university partnership to enhance university training and industry
Conference Session
Methods, Cases, and Directions
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joseph C. Hartman, University of Florida
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering
consuming. Furthermore,breaking risk analysis down to these fundamental steps clouds the overall goal and point to riskanalysis: making a good decision. To overcome this, case studies or projects may be assigned tohelp instill these skillsets and allow for practice in their application. However, as these aregenerally completed in teams, there may also be a need to devise individualized testing of thissubject matter in an appropriate context.For the past several years, the author5,6 has employed a “one question” final exam in which thestudents are provided an investment scenario and background information from which they havetwo hours to make a compelling argument of whether the investment should be pursued or not.A university computer laboratory is
Conference Session
Methods, Cases, and Directions
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Bidhan C. Roy, University of Wisconsin, Platteville; Osama M. Jadaan, University of Mount Union; Mitchell Dean Cornelius, University of Wisconsin, Platteville
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering
labs in industry, university, and government laboratories. Some of the equipments deal with metal organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) for LED’s and solar cells, and molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) products. The financial health of the company (all number in 1000’s) as described in its income statement is as follows5 -Year 12/2007 12/2008 12/2009 12/2010Total Revenue $402,475 $442,809 $380,149
Conference Session
Industrial Engineering Division Tech Session 1: IE-ing a Broader Perspective
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Susan O. Schall, SOS Consulting, LLC
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering
by such factors as education, participation in professional societiesand licensure. The program must also demonstrate the faculty have sufficient authority to ensureproper guidance of the program. Both of these can be demonstrated using the Hoshin Kanrimatrix by adding rows/columns intersecting the faculty rowsFigure 4: Hoshin Kanri Matrix for Criteria 2 - 6Criterion 7: Facilities ISO 9001:2015 states “The organization shall determine, provide and maintain theinfrastructure necessary for the operation of its processes to achieve conformity of products andservices”. [8] If you replace infrastructure with “classrooms, offices, laboratories, and associatedequipment” and conformity of products and services with “attainment of student
Conference Session
Pedagogical Advancements in Engineering Management
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
S. Jimmy Gandhi, Stevens Institute of Technology; Brian Sauser, Stevens Institute of Technology; Brian E. White, Complexity Are Us - Systems Engineering Strategies; Alex Gorod, Visiting Fellow, University of Adelaide; Vernon Ireland, University of Adelaide
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering
the the Systems Development and Maturity Laboratory (http://www.SysDML.com/), which seeks to advance the state of knowledge and practice in how we manage system lifecycles. He teaches courses in Project Manage- ment of Complex Systems, Designing and Managing the Development Enterprise, Advances in System of Systems Engineering, and Systems Thinking. In addition, he is a National Aeronautics and Space Ad- ministration Faculty Fellow, Editor-in-Chief of the Systems Research Forum, and Associate Editor of the IEEE Systems Journal.Dr. Brian Emery White, Complexity Are Us - Systems Engineering Strategies Brian E. White received Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in computer sciences from the University of Wisconsin, and S.M
Conference Session
Engineering Economy: Beyond the Classroom
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Donald Remer, Harvey Mudd College; Karen Ahle, Raytheon; Kevin Alley, Southwest Research Institute; John Silny, Raytheon; Karen Hsin, Accenture; Elijah Kwitman, Harvey Mudd College; Allison Hutchings, Harvey Mudd College
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
cost estimation and related topics at Universities such as UCLA, Caltech, Page 12.411.5University of California at Riverside, and the University of Wisconsin at Madison. These shortcourses have also been presented at over 25 companies, national laboratories, and governmentagencies. Many of these engineers and managers have strongly felt this topic should be introducedinto the engineering undergraduate curriculum. To prepare our graduates at Harvey MuddCollege for the challenges they will be facing in their careers in the complex global economy, wehave introduced an elective course on cost estimation for our engineering majors. This
Conference Session
Innovation in Teaching Engineering Economics
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Karen Bursic, University of Pittsburgh
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
. (1997), “Problem Based Learning via Open Ended Projects in Carnegie MellonUniversity's Chemical Engineering Undergraduate Laboratory,” Frontiers in Education Conference, 1997, 27thAnnual Conference. 'Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change'. Proceedings, 350–354.[3] Criteria For Accrediting Engineering Programs (Effective for Evaluations During the 2005-2006 AccreditationCycle); Engineering Accreditation Commission; ABET, Inc. Baltimore, MD November 1, 2004.[4] De Camargo Ribeiro, L.R. and Mizukami, M.G.N. (2005), “Student Assessment of a Problem-Based LearningExperiment in Civil Engineering Education,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice,131(1), 13-18.[5] Dym, C.L., Agogino, A.M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., and
Conference Session
New Topics in Engineering Economics
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Charles Nippert, Widener University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
cheating6 Using a computer/laptop during in-class tests 4.2 0.0 4.2 54.2 37.5 makes the tests more like engineering practice.7 Allowing students to use laptops during tests 4.2 16.7 45.8 25.0 8.3 favors students who can afford them8 The use of computers during tests should be 4.2 0.0 8.3 62.5 25.0 allowed when the tests take place in a computer laboratory.9 The use of laptops during tests should be allowed 8.3 12.5 8.3 50.0 20.8 when the tests take place in a regular classroom.N= 25Additional statistical information can be obtained by using a chi square test to compare responsesto pairs of questions. The chi
Conference Session
Advances in Engineering Economy Pedagogy
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Paul Kauffmann, East Carolina University; Stephanie Sullivan, East Carolina University; Gene Dixon, East Carolina University; B.J. Kim, East Carolina University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
Engineering at East Carolina University. She received a MS in Chemical Engineering from NC State University. Her research interests focus on biomaterials and bioprocessing. Educational efforts include the development of a bioprocess engineering laboratory, engineering program outreach, as well as curriculum development.Gene Dixon, East Carolina University Gene Dixon is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering at East Carolina University. He received a BS in Material Engineering from Auburn University, an MBA from Nova Southeastern and a PhD in Industrial and System Engineering and Engineering Management from the University of Alabama – Huntsville. His professional experience
Conference Session
Engineering Economy Education
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Bruce V. Mutter, Bluefield State College
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
review for tests and quizzes; (7) providestudents with a ready-made, savable, printable, portfolio useful for Fundamentals of Engineering(FE) review and exam preparation, and (8) work more high-quality problem examples due tothese increased course delivery efficiencies.BackgroundENGR 315 -Engineering Economics is a three credit hour course that does not incorporate aformal laboratory (3-0-3). At our college it is described as the study of the relative economy ofengineering alternatives, compound interest in relation to calculation of annual costs, presentworth and prospective rates of returns on investments, methods of depreciation, sinking cost,increment cost, general studies with emphasis on retirement and replacement of equipment
Conference Session
Engineering Economics New Frontiers
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Oscar M. Bonilla, Baruch College of the City University of New York; Donald N. Merino P.E., Stevens Institute of Technology (SES)
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
fourdomains are the foundation blocks of the DFC model and each component of the modeldeliberately addresses the individual factors through a series of engineering, financial andoperational strategies that are combined in a comprehensive systems approach.Design for Commercialization (DFC)Many people think of commercialization as the final stage of a neat, linear process of innovation.They think in terms of someone with an idea in a laboratory, and imagine that, step by step, theidea matures into a product, service or process that enters the marketplace (Expert Panel onCommercialization, 2006)4.Commercialization is a complex, integrated system anchored in the world of business. It hasmany components that come together in different ways. Each
Conference Session
Industrial Engineering Division Tech Session 1: IE-ing a Broader Perspective
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cristina D. Pomales-Garcia, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez campus; Christopher Papadopoulos, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez campus
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering
) evaluation, enhancement or design of worksystems following ergonomic principles. The course is a core 4 credit course (75 contacthours) with guided laboratory activities and a required design project. Typically, the courseproject is defined by the course instructor and can vary between a case study, classroomprojects or projects in service or manufacturing industry (Pomales-Garcia & Cortes, 2014). Inthis particular scenario, the project weight was 17% of the final course grade and required aproposal, a final written report and an oral presentation using a poster format. Courseactivities incorporated the use of rubrics for evaluation purposes (see Appendix A-C).MethodologyIn 2015, a group of 45 Industrial Engineering undergraduate students (22
Conference Session
Industrial Engineering Division Tech Session 2, IE-ing the Classroom
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Paul C. Lynch, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College; Joseph Wilck, College of William & Mary; Amanda Elizabeth VanBuskirk
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering
alsooptimized the use of a course management system. The IE EE class met three times a week (50minutes each lecture) for 15 weeks. The IE MFG class met twice a week (50 minutes eachlecture) and an additional time each week (110 minutes) for a laboratory session. The instructoranswered student emails promptly but refrained from emailing students in the class as a whole.The instructor communicated with the entire class of students at the beginning of each and everyclass period. It was at this point in time that all questions were answered and everyone wasbrought up to date on upcoming events in the ANGEL calendar. Both courses werepredominantly made up of junior industrial engineering students. The course managementsystem was the place where students
Conference Session
Industrial Engineering Division Tech Session 2, IE-ing the Classroom
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nadiye O. Erdil, University of New Haven
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering
Introductory Engineering Courses”. Journal of STEM Education, 16(4):6-12.9. Girgis, M. (2015). “A Scaffolding Case Study for Teaching Engineering Problem Solving to Underrepresented Minorities”. Proceedings. American Society of Engineering Education Conference.10. Kellogg, S. (2007). “Technology Enabled Support Modules for Engineering Management”. Proceedings. American Society of Engineering Education Conference.11. Scriven, M., and Paul, R., (1987). “Critical Thinking as Defined by the National Council for Excellence in Critical Thinking”. Retrieved from http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/defining-critical-thinking/76612. Jaksic, C. and Spencer, D. (2009). “A Manufacturing Processes Laboratory: What Book- Making and Sheet
Conference Session
Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Omar Ashour, The Pennsylvania State University, The Behrend College; Faisal Aqlan, Penn State Behrend; Paul C. Lynch, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
instructors on what areas to focus on when planning forfuture offerings of the course.References[1] Guskey, T. R. (2005). Formative Classroom Assessment and Benjamin S. Bloom: Theory, Research and Implications. In the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.[2] Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., and Madaus, G. F. (1973). Learning for Mastery. National Laboratory for Higher Education.[3] Bloom, B. S., and Carroll, J. B. (1971). Mastery learning: Theory and Practice. Ed. James H. Block. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.[4] Keller, F. S., Sherman, J. G., and Bori, C. M. (1974). PSI, the Keller Plan Handbook: Essays on a Personalized System of Instruction. Menlo Park, Calif.: WA Benjamin.[5] Onipede, O
Conference Session
Improving IE Course Content
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hung-da Wan, University of Texas, San Antonio; Yi-Ching Liao, University of Texas, San Antonio; Glenn Kuriger, University of Texas, San Antonio
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering
Yi-Ching Liao, University of Texas, San Antonio Yi-Ching Liao is a master’s student in advanced manufacturing and enterprise engineering at the Univer- sity of Texas, San Antonio (UTSA). She is also a Graduate Research Assistant at the Sustainable Manufac- turing System Laboratory at UTSA. She received her B.S. in system and naval mechatronic wngineering from National Cheng Kung University (NCKU) in Taiwan. Her research interests include lean systems design and implementation, simulation and gaming, and engineering education.Dr. Glenn Kuriger, University of Texas, San Antonio Glenn Kuriger is a Research Assistant Professor at the Center for Advanced Manufacturing and Lean Sys- tems (CAMLS) and the Department of
Conference Session
Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jerome P. Lavelle, North Carolina State University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
Information X Faculty Qualifications (Table 6-1) XProgram History X Faculty Workload (Table 6-2) XOptions X Faculty Size XProgram Delivery Modes X Professional Development XProgram Locations X Authority and Responsibility of Faculty XPublic Disclosure X CRITERION 7. FACILITIESSummarize last Shortcomings X Offices, Classrooms and Laboratories XGENERAL CRITERIA Computing Resources XCRITERION 1. STUDENTS Guidance
Conference Session
Assessment and Accreditation in Engineering Management
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
David S. Cochran, Southern Methodist University and Meijo University; Makoto Kawada, Meijo University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering
AC 2012-4481: EDUCATION APPROACH IN JAPAN FOR MANAGEMENTAND ENGINEERING OF SYSTEMSProf. David S. Cochran, Southern Methodist University and Meijo University David Cochran is a professor of industrial and systems engineering management. He is Founder and Prin- cipal of System Design, LLC, Visiting Professor with the School of Business, Meijo University, Nagoya, Japan and faculty of systems engineering, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas. Cochran devel- oped the Manufacturing System Design Decomposition (MSDD) to determine the underlying design of the Toyota Production System (and ”lean”) from a systems engineering viewpoint and was Founder and Director of the Production System Design Laboratory in the