minds of local citizens and their level of trust and confidence inengineering and engineering-dominated organizations such as the Army Corps of Engineers.26Different opinions were voiced in class, including why rebuild at all in areas below sea level?However, about half of the students were silent and did not engage in these discussions. Thestudents were perhaps uncomfortable with uncertainty and the lack of clear, correct answers; oruncomfortable sharing their personal opinions when they were uncertain if their peers agreed ordisagreed. Some students voiced open skepticism, wondering why we were even looking at amap of residency disaggregated by race and in reference to sea level in New Orleans.In-class Discussion: Social JusticeA full class
utilizing case studies resulting in an improved awareness of boththe problems and their resolution for the students.The case study approach to engineering ethics is very effective and generates interest in thestudents. They become actively involved in the process to determine the best overall solution tochallenging problems. Mathematics and science alone cannot solve these types of problems, itrequires judgment and only through experience can this be acquired. Case studies fit into thisscenario perfectly.Students require a better understanding of the principles and practices that serve as a foundationfor all ethical decision making. Once these are firmly entrenched in the students' mind, theybecome the basis for all solutions to ethical dilemmas
Paper ID #13957Practicing care in global engineering with underserved communitiesDr. Bhavna Hariharan, Stanford University Bhavna Hariharan is a Social Science Research Associate at the Kozmetsky Global Collaboratory in the School of Humanities and Sciences at Stanford University. Her field of inquiry is Engineering Education Research (EER) with a focus on engineering design for and with underserved communities around the world. For the last nine years, she has worked on designing, implementing and managing environments for interdisciplinary, geographically distributed, collaborative research projects among scholars, and
Paper ID #8857Developing Engineering Ethics through Expert Witness Role PlaysDr. Bradley J. Brummel, The University of Tulsa Bradley Brummel is an Assistant Professor of Psychology at The University of Tulsa. His research inter- ests include using role plays and other simulations to teach responsible conduct of research. He conducts interdisciplinary research with Mechanical Engineering, Neuroscience, and Computer Science. His work has appeared in journals such as Science and Engineering Ethics, Personnel Psychology, Human Rela- tions, and Journal of ManagementDr. Jeremy S. Daily P.E., The University of Tulsa
AC 2009-1165: INCORPORATING ETHICS DISCUSSION INTO ANENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY COURSETimothy Skvarenina, Purdue University Page 14.720.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Session 2533 Incorporating Incorporating Ethics Discussion into an Engineering Technology Course Timothy L. Skvarenina College of Technology, Purdue UniversityAbstractTAC-ABET accreditation requires that each program develop program outcomes that embraceABET criteria 2a to k. Several of those, such as diversity
.36 But after the foundation was poured and the basement levels completed, owner LeeJoon changed his mind. Instead of an office building, the structure would become a massiveupscale shopping mall, offering customers a variety of goods ranging from groceries to expensivedesigner clothing. The new vision included the addition of a fifth floor roller-skating rink.36Woosung engineers expressed doubt about the changes and refused to comply. Rather thanchange his vision, Lee simply fired the engineers and used his own firm, SampoongConstruction, to complete the building to his satisfaction. Lee had been involved in constructionfor more than two decades, initially doing work for the military and then branching out tocommercial real estate ventures
also presenting some recognition of therelativistic nature of morality – and of design.Semester 2There were few, if any, changes in Brenda’s ethical orientation. She still maintained, for the mostpart, dualistic descriptions of morality and continued to appeal to authority structures as sourcesfor moral answers in design. Similar to her first semester, Brenda’s basic conceptions of ethicswere constrained by professional standards and established codes of practices. I: When you hear the word ethics, what’s the first thing that comes to mind? R: Um, I think of professional ethics [pause] in engineering, like different codes of practice. Just making decisions that are not only morally right but also follow
intentions with the technology they are building. If someone takes their technology and uses it, you know, in a bad way that’s more on the person who used it. That’s my personal opinion (shrugs shoulders) anyways.Asked if in his future job he personally will have to grapple with the social impact of his designs,he says that he would like to be involved in that discussion. But says that engineers might belimited by their mindset: Engineers can be closed minded. We are very technically oriented. We don’t really think a lot about our impacts...I think it’s just how our brain works...Because I don’t come from an engineering [familial] background, I think about it. I would like to have some say in how [my
ethical becoming of architecture students within courses utilizing community-engaged pedagogies.Dr. Brandon H Sorge, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Brandon Sorge is an Assistant Professor of STEM Education Research in the Department of Technology Leadership and Communication at the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology at IUPUI. His research interests focus on creating a diverse and civically minded STEM citizenry. He is especially interested the impacts of all levels of policy, leadership, and corporate social responsibility on creating these outcomes. Before coming to IUPUI, Brandon ran the day-to-day operations of the Indiana STEM Resource Network where he co-founded the Indiana Science
. Bushan, “Organizing a K-12 AI Curriculum using Philosophy of the Mind,” Proc. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, 2005.[6]Jonathan Vos Post, Kirk L. Kroeker, “Writing the Future: Computers in Science Fiction,” Computer 33, 1, 2000, pp. 29-37.[7] Nathan Schurr, Pradeep Varakantham, Emma Bowring, Milind Tambe and Barbara Grosz, “Asimovian Multiagents: Applying Laws of Robotics to Teams of Humans and Agents,” Proc. 4 th International Conference on Programming Multi-agent Systems, 2007, pp. 41-55.[8] Nick Bostrom, “Ethical Issues in Advanced Artificial Intelligence,” Cognitive, Emotive and Ethical Aspects of Decision Making in Humans and in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2, ed. I. Smit et al
affective domain as it does to the cognitive.Recent research shows the importance of the peer group, together with interaction with faculty tobe the most important factors in student achievement and development. Faculty have a majorrole to play in helping engineering students overcome negative attitudes toward liberalism, asdoes mixing with students who have other interests. Enlargement of mind is helped by anacquaintance with the perennial problems of philosophy since the answers a person gives to theminfluence her/his thinking and behaviour. In the discussion that ends the paper, attention is drawnto recent research on the experience of students of their undergraduate education that supportssome of the contentions made in this paper.Recent
/Instructors.pdf. [Accessed: 10-Mar-2019].[21] ABET, “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs (2016–2017),” 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2016-2017/. [Accessed: 29-Jan-2019].[22] “25 Years of Washington Accord,” 2014.[23] E. Schwitzgebel and J. Rust, “The moral behavior of ethics professors: Relationships among self-reported behavior, expressed normative attitude, and directly observed behavior,” Philos. Psychol., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 293–327, 2014.[24] J. Haidt, The righteous mind. New York: Vintage Press, 2012.[25] J. D. Greene, Moral tribes: Emotion, reason, and the gap between us and them. New York
common with the students’ definitions ofethical/moral character included being humble, open-minded, and personable, and havingrespect, empathy, and self-awareness. However, the interviewees identified some unique traitsrelated to the engineering ethics context, such as having common sense, hardworking, diligent,and loyal.Technical competence was the most common trait identified by the students that was unique tothe engineering context. Some of the interviewees who stated technical competence as importantfor engineers to possess also demonstrated an awareness of the impact and power of thespecialized skills that engineers possess, and thus, the responsibility they have to protect generalpublic.The interviewees also referenced engineering norms
the cultures of the organizations in whichengineers work. This understanding will provide engineering ethics educators with better insightson how to prepare engineering students for ethical engineering practice.AcknowledgementsWe thank Louis Tay and Ruth Streveler for their advice on this research project. This work issupported in part by the Dale and Suzi Gallagher Professorship in Engineering Education at PurdueUniversity.References[1] R. E. McGinn, “‘Mind the gaps’: An empirical approach to engineering ethics, 1997-2001,”Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 517–542, 2003, doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0048-3.[2] D. Kim, “Work-in-progress: Emotion and intuition in engineering students’ ethical decision-making and its implications for engineering
-world scenarios. Indeed,in terms of cross-cultural ideological patterns [19], east-west differences in foundation [20], andgender differences [21], the moral foundations questionnaire (and the moral foundations theoryon which it was built), was shown to have practical application.The described purpose of the original publicly-available moral foundations questionnaire was to“understand the way our ‘moral minds’ work” answering questions like “why do people disagreeso passionately about what is right?” and “why, in particular, is there such hostility andincomprehension between members of different political parties?” [22]. Its application in thecontext of engineering disciplines can play, we think, a role in answering very similar questions.While
Investigation,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[11] J. Graham, J. Haidt, and B. A. Nosek, “Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 96, no. 5, pp. 1029–1046, 2009.[12] J. Haidt, The Righteous Mind. New York: Vintage Press, 2012.[13] E. E. Buchtel et al., “Immorality East and West: Are Immoral Behaviors Especially Harmful, or Especially Uncivilized?,” Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull., vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1382–1394, 2015.[14] V. Dranseika, R. Berniūnas, and V. Silius, “Immorality and bu daode, unculturedness and bu wenming,” J. Cult. Cogn. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1–2, pp. 71–84, 2018.[15] J. D
AC 2007-2655: OVERCOMING THE ETHICAL DANGERS OF ACADEMIC FAIRUSE IN THE HIGH TECHNOLOGY CLASSROOMEdward Sobiesk, United States Military Academy Edward Sobiesk has a Ph.D. in Computer and Information Sciences from the University of Minnesota. He is currently an Assistant Professor and Course Director for the course IT305-Theory and Practice of Military IT Systems in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the United States Military Academy. He can be reached at edward.sobiesk@us.army.mil.William Suchan, United States Military Academy Will Suchan has a Ph.D. in Computer Science from Arizona State University. He is the Information Technology Core Program Director in
Paper ID #26997Resolving Moral Dilemmas Using the Creative Middle Way ApproachDr. Ashraf Ghaly P.E., Union College Ashraf Ghaly is Director of Engineering and Carl B. Jansen Professor of Engineering at Union College, Schenectady, NY. Published over 250 papers, technical notes, and reports. Supervised over 50 research studies. Registered PE in NYS. ASCE Fellow and Member of the Chi-Epsilon Civil Engineering Honor Society. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Resolving Moral Dilemmas Using the Creative Middle Way Approach Ashraf Ghaly, Ph.D., P.E., Professor
, 2017. 8[24] N. Tuana, “Leading with Ethics, Aiming for Policy: New Opportunities for Philosophy of Science.”Synthese 177: 479, 2010. [25] ibid. [26] N. Tuana, “Leading with Ethics, Aiming for Policy: New Opportunities for Philosophy of Science.”Synthese 177: 481, 2010. th[27] T.L. Beauchamp, Principles of Biomedical Ethics: 6 Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. [28] J. Haidt. The Righteous Mind. New York: Vintage, 2012: 155. [29] ibid: 158. [30] J. Haidt. The Righteous Mind. New York: Vintage, 2012: 167. [31] H.W. Walker, “Moral Foundations of the Engineering Profession
AC 2009-898: A MODEL FOR INTEGRATING ETHICS INTO AN ENGINEERINGCURRICULUMDonald McEachron, Drexel UniversitySheila Vaidya, Drexel University Interim Associate Dean for Research School of EducationStacey Ake, Drexel University Assistant Professor of Philosophy Department of English and Philosophy Page 14.60.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 A MODEL FOR ETHICS INTEGRATION INTO AN ENGINEERING CURRICULUMAbstractEthics education is currently of major concern in higher education and in engineering inparticular. There are many reasons for this, such as the seeming increase of cheating andplagiarism
AC 2010-1428: INTEGRATING ETHICS CURRICULUM WITHIN ASERVICE-LEARNING DESIGN CONTEXTCraig Titus, Purdue University Craig Titus is a Ph.D. candidate in Philosophy at Purdue University and a graduate assistant for the EPICS Program, participating in the curriculum development and the research teams.Carla Zoltowski, Purdue University CARLA B. ZOLTOWSKI is Education Administrator of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her BSEE and MSEE from Purdue University, and is a PhD Candidate in Engineering Education at Purdue. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering.William Oakes, Purdue University William Oakes is the Director of the
ethics, engineers can object to or abstain from a project on moral grounds.If objecting to a project by appeal to one’s professional code is to carry weight, the codemust play a justificatory role in the objection (i.e., it must appeal to one or more of theaxioms listed in the code that the engineer would violate by participating), otherwise theobjection is based on mere private conscience. For instance, in Thiokol’s case, had Lundrefused to change his mind and keep the astronauts’ welfare as his top consideration, hewould have implicitly appealed to Canon I of the ABET code. What sort of a general guide is this, and, more importantly, how does it relate toengineers’ moral choices? An engineer that adheres to her code has good reason to do
codes orpractices that allows one to make ethical decisions.[22] Haws (2006) called for a holistic andcontextualized ethics education that would help students develop “enactive mastery, as theyencounter moral dilemma and work through ethical deliberations” while being provided“vicarious experience, encountering the moral dilemma of others with whom they identify;and expert testimony, following those whose expertise they accept”.[23] More recently,scholars’ research on the goals of engineering ethics can be covered in two dimensions:internalization in mind, including knowledge and consciousness, and externalization inaction.[24] First, at the “knowledge” level, MIT D-Lab has designed a series of courses, such asIntroduction to Energy in Global
encounter, secondary STEM teacher professional development, and issues of power in STEM education discourse. He is also an Anthropology doctoral candidate at the University of Cape Town, where he was previously awarded a Master’s degree. His dissertation research is focused on exploring the ethical becoming of architecture students within courses utilizing community-engaged pedagogies.Dr. Justin L. Hess, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis Dr. Justin L Hess is the Assistant Director of the STEM Education Innovation and Research Institute at IUPUI. His research interests include ethics, design, and sustainability. Dr. Hess received each of his degrees from Purdue University, including a PhD in Engineering
Moral Mind: How Five Sets of Innate Intuitions Guide the Development of Many Culture-Specific Virtues, and Perhaps Even Modules,” in The Innate Mind, Vol. 3, P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, and S. Stich, Eds. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 367–391.[19] J. Haidt, The Righteous Mind. New York: Vintage Press, 2012.[20] M. Martin and R. Schinzinger, Introduction to Engineering Ethics, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2009.[21] R. J. Baum, “Ethics and Engineering Curricula,” Hastings on the Hudson, 1980.[22] B. Stappenbelt, “Ethics in engineering: Student perceptions and their professional identity development,” J. Technol. Sci. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 86–93, 2013, doi: 10.3926/jotse.51.[23] J
be argued that they tend to emphasize therole of ethics in the life of the individual engineer rather than the ethical implications ofengineering as a profession, as a force that shapes and affects society. Given the role oftechnology in the modern world, it is crucial to bear in mind Herkert’s distinction between“microethics” and “macroethics.” [3] Macroethics, as Herkert defines it, is the study of the ethicsof the profession of engineering, of engineers as a whole. It seems self-evident that we mustinclude the macroethical view in ethics education, but this view is difficult to emphasize incertain pedagogical modalities. Many ethics pedagogies focus on the role of the individualengineer, particularly case studies that analyze issues such
: Chile and United States,” in Engineering Ethics for a Globalized World, C. Murphy, P. Gardoni, H. Bashir, C. E. Harris, and E. Masad, Eds. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015, pp. 189–211.[9] J. Haidt, The Righteous Mind. New York: Vintage Press, 2012.[10] J. D. Greene, Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap between Us and Them. New York: Penguin Books, 2014.[11] M. H. Bazerman and A. Tenbrunsel, Blind Spots: Why We Fail to Do What’s Right and What to Do about It. Princeton University Press, 2012.[12] J. Haidt and C. Joseph, “The Moral Mind: How Five Sets of Innate Intuitions Guide the Development of Many Culture-Specific Virtues, and Perhaps Even Modules,” in The Innate Mind, Vol. 3, P. Carruthers, S
of certain scenarios and acquired by experiences[17]. In other words, he posits that affect is interwoven with all human decision-making.Immordino-Yang and Damasio [18] describe this large overlap between emotion and cognitionas “emotional thought” and consider its educational implication. After observations of brain-damaged patients, they concluded knowledge and reasoning detached from emotionalimplications are of little use in the real world. Therefore, we believe engineering ethics educationshould also appreciate importance of emotion.A few studies have acknowledged the importance of incorporating emotional aspects in ethicseducation. For example, Kretz advocated student empowerment for morally activated minds andhearts [19] and
explores the intersecting realms of emerging technologies, science, fiction and myth, and the links between the human and non-human worlds. Her academic research and writing span considerations of ethics in biotechnology, nanotechnol- ogy, and reproductive technology, with two academic books, numerous conference papers and journal articles published under her name. She has also written in the genre of science fiction, and published award-winning books in the body-mind-spirit genre about her encounters with horses. She has taught courses in Nanotechnology Ethics and Policy; Gender Issues and Ethics in the New Reproductive Tech- nologies; Religion and Technology; STS & Engineering Practice; The Engineer, Ethics, and
. Dr. Edwards is currently a University Distinguished professor of Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech, where he teaches courses in environmental engineering ethics and applied aquatic chemistry. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 A Graduate-Level Engineering Ethics Course: An Initial Attempt to Provoke Moral Imagination1. IntroductionMost Western, Euro-centric educational systems under the dominant discourses of idealism havefostered a belief in ourselves as ethereal minds/souls who exist with the unfortunatecircumstance that we are stuck with earthly bodies and that our true essential condition is to existfree of any pain