Should Be Done? Summary of a Workshop. The NationalAcademies Press.[7] Litzinger, T. A., and Lattuca, L. R. 2014. “Translating Research to Widespread Practice in EngineeringEducation.” In A. Johri, and B. M. Olds eds. Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research.Cambridge University Press.[8] Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. 2010. Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: ASurvey of Awareness and Adoption Rates in US Engineering Departments. Journal of EngineeringEducation, 99 (3), 185-207.[9] Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. 2008. Educating Engineers: Designingfor the Future of the Field. Jossey-Bass.[10] Bodilly, S. J., Glennan, T. K., Kerr, K. A., and Galegher, J. R. 2004
. 8References1. Drash, W. (2015). Imagining daddy: A rig worker's daughter and her dreams. Retrieved September 2, 2015, from http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/10/us/oil-rig-victim-families-five-years-later/2. Juhasz, A. (2011). Black tide: The devastating impact of the gulf oil spill. Hobokon, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.3. Li, F. J., Duggal, R. N., Oliva, O. M., Karki, S., Surolia, R., Wang, Z., . . . Antony, V. B. (2015). Heme Oxygenase-1 protects Corexit 9500A-induced respiratory epithelial injury across species. PloS one, 10(4).4. Klimasinska, K. (2012). Deepwater permits in U.S. Gulf exceed pre-BP spill level. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2012-10-17/deepwater-permits-in-u-s-gulf-exceed-pre-bp-spill- level.html5
evenly distributedover time. Cases involving misleading information have increased in recent years, with 24 of the35 (71%) occurring after 1985. On the other hand, a clear decrease in the cases involvingadvertising can be seen over time, with 22 of the 28 cases (79%) occurring before 1980. Thisphenomenon is likely tied to several changes in the Code of Ethics in the 1970’s involvingadvertising9. The cases containing unfair competition also encountered a significant decreaseover time, 79% of which ensued prior to 1985. In contrast, cases relating to disclosing privateinformation and negligence, of which there were eight for each category, weren’t pertinent untilthe mid-80s.Based on the noted ethical dilemmas and how they are discussed in the Code
., Griffin, P. M., Kirkman, R., & Swann, J. L. (2005). Engineering Ethical Curricula: Assessment and Comparison of Two Approaches. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(2), 9. 6. Boatman, L. (2011, 10 3). Engineering: Throwing our ethics into the trash (literally). (Berkeley Science Review) Retrieved 9 2, 2012, from http://sciencereview.berkeley.edu/engineering- throwing-our-ethics-into-the-trash-literally/ 7. Masters, K., & Pfatteicher, S. (2008). Lowering the Barriers to Achieve Ethics Across the Engineering Curriculum. ASEE Annual Conference. Pittsburgh, PA. 8. Perlman, B., & Varma, R. (2001). Teaching Engineering Ethics. ASEE Annual Conference. Albuquerque, NM. 9. Freeman, R., Johnaon, P., &
modelsfor caring professionals when students come to us with health challenges and should strive toembrace this opportunity.AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank the students for their candor in sharing stories of their experiences. Thismaterial is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant #1158863.Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography[1] A. C. H. Association, “American college health association–national college health assessment: reference group data report, spring 2008,” Baltimore, MD: American College Health Association, pp. 477–488, 2008.[2] R. P
current political system [17]. While locus of control has been studied extensively since the 1980’s, there is no generalconsensus as to the correlation between the locus of control and ethical decision-making. Studieshave shown no correlation between the two constructs, while others have reported that aninternal locus of control is positively correlated to ethical decision-making [10],[14]. An internallocus of control means that the individual feels they are in control of a given behavior [16].While not indicative of ethical behavior, the perception of being in control when faced with anethical dilemma may positively correlate to ethical decision-making and ethical awareness. Personality has been used to elucidate a variety of
AC 2012-3445: CHANGING ENGINEERING ETHICS EDUCATION: UN-DERSTANDING ILL-STRUCTURED PROBLEMS THROUGH ARGUMENTVISUALIZATION IN COLLABORATIVE LEARNINGProf. Michael H.G. Hoffmann, Georgia Institute as Technology Michael H.G. Hoffmann’s research focuses on the question of how creativity, cognitive change, and learn- ing can be stimulated by constructing diagrammatic representations, and by experimenting with those representations. This idea has first been developed by Charles S. Peirce in his concept of ”diagrammatic reasoning.” Since 2004, he developed ”Logical Argument Mapping (LAM),” a method and diagrammatic system of representation that is supposed to stimulate critical thinking. LAM has been implemented in the
Accreditation of Bachelors Degree," American Council for Construction Education, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.acce- hq.org/forms-documents[6] NAAB, "Conditions for Accreditation 2020 Edition," National Architectural Accrediting Board, Inc., 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.naab.org/accreditation/[7] NSPE, "Ethics Resources," National Society of Professional Engineers, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/ethics-resources[8] Saap and J. H. Gill, American Insitute of Constructors: A Program on Construction Ethics 3rd Edition American Institute of Constructors, 2016.[9] J. Smith and S. Nichols, "Incident At Morales: An Engineering Ethics Story," Salt Lake City
, pp. 220–252, 2014, doi: 10.1002/jee.20040.[5] G. Tejedor, M. Rosas-Casals, and J. Segalas, “Patterns and trends in engineering education in sustainability: A vision from relevant journals in the field,” Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 360–377, 2019, doi: 10.1108/IJSHE-07-2018-0131.[6] N. (National S. for P. Engineers), “History of the Code of Ethics for Engineers.” https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics/history-code-ethics-engineers.[7] K. Q. Fisher, A. Sitomer, J. Bouwma-gearhart, and M. Koretsky, “Using social network analysis to develop relational expertise for an instructional change initiative,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 5, 2019.[8] C. Wieman, K. Perkins, and S. Gilbert
following scenarios, rate the objectivity of the character(s). 3a "A hiring manager chooses the top 5 candidates for a job opening and Objectivity Likert after interviewing each hires the one that best fits with the office culture." 3b “An engineer selects their colleagues to train a new facial ID Objectivity Likert algorithm.” 3c "A professor grades papers for students after looking up their grades in Objectivity Likert previous classes." 3d "A judge sets bail for a person accused of a crime using an automated Objectivity Likert system that predicts flight risk and chance of future lawbreaking." 3e "A group of designers test a new product on themselves to make sure it Objectivity
. Journal ofEngineering Education, 94(4), 383-390.[2] McGinn, R. E. (2003). “Mind the gaps”: An empirical approach to engineering ethics, 1997–2001. Science andEngineering Ethics, 9(4), 517-542.[3] Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2008). Ethics teaching in undergraduate engineering education. Journal ofEngineering Education, 97(3), 327-338.[4] Phase, I. I. (2005). Educating the Engineer of 2020:: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century.National Academies Press.[5] O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375-413.[6] Valentine, S. R., & Rittenburg, T. L. (2007). The ethical decision making of men and women executives
Union Address. Washington, D.C. January, 25.2. Hadgraft, R., & Goricanec, J. (2007). Engineering sustainability?! American Society for Engineering EducationConference Proceedings. Honolulu, HI: ASEE.3. Stattler, M. L., Pearson-Weatherton, Y., Chen, V. C. P., Mattingly, S. P., & Rogers, K. J. (2011). Engineeringsustainable civil engineers. American Society for Engineering Education Conference Proceedings. Vancouver, BC:ASEE.4. Hoffman, S. R., Pawley, A. L., Rao, R. L., Cardella, M. E., & Ohland. M. W. (2011). Defining “sustainableengineering”: A comparative analysis of published sustainability principles and existing courses. American Societyfor Engineering Education. Vancouver, BC: ASEE
a four-component model. Mis Quarterly , 30 (1), 167-180.Peterson, D. K. (2002). Computer ethics: the influence of guidelines and universal moralbeliefs. Information Technology & People , 15 (4), 346-361.Phukan, S. (2005). Using Information Technology Ethically: New Dimensions in the Age ofthe Internet. The Business Review, Cambridge , 4 (1), 234-239.Renwick, J. S., & Riemenschneider, C. K. (2013). A model of ethical decision making byinformation technology students. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges , 28 (5), 62-69.Riemenschneider, C. K., Leonard, L. N., & Manly, T. S. (2011). Students' Ethical Decision-Making in an Information Technology Context: A Theory of Planned Behavior Approach.Journal of Information Systems
sensitivity/awareness) and decide on ethical actions (similar tojudgment/imagination). The table also indicates if there was evidence of each code for the threecourses based on if any student discussed something that was coded to the element of the 4DDD.Table 2: Deductive codes from the 4DDD and evidence from focus group of students fromthe courses (F = Fluid Mechanics, E = Sustainable Energy, S = Energy and Sustainability,No = not observed)Code Definition CourseMastery Competence, proficiency in understanding and applying No knowledgeBroader context Understanding of the subject’s societal implications F, E
Futurity: Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice, A. Dobson, Ed., Oxford: Oxford UP, 1999, pp. 21-45..11. H. Farley and Z. Smith, Sustainability: If It's Everything, Is It Nothing?, Abingdon: Routledge, 2014.12. R. Norgaard, "Transdisciplinary Shared Learning," in Sustainability on Campus: Stories and Strategies for Change, Barlett, P. and G. Chase, Eds., Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2004, pp. 107-20.13. P. Barlett and G. Chase, Sustainability on Campus: Stories and Strategies for Change, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.14. P. Barlett and G. Chase, Sustainability in Higher Education, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2013.15. P. Jones, D. Selby and S. Sterling, Sustainability Education: Perspectives and
. Mission Statement Development Identify Establish Generate Select Test Set Plan Plan Customer Target Product Product Product Final Downstream Needs Specifications Concepts Concept(s) Concept(s) Specifications Development Perform Economic Analysis Benchmark Competitive Products Build and Test Models and
curriculum. Following this there was a surgein publications regarding ethics education at the annual conferences for the American Society forEngineering Education (ASEE). A common concern which kept surfacing were questionsregarding how to measure the effectiveness of new curricular efforts geared towards ethics. Asnoted by a team at Purdue [4], one of the only reliable scales for measuring ethical reasoningmechanisms was the current version of the Defining Issues Test (DIT2). The team noted that,although the DIT2 was a validated measure for the general population, it may not be sufficient tomeasure engineering-specific aspects of moral judgment [5]. In response to this criticism of theDIT2’s appropriateness within engineering education, they
Education, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 223–229, 2001. [5] J. L. Hess and G. Fore, “A systematic literature review of us engineering ethics interventions,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 24, pp. 551–583, Apr 2018. [6] S. Sheppard, K. Macatangay, A. Colby, W. Sullivan, and L. Shulman, Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field. Jossey-Bass/Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Wiley, 2008. [7] B. E. Barry and M. W. Ohland, “Abet criterion 3.f: How much curriculum content is enough?,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 18, pp. 369–392, Jun 2012. [8] S. M. Culver, I. K. Puri, R. E. Wokutch, and V. Lohani, “Comparison of engagement with ethics between an engineering and a business program,” Science and
AC 2012-2976: INTERRUPTED CASE METHOD FOR TEACHING ETHICSIN TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING AND SYSTEMS MANAGEMENTCOURSEDr. Robert M. Brooks, Temple University Robert Brooks is an Associate Professor of civil engineering at Temple University. He is a Fellow of ASCE. His research interests are engineering education, civil engineering materials, and transportation engineering.Jyothsna K. S., St.Joseph’s College Jyothsna K. S. is in the Department of English, St.Joseph’s College, Bangalore. K. S. secured a gold Medal for the highest aggregate marks in the Post Graduate English Literature course at St.Joseph’s College (autonomous). K. S. has been working for the Department of English, St.Joseph’s College, for almost two
ofresults includes faculty observations of student learning experiences.BackgroundThe STEM scholarship is awarded on a competitive basis with an emphasis on selecting studentsto form a diverse cohort. The intention is to create a group of scholars representing differentSTEM majors, academic years, gender, race, socioeconomic background, and culturalexperience. Scholars are awarded a $5,000 scholarship (providing significant tuition assistance)which is renewable for up to three years. These scholarships are funded by a National ScienceFoundation S-STEM grant and the selected students must have demonstrated financial need andan eligible declared major (Mathematics, Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Information Technology;Electrical, Computer, Civil
that you think undergraduates should be prepared for at the outset of their professional careers.Over ninety CoE alumni or alumnae responded to the email. The survey was not intended to be ascientific instrument. The organizers could determine the age, gender and engineering majorthrough alumni records, but elected not to do so. However, approximately one-half of therespondents did list their majors and years of graduation. All engineering majors wererepresented: chemical (7%), civil (32%) electrical/computer (27%) and mechanical (34%). Theyears of graduation ranged from the 1940’s to the 2000’s. The 1950’s, 1960’s, 1980’s and1990’s were the most prevalent years.Most of the respondents did not address the two questions directly
ethics.” Proc. of the 36th Frontiers in Education Conference. NewYork: IEEE, 2006. [Online]. Available: doi: 10.1109/FIE.2006.322284.[6] M. Leistner, “The Times Beach story,” Synthesis/Regeneration, vol. 7-8, 1995. [Online]. Available:www.greens.org/s-r/078/07-09.html[7] “Business sideline puts oil dealer in the spotlight in Missouri’s dioxin case,” The New York Times. Jan. 24,1982. [Online]. Available: www.nytimes.com/1983/01/24/us/business-sideline-puts-oil-dealer-in-thespotlight-in-missouri-s-dioxin-case.html[8] “U.S. v. Bliss.” May 14, 2015. [Online]. Available: www.justice.gov/enrd/us-v-bliss[9] Committee to Review the Health Effects in Vietnam Veterans of Exposure to Herbicides, Veterans and AgentOrange, Health effects of herbicides used
“extension[s] of man”: the hammer is an extension of the hand, eyeglasses anextension of the eyes, the wheel an extension of the foot.14 Thus media are not separate from theircreators but intimately intertwined. And if media/technologies are physical extensions of people,it follows that they may also embody other human characteristics, such as ethics and values.Furthermore, the user has only limited choice for using a particular technological artifact, as eachhas a built-in bias. According to social critic Neil Postman, “It has within its physical form apredisposition toward being used in certain ways and not others.”15 Each medium“massages”—and hence changes—the information that flows through it.2 “The medium,”McLuhan famously declared, “is the
that revolvedaround other people included: considering others’ perspectives; the importance of applyingempathy in understanding; the potential in each human being for good and evil; the necessity ofholding paramount the health, safety, and welfare of the public; and recognizing responsibilitiesto employer(s), coworkers, communities, and society writ large. Regarding ethical-decision-making, participants mentioned the importance of sustainability in decision-making; consideringthe prospect of unintended consequences; properly weighting cost and benefit analyses; making acommitment to principles and beliefs; having an understanding of specific ethical theories; thepotential role that culture can play in shaping ethical norms; and the role of
-year calculus-based physics course reduced the achievement gap between menand women in the course, and elevated women‟s modal grade from a C to a B.20 In the first yearcourses for civil and environmental engineering at the University of Colorado (CU) therespective BOK6,1 is presented to students in order to show that a diversity of knowledge, skills,and values are important, in the hopes that students will find some parts of the profession withwhich they can personally identify.A secondary goal of this research was to determine if there were significant differences in theattitudes toward sustainability of the first year students in the civil engineering course versus theenvironmental engineering course. My hypothesis was that a higher
computing.Podcast project checkpoints and rubric: Since students were learning computing concepts inC for the remainder of the semester, weekly project checkpoints were included to help studentsmanage their time on the project as well as course homework assignments. Students hadapproximately six weeks to complete the assignment. The checkpoints were assigned as follows:Podcast Project CheckpointsWeek 1: Submit list of group membersWeek 2: Podcast Planning: 1. General Ethical Principle(s) Selected for Discussion 2. Podcast Format(s) Selected: Single vs. Group Conversation Scripted vs. Casual Interviews Read vs. “Live Interview”Week 3: Submit draft podcast storyboard or
ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, Colorado, USA,November 5-8, 2003.[5] J. Everett, S. Streiner, “PathFinder: Affordable and Effective Web-books for First YearEngineering Courses.” in 10th Annual First Year Engineering Education Conference, Glassboro,NJ, USA, July 25-6, 2018. [Online]. Available:https://peer.asee.org/full-paper-pathfinder-affordable-and-effective-web-books-for-first-year-engineering-courses [Accessed: Dec. 28, 2018].[6] Gulotta, J., Parisi, N., Bodnar, C. A., “Leveling Up by Gamifying Freshman EngineeringClinic” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, June 26-29, 2016,[Online]. Available at https://www.asee.org/public/conferences
itproduced a “wrong” answer because it failed to account for the most significant factor in ethicaldecision-making: a decision that has the potential to harm the environment, people or morespecifically children, will have a more greater impact on the decision than the current modelallows [4].A traditional cost-benefit analysis (CBA) consists of listing alternative projects and programs,listing stakeholders, and selecting measurements. In the triple bottom line approach, quantifyingsuch attributes becomes increasingly difficult as has been discussed since the introduction of thesocial and environmental components in the 1970’s. The difficulty in creating a commonmeasurement of quantity for comparing and creating a single CBA rests in the question of
-averageperformance for example, in a prerequisite course). In this case, a negative correla-tion between website use and final exam performance would not determine a negativeeffect. For this reason, Cramster website use was first compared with common mea-sures of students’ skills entering the course to determine whether a lack of preparationcaused a predisposition for website use. Scores on both the SAT Math test and thefinal exam of the prerequisite course were normalized; the Z score for a given student’sexam, s, is calculated by normalizing the deviation from the mean by the standarddeviation, or s−µ Zs = . (1
training” modules, whether they participated in aReflection exercise that emphasized ethics, etc. ) we can begin to identify the “best practices”that are linked to more positive outcomes.Bibliography 1. Ross, M., & Jones, E. (2002). Can team effectiveness be predicted? Team Performance Management, 14 (5), 248-268. 2. Bunderson, S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2002). Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (5), 875-893. 3. Gandara, D., May, J., & Gandhi, A. (2010). Cross-Functional Teamwork: Creating a measure for effectiveness. Paper presented at the 31st annual meeting of the Industrial